Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

WEI Jianfei; DING Zhiwei; MENG Yiwei; LI Qiang

doi:10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4

Volume 30 Issue 6

Dec. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Geographical Science > 2020 > 30(6): 976-992

WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4

Citation:

WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4

WEI Jianfei^1,2,3,
DING Zhiwei^{1,2
,
,},
MENG Yiwei^1,2,
LI Qiang³

1. Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions of Ministry of Education&Collaborative Innovation Center of Urban-Rural Coordinated Development of Henan Province/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development&Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;
2. College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;
3. College of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China

Funds:

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701130), The Decision-making Bidding Project of Henan Provincial Government in 2018 (No. 2018B163)

Received Date: 2019-12-10

Abstract

The core issue of sustainable development refers to the coordinated development of economic-social-environmental issues. In the present study, by complying with the China Sustainable Development Indicator System (CSDIS) concept, a comprehensive index system was built; besides, Natural Breaks (Jenks) Classification Method, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Geographic Detector Analysis were conducted to delve into the sustainability and coordinated degree at city level in China from 2007 to 2017. The achieved results are presented as follows. First, for spatial differentiation, the overall spatial distribution pattern was characterized by the high-value units in eastern China and the low-value units in western China from 2007 to 2017. To be specific, the high-value units were radiated along the Beijing-Guangdong Axis (Jing-Guang Axis) centered on the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the middle-value units were distributed in strips along the coast, and the low-value units were vastly gathered in western China and gradually break via the Hu Huanyong line (Hu Line) in south China from 2007 to 2017. More specifically, based on the five subsystems, the pattern of each system was consistent with the whole, whereas the degree of concentration was different. Second, for spatial correlation, the significant High-High (HH) areas were primarily distributed in the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions. The significant Low-Low (LL) areas were continuously distributed in the southwest China and broke through the Hu Line from 2007 to 2017. There were insufficient number of significant High-Low (HL) and significant Low-High (LH) areas, whereas the spatial agglomeration of them was less obvious. Third, for internal coupling coordination, the spatial differentiation between the coupling degree and the coupling coordinated degree was significantly consistent in 2007 and 2017. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions have demonstrated a high level of coordinated evolution, and the pattern of western mountainous areas exhibited a low degree of coordinated growth. Lastly, based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative, its factors were underpinned by robust economic strength, the vitality support of the information level and the basic support function of the topography, active guidance of national policies and path dependence and industrial transfer.
- sustainable development level,
- spatial differentiation,
- city level,
- China

References

[1]	Ali-Toudert F, Ji L M, 2017. Modeling and measuring urban sustainability in multi-criteria based systems:a challenging issue. Ecological Indicators, 73:597-611. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2016.09.046
[2]	Asomani-Boateng R, 2011. Borrowing from the past to sustain the present and the future:indigenous African urban forms, architecture, and sustainable urban development in contemporary Africa. Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 4(3):239-262. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2011.634573
[3]	Boggia A, Massei G, Pace E et al., 2018. Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment:a new model for decision making. Land Use Policy, 71:281-292. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.036
[4]	Chen Chunfeng, Wang Hongyan, Xiao Du'ning et al., 2008. Comparison of sustainable development status in Heilongjiang Province based on traditional ecological footprint method and emergy ecological footprint method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19(11):2544-2549. (in Chinese)
[5]	Cheng Mingyang, Liu Yansui, Jiang Ning, 2019. Study on the spatial pattern and mechanism of rural population-land-industry coordinating development in Huang-Huai-Hai area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(8):1576-1589. (in Chinese)
[6]	Guan Wei, 2007. The data analysis of regional water resources and economic society coupling system sustainable development. Geographical Research, 26(4):685-692. (in Chinese)
[7]	He J Q, Wang S J, Liu Y S et al., 2017. Examining the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment using a coupling analysis:case study of Shanghai, China. Ecological Indicators, 77:185-193. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2017.01.017
[8]	Jeníček V, 2013. Sustainable development indicators. Agricultural Economics, 59(2):74-80. doi: 10.17221/11/2012-AGRICECON
[9]	Jiang Xiaojun, Yang Qingshan, Liu Jian, 2017. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of the ‘Five Modernizations’ coordinated development of prefecture level and above cities in China. Progress in Geography, 36(7):806-819. (in Chinese)
[10]	Khlobystov E, 2009. Modern approaches to sustainability and spatial development:educational aspects. In:Allen-Gil S, Stelljes L, Borysova O. Addressing Global Environmental Security Through Innovative Educational Curricula. Dordrecht:Springer, 51-56. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9314-2_6
[11]	Lele Sharachandra, 1991. Sustainable development:a critical review. World Development, 19(6):607-621. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
[12]	Lu H Y, Wei Y Q, Yang S C, et al., 2019. Regional spatial patterns and influencing factors of environmental auditing for sustainable development:summaries and illuminations from international experiences. Environment, Development and Sustainability, (1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00357-w
[13]	Jabareen Yosef, 2008. A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environment Development &Sustainability, 10(2):179-192. doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
[14]	Li Y C, Zhao L, Suo J J, 2014. Comprehensive assessment on sustainable development of highway transportation capacity based on entropy weight and TOPSIS. Sustainability, 6(7):4685-4693. doi: 10.3390/su6074685
[15]	Li Y F, Li Y, Zhou Y et al., 2012. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 98:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
[16]	Lin C W, Jeng S Y, Tseng M et al., 2019. Sustainable development for zero-wastewater-discharge reproduction planning under quantitative and qualitative information. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(5):1114-1131. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0213
[17]	Lind N, 2014. Human development index (HDI). In:Michalos A C (ed). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht:Springer, 3012-3013. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1342
[18]	Liu Jing, Fang Chuanglin, He Lunzhi et al., 2019. Evaluation index system of urbanization development quality in countries along the belt and road:based on economic, institutional and social perspectives. Economic Geography, 39(4):59-66. (in Chinese)
[19]	Liu Zhaode, Liu Cong, Liu Qiang et al., 2017. Regional comprehensive development level and its types of prefecture level cities or above in China. Economic Geography, 37(3):25-31, 39. (in Chinese)
[20]	Lyu L C, Sun F X, Huang R, 2019. Innovation-based urbanization:evidence from 270 cities at the prefecture level or above in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 29(8):1283-1299. doi: 10.1007/s11442-019-1659-1
[21]	Ma Yanji, Ai Xiaoping, 2019. Evaluation of sustainable urbanization development in Jilin Province based on the 2030 sustainable development goals. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 39(3):487-495. (in Chinese)
[22]	Mao J S, Li C H, Pei Y S et al., 2018. Sustainable development enterprise. In:Mao J S, Li C H, Pei Y S et al. (eds). Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Enterprises. Singapore:Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8524-6_11
[23]	Mishra S, Deshmukh S G, Vrat P, 2002. Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(1):1-27. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00123-8
[24]	Mu Naixia, Liu Wenbao, Wang Haiyin et al., 2014. ArcGIS 10 Tutorial:from Beginner to Master. Beijing:Surveying and Mapping Press. (in Chinese)
[25]	Nyerges T, Roderick M, Prager S et al., 2014. Foundations of sustainability information representation theory:spatial-temporal dynamics of sustainable systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(5):1165-1185. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2013.853304
[26]	National Bureau of Statistics. China Urban Statistical Yearbook, China Environmental Statistics Yearbook. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2008 and 2018.
[27]	Pan Jinghu, Hu Yanxing, Liu Xiao et al., 2016. Spatial-temporal pattern of the coordinated development efficiency of the ‘four modernizations’ of prefecture level cities or above in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36(4):512-520. (in Chinese)
[28]	Pu Yingxia, Ge Ying, Ma Ronghua M et al., 2005. Analyzing regional economic disparities based on ESDA. Geographical Research, 24(6):965-974. (in Chinese)
[29]	Rodriguez R, Svensson G, Otero-Neira C, 2019. Framing sustainable development through descriptive determinants in private hospitals-Orientation and organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 75:78-88. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan. 2019.05.006
[30]	Sobhanifard Y, Vaeysi M, 2020. Mixed modeling of the social network mechanisms for the sustainable development of tourism:the case of Iranian Kurdistan. Sustainable Development, 28(1):187-196. doi: 10.1002/sd.1981
[31]	Tang Qing, Li Yang, Chen Mingxing et al., 2018. Sustainable livelihoods of semi-urbanized farmers and sustainable rural development:theoretical framework, research progress and future prospect. Progress in Geography, 37(8):1022-1030. (in Chinese)
[32]	Uğurlu E, 2019. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development in the European Union. In:Kurochkin D, Shabliy E V, Shittu E (eds). Renewable Energy. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14207-0_3
[33]	Vučetić A Š, 2018. Importance of environmental indicators of sustainable development in the transitional selective tourism destination. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(3):317-325. doi: 10.1002/jtr.2183
[34]	Wang Fang, Wang Shunyi, Prominski M, 2018. Water-related urbanization and locality:protection and utilization of water environment as well as planning and design of water space in a sustainable perspective. Geographical Research, 37(12):2576-2584. (in Chinese)
[35]	Wang S J, Ma H T, Zhao Y B, 2014. Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecological Indicators, 45:171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006
[36]	Wong C, 2014. Sustainable development indicators. In:Michalos A C (ed). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht:Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2948
[37]	Yang Y, Fan M D, 2019. Analysis of the spatial-temporal differences and fairness of the regional energy ecological footprint of the Silk Road Economic Belt (China Section). Journal of Cleaner Production, 215:1246-1261. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.01.170
[38]	Zhang Donghai, Ren Zhiyuan, Feng Xueming et al., 2013. Dynamic change and spatial difference of coordinated development on economy-society and ecology of western area in China. Arid Land Geography, 36(3):545-552. (in Chinese)
[39]	Zhang Jinping, Qin Yaochen, Zhang Erxun, 2009. Quantitative study methods of regional sustainable development in China:a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(12):6702-6711. (in Chinese)
[40]	Zhang Liguo, Bao Bingfei, Yang Shengsu, 2019. Spatial exploratory analysis of agricultural sustainable development in China. Economic Geography, 39(11):159-164. (in Chinese)
[41]	Zhao Chuansong, Ren Jianlan, Chen Yanbin et al., 2018. Coupling coordination and spatio-temporal differentiation of scientific and technological innovation and sustainable development in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(2):214-222. (in Chinese)
[42]	Zhou Liang, Che Lei, Zhou Chenghu, 2019. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(10):2027-2044. (in Chinese)

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(173) PDF downloads(33) Cited by()

Proportional views

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

1. Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions of Ministry of Education&Collaborative Innovation Center of Urban-Rural Coordinated Development of Henan Province/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development&Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;

2. College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;

3. College of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China

Funds:

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701130), The Decision-making Bidding Project of Henan Provincial Government in 2018 (No. 2018B163)

Received Date: 2019-12-10

Key words:

Abstract: The core issue of sustainable development refers to the coordinated development of economic-social-environmental issues. In the present study, by complying with the China Sustainable Development Indicator System (CSDIS) concept, a comprehensive index system was built; besides, Natural Breaks (Jenks) Classification Method, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Geographic Detector Analysis were conducted to delve into the sustainability and coordinated degree at city level in China from 2007 to 2017. The achieved results are presented as follows. First, for spatial differentiation, the overall spatial distribution pattern was characterized by the high-value units in eastern China and the low-value units in western China from 2007 to 2017. To be specific, the high-value units were radiated along the Beijing-Guangdong Axis (Jing-Guang Axis) centered on the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the middle-value units were distributed in strips along the coast, and the low-value units were vastly gathered in western China and gradually break via the Hu Huanyong line (Hu Line) in south China from 2007 to 2017. More specifically, based on the five subsystems, the pattern of each system was consistent with the whole, whereas the degree of concentration was different. Second, for spatial correlation, the significant High-High (HH) areas were primarily distributed in the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions. The significant Low-Low (LL) areas were continuously distributed in the southwest China and broke through the Hu Line from 2007 to 2017. There were insufficient number of significant High-Low (HL) and significant Low-High (LH) areas, whereas the spatial agglomeration of them was less obvious. Third, for internal coupling coordination, the spatial differentiation between the coupling degree and the coupling coordinated degree was significantly consistent in 2007 and 2017. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions have demonstrated a high level of coordinated evolution, and the pattern of western mountainous areas exhibited a low degree of coordinated growth. Lastly, based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative, its factors were underpinned by robust economic strength, the vitality support of the information level and the basic support function of the topography, active guidance of national policies and path dependence and industrial transfer.

HTML

Reference (42)

[1]	Ali-Toudert F, Ji L M, 2017. Modeling and measuring urban sustainability in multi-criteria based systems:a challenging issue. Ecological Indicators, 73:597-611. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2016.09.046
[2]	Asomani-Boateng R, 2011. Borrowing from the past to sustain the present and the future:indigenous African urban forms, architecture, and sustainable urban development in contemporary Africa. Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 4(3):239-262. doi:10.1080/17549175.2011.634573
[3]	Boggia A, Massei G, Pace E et al., 2018. Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment:a new model for decision making. Land Use Policy, 71:281-292. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.036
[4]	Chen Chunfeng, Wang Hongyan, Xiao Du'ning et al., 2008. Comparison of sustainable development status in Heilongjiang Province based on traditional ecological footprint method and emergy ecological footprint method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19(11):2544-2549. (in Chinese)
[5]	Cheng Mingyang, Liu Yansui, Jiang Ning, 2019. Study on the spatial pattern and mechanism of rural population-land-industry coordinating development in Huang-Huai-Hai area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(8):1576-1589. (in Chinese)
[6]	Guan Wei, 2007. The data analysis of regional water resources and economic society coupling system sustainable development. Geographical Research, 26(4):685-692. (in Chinese)
[7]	He J Q, Wang S J, Liu Y S et al., 2017. Examining the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment using a coupling analysis:case study of Shanghai, China. Ecological Indicators, 77:185-193. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2017.01.017
[8]	Jeníček V, 2013. Sustainable development indicators. Agricultural Economics, 59(2):74-80. doi:10.17221/11/2012-AGRICECON
[9]	Jiang Xiaojun, Yang Qingshan, Liu Jian, 2017. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of the ‘Five Modernizations’ coordinated development of prefecture level and above cities in China. Progress in Geography, 36(7):806-819. (in Chinese)
[10]	Khlobystov E, 2009. Modern approaches to sustainability and spatial development:educational aspects. In:Allen-Gil S, Stelljes L, Borysova O. Addressing Global Environmental Security Through Innovative Educational Curricula. Dordrecht:Springer, 51-56. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9314-2_6
[11]	Lele Sharachandra, 1991. Sustainable development:a critical review. World Development, 19(6):607-621. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
[12]	Lu H Y, Wei Y Q, Yang S C, et al., 2019. Regional spatial patterns and influencing factors of environmental auditing for sustainable development:summaries and illuminations from international experiences. Environment, Development and Sustainability, (1):1-21. doi:10.1007/s10668-019-00357-w
[13]	Jabareen Yosef, 2008. A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environment Development &Sustainability, 10(2):179-192. doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
[14]	Li Y C, Zhao L, Suo J J, 2014. Comprehensive assessment on sustainable development of highway transportation capacity based on entropy weight and TOPSIS. Sustainability, 6(7):4685-4693. doi:10.3390/su6074685
[15]	Li Y F, Li Y, Zhou Y et al., 2012. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 98:127-133. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
[16]	Lin C W, Jeng S Y, Tseng M et al., 2019. Sustainable development for zero-wastewater-discharge reproduction planning under quantitative and qualitative information. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(5):1114-1131. doi:10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0213
[17]	Lind N, 2014. Human development index (HDI). In:Michalos A C (ed). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht:Springer, 3012-3013. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1342
[18]	Liu Jing, Fang Chuanglin, He Lunzhi et al., 2019. Evaluation index system of urbanization development quality in countries along the belt and road:based on economic, institutional and social perspectives. Economic Geography, 39(4):59-66. (in Chinese)
[19]	Liu Zhaode, Liu Cong, Liu Qiang et al., 2017. Regional comprehensive development level and its types of prefecture level cities or above in China. Economic Geography, 37(3):25-31, 39. (in Chinese)
[20]	Lyu L C, Sun F X, Huang R, 2019. Innovation-based urbanization:evidence from 270 cities at the prefecture level or above in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 29(8):1283-1299. doi:10.1007/s11442-019-1659-1
[21]	Ma Yanji, Ai Xiaoping, 2019. Evaluation of sustainable urbanization development in Jilin Province based on the 2030 sustainable development goals. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 39(3):487-495. (in Chinese)
[22]	Mao J S, Li C H, Pei Y S et al., 2018. Sustainable development enterprise. In:Mao J S, Li C H, Pei Y S et al. (eds). Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Enterprises. Singapore:Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8524-6_11
[23]	Mishra S, Deshmukh S G, Vrat P, 2002. Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(1):1-27. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00123-8
[24]	Mu Naixia, Liu Wenbao, Wang Haiyin et al., 2014. ArcGIS 10 Tutorial:from Beginner to Master. Beijing:Surveying and Mapping Press. (in Chinese)
[25]	Nyerges T, Roderick M, Prager S et al., 2014. Foundations of sustainability information representation theory:spatial-temporal dynamics of sustainable systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(5):1165-1185. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.853304
[26]	National Bureau of Statistics. China Urban Statistical Yearbook, China Environmental Statistics Yearbook. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2008 and 2018.
[27]	Pan Jinghu, Hu Yanxing, Liu Xiao et al., 2016. Spatial-temporal pattern of the coordinated development efficiency of the ‘four modernizations’ of prefecture level cities or above in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36(4):512-520. (in Chinese)
[28]	Pu Yingxia, Ge Ying, Ma Ronghua M et al., 2005. Analyzing regional economic disparities based on ESDA. Geographical Research, 24(6):965-974. (in Chinese)
[29]	Rodriguez R, Svensson G, Otero-Neira C, 2019. Framing sustainable development through descriptive determinants in private hospitals-Orientation and organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 75:78-88. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan. 2019.05.006
[30]	Sobhanifard Y, Vaeysi M, 2020. Mixed modeling of the social network mechanisms for the sustainable development of tourism:the case of Iranian Kurdistan. Sustainable Development, 28(1):187-196. doi:10.1002/sd.1981
[31]	Tang Qing, Li Yang, Chen Mingxing et al., 2018. Sustainable livelihoods of semi-urbanized farmers and sustainable rural development:theoretical framework, research progress and future prospect. Progress in Geography, 37(8):1022-1030. (in Chinese)
[32]	Uğurlu E, 2019. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development in the European Union. In:Kurochkin D, Shabliy E V, Shittu E (eds). Renewable Energy. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14207-0_3
[33]	Vučetić A Š, 2018. Importance of environmental indicators of sustainable development in the transitional selective tourism destination. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(3):317-325. doi:10.1002/jtr.2183
[34]	Wang Fang, Wang Shunyi, Prominski M, 2018. Water-related urbanization and locality:protection and utilization of water environment as well as planning and design of water space in a sustainable perspective. Geographical Research, 37(12):2576-2584. (in Chinese)
[35]	Wang S J, Ma H T, Zhao Y B, 2014. Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecological Indicators, 45:171-183. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006
[36]	Wong C, 2014. Sustainable development indicators. In:Michalos A C (ed). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht:Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2948
[37]	Yang Y, Fan M D, 2019. Analysis of the spatial-temporal differences and fairness of the regional energy ecological footprint of the Silk Road Economic Belt (China Section). Journal of Cleaner Production, 215:1246-1261. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.01.170
[38]	Zhang Donghai, Ren Zhiyuan, Feng Xueming et al., 2013. Dynamic change and spatial difference of coordinated development on economy-society and ecology of western area in China. Arid Land Geography, 36(3):545-552. (in Chinese)
[39]	Zhang Jinping, Qin Yaochen, Zhang Erxun, 2009. Quantitative study methods of regional sustainable development in China:a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(12):6702-6711. (in Chinese)
[40]	Zhang Liguo, Bao Bingfei, Yang Shengsu, 2019. Spatial exploratory analysis of agricultural sustainable development in China. Economic Geography, 39(11):159-164. (in Chinese)
[41]	Zhao Chuansong, Ren Jianlan, Chen Yanbin et al., 2018. Coupling coordination and spatio-temporal differentiation of scientific and technological innovation and sustainable development in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(2):214-222. (in Chinese)
[42]	Zhou Liang, Che Lei, Zhou Chenghu, 2019. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(10):2027-2044. (in Chinese)

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related