XU Jie, XIAO Yu, XIE Gaodi, JIANG Yuan. Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 214-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3
Citation: XU Jie, XIAO Yu, XIE Gaodi, JIANG Yuan. Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 214-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3

Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0503706; 2016YFC0503403); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31400411), Technical Support Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2013BAC03B05)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: XIAO Yu
  • Received Date: 2018-01-11
  • Publish Date: 2019-04-27
  • Water supply services (WSSs) are critical for the regional water balance and water circulation, but relevant studies have not established the relationship between WSSs and human well-being. This research identifies the scope of areas that benefit from WSSs from an ecosystem service flow perspective. Moreover, the path and quantity of the flow of WSSs are simulated to provide a scientific theoretical basis for ecosystem service management and ecological compensation. The Dongjiang Lake Basin is a national priority river basin in China where ecological compensation pilot programmes concerning water resources are top priorities. Dongjiang Lake Basin experienced an increase and then a decrease in the overall supply of water, with an average net water supply of 1096-1500 mm for the years 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010. The water demand increased each year in service beneficiary areas (SBAs), varying from 387 to 580 mm. Overall, Dongjiang Lake Basin met the net water demands of the actual SBAs in the lower reaches, but a gap in the water supply and demand emerged gradually. This research provides an understanding of the functional mechanisms for the provision, demand and flow of WSSs and provides a scientific theoretical basis for ecosystem service management and ecological compensation.
  • [1] Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B et al., 2013a. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows:a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 4:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
    [2] Bagstad K J, Semmens D J, Winthrop R, 2013b. Comparing ap-proaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling:a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosystem Services, 5:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007
    [3] Bagstad K J, Villa F, Batker D et al., 2014. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services:mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society, 19(2):64. doi: 10.5751/ES-06523-190264
    [4] Bangash R F, Passuello A, Sanchez-Canales M et al., 2013. Eco-system services in Mediterranean river basin:climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control. Science of the Total Environment, 458-460:246-255. doi:10.1016/j. sci-totenv.2013.04.025
    [5] Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G et al., 2016. Mapping ecosystem ser-vice capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban plan-ning:a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 57:405-417. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06. 006
    [6] Bryan B A, King D, Ward J R, 2011. Modelling and mapping agricultural opportunity costs to guide landscape planning for natural resource management. Ecological Indicators, 11(1):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.005
    [7] Budyko M I, 1974. Climate and Life. New York:Academic Press, 1-510.
    [8] Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S et al., 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
    [9] Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J B et al., 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108(4):583-595. doi: 10.1007/BF00329030
    [10] Costanza R, 2008. Ecosystem services:multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 141(2):350-352. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020
    [11] CSIRO, 2008. Water Availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. Australia:CSIRO, 1-11.
    [12] Duku C, Rathjens H, Zwart S J et al., 2015. Towards ecosystem accounting:a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(10):4377-4396. doi: 10.5194/hess-19-4377-2015
    [13] Felipe-Lucia M R, Martín-López B, Lavorel S et al., 2015. Eco-system services flows:why stakeholders' power relationships matter. PLoS One, 10(7):e0132232. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0132232
    [14] Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P, 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3):643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
    [15] Francesconi W, Srinivasan R, Pérez-Miñana E et al., 2016. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosys-tem services:a systematic review. Journal of Hydrology, 535:625-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.034
    [16] Gao Y, Feng Z, Li Y et al., 2014. Freshwater ecosystem service footprint model:a model to evaluate regional freshwater sus-tainable development-a case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China. Ecological Indicators, 39:1-9. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2013.11.025
    [17] Gascoigne W R, Hoag D, Koontz L et al., 2011. Valuing ecosys-tem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecological Economics, 70(10):1715-1725. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011. 04.010
    [18] Hoekstra A Y, 2009. Human appropriation of natural capital:a comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecological Economics, 68(7):1963-1974. doi:10.1016/j. ecolecon.2008.06.021
    [19] Honey-Rosés J, Acuña V, Bardina M et al., 2013. Examining the demand for ecosystem services:the value of stream restoration for drinking water treatment managers in the Llobregat River, Spain. Ecological Economics, 90:196-205. doi:10.1016/j. ecolecon.2013.03.019
    [20] Huntchinson M F, Xu T B, 2013. Anusplin Version 4.4 User Guide. Canberra:The Australian National University.
    [21] Jorda-Capdevila D, Rodríguez-Labajos B, Bardina M, 2016. An integrative modelling approach for linking environmental flow management, ecosystem service provision and inter-stakeholder conflict. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.007
    [22] Karabulut A, Egoh B N, Lanzanova D et al., 2016. Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem-water-food-energy nexus in the Danube river basin. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 17:278-292. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015. 08.002
    [23] Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D et al., 2012. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy, 29(3):521-535. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol. 2011.07.008
    [24] Laterra P, Orúe M E, Booman G C, 2012. Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.013
    [25] Marquès M, Bangash R F, Kumar V et al., 2013. The impact of climate change on water provision under a low flow regime:a case study of the ecosystems services in the Francoli river ba-sin. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 263:224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.049
    [26] Marquínez J, Lastra J, García P, 2003. Estimation models for precipitation in mountainous regions:the use of GIS and mul-tivariate analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 270(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00110-5
    [27] Nedkov S, Burkhard B, 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem ser-vices-Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole munici-pality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 21:67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
    [28] Palacios-Agundez I, Onaindia M, Barraqueta P et al., 2015. Pro-visioning ecosystem services supply and demand:the role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote syn-ergies with other ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 47:145-155. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.012
    [29] Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M et al., 2013. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands:mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 4:104-116. doi:10.1016/j. ecoser.2012.09.001
    [30] Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1990-2014. Hunan Statis-tical Yearbook. Beijing:China Statistics Press.
    [31] Schägner J P, Brander L, Maes J et al., 2013. Mapping ecosystem services' values:current practice and future prospects. Eco-system Services, 4:33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003
    [32] Schirpke U, Scolozzi R, De Marco C et al., 2014. Mapping bene-ficiaries of ecosystem services flows from Natura 2000 sites. Ecosystem Services, 9:170-179. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser. 2014.06.003
    [33] Schmalz B, Kruse M, Kiesel J et al., 2016. Water-related ecosystem services in Western Siberian lowland basins-Analysing and mapping spatial and seasonal effects on regulating services based on ecohydrological modelling results. Ecological Indicators, 71:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.050
    [34] Schröter M, Remme R P, Hein L, 2012. How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes? Ecological Indicators, 23:220-221. doi:10.1016/j. ecolind.2012.03.025
    [35] Schröter M, Barton D N, Remme R P et al., 2014. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services:a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators, 36:539-551. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018
    [36] Schulp C J E, Alkemade R, Goldewijk K K et al., 2012. Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2):156-168. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2011.645880
    [37] Serna-Chavez H M, Schulp C J E, Van Bodegom P M et al., 2014. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of eco-system services. Ecological Indicators, 39:24-33. doi:10. 1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
    [38] Syrbe R U, Walz U, 2012. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services:providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 21:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
    [39] Turner W R, Brandon K, Brooks T M et al., 2007. Global conser-vation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience, 57(10):868-873. doi: 10.1641/B571009
    [40] Villamagna A M, Angermeier P L, Bennett E M, 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow:a conceptual framework for ana-lyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity, 15:114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
    [41] Vrebos D, Staes J, Vandenbroucke T et al., 2015. Mapping eco-system service flows with land cover scoring maps for da-ta-scarce regions. Ecosystem Services, 13:28-40. doi:10. 1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.005
    [42] Wu Fang, Zhang Xinfeng, Cui Xuefeng, 2017. Characteristics and future trends of water resources utilization in China. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 34(1):30-39. (in Chinese)
    [43] Xu Pei, Peng Peihao, Wang Yukuan et al., 2007. Estimation and assessment on eco-water storage of the Jiuzhaigou Natural Reserve. Earth and Environment, 35(1):61-64. (in Chinese)
    [44] Yao Dan, 2010. Research on Xiangjiang Water Resources Alloca-tion. Changsha, China:Hunan Normal University. (in Chinese)
    [45] Zank B, Bagstad K J, Voigt B et al., 2016. Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows:a case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 149:31-42. doi:10. 1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.004
    [46] Zhang Chenjun, Zhang Hengquan, Chen Qiyong et al., 2016. Factors influencing water use changes based on LMDI meth-ods. Resources Science, 38(7):1308-1322. (in Chinese)
    [47] Zhang L, Dawes W R, Walker G R, 2001. Response of mean an-nual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research, 37(3):701-708. doi:10. 1029/2000WR900325
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(95) PDF downloads(240) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0503706; 2016YFC0503403); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31400411), Technical Support Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2013BAC03B05)
    Corresponding author: XIAO Yu

Abstract: Water supply services (WSSs) are critical for the regional water balance and water circulation, but relevant studies have not established the relationship between WSSs and human well-being. This research identifies the scope of areas that benefit from WSSs from an ecosystem service flow perspective. Moreover, the path and quantity of the flow of WSSs are simulated to provide a scientific theoretical basis for ecosystem service management and ecological compensation. The Dongjiang Lake Basin is a national priority river basin in China where ecological compensation pilot programmes concerning water resources are top priorities. Dongjiang Lake Basin experienced an increase and then a decrease in the overall supply of water, with an average net water supply of 1096-1500 mm for the years 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010. The water demand increased each year in service beneficiary areas (SBAs), varying from 387 to 580 mm. Overall, Dongjiang Lake Basin met the net water demands of the actual SBAs in the lower reaches, but a gap in the water supply and demand emerged gradually. This research provides an understanding of the functional mechanisms for the provision, demand and flow of WSSs and provides a scientific theoretical basis for ecosystem service management and ecological compensation.

XU Jie, XIAO Yu, XIE Gaodi, JIANG Yuan. Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 214-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3
Citation: XU Jie, XIAO Yu, XIE Gaodi, JIANG Yuan. Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 214-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3
Reference (47)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return