SHI Lifeng, ZHANG Zengxiang, LIU Fang, ZHAO Xiaoli, WANG Xiao, LIU Bin, HU Shunguang, WEN Qingke, ZUO Lijun, YI Ling, XU Jinyong. City Size Distribution and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(6): 703-714. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0832-z
Citation: SHI Lifeng, ZHANG Zengxiang, LIU Fang, ZHAO Xiaoli, WANG Xiao, LIU Bin, HU Shunguang, WEN Qingke, ZUO Lijun, YI Ling, XU Jinyong. City Size Distribution and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(6): 703-714. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0832-z

City Size Distribution and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0832-z
Funds:  Under the auspices of the Young Scientist Fund of National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 41101148)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Fang.E-mail:liufang@radi.ac.cn
  • Received Date: 2015-11-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-03-10
  • Publish Date: 2016-12-27
  • Based on the National Land Use/Cover Database of China (NLUD-C) in the end of the 1980s (the 1980s, hereafter), 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010, 665 cities were selected to study the size distribution and its changes of urban lands in China. In this study, the spatiotemporal evolutions of urban land size distribution as well as the influence of administrative-level on these cities were explored by combining urban spatial positions and administrative-levels. Results indicate that:1) City size distribution using urban lands was more practical and reasonable than using non-agricultural population. 2) In the 1980s, cities with ascending urban land rank were centralized in Eastern China, specially the Changjiang (Yangtze) River Delta, the Zhujiang (Pearl) River Delta, and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Cities in Central, Western, and Northeast China mainly indicated descending urban land rank. 3) The transfer of national development focus resulted in cities with ascending urban land rank becoming evenly distributed nationwide; however, this trend was slightly centralized around Chengdu, Chongqing, and Wuhan in different periods. 4) During the 1980s to 2010, the proportion of cities with ascending urban land rank in provincial capitals, municipalities, and special administrative regions (high-level cities, hereafter) was consistently higher than those in prefecture-and county-level cities except for 2005-2010. The ranks of the majority of the prefecture-and county-level cities were mainly descending, supported by ascending; the proportion of cities with unchanged rank is small. This study breaks through the bottleneck of traditional research in the area of city size distribution by examining urban land replacing the non-agricultural population. The current study also provides scientific explanation for the healthy and reasonable development of urban land as well as the coordinated development of population urbanization and land urbanization.
  • [1] Anderson G, Ge Y, 2005. The size distribution of Chinese cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(6):756-776. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.01.003
    [2] Auerbach F, 1913. Das Gesetz der Belvolkerungskoncertration. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 59:74-76. (in German)
    [3] Berry B J L, 1961. City size distributions and economic devel-opment. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9(4):573-588.
    [4] Berry B J L, Okulicz-Kozaryn A, 2012. The city size distribution debate:resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan aras. Cities, 29(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.007
    [5] CCSY (Department of city social economy investigation bureau of statistics of China), 1988; 1996; 2001; 2011. China City Statistical Yearbook 1987/1996/2001/2011. Beijing:China Sta-tistics Press. (in Chinese)
    [6] CESY (Department of population and employment statistics na-tional bureau of statistics of China), 2006; 2011. China Population and Employment Statistics Yearbook 2006/2011. Beijing:China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
    [7] Chan K W, 2010. The household registration system and migrant labor in China:notes on a debate. Population and Development Review, 36(2):357-364. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00333.x
    [8] Córdoba J C, 2008. On the distribution of city sizes. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1):177-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.01.005
    [9] Deng Q H, Gustafsson B, 2014. The Hukou Converters:China's lesser known rural to urban migrants. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(88):657-679. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2013.861147
    [10] Ding C R, 2002. Land policy reform in China:assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy, 20(2):109-120. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00073-X
    [11] Duranton G, 2006. Some foundations for Zipf's law:product pro-liferation and local spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(4):542-563. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.008
    [12] Eeckhout J, 2004. Gibrat's Law for (all) cities. American Economic Review, 94(5):1429-1451. doi: 10.1257/0002828043052303
    [13] Eeckhout J, 2009. Gibrat's Law for (all) cities:a reply. American Economic Review, 99(4):1676-1683. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.4.1676
    [14] Evett S R, Kustas W P, Gowda P H et al., 2012. Overview of the bushland evapotranspiration and agricultural remote sensing experiment 2008 (BEAREX08):a field experiment evaluating methods for quantifying ET at multiple scales. Advances in Water Resources, 50:4-19. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.010
    [15] Fluet-Chouinard E, Lehner B, Rebelo L M et al., 2015. Develop-ment of a global inundation map at high spatial resolution from topographic downscaling of coarse-scale remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 158:348-361. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015
    [16] Gabaix X, 1999. Zipf's Law for cities:an explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739-767. doi: 10.1162/003355399556133
    [17] Gan L, Li D, Song S F, 2006. Is the Zipf's law spurious in ex-plaining city-size distributions? Economics Letters, 92(2):256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.004
    [18] Gao J, Wei Y D, Chen W et al., 2014. Economic transition and urban land expansion in Provincial China. Habitat Interna-tional, 44:461-473. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.09.002
    [19] González-Val R, 2011. Deviations from Zipf's Law for American cities:an empirical examination. Urban Studies, 48(5):1017-1035. doi: 10.1177/0042098010371394
    [20] Ioannides Y M, Overman H G, 2003. Zipf's Law for cities:an empirical examination. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2):127-137. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(02)00006-6
    [21] Ji C Y, Liu Q, Sun D et al., 2001. Monitoring urban expansion with remote sensing in China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(8):1441-1455. doi: 10.1080/01431160117207
    [22] Jiang B, Jia T, 2011. Zipf's law for all the natural cities in the United States:a geospatial perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(8):1269-1281. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.510801
    [23] Krugman P, 1996. Confronting the mystery of urban hierarchy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10(4):399-418. doi: 10.1006/jjie.1996.0023
    [24] Kuang W H, Liu J Y, Zhang Z X et al., 2013. Spatiotemporal dynamics of impervious surface areas across China during the early 21st century. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(14):1691-1701. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5568-2
    [25] Levy M, 2009. Gibrats's Law for (all) cities:comment. The American Economic Review, 99(4):1672-1675. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.4.1672
    [26] Liang S M, 2011. Research on China's urban development strategy based on arable land preservation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(3):329-336. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000062
    [27] Liu F, Zhang Z X, Shi L F et al., 2016. Urban expansion in China and its spatial-temporal differences over the past four decades. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(10):1477-1496. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1339-3
    [28] Liu J Y, Deng X Z, 2010. Progress of the research methodologies on the temporal and spatial process of LUCC. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(14):1354-1362. doi: 10.1007/s11434-009-0733-y
    [29] Liu J Y, Liu M L, Zhuang D F et al., 2003. Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995-2000. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 46(4):373-384. doi: 10.1360/03yd9033
    [30] Liu J Y, Zhan J Y, Deng X Z, 2005. Spatio-temporal patterns and driving forces of urban land expansion in China during the economic reform era. Ambio, 34(6):450-455. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.6.450
    [31] Liu J Y, Zhang Z X, Xu X L et al., 2010. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(4):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0483-4
    [32] Malevergne Y, Pisarenko V, Sornette D, 2011. Testing the Pareto against the lognormal distributions with the uniformly most powerful unbiased test applied to the distribution of cities. Physical Review E, 83(3):036111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036111
    [33] Overholt W H, 2010. China in the global financial crisis:rising influence, rising challenges. The Washington Quarterly, 33(1):21-34. doi: 10.1080/01636600903418652
    [34] Rosen K T, Resnick M, 1980. The size distribution of cities:an examination of the Pareto law and primacy. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(2):165-186. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(80)90043-1
    [35] Shi Lifeng, Liu Fang, Zhang Zengxiang et al., 2015. Spatial dif-ferences of coastal urban expansion in China from 1970s to 2013. Chinese Geographical Science, 25(4):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0765-y
    [36] Simon H A, 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Bi-ometrika, 42(3/4):425-440. doi: 10.2307/2333389
    [37] Singer H W, 1936. The 'Courbe des Populations':a parallel to Pareto's law. The Economic Journal, 46(182):254-263.
    [38] Soo K T, 2005. Zipf's Law for cities:a cross-country investigation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(3):239-263. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.04.004
    [39] Wang C T, 2012. History of the Chinese family planning program:1970-2010. Contraception, 85(6):563-569. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.013
    [40] Wang J, Chen Y Q, Shao X M et al., 2012. Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China:present, trend and future. Land Use Policy, 29(4):737-749. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.010
    [41] Wang L, Li C C, Ying Q et al., 2012. China's urban expansion from 1990 to 2010 determined with satellite remote sensing. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(22):2802-2812. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5235-7
    [42] Weng Q H, 2012. Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas:requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117:34-49. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030
    [43] Wulder M A, White J C, Masek J G et al., 2011. Continuity of Landsat observations:short term considerations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(2):747-751. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.002
    [44] Xue Fei, 2007. The Test of Zipf Law on China's Urban Size and its Influenting Factors. Xiamen:Xiamen University. (in Chinese)
    [45] Zhang Q, Wallace J, Deng X Z et al., 2014. Central versus local states:which matters more in affecting China's urban growth? Land Use Policy, 38:487-496. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.015
    [46] Zhao S, Zhou D, Zhu C et al., 2015. Rates and patterns of urban expansion in China's 32 major cities over the past three decades. Landscape Ecology, 30(8):1541-1559. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0211-7
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(405) PDF downloads(982) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

City Size Distribution and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0832-z
Funds:  Under the auspices of the Young Scientist Fund of National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 41101148)
    Corresponding author: LIU Fang.E-mail:liufang@radi.ac.cn

Abstract: Based on the National Land Use/Cover Database of China (NLUD-C) in the end of the 1980s (the 1980s, hereafter), 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010, 665 cities were selected to study the size distribution and its changes of urban lands in China. In this study, the spatiotemporal evolutions of urban land size distribution as well as the influence of administrative-level on these cities were explored by combining urban spatial positions and administrative-levels. Results indicate that:1) City size distribution using urban lands was more practical and reasonable than using non-agricultural population. 2) In the 1980s, cities with ascending urban land rank were centralized in Eastern China, specially the Changjiang (Yangtze) River Delta, the Zhujiang (Pearl) River Delta, and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Cities in Central, Western, and Northeast China mainly indicated descending urban land rank. 3) The transfer of national development focus resulted in cities with ascending urban land rank becoming evenly distributed nationwide; however, this trend was slightly centralized around Chengdu, Chongqing, and Wuhan in different periods. 4) During the 1980s to 2010, the proportion of cities with ascending urban land rank in provincial capitals, municipalities, and special administrative regions (high-level cities, hereafter) was consistently higher than those in prefecture-and county-level cities except for 2005-2010. The ranks of the majority of the prefecture-and county-level cities were mainly descending, supported by ascending; the proportion of cities with unchanged rank is small. This study breaks through the bottleneck of traditional research in the area of city size distribution by examining urban land replacing the non-agricultural population. The current study also provides scientific explanation for the healthy and reasonable development of urban land as well as the coordinated development of population urbanization and land urbanization.

SHI Lifeng, ZHANG Zengxiang, LIU Fang, ZHAO Xiaoli, WANG Xiao, LIU Bin, HU Shunguang, WEN Qingke, ZUO Lijun, YI Ling, XU Jinyong. City Size Distribution and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(6): 703-714. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0832-z
Citation: SHI Lifeng, ZHANG Zengxiang, LIU Fang, ZHAO Xiaoli, WANG Xiao, LIU Bin, HU Shunguang, WEN Qingke, ZUO Lijun, YI Ling, XU Jinyong. City Size Distribution and Its Spatiotemporal Evolution in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(6): 703-714. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0832-z
Reference (46)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return