YANG Jun, LI Chuang, LI Yuechen, XI Jianhao, GE Quansheng, LI Xueming. Urban Green Space, Uneven Development and Accessibility: A Case of Dalian's Xigang District[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(5): 644-656. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y
Citation: YANG Jun, LI Chuang, LI Yuechen, XI Jianhao, GE Quansheng, LI Xueming. Urban Green Space, Uneven Development and Accessibility: A Case of Dalian's Xigang District[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(5): 644-656. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y

Urban Green Space, Uneven Development and Accessibility: A Case of Dalian's Xigang District

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41471140)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: YANG Jun.E-mail:yangjun@lnnu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2014-08-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-11-21
  • Publish Date: 2015-05-27
  • This study examines the socio-spatial context of uneven development and the residential accessibility of green space in Dalian of Liaoning Province, China. The social fairness was analyzed with a community scale as the basis. We combined social scientific methods with a GIS method using a behavior accessibility model from the perspectives of fairness of urban green space allocation based on social geography, geographic information science, management science and many other related discipline theories. The results show that: 1) Most of the urban green space distribution presents an unbalanced phenomenon, and it does not match with the population distribution; 2) We found some differences in the accessibility of the population with different attributes and opportunities to use and enjoy the urban green spaces, mainly due to: the dual social and spatial attributes of the residents and the serious stratum differentiation generated were the internal causes; the residential space differentiation and the pursuit of economic and real estate development were the direct causes; and unreasonable planning, in regard to the fact that government policies did not give consideration to efficiency and fairness, was also an important factor.
  • [1] Beler E F, 1997. The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 14(6): 353-361. doi:  10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00026-7
    [2] Cohen P, Potchter O, Schnell I, 2014. A methodological approach to the environmental quantitative assessment of urban parks. Applied Geography, 48: 87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014. 01.006
    [3] Dai D, 2011. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: where to intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4): 234-244.
    [4] Dawson K J, 1995. A comprehensive conservation strategy for Georgia's greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1): 27-43. doi:  10.1016/0169-2046(94)02012-5
    [5] Giles-Corti B, Broomhall M H, Knuiman M et al., 2005. Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American journal of preventive medicine, 28(2): 169-176. doi:  10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
    [6] Gu Mingdong, Yin Haiwei, 2010. Review on spatial accessibility and equity of public facilities. Urban Problems, (5): 25-29. (in Chinese)
    [7] Hu Zhibin, He Xingyuan, Lu Qingxuan et al., 2005. Green space accessibility research based on GIS: taking Shenyang as an example. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 21(6): 671-675. (in Chinese)
    [8] Jiang Haiyan, Zhou Chunshan, Xiao Rongbo, 2010. Spatial differentiation and social equity of public parks in Guanzhou. City Planning Review, (4): 43-48. (in Chinese)
    [9] Jim C Y, Chen W Y, 2006. Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1): 81-96. doi:10.1016/j. landurbplan.2004.08.008
    [10] Kabisch N, Haase D, 2014. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122: 129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2013.11.016
    [11] Li Bo, Song Yun, Yu Kongjian, 2008. Evaluation Method for Measurement of Accessibility in Urban Public Green Space Planning. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 44(4): 618-624. (in Chinese)
    [12] Lineberry R L, 1977. Equality and Urban Policy: The Distribution of Municipal Public Services. Sage Publications.
    [13] Lucy W, 1981. Equity and planning for local services. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(4): 447-457. doi:  10.1080/01944368108976526
    [14] Ma Linbing, Cao Xiaoshu, 2006. A GIS-based evalutation method for accessibility of urban public green landscape. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 45(6): 111-115. (in Chinese)
    [15] Mullick A, 1993. Accessibility issues in park design: the National Parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1): 25-33. doi: 10. 1016/0169-2046(93)90005-X
    [16] Rich R C, 1979. Neglected issues in the study of urban service distributions: a research agenda. Urban Studies, 16(2): 143-156. doi:  10.1080/00420987920080221
    [17] Sang Lijie, Shu Yonggang, Zhu Weiping et al., 2013. Accessibility of urban green spaces in Hangzhou City. Progress in Geography, 32(6): 950-957. (in Chinese)
    [18] Sonmez T H, Malkoc Y E, Altug I, 2007. Evaluation of elderly people's requirements in public open spaces: a case study in Bornova District (Izmir, Turkey). Building and Environment, 42(5): 2035-2045. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03. 004
    [19] Talen E, 1998. Visualizing fairness: equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1): 22-38. doi:  10.1080/01944369808975954
    [20] Talen E, Anselin L, 1998. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4): 595-613. doi:  10.1068/a300595
    [21] Van H A, Wiedemann T, 2003. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2): 109-126. doi: 10.1016/ S0169-2046(02)00192-5
    [22] Wang Laijie, 2007. Changes in public services in Western countries: orbits and characteristics. Socialism Studies, (6): 89-92. (in Chinese)
    [23] Wicks B E, Crompton J L, 1986. Citizen and administrator perspectives of equity in the delivery of park services. Leisure Sciences, 8(4): 341-365. doi:  10.1080/01490408609513080
    [24] Wright W H E, Zarger R K, Mihelcic J R, 2012. Accessibility and usability: green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3): 272-282. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2012.06.003
    [25] Yin Haiwei, Kong Fanhua, Zong Yueguang, 2008. Accessibility and equity assessment on urban green space. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(7): 3375-3383. (in Chinese)
    [26] Yin Haiwei, Kong Fanhua, 2006. Accessibility analysis of urban green space in Jinan. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 30(1): 17-24. (in Chinese)
    [27] Yu Kongjian, Duan Tiewu, Li Dihua et al., 1999. Landscape accessibility as a measurement of the function of urban green system. City Planning Review, 23(8): 8-11. (in Chinese)
    [28] Zhou Xiang, Zhang Xiaogang, He Longbin et al., 2013. Equity assessment on urban green space pattern based on human behavior scale and its optimization strategy: a case study in Shenzhen. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 49(5): 892-898. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(280) PDF downloads(1064) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Urban Green Space, Uneven Development and Accessibility: A Case of Dalian's Xigang District

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41471140)
    Corresponding author: YANG Jun.E-mail:yangjun@lnnu.edu.cn

Abstract: This study examines the socio-spatial context of uneven development and the residential accessibility of green space in Dalian of Liaoning Province, China. The social fairness was analyzed with a community scale as the basis. We combined social scientific methods with a GIS method using a behavior accessibility model from the perspectives of fairness of urban green space allocation based on social geography, geographic information science, management science and many other related discipline theories. The results show that: 1) Most of the urban green space distribution presents an unbalanced phenomenon, and it does not match with the population distribution; 2) We found some differences in the accessibility of the population with different attributes and opportunities to use and enjoy the urban green spaces, mainly due to: the dual social and spatial attributes of the residents and the serious stratum differentiation generated were the internal causes; the residential space differentiation and the pursuit of economic and real estate development were the direct causes; and unreasonable planning, in regard to the fact that government policies did not give consideration to efficiency and fairness, was also an important factor.

YANG Jun, LI Chuang, LI Yuechen, XI Jianhao, GE Quansheng, LI Xueming. Urban Green Space, Uneven Development and Accessibility: A Case of Dalian's Xigang District[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(5): 644-656. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y
Citation: YANG Jun, LI Chuang, LI Yuechen, XI Jianhao, GE Quansheng, LI Xueming. Urban Green Space, Uneven Development and Accessibility: A Case of Dalian's Xigang District[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(5): 644-656. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0781-y
Reference (28)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return