CHEN Ziying, YAN Fengqin, SU Fenzhen, LYNE Vincent, MAO Yujie, CUI Yikun, ZHANG Jiaojie, TANG Yuzhi, TAO Keyu, PAN Tingting. Ecosystem Carbon Stocks Assessment and Projection Under Future Developments of the Coastal Greater Bay Area, China. Chinese Geographical Science. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-026-1712-9
Citation: CHEN Ziying, YAN Fengqin, SU Fenzhen, LYNE Vincent, MAO Yujie, CUI Yikun, ZHANG Jiaojie, TANG Yuzhi, TAO Keyu, PAN Tingting. Ecosystem Carbon Stocks Assessment and Projection Under Future Developments of the Coastal Greater Bay Area, China. Chinese Geographical Science. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-026-1712-9

Ecosystem Carbon Stocks Assessment and Projection Under Future Developments of the Coastal Greater Bay Area, China

  • Coastal zones are dynamic land-sea transition systems in which rapid land-use change can substantially alter ecosystem carbon stocks. However, integrated assessments linking historical land-use transformation, carbon-stock dynamics, spatial drivers, future trajectories, and scenario trade-offs remain limited in highly urbanized coastal regions. Taking the coastal zone of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), China as the study area, this study employed the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model, GeoDetector, the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to assess historical ecosystem carbon-stock dynamics and their spatial drivers, project carbon stocks under four future land-use scenarios, and evaluate trade-offs between development demand and ecological conservation. Results showed that from 2000 to 2020, construction land expanded by 71.29%, whereas cropland, woodland, and salt marshes decreased by 27.01%, 3.25%, and 26.30%, respectively. Total carbon stocks declined from 44.58 million to 44.13 million t (−1.01%). Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was the strongest individual explanatory factor for spatial carbon-stock heterogeneity (q = 0.56), and its interactions with climatic and topographic factors enhanced explanatory power. Among the 2030 scenarios, Ecological Protection (EP) yielded the greatest increase in carbon stocks (approximately 0.13 million t, 0.29%), whereas Economic Development (ED) led to a net carbon loss. Sustainable Development (SD) achieved the highest TOPSIS score (Scon = 0.74), with construction land increasing by 8.16% and carbon stocks increasing by approximately 0.08 million t (0.17%). Overall, SD provided the most balanced pathway for reconciling development demand with ecological conservation, wetland protection, carbon-stock conservation. These findings provide a practical basis for optimizing land-use allocation and strengthening ecosystem carbon management in rapidly urbanizing coastal regions.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return