留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China

Yixu WANG Shuo SUN Wentian XU Xuecheng FU Lei YAO

WANG Yixu, SUN Shuo, XU Wentian, FU Xuecheng, YAO Lei, 2023. Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 33(1): 161−174 doi:  10.1007/s11769-023-1331-7
Citation: WANG Yixu, SUN Shuo, XU Wentian, FU Xuecheng, YAO Lei, 2023. Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 33(1): 161−174 doi:  10.1007/s11769-023-1331-7

doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1331-7

Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42171094), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2021MD095, ZR2021QD093), Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20YJCZH198)
More Information
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
  • Figure  1.  The location of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (BTH) and PM2.5 monitoring stations

    Figure  2.  PM2.5 pollution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018. BJ: Beijing. TJ: Tianjin. SJZ: Shijiazhuang. TS: Tangshan. QHD: Qinhuangdao. HD: Handan. XT: Xingtai. BD: Baoding. ZJK: Zhangjiakou. CD: Chengde. CZ: Cangzhou. LF: Langfang. HS: Hengshui. P-Ⅰ, P-Ⅱ and P-Ⅲ: PM2.5 pollution levels

    Figure  3.  The systematic clustering result of socioeconomic indicators in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018. The horizontal axis is the classified distance of cluster analysis. All the indicators were processed by deviation standardization

    Table  1.   PM2.5 concentration grouping and pollution types in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China

    Range / (μg/m3)Pollution levels
    0–35P-Ⅰ
    35–55P-Ⅱ
    55–75
    75–95P-Ⅲ
    95–115
    >115
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   Indicators of potential influential factors of PM2.5 polution

    ThemeIndicatorsUnitDescriptionReference
    Natural (X1) Altitude (X11) m Indicates elevation changes in the study area Liu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Bei et al., 2020; Halim et al., 2020
    Normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI (X12) Represents vegetation coverage and intensity
    Precipitation (X13) mm Meteorology information
    Wind velocity (X14) m/s
    Air temperature (X15) °C
    Relative humidity (X16) %
    Economy (X2) The proportion of secondary industry (X21) % Indicates the intensity of industrial development Han et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2019; Du et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2021
    The proportion of tertiary industry (X22) % Indicates the intensity of service industry
    Per capita disposable income (X23) Yuan (RMB) Indicates the living standard of regional residents
    Gross domestic product, GDP (X24) 100 million yuan Reflects the level of economic development
    Number of industrial enterprise (X25) Count Reflects the development of industries above the designated size
    Foreign investment (X26) USD 10000 Reflects the ability to attract foreign investment
    Research and development internal outlay (X27) 10000 yuan Reflects the scientific and technological development level of the city
    Number of patent authorizations (X28) Piece
    Sown area (X29) 1000 ha Reflects the agricultural development intensity
    Floor space of buildings (X210) 10000 m2 Reflects the activity intensity of the construction industry by the floor space under construction
    Traffic (X3) Area of city paved roads (X31) 10000 m2 Reflects the total area of City Paved Roads Lu et al., 2017; Harrison et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021
    Public passenger transport (X32) 10000 person-times Reflects traffic activity with the total number of public transported passengers
    Highway passenger traffic (X33) 10000 persons Reflects traffic activity with the total number of transported passengers on highways
    Highway freight traffic (X34) 10000 t Reflects traffic activity with the weight of transported goods on highways
    Population and City (X4) Population (X41) 10000 persons Reflects the total regional population Han et al., 2014, 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020a; 2020b
    The proportion of urban population (X42) % Indicator of the population urbanization rate
    Population density (X43) Person/km2 Reflects the intensity of human activity
    Night light index, NLI (X44) Indicates the level of urbanization
    Build-up area (X45) km Reflects the process of urban expansion
    Area of green land (X46) ha Reflects the areas used for greening
    Electricity consumption (X47) 10000 kWh Reflects the total energy consumption of the city
    Liquefied petroleum gas supply (X48) t
    Pollutant emission (X5) Volume of industrial Sulphur dioxide emission (X51) t Indicates the pollutant emissions associated with PM2.5 pollution Lu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021a
    Volume of industrial soot (dust) emission (X52) t
    Notes: The natural (X1) indicators were provided by the Resources and Environmental Sciences and Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx). The NLI (X44) data are from the National Centers for Environmental Information in the United States with a spatial resolution of 500 m. Other statistical data were obtained from the China City Statistical Yearbook (https://navi.cnki.net/knavi/yearbooks/YZGCA/detail), the Beijing Statistical Yearbook (http://tjj.beijing.gov.cn/tjsj_31433/), the Tianjin Statistical Yearbook (https://stats.tj.gov.cn/tjsj_52032/tjnj/) and the Hebei Economic Yearbook (http://www.hetj.gov.cn/hetj/tjsj/jjnj/)
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   The ranking results of socioeconomic indicators using the RF-RFE method in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018

    IndicatorsRankIndicatorsRankIndicatorsRank
    X211X2109X4117
    X432X3410X2418
    X253X2811X4619
    X334X2312X4520
    X475X2713X3121
    X446X2614X5122
    X297X5215X4223
    X228X4816X3224
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  4.   The stepwise multiple regression models for PM2.5 pollution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018 based on multiple natural and socioeconomic factors

    CityStandardization CoefficientR2
    X11X12X13X14X15X16X21X22X29X33X43X52
    BTH−0.253**−0.082**−0.384**−0.363**−0.394**−1.683**−3.473**0.365**0.581**1.839**0.839
    BJ0.130**0.847**0.849
    TJ0.280**0.719**0.834
    SJZ−1.068**−0.348*0.722
    TS−0.493**−0.522**0.956
    QHD0.850**0.722
    HD0.534**−0.483**0.933
    XT−0.346**−1.211**0.951
    BD−0.459**−0.531**0.947
    ZJK
    CD0.911**0.829
    CZ0.859**−1.672**0.915
    LF−0.129**0.940**0.976
    HS−0.775**0.285**0.983
    Notes: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. BJ: Beijing. TJ: Tianjin. SJZ: Shijiazhuang. TS: Tangshan. QHD: Qinhuangdao. HD: Handan. XT: Xingtai. BD: Baoding. ZJK: Zhangjiakou. CD: Chengde. CZ: Cangzhou. LF: Langfang. HS: Hengshui
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Bei N F, Li X P, Tie X et al., 2020. Impact of synoptic patterns and meteorological elements on the wintertime haze in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China from 2013 to 2017. Science of the Total Environment, 704: 135210. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135210
    [2] Cai S Y, Wang Y J, Zhao B et al., 2017. The impact of the ‘Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan’ on PM2.5 concentrations in Jing-Jin-Ji Region during 2012–2020. Science of the Total Environment, 580: 197–209. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.188
    [3] Chen H, Li L, Lei Y L et al., 2020. Public health effect and its economics loss of PM2.5 pollution from coal consumption in China. Science of the Total Environment, 732: 138973. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138973
    [4] Chengde Municipal People’s Government, 2019. 2018 National Economic and Development Statistics Bulletin of Chengde City. Available at: https://www.chengde.gov.cn/art/2019/4/10/art_9942_225341.html. (in Chinese)
    [5] Ding Y T, Zhang M, Chen S et al., 2019. The environmental Kuznets curve for PM2.5 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China: a spatial panel data approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220: 984–994. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.229
    [6] Du Y Y, Wan Q, Liu H M et al., 2019. How does urbanization influence PM2.5 concentrations? Perspective of spillover effect of multi-dimensional urbanization impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220: 974–983. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.222
    [7] Fan H, Zhao C F, Yang Y K, 2020. A comprehensive analysis of the spatio-temporal variation of urban air pollution in China during 2014–2018. Atmospheric Environment, 220: 117066. doi:  10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117066
    [8] Gu K Y, Zhou Y, Sun H et al., 2021. Spatial distribution and determinants of PM2.5 in China’s cities: fresh evidence from IDW and GWR. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193: 15. doi:  10.1007/s10661-020-08749-6
    [9] Guo B, Wang X X, Pei L et al., 2021. Identifying the spatiotemporal dynamic of PM2.5 concentrations at multiple scales using geographically and temporally weighted regression model across China during 2015–2018. Science of the Total Environment, 751: 141765. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141765
    [10] Halim N D A, Latif M T, Mohamed A F et al., 2020. Spatial assessment of land use impact on air quality in mega urban regions, Malaysia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63: 102436. doi:  10.1016/j.scs.2020.102436
    [11] Han L J, Zhou W Q, Li W F et al., 2014. Impact of urbanization level on urban air quality: a case of fine particles (PM2.5) in Chinese cities. Environmental Pollution, 194: 163–170. doi:  10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.022
    [12] Han L J, Zhou W Q, Li W F et al., 2018. Urbanization strategy and environmental changes: an insight with relationship between population change and fine particulate pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 642: 789–799. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.094
    [13] Harrison R M, Vu T V, Jafar H et al., 2021. More mileage in reducing urban air pollution from road traffic. Environment International, 149: 106329. doi:  10.1016/j.envint.2020.106329
    [14] Hebei Forestry, 2015. Shijiazhuang wins the title of ‘National Forest City’. Hebei Forestry, 219(11): 2. (in Chinese)
    [15] Huang T H, Yu Y J, Wei Y G et al., 2018. Spatial-seasonal characteristics and critical impact factors of PM2.5 concentration in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. PLoS One, 13(9): e0201364. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0201364
    [16] Kampa M, Castanas E, 2008. Human health effects of air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 151(2): 362–367. doi:  10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
    [17] Lelieveld J, Evans J S, Fnais M et al., 2015. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569): 367–371. doi:  10.1038/nature15371
    [18] Li N, Zhang X L, Shi M J et al., 2019. Does China’s air pollution abatement policy matter? An assessment of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on a multi-regional CGE model. Energy Policy, 127: 213–227. doi:  10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.019
    [19] Li T, Xu Y, Yao L, 2021. Detecting urban landscape factors controlling seasonal land surface temperature: from the perspective of urban function zones. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(30): 41191–41206. doi:  10.1007/s11356-021-13695-y
    [20] Li W F, Han C M, Li W J et al., 2020a. Multi-scale effects of urban agglomeration on thermal environment: a case of the Yangtze River Delta Megaregion, China. Science of the Total Environment, 713: 136556. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136556
    [21] Li W J, Shao L Y, Wang W H et al., 2020b. Air quality improvement in response to intensified control strategies in Beijing during 2013–2019. Science of the Total Environment, 744: 140776. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140776
    [22] Liu H M, Fang C L, Zhang X L et al., 2017. The effect of natural and anthropogenic factors on haze pollution in Chinese cities: a spatial econometrics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165: 323–333. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.127
    [23] Liu Q Q, Wang S J, Zhang W Z et al., 2019. The effect of natural and anthropogenic factors on PM2.5: empirical evidence from Chinese cities with different income levels. Science of the Total Environment, 653: 157–167. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.367
    [24] Liu X P, Zou B, Feng H H et al., 2020. Anthropogenic factors of PM2.5 distributions in China’s major urban agglomerations: a spatial-temporal analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 121709. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121709
    [25] Lou C R, Liu H Y, Li Y F et al., 2016. Socioeconomic drivers of PM2.5 in the accumulation phase of air pollution episodes in the Yangtze River Delta of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(10): 928. doi:  10.3390/ijerph13100928
    [26] Lu D B, Xu J H, Yang D Y et al., 2017. Spatio-temporal variation and influence factors of PM2.5 concentrations in China from 1998 to 2014. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 8(6): 1151–1159. doi:  10.1016/j.apr.2017.05.005
    [27] Lu X C, Lin C Q, Li W K et al., 2019. Analysis of the adverse health effects of PM2.5 from 2001 to 2017 in China and the role of urbanization in aggravating the health burden. Science of the Total Environment, 652: 683–695. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.140
    [28] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2013. Circular of the State Council on printing and distributing the action plan for the prevention and control of air pollution. https://www.mee.gov.cn/zcwj/gwywj/201811/t20181129_676555.shtml. (in Chinese)
    [29] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2019. Ecology and Environment Statement of China. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywdt/tpxw/201905/t20190529_704841.shtml. (in Chinese)
    [30] Mu Quan, Zhang Shiqiu, 2013. An evaluation of the economic loss due to the heavy haze during January 2013 in China. China Environmental Science, 33(11): 2087–2094. (in Chinese)
    [31] Pope C A 3rd, Burnett R T, Thun M J et al., 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 287(9): 1132–1141. doi:  10.1001/jama.287.9.1132
    [32] Pui D Y H, Chen S C, Zuo Z L, 2014. PM2.5 in China: measurements, sources, visibility and health effects, and mitigation. Particuology, 13: 1–26. doi:  10.1016/j.partic.2013.11.001
    [33] Qinhuangdao Municipal People’s Government, 2019. 2018 National economic and development statistics bulletin of Qinhuangdao City. http://qhd.gov.cn/front_pcthi.do?uuid=726B59991EF82D99A1D972275F10B3FE. (in Chinese)
    [34] Shen H Z, Tao S, Chen Y L et al., 2017. Urbanization-induced population migration has reduced ambient PM2.5 concentrations in China. Science Advances, 3(7): e1700300. doi:  10.1126/sciadv.1700300
    [35] Shi T, Hu Y M, Liu M et al., 2020. How do economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization affect fine particulate matter concentrations? An assessment in Liaoning Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15): 5441. doi:  10.3390/ijerph17155441
    [36] Stone B Jr, 2008. Urban sprawl and air quality in large US cities. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(4): 688–698. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.034
    [37] The People’s Government of Hebei Province, 2019. Hebei Economic Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House. (in Chinese)
    [38] Tian G J, Wu J G, Yang Z F, 2010. Spatial pattern of urban functions in the Beijing metropolitan region. Habitat International, 34(2): 249–255. doi:  10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.010
    [39] Wang L, Zhang F Y, Pilot E et al., 2018. Taking action on air pollution control in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) Region: progress, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2): 306. doi:  10.3390/ijerph15020306
    [40] Wang L L, Xiong Q L, Wu G F et al., 2019. Spatio-temporal variation characteristics of PM2.5 in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China, from 2013 to 2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21): 4276. doi:  10.3390/ijerph16214276
    [41] Wang Y C, Liu C G, Wang Q Y et al., 2021a. Impacts of natural and socioeconomic factors on PM2.5 from 2014 to 2017. Journal of Environmental Management, 284: 112071. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112071
    [42] Wang Y X, Yao L, Xu Y et al., 2021b. Potential heterogeneity in the relationship between urbanization and air pollution, from the perspective of urban agglomeration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298: 126822. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126822
    [43] Wang Z B, Fang C L, 2016. Spatial-temporal characteristics and determinants of PM2.5 in the Bohai Rim Urban Agglomeration. Chemosphere, 148: 148–162. doi:  10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.118
    [44] Wen X, Zhang P Y, Liu D Q, 2018. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors analysis of PM2.5 concentrations in Jilin Province, Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(5): 810–822. doi:  10.1007/s11769-018-0992-0
    [45] Wu Q L, Guo R X, Luo J H et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal evolution and the driving factors of PM2.5 in Chinese urban agglomerations between 2000 and 2017. Ecological Indicators, 125: 107491. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107491
    [46] Wu W Q, Zhang M, Ding Y T, 2020. Exploring the effect of economic and environment factors on PM2.5 concentration: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Journal of Environmental Management, 268: 110703. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110703
    [47] Xiao Q Y, Geng G N, Liang F C et al., 2020. Changes in spatial patterns of PM2.5 pollution in China 2000–2018: impact of clean air policies. Environment International, 141: 105776. doi:  10.1016/j.envint.2020.105776
    [48] Xu C, Dong L, Yu C et al., 2020. Can forest city construction affect urban air quality? The evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 121607. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121607
    [49] Xu G Y, Ren X D, Xiong K N et al., 2020. Analysis of the driving factors of PM2.5 concentration in the air: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecological Indicators, 110: 105889. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105889
    [50] Xu W T, Wang Y X, Sun S et al., 2022. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of PM2.5 and its driving difference comparison associated with urbanization in China’s multiple urban agglomerations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(20): 29689–29703. doi:  10.1007/s11356-021-17929-x
    [51] Xu W X, Sun J Q, Liu Y X et al., 2019. Spatiotemporal variation and socioeconomic drivers of air pollution in China during 2005–2016. Journal of Environmental Management, 245: 66–75. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.041
    [52] Yan D, Kong Y, Jiang P et al., 2021a. How do socioeconomic factors influence urban PM2.5 pollution in China? Empirical analysis from the perspective of spatiotemporal disequilibrium. Science of the Total Environment, 761: 143266. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143266
    [53] Yan H, Ding G L, Feng K L et al., 2020. Systematic evaluation framework and empirical study of the impacts of building construction dust on the surrounding environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275: 122767. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122767
    [54] Yan J W, Tao F, Zhang S Q et al., 2021b. Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and driving forces of PM2.5 in three urban agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5): 2222. doi:  10.3390/ijerph18052222
    [55] Yang X L, Zhang L W, Chen X et al., 2021. Long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 and stroke mortality among urban residents in northern China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 213: 112063. doi:  10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112063
    [56] Yue H B, He C Y, Huang Q X et al., 2020. Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China. Nature Communications, 11(1): 1462. doi:  10.1038/s41467-020-15319-4
    [57] Zhang L C, An J, Liu M Y et al., 2020a. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing, China. Environmental Pollution, 262: 114276. doi:  10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114276
    [58] Zhang X L, Shi M J, Li Y J et al., 2018. Correlating PM2.5 concentrations with air pollutant emissions: a longitudinal study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179: 103–113. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.072
    [59] Zhang X X, Gu X C, Cheng C X et al., 2020b. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of PM2.5 and its relationship with urbanization in North China from 2000 to 2017. Science of the Total Environment, 744: 140925. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140925
    [60] Zhao X L, Zhou W Q, Han L J et al., 2019. Spatiotemporal variation in PM2.5 concentrations and their relationship with socioeconomic factors in China’s major cities. Environment International, 133: 105145. doi:  10.1016/j.envint.2019.105145
    [61] Zhao X L, Zhou W Q, Han L J, 2021. The spatial and seasonal complexity of PM2.5 pollution in cities from a social-ecological perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309: 127476. doi:  10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127476
    [62] Zhou C S, Chen J, Wang S J, 2018. Examining the effects of socioeconomic development on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China’s cities using spatial regression and the geographical detector technique. Science of the Total Environment, 619–620: 436–445. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.124
    [63] Zhu L, Huang Q X, Ren Q et al., 2020. Identifying urban haze islands and extracting their spatial features. Ecological Indicators, 115: 106385. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106385
  • [1] Mingchang WANG, Xingnan LIU, Ziwei LIU, Fengyan WANG, Xiaoyan LI, Guanglei HOU, Shijun ZHAO.  Evaluation and Driving Force Analysis of Cultivated Land Quality in Black Soil Region of Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(4): 601-615. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1361-1
    [2] Menglin QIN, Yincheng ZHAO, Yuting LIU, Hongbo JIANG, Hang LI, Ziming ZHU.  Multi-scenario Simulation for 2060 and Driving Factors of the Eco-spatial Carbon Sink in the Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(1): 85-101. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1327-3
    [3] Yun TONG, Li PANG, Minghui SUN, Junyi HAN.  Detection of Multi-dimensional Driving Forces of Public Environmental Concern in China: Based on Spatial Heterogeneity Perspectives . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(6): 1109-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1378-5
    [4] Sijia LI, Lihua WU.  The Effect of Urban Agglomeration Expansion on PM2.5 Concentrations: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(2): 250-270. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1342-4
    [5] Bo CAO, Xiaole KONG, Yixuan WANG, Hang LIU, Hongwei PEI, Yan-Jun SHEN.  Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(3): 491-505. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8
    [6] HUANG Xingling, LIU Jianguo.  Regional Economic Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors of Bei-jing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitans in China Based on a Heterogeneity Stochastic Frontier Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(1): 30-44. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1089-0
    [7] LUAN Qingzu, JIANG Wei, LIU Shuo, GUO Hongxiang.  Impact of Urban 3D Morphology on Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5) Concentrations: Case Study of Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 294-308. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1112-5
    [8] LI Hua, TONG Helong, WU Xianhua, LU Xiaoli, MENG Shuhan.  Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of PM2.5 in China from 1998 to 2016 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 947-958. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1157-5
    [9] CHEN Weiwei, ZHANG Shichun, TONG Quansong, ZHANG Xuelei, ZHAO Hongmei, MA Siqi, XIU Aijun, HE Yuexin.  Regional Characteristics and Causes of Haze Events in Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(5): 836-850. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0965-3
    [10] WEN Xin, ZHANG Pingyu, LIU Daqian.  Spatiotemporal Variations and Influencing Factors Analysis of PM2.5 Concentrations in Jilin Province, Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(5): 810-822. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0992-0
    [11] ZHU Jianhua, CHEN Xi, CHEN Tian.  Spheres of Urban Influence and Factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region Based on Viewpoint of Administrative Division Adjustment . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(5): 709-721. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0881-y
    [12] LI Xiaosong, WANG Hongyan, ZHOU Shufang, SUN Bin, GAO Zhihai.  Did Ecological Engineering Projects Have a Significant Effect on Large-scale Vegetation Restoration in Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region, China? A Remote Sensing Approach . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 216-228. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0801-6
    [13] HUANG Jianyi, SU Fei, ZHANG Pingyu.  Measuring Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(4): 472-485. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0769-7
    [14] WU Xiuqin, LIU Hongmeng, HUANG Xiulan, ZHOU Tao.  Human Driving Forces: Analysis of Rocky Desertification in Karst Region in Guanling County, Guizhou Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(5): 600-.
    [15] CHEN Hongxia, LI Guoping.  Empirical Study on Effect of Industrial Structure Change on Regional Economic Growth of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(6): 708-714.
    [16] ZONG Yueguang, YANG Wei, MA Qiang, XUE Song.  Cassini Growth of Population Between Two Metropolitan Cities——A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin Region, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 203-210. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0203-0
    [17] QUAN Bin, M J M RÖMKENS, TAO Jianjun, LI Bichen, LI Chaokui, YU Guanghui, CHEN Qichun.  Spatial-temporal Pattern and Population Driving Force of Land Use Change in Liupan Mountains Region, Southern Ningxia, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(4): 323-330. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0323-y
    [18] FENG Zhiming, LIU Dengwei, ZHANG Yuehong.  Water Requirements and Irrigation Scheduling of Spring Maize Using GIS and CropWat Model in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(1): 56-63. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0056-3
    [19] YU Tao-fang.  STRUCTURE AND RESTRUCTURING OF BEIJING-TIANJIN-HEBEI MEGALOPOLIS IN CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(1): 1-8.
    [20] ZHOU De-min, XU Jian-chun, John RADKE, MU Lan.  A SPATIAL CLUSTER METHOD SUPPORTED BY GIS FOR URBAN-SUBURBAN-RURAL CLASSIFICATION . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(4): 337-342.
  • 加载中
图(3) / 表ll (4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  153
  • HTML全文浏览量:  56
  • PDF下载量:  11
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-05-11
  • 录用日期:  2022-09-28
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-05

Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1331-7
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42171094), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2021MD095, ZR2021QD093), Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20YJCZH198)
    通讯作者: YAO Lei. E-mail: alex_yaolei@126.com

English Abstract

WANG Yixu, SUN Shuo, XU Wentian, FU Xuecheng, YAO Lei, 2023. Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 33(1): 161−174 doi:  10.1007/s11769-023-1331-7
Citation: WANG Yixu, SUN Shuo, XU Wentian, FU Xuecheng, YAO Lei, 2023. Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Pollution in Imbalanced Natural and Socioeconomic Processes: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 33(1): 161−174 doi:  10.1007/s11769-023-1331-7
    • Since the reform and opening-up of China, industrialization and urbanization have developed very rapidly, bringing about a sustained economic growth. However, due to a lack of comprehensive and predictable urban planning in most cities, resource and environmental costs have been ignored in the process of urban development (Gu et al., 2021). Meanwhile, increased population and construction land as well as the high energy consumption have intensified the contradiction between China’s economic development and environmental protection. This leads to huge environmental cost and serious regional environmental pollution in China, among which, the problem of air pollution is particularly prominent. According to the Ecology and Environment Statement of China in 2018, the days with PM2.5 as the primary pollutant accounted for 60% of the severe pollution incidents. Thus, PM2.5 become as the major concern of air pollution in China (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2019). PM2.5 is characterized by a small particle size, high activity, the ability to carry a large number of toxic substances (such as heavy metals and viruses) and a long transportation distance. High-concentration PM2.5 not only poses a serious threat to the atmospheric environment, but also hinders the construction of urban ecological civilizations, impedes sustainable socioeconomic development, and increases the mortality rate of exposed people (Kampa and Castanas, 2008; Pui et al., 2014; Lelieveld et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2021). Previous study showed that, for every 10 mg/m3 increase in fine particulate matter, the risk of death from all causes, cardiopulmonary disease, and lung cancer increased by 4%, 6%, and 8%, respectively (Pope et al., 2002). The negative effects or economic losses caused by such pollutants are not estimable (Mu and Zhang, 2013; Chen et al., 2020). Therefore, PM2.5 pollution problem in China needs to be addressed urgently (Zhou et al., 2018; Gu et al., 2021).

      In order to control the sources of fine particulate matter pollution and improve the air quality in China, since 2012, the Chinese government has adopted a series of air pollution prevention and control measures. However, the air pollution situation remains serious. There is no doubt that research on the potential drivers is particularly necessary to control regional PM2.5 pollution. In past studies, scholars have mainly focused on both the natural and socioeconomic factors. Regarding natural factors, scholars have indicated that the accumulations, diffusions, distributions, and variations of PM2.5 are significantly affected by vegetation on the ground, topography, and meteorological factors (Lu et al., 2017; Bei et al., 2020; Xu C et al., 2020a; Xu G Y et al., 2020b). In addition, urbanization in terms of socioeconomic development has become the factor that significantly impact local air pollution, either positively or negatively (Lu et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019; Xu G Y et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020b). In the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) Region, Bei et al. (2020) pointed out that natural conditions such as wind, temperature, and relative humidity perform as important role in the variation of PM2.5. Huang et al. (2018) reported that PM2.5 pollution is closely related to population density, urbanization rate, total energy consumption, industrial pollutant discharge, etc. Meanwhile, considering the city as a complex social-ecological system (Zhao et al., 2021), scholars tended to explore the potential influencers of urban PM2.5 pollution from both the natural and socioeconomic perspectives (Liu et al., 2017; Wen et al., 2018). For example, Wu et al. (2021) reported that the temperature and population density are the key driving factors in Chinese urban agglomerations. A more comprehensive index system is very important to understand PM2.5 pollution. However, previous studies directly introduce the potential factors into the driving analysis model based on relevant studies (Lu et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2021). Due to the similarities and complexities among the indicators, inappropriate factors may be brought into the analysis model (Yan et al., 2021b). Therefore, it is necessary to screen the indicators to avoid duplication and redundancy and to ensure a more representative index system to evaluate the causes of PM2.5 pollution.

      In recent years, scholars have systematically discussed the driving mechanisms of PM2.5 pollution at local, regional and national scales, taking into account various indicators ( Wang and Fang, 2016; Zhao et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Most of these studies have taken the study area (such as urban agglomeration) as a unit to reveal the overall regularity. The heterogeneity of natural conditions, population and industrial structures among cities in a region has often been ignored. However, this heterogeneity, in essence, brings about different characteristics of each region (or city) in terms of natural, urbanization, and pollution conditions. Does this further lead to different key drivers affecting different cities? Some studies have considered the unbalanced distribution of factors in different regions, and then discussed the differences in driving factors across countries or urban agglomerations. For example, the population density and economic development level of underdeveloped cities in China showed opposite correlation with PM2.5 pollution (Gu et al., 2021). However, less attention has been paid to the pollution-driven relationships between different cities within the same region. For example, many studies only focused on the large city in the BTH Region (Li et al., 2020b; Zhang et al., 2020a). Compared with the large cities in the region, the relatively underdeveloped cities have received less policy, public and academic attention. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the differences in PM2.5 pollution response to multiple factors on a detailed spatial scale.

      Based on the above background, this study chose the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China as the case study region, where the PM2.5 pollution situation is severe and the natural and socioeconomic conditions in the region are unbalanced. Moreover, the BTH Region is a key concern area by the China’s environmental policies, such as the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan issued in September 2013 and the Blue Sky Protection Campaign launched in 2018, thus it is necessary to understand the extent of PM2.5 pollution during the policy implementation period (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2013; Wang et al., 2019). The ground PM2.5 monitoring data and a representative index system was used to characterize urban air pollution and its influencing factors. The research objectives are as follows: 1) to identify the characteristics of the annual average PM2.5 pollution in the study area from 2014 to 2018; 2) to quantify the specific impact of natural and socioeconomic factors on air pollution; and 3) to explore the influence of objective differences in urban natural and socioeconomic conditions on PM2.5 pollution driving factors from the perspective of multi-city comparisons within urban agglomeration. The results of this study will help to deepen our scientific understanding of the atmospheric environmental effects of different natural and urbanization conditions, and could provide certain theoretical support for precise pollution prevention and control.

    • The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (BTH) Region is located in North China (36°03′N–42°40′N, 113°27′E–119°50′E) (Fig. 1). The region is an important political and economic area in North China and includes Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Handan, Xingtai, Baoding, Zhangjiakou, Chengde, Cangzhou, Langfang, and Hengshui. In the long course of its development, the BTH Region has accumulated a large population and substantial economic resources. Its urbanization rate increased from 43.0% in 2005 to 59.6% in 2018 (The People’s Government of Hebei Province, 2019). The rapid development in the BTH Region has been accompanied by high energy consumption and pollutant emissions. Complex terrain and meteorological conditions additionally impede the dispersion of pollutants. Therefore, the BTH Region has become one of the areas with the worst PM2.5 pollution in China (Wang et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2021), which suffers enormous environmental pressure and serious threaten on local health. This pollution problem is the focus of much attention. Moreover, there are significant differences in natural and socioeconomic conditions in the cities of the BTH Region. This regional heterogeneity makes it possible to explore the potential differences in the driving forces of the PM2.5 pollution in the study region.

      Figure 1.  The location of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (BTH) and PM2.5 monitoring stations

    • In this study, we used ground recorded hourly PM2.5 concentration data from the China’s National Environmental Monitoring Station. The detailed data were downloaded from the National Urban Air Quality Real-time Publishing Platform (https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/). We collected PM2.5 data from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018, and the collection range covered 69 monitoring stations in the BTH Region (Fig. 1).

    • To investigate the dynamics of PM2.5 pollution in the BTH Region from 2014 to 2018, we first used statistical methods to summarize the annual average concentration of PM2.5 in each city. Thereafter, according to the annual average concentration limit of PM2.5 (35 μg/m3) specified in China’s Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-2012), the pollution conditions were divided into six categories with equal concentration interval (i.e., less than 35 μg/m3, 35–55 μg/m3, 55–75 μg/m3, 75–95 μg/m3, 95–115 μg/m3, and more than 115 μg/m3). Cities with similar PM2.5 concentrations were classified and visualized using the manual classification method in ArcGIS. Moreover, the PM2.5 pollution in the BTH Region was further defined as level I (P-Ⅰ), II (P-Ⅱ) or III (P-Ⅲ) (Table 1). Different grades represent different pollution levels, and the higher level represents more severe PM2.5 pollution.

      Table 1.  PM2.5 concentration grouping and pollution types in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China

      Range / (μg/m3)Pollution levels
      0–35P-Ⅰ
      35–55P-Ⅱ
      55–75
      75–95P-Ⅲ
      95–115
      >115
    • PM2.5 pollution is the result of the comprehensive effects of natural conditions, economic development, population, city size, transportation and other factors (Wang et al., 2021a; Yan et al., 2021a). According to previous studies on PM2.5 pollution, the driving factors are divided into natural and socioeconomic factors. Based on the principle of integrity and availability of panel data, six natural indicators (X1) were selected and 24 variables (Table 2) were collected from four socioeconomic perspectives (economy (X2), traffic (X3), population and city (X4), and pollutant emission (X5)). However, there are inevitably similarities and redundancies among various socioeconomic indicators that may affect the driving results. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the initially selected 24 variables into the subsequent indicator screening model to ensure that the socioeconomic indicators that eventually entered the PM2.5 pollution driving analysis model are representative and non-redundant.

      Table 2.  Indicators of potential influential factors of PM2.5 polution

      ThemeIndicatorsUnitDescriptionReference
      Natural (X1) Altitude (X11) m Indicates elevation changes in the study area Liu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Bei et al., 2020; Halim et al., 2020
      Normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI (X12) Represents vegetation coverage and intensity
      Precipitation (X13) mm Meteorology information
      Wind velocity (X14) m/s
      Air temperature (X15) °C
      Relative humidity (X16) %
      Economy (X2) The proportion of secondary industry (X21) % Indicates the intensity of industrial development Han et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2019; Du et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2021
      The proportion of tertiary industry (X22) % Indicates the intensity of service industry
      Per capita disposable income (X23) Yuan (RMB) Indicates the living standard of regional residents
      Gross domestic product, GDP (X24) 100 million yuan Reflects the level of economic development
      Number of industrial enterprise (X25) Count Reflects the development of industries above the designated size
      Foreign investment (X26) USD 10000 Reflects the ability to attract foreign investment
      Research and development internal outlay (X27) 10000 yuan Reflects the scientific and technological development level of the city
      Number of patent authorizations (X28) Piece
      Sown area (X29) 1000 ha Reflects the agricultural development intensity
      Floor space of buildings (X210) 10000 m2 Reflects the activity intensity of the construction industry by the floor space under construction
      Traffic (X3) Area of city paved roads (X31) 10000 m2 Reflects the total area of City Paved Roads Lu et al., 2017; Harrison et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021
      Public passenger transport (X32) 10000 person-times Reflects traffic activity with the total number of public transported passengers
      Highway passenger traffic (X33) 10000 persons Reflects traffic activity with the total number of transported passengers on highways
      Highway freight traffic (X34) 10000 t Reflects traffic activity with the weight of transported goods on highways
      Population and City (X4) Population (X41) 10000 persons Reflects the total regional population Han et al., 2014, 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020a; 2020b
      The proportion of urban population (X42) % Indicator of the population urbanization rate
      Population density (X43) Person/km2 Reflects the intensity of human activity
      Night light index, NLI (X44) Indicates the level of urbanization
      Build-up area (X45) km Reflects the process of urban expansion
      Area of green land (X46) ha Reflects the areas used for greening
      Electricity consumption (X47) 10000 kWh Reflects the total energy consumption of the city
      Liquefied petroleum gas supply (X48) t
      Pollutant emission (X5) Volume of industrial Sulphur dioxide emission (X51) t Indicates the pollutant emissions associated with PM2.5 pollution Lu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021a
      Volume of industrial soot (dust) emission (X52) t
      Notes: The natural (X1) indicators were provided by the Resources and Environmental Sciences and Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx). The NLI (X44) data are from the National Centers for Environmental Information in the United States with a spatial resolution of 500 m. Other statistical data were obtained from the China City Statistical Yearbook (https://navi.cnki.net/knavi/yearbooks/YZGCA/detail), the Beijing Statistical Yearbook (http://tjj.beijing.gov.cn/tjsj_31433/), the Tianjin Statistical Yearbook (https://stats.tj.gov.cn/tjsj_52032/tjnj/) and the Hebei Economic Yearbook (http://www.hetj.gov.cn/hetj/tjsj/jjnj/)

      The combination of the systematic cluster analysis method and the random forest recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE) algorithm supports the screening of important and representative factors were adopted in this study (Li et al., 2021). First, the systematic cluster analysis method was used to group and classify 24 socioeconomic factors according to their distance or similarity to ensure that indicators in the same cluster remain similar and that there are great differences between indicators in different clusters. Then, a sequential backward selection algorithm based on the random forest and the principle of the maximum interval, namely random forest recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE), was used to rank the importance of each index. Finally, the results of the above two steps were combined to select the most representative socioeconomic indicators in each different cluster category.

    • Based on the indicator screening results, stepwise regression models were established to explore the response of PM2.5 pollution to natural and socioeconomic factors. Stepwise regression is an effective method for identifying indicators that have a significant impact on dependent variables and is widely used in multiple quantitative regression analysis (Li et al., 2020a; Zhu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021b). In this research, PM2.5 concentration values at each monitoring station were used as response variables, various natural and socioeconomic indicators of the cities where the stations are located were used as response variables. The optimal model was selected based on the goodness of fit (R2), and the probability of factor selection in the model was set to 0.05. Thereafter, standardized coefficients were used to compare the direction and magnitude of the interaction between the selected indicators and PM2.5 pollution, and the differences and contribution intensity of the key driving factors in each city within the BTH Region were evaluated. The greater the absolute value of the factor standardization coefficient in the model, the greater the relative contribution of the factor to pollution.

    • It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the PM2.5 concentrations in the 13 cities in the BTH Region present a spatial pattern of high concentrations in the southwest and low concentrations in the north. The air quality of Zhangjiakou and Chengde was good, and the two cities reached the lowest PM2.5 pollution level (P-Ⅰ) in 2017 and 2018. The cities with the highest pollution level (P-Ⅲ) were mainly distributed in Baoding, Shijiazhuang, Hengshui, Xingtai, and Handan in the southwest. In addition, the difference in air pollution between the north and south weakened, and the range of high concentration pollution in the whole region gradually contracted to the southwest. Furthermore, we found that the PM2.5 concentration in the BTH Region showed a declining trend from 2014 (94.24 μg/m3, P-Ⅲ) to 2018 (54.94 μg/m3, P-Ⅱ) (Fig. 2). Additionally, all the cities in the BTH Region with P-Ⅲ levels were transformed to lower P-Ⅱ level (2014–2018). Moreover, Baoding had the largest decrease (48.17%), followed by Xingtai (47.08%), Langfang (46.62%), and Shijiazhuang (44.27%), while Hengshui (42.41%), Chengde (41.76%), Beijing (41.48%), Tangshan (40.46%), Tianjin (40.00%), Handan (39.23%), Cangzhou (34.26%), Qinhuangdao (33.87%), and Zhangjiakou had the lowest decrease (10.53%).

      Figure 2.  PM2.5 pollution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018. BJ: Beijing. TJ: Tianjin. SJZ: Shijiazhuang. TS: Tangshan. QHD: Qinhuangdao. HD: Handan. XT: Xingtai. BD: Baoding. ZJK: Zhangjiakou. CD: Chengde. CZ: Cangzhou. LF: Langfang. HS: Hengshui. P-Ⅰ, P-Ⅱ and P-Ⅲ: PM2.5 pollution levels

    • The results of cluster analysis showed that when the distance of classification was defined as seven, we obtained six groups of indicators with the same number as the natural indicators (Fig. 3). Table 3 showed the results of the RF-RFE method for ranking the indicators. Combined with the above analysis, the six indicators belonging to different clustering categories and ranking the highest in this category were selected, that is, the proportion of secondary industry (X21), the proportion of tertiary industry (X22), sown area (X29), highway passenger traffic (X33), population density (X43), and volume of industrial soot (dust) emission (X52) were selected as representative indicators to discuss the impact of socioeconomic factors on PM2.5 pollution.

      Figure 3.  The systematic clustering result of socioeconomic indicators in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018. The horizontal axis is the classified distance of cluster analysis. All the indicators were processed by deviation standardization

      Table 3.  The ranking results of socioeconomic indicators using the RF-RFE method in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018

      IndicatorsRankIndicatorsRankIndicatorsRank
      X211X2109X4117
      X432X3410X2418
      X253X2811X4619
      X334X2312X4520
      X475X2713X3121
      X446X2614X5122
      X297X5215X4223
      X228X4816X3224

      The stepwise regression results showed that the annual average PM2.5 concentrations were significantly correlated with the natural and socioeconomic indicators for the whole BTH Region and each city (P < 0.05, except for Zhangjiakou) (Table 4). However, there were significant differences in the main factors affecting PM2.5 pollution in different cities. For the BTH Region, the proportion of tertiary industry (X22) was the most important negative driving factor, while population density (X43) was the most important positive driving factor. The proportion of secondary industry (X21) was the second most negative important factor. Moreover, precipitation (X13) was the least important factor, and the effects of the NDVI (X12) and volume of industrial soot (dust) emission (X52) were not important. For individual cities, population density (X43) was the most important (negative) affecting factor in Tangshan, Xingtai, Baoding and Cangzhou. The proportion of secondary industry (X21) was the most important (positive) factor in Qinhuangdao and Handan, and the influence direction of these two indicators on each city was opposite to that of the whole region. Sown area (X29) and highway passenger traffic (X33) were the key (positive) driving factors for Beijing and Langfang, respectively. Volume of industrial soot (dust) emission (X52) was the key (positive) factor in Tianjin and Chengde. The proportion of tertiary industry (X22) was the most important (negative) factor in Hengshui. NDVI (X12) was the key factor in Shijiazhuang, which had a negative effect. In contrast, the NDVI (X12) positively affected PM2.5 pollution in Cangzhou, although it was not the most important factor.

      Table 4.  The stepwise multiple regression models for PM2.5 pollution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2014 to 2018 based on multiple natural and socioeconomic factors

      CityStandardization CoefficientR2
      X11X12X13X14X15X16X21X22X29X33X43X52
      BTH−0.253**−0.082**−0.384**−0.363**−0.394**−1.683**−3.473**0.365**0.581**1.839**0.839
      BJ0.130**0.847**0.849
      TJ0.280**0.719**0.834
      SJZ−1.068**−0.348*0.722
      TS−0.493**−0.522**0.956
      QHD0.850**0.722
      HD0.534**−0.483**0.933
      XT−0.346**−1.211**0.951
      BD−0.459**−0.531**0.947
      ZJK
      CD0.911**0.829
      CZ0.859**−1.672**0.915
      LF−0.129**0.940**0.976
      HS−0.775**0.285**0.983
      Notes: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. BJ: Beijing. TJ: Tianjin. SJZ: Shijiazhuang. TS: Tangshan. QHD: Qinhuangdao. HD: Handan. XT: Xingtai. BD: Baoding. ZJK: Zhangjiakou. CD: Chengde. CZ: Cangzhou. LF: Langfang. HS: Hengshui
    • This study discussed the relationship between the natural and socioeconomic factors and the annual average PM2.5 concentrations in the BTH Region, indicating that PM2.5 pollution is affected by multiple factors (Table 4). In the whole BTH Region, the proportion of tertiary industry (X22) had the most important negative driving effect on PM2.5 pollution. The tertiary industry mainly involves industries such as scientific research, information, services industry, and public facility management, which have no direct relationship with the source emissions of air pollution. Furthermore, as tertiary industry development, the adoption of advanced science and technology to improve the specialization level of industrial and agricultural production has become an effective means to alleviate PM2.5 pollution (Zhang et al., 2020b). Population density (X43) was the most important positive driver. With the rapid development of urbanization, the continuous agglomeration of the urban population will inevitably lead to more intensive production and daily living needs (Liu et al., 2020). For example, the increase in production and daily living activities such as transportation and urban construction, will be accompanied by indirect energy consumption and air pollutant emissions (Lou et al., 2016). In our study, this is also demonstrated by the positive driving relationship between the traffic (X3) indicators and PM2.5 pollution. In addition to socioeconomic indicators, the impact of natural conditions on regional PM2.5 pollution is also important. For example, the topography in the BTH Region is high in the north and low in the south, while the distribution of PM2.5 pollution is low in the north and high in the south. To some extent, the negative effect of altitude on PM2.5 pollution may be due to the high mountains in the north blocking the air pollutants from the south (Wang et al., 2019).

      Further investigation at the city scale revealed that there are substantial differences in the key drivers of PM2.5 pollution in different cities. This may be because the cities have different natural conditions and socioeconomic development levels. For example, in Beijing and Tianjin, the economic development level is far more advanced than in other cities in the BTH Region, but the urban economic structure of these cities is completely opposite. Beijing completed the industrial transformation earlier (Tian et al., 2010). However, Tianjin is a traditional industrial city with the secondary industry accounting for more than 40% of its industrial structure. Pollutant emission (X5) has a great impact on the urban environment.

      Similarly, although Qinhuangdao and Chengde are both new industrial cities, their key drivers are different. In Qinhuangdao, the four pillar industries are equipment manufacturing, food processing, glass production and metal smelting (Qinhuangdao Municipal People’s Government, 2019). Equipment manufacturing and metal smelting, which have a high energy consumption, take up a prominent proportion of these industries. Therefore, these energy-intensive industrial activities have a significant impact on the PM2.5 pollution in Qinhuangdao. In Chengde, where the industrial energy consumption is also great, the key contributor to air pollution is volume of industrial soot (dust) emission (X52), not the secondary industry. According to the Statistical Bulletin of Chengde in 2018 (Chengde Municipal People’s Government, 2019), iron ore mining and ferrous metal smelting and rolling industry, accounted for 47.5% of the industries above the designated size of the city. In the iron ore mining industry, each production process creates a large amount of air particulate matter, such as the dust emission by the transport of mineral raw materials and ore crushing and sieving classification. This will increase the environmental pressure in Chengde. Therefore, the government needs to pay attention to the targeted industrial adjustment to improve PM2.5 pollution, such as the reasonable planning and protection of mineral resources in Chengde and strengthening the supervision and management of the iron ore mining and dressing industry.

      In Shijiazhuang, NDVI (X12), which can represent vegetation coverage, has a significant positive effect on air quality. This relationship between urban greening and air pollution has been confirmed in other national and regional studies (Xu et al., 2019; 2020a). Shijiazhuang is the second city in the BTH Region to win the title of National Forest City (Hebei Forestry, 2015). This means that the city has a strict supervision system for urban forest construction, under which the urban green vegetation area continuously increases. Vegetation can not only fix the soil, thus reducing the generation of PM2.5, but also capture, retain and filter part of the dust pollution, so that the particulate matter in the air will stay in the vegetation zone (Wang et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020a). This means that urban greening will eventually ease the air pollution pressure, therefore, in other cities, governments should encourage attention to the concept of the Ecological City or the Garden City.

    • The regression results showed that, when exploring the relationship between various factors and PM2.5 pollution from the perspective of the BTH Region and individual city, the results were notably different in the significance or impact direction of factors. Moreover, such differences may be caused by different research scales (Wang et al., 2021b; Xu et al., 2022). Taking urban agglomerations as a whole may weaken the influence of the unique characteristics of individual cities on pollution, as well as highlight the comprehensive characteristics of the impact on air pollution in the whole region.

      For example, as mentioned above, due to the unique industrial characteristics of Tianjin and Chengde, soot emission has become the main driving factor impacting pollution in those cities, which is different from that of the BTH Region. In addition, although the highway passenger volume (X33) was not significant in many cities, it can not be denied that X33 is a significant factor affecting PM2.5 pollution in the BTH Region. In some cities, traffic (X3) factors were relatively unimportant due to strong traffic control policies. Furthermore, the transformation of the industrial structure and the closure of heavily polluting enterprises in the BTH Region in recent years may help to explain the negative driving effect of the proportion of secondary industry (X21) on BTH pollution, whereas it was positive in a few cities experiencing rapid development in high energy consuming industries (such as Qinhuangdao and Handan). Similarly, population density (X43) had a negative effect on pollution in Tangshan, Handan, Xingtai, Baoding and Cangzhou, in contrary to the BTH Region as a whole. Therefore, should we revisit the specific impact of human activities on pollution? In fact, a highly concentrated population will not only bring greater daily living needs and emissions, but will also improve the urban environment in anyways, such as the provision of central heating and centralized disposal of waste (Stone, 2008; Shen et al., 2017).

    • Although the above analysis shows that both the natural and socioeconomic indicators have substantial influence on urban pollution, previous studies found that the regional transmission caused by natural factors such as topography and meteorological conditions is also an important factor affecting the spatial pattern of PM2.5 pollution in the BTH Region (Zhang et al., 2018). In addition, meteorological conditions have made little contribution to the improvement of annual average air pollution as there has been little change in recent years (Fan et al., 2020). Combining the above conclusions with the fact that air quality in the BTH Region improved significantly from 2014 to 2018, we have to ask whether the air quality improvement is ultimately caused by socioeconomic development. However, we found that the declining levels of PM2.5 concentration were similar among some cities with deeply varied situations of socioeconomic development. For example, Beijing, which has the highest proportion of tertiary industry (more than 75%), has a similar decreasing degree in PM2.5 pollution (41.48%) with Tangshan (40.46%), and Tangshan has a lower proportion of tertiary industry (less than 40%). It is likely that the strict clean air policies and emission restriction measures in recent years have significantly mitigated the air pollution in the BTH Region. This view has been validated in other studies (Cai et al., 2017). Environmental policies can reduce PM2.5 emissions through industrial governance, technological innovation, vehicle emissions control, and other means. For example, policy restrictions on high energy consuming industries indirectly increased the proportion of tertiary industry in the BTH Region, resulting in regional pollution reduction. The negative correlation between the proportion of tertiary industry (X22) and pollution in our study also proves this finding. Furthermore, Xiao et al. (2020) have confirmed that clean air policies can modify the relationship between the air pollution and economic growth (i.e., improve air quality without affecting the level of economic development). If stricter emission restriction policies were adopted, PM2.5 pollution will be further remitted in the future (Li et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2020). Moreover, although the implementation of policies provides a possible way to effectively alleviate air pollution, the annual average PM2.5 concentration in the BTH Region (P-Ⅱ) is still higher than the Chinese environmental quality class Ⅱ standard. The PM2.5 pollution situation is still a major problem, thus stronger pollution control measures are further needed and the formulation of specific measures should also be concerned.

    • This study constructed a unique index system for PM2.5 pollution impact factor analysis, distinguishing it from other studies. Other research has directly determined the potential driving factors of PM2.5 on the basis of previous similar studies (Lu et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2021), which may be difficult to avoid the redundancy of factors. Whereas this study further screening of potential influencing factors meant that the indicators that finally entered the driving analysis model were more representative. This attempt can provide more abundant and reliable information for understanding the factors influencing PM2.5 pollution. Moreover, this study points out that, due to differences in natural and socioeconomic conditions of the study region, each city has its dominant factors affecting PM2.5 pollution. Most of the previous relevant studies on the whole region have ignored the refining difference characteristics driving PM2.5 pollution within the region, bringing uncertainty to the formulation of further control measures. Our emphasis on such regional heterogeneity can provide a reference for deeper understanding of the driving differences of air pollution. At the same time, based on such differences in driving factors, the different regions should be taken into account when setting expected PM2.5 targets. For example, the current targets for air pollution regulation in the BTH Region may be difficult to meet for cities in the Hebei Province. Strict regulations in the region have forced Hebei Province to restrict pillar industries (such as the steel and coal industries) in order to achieve the required PM2.5 limit at the cost of slower GDP growth (Xu et al., 2020a). In future studies, specific discussions on urban pollution within the region should be strengthened so as to aid the government to propose targeted measures for regional air pollution control. It should also be noted that policies based on measures such as industrial restructuring may result in huge economic and social costs in the long run, such as unemployment (Wang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019). In the future, measures such as strengthening urban infrastructure construction, promoting technological innovation and clean energy may be important means to ensure the sustainability of air pollution control.

      There are still some limitations to this study. Firstly, the spatial distribution of PM2.5 monitoring stations is relatively concentrated, to a certain extent, which can not accurately reflect the pollution status of the whole city. This may affect the accuracy of subsequent evaluation results. Secondly, as this study focuses on the discussion of pollution differences within an urban agglomeration, we failed to further enrich the spatial correlation research due to the limitation of the number and space interval of cities within a single urban agglomeration. Third, although reliable results of the pollution driving analysis can be obtained (Table 4, R2 > 0.7), the accuracy of the model fit may still be limited by the amount of data for a short time span. In future studies, using data with wider spatial coverage and longer time series could help us obtain a higher simulation accuracy, as well as the richer pollution characteristics of PM2.5 and the heterogeneity characteristics of the driving factors. Moreover, it must be pointed out that some relevant studies in the northern China support the significant effect of the heating in winter on the PM2.5 pollution level, but this is not considered in this study due to limited statistical data acquisition (Wen et al., 2018). Although we selected representative natural and socioeconomic indicators for driving analysis, the complex coupling relationships among the meteorological conditions, urbanization, industrialization, economic development, and air pollution are not included in this study. A deeper understanding of these coupling relationships would be of great significance to the formulation of pollution prevention and control policies.

    • Based on the PM2.5 monitoring stations data and natural and socioeconomic indicators, this study analyzed the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of PM2.5 pollution in the BTH Region, China from 2014 to 2018. Furthermore, we explored the potential heterogeneity of PM2.5 pollution drivers within the study area from the perspective of urban spatial differences. The main conclusions are as follows:

      (1) From 2014 to 2018, PM2.5 pollution in the BTH Region showed a spatial distribution pattern of low in the north and high in the south, and the air quality for all cities had an obvious improvement.

      (2) The key driving factors of PM2.5 pollution varied in different study cities. In the BTH Region, economy (X2) is the most important driver of pollution. In terms of specific cities, natural (X1) and traffic (X3) were the key driving factors of PM2.5 pollution in Shijiazhuang and Langfang, respectively. Economy (X2) was the most important driver for Beijing, Qinhuangdao, Handan and Hengshui. Tangshan, Xingtai, Baoding and Cangzhou were most affected by population and city (X4). The most important influencing factor for Tianjin and Chengde was pollutant emission (X5).

      (3) Cities with large differences in socioeconomic development had a similar decline degree of PM2.5 pollution during the policy implementation period. Environmental policies have contributed to improving the pollution situation in the BTH Region.

      The significance of this study is to emphasize the driving heterogeneity of imbalanced background conditions on PM2.5 pollution by focusing on cities within urban agglomeration. At the same time, identifying the differences arising from the unique characteristics of different cities can facilitate the development of more targeted policies to further control air pollution in the region.

参考文献 (63)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回