留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China

Bo CAO Xiaole KONG Yixuan WANG Hang LIU Hongwei PEI Yan-Jun SHEN

CAO Bo, KONG Xiaole, WANG Yixuan, LIU Hang, PEI Hongwei, SHEN Yan-Jun, 2021. Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(3): 491−505 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8
Citation: CAO Bo, KONG Xiaole, WANG Yixuan, LIU Hang, PEI Hongwei, SHEN Yan-Jun, 2021. Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(3): 491−505 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8

doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8

Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41807177, 41701017), the Pioneer ‘Hundred Talents Program’ of Chinese Academy of Sciences
More Information
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
  • Figure  1.  Location of the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region (BTSSR) in China. Overview of the available data: (a) subregions (I: Water conservation regions in the Bashang Plateau and hilly regions of the northern China; II: The Hunshandak-Horqin sandy land region; III: Grassland degradation region in the Xilingol Plateau and Wuzhumuqin Basin; IV: Desert steppe degradation region in the Ulanqab Plateau; V: Sandy land region in the Ordos Plateau), elevation, and location of meteorological stations; (b) vegetation types

    Figure  2.  The spatial distribution (a) and trends (b) of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) in the growing season in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  3.  Inter-annual variation of NDVI anomalies (a) and SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index) (b) in the growing season from 2000 to 2017 in the BTSSR

    Figure  4.  Spatial distribution of Rmax (maximum correlation coefficient in the growing season between NDVI and SPEI) (a) and Tmax (corresponding time-scale of SPEI) (b) in the BTSSR during 2000–2017 (Rmax > 0.4683 indicates significant positive (P < 0.05), Rmax > 0.5897 indicates extremely significant positive (P < 0.01), Rmax > 0.7084 indicates positive correlation at the significance level of 0.001)

    Figure  5.  The proportions of pixels with positive monthly Rmax at different significance levels in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  6.  Mean value of monthly Rmax in the area with significant positive monthly Rmax in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  7.  Spatial distribution of monthly Rmax in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  8.  The proportions of pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  9.  Area-averaged Rmax in five subregions of BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  10.  The proportions of pixels with positive Rmax at different significance levels in five subregions during 2000–2017

    Figure  11.  The proportions of pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months of subregion I (a), subregion II (b), subregion III (c), subregion IV (d), and subregion V (e) during 2000–2017

    Figure  12.  Area-averaged Rmax for different vegetation types in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  13.  The proportions of pixels with positive Rmax at different significance levels in different vegetation types in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Figure  14.  The proportions of pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months of grassland (a), shrubland (b), forest (c), and cultivated vegetation (d) in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    Table  1.   Annual mean temperature and mean annual precipitation during 2000–2017 in five subregions of Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China

    Climatic conditionIIIIIIIVV
    Temperature / ℃8.385.932.645.28.55
    Precipitation / mm436.36340.34240.07218.77365.86
    Note: Regions I−V see Fig. 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   The proportions of pixels with different trends in different regions of BTSSR during 2000–2017 / %

    TrendBTSSRIIIIIIIVV
    Insignificant decrease 10.59 3.59 17.66 10.41 19.57 2.97
    Significant decrease 1.22 1.79 2.36 0.60 0.68 0.82
    Decrease 11.81 5.38 20.01 11.02 20.26 3.79
    Insignificant increase 39.88 13.73 40.14 67.79 64.30 19.46
    Significant increase 48.30 80.89 39.84 21.20 15.44 76.75
    Increase 88.19 94.62 79.99 88.98 79.74 96.21
    Notes: Regions I–V see Fig. 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   The proportions of pixels with different trends for different vegetation types in the BTSSR during 2000–2017 / %

    TrendGrasslandShrublandForestCultivated vegetation
    Insignificant decrease 11.89 9.38 8.67 8.11
    Significant decrease 0.83 1.39 1.86 2.20
    Decrease 12.72 10.77 10.53 10.31
    Insignificant increase 49.24 23.07 26.62 21.42
    Significant increase 38.04 66.16 62.85 68.27
    Increase 87.28 89.23 89.47 89.69
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D et al., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome: FAO.
    [2] An C C, Fan J R, Zhang Y F et al., 2018. Characterizing the responses of vegetation to climate change in the Tibet Plateau using remote sensing data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 12(1): 016035. doi:  10.1117/1.JRS.12.016035
    [3] Berdugo M, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Soliveres S et al., 2020. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science, 367(6479): 787–790. doi:  10.1126/science.aay5958
    [4] Bunting E L, Munson S M, Villarreal M L, 2017. Climate legacy and lag effects on dryland plant communities in the southwestern U.S. Ecological Indicators, 74: 216–229. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.024
    [5] Chen C, He B, Guo L L et al., 2018. Identifying critical climate periods for vegetation growth in the Northern Hemisphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 123(8): 2541–2552. doi:  10.1029/2018jg004443
    [6] Chen H P, Sun J Q, 2015. Changes in drought characteristics over China using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of Climate, 28(13): 5430–5447. doi:  10.1175/jcli-d-14-00707.1
    [7] Craine J M, Ocheltree T W, Nippert J B et al., 2013. Global diversity of drought tolerance and grassland climate-change resilience. Nature Climate Change, 3(1): 63–67. doi:  10.1038/NCLIMATE1634
    [8] Ding Y X, Li Z, Peng S Z, 2020. Global analysis of time-lag and-accumulation effects of climate on vegetation growth. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 92: 102179. doi:  10.1016/j.jag.2020.102179
    [9] Doughty C E, Metcalfe D B, Girardin C A J et al., 2015. Drought impact on forest carbon dynamics and fluxes in Amazonia. Nature, 519(7541): 78–82. doi:  10.1038/nature14213
    [10] Feng X M, Fu B J, Piao S L et al., 2016. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6(11): 1019–1022. doi:  10.1038/nclimate3092
    [11] Gouveia C M, Trigo R M, Beguería S et al., 2017. Drought impacts on vegetation activity in the Mediterranean region: an assessment using remote sensing data and multi-scale drought indicators. Global and Planetary Change, 151: 15–27. doi:  10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.06.011
    [12] Guo J T, Hu Y M, Xiong Z P et al., 2017a. Spatiotemporal variations of growing-season NDVI associated with climate change in northeastern China’s permafrost zone. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(4): 1521–1529. doi:  10.15244/pjoes/68874
    [13] Guo L, Cheng J M, Luedeling E et al., 2017b. Critical climate periods for grassland productivity on China’s Loess Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 233: 101–109. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.006
    [14] Holben B N, 1986. Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7(11): 1417–1434. doi:  10.1080/01431168608948945
    [15] Hua T, Wang X M, Zhang C X et al., 2017. Responses of vegetation activity to drought in northern China. Land Degradation & Development, 28(7): 1913–1921. doi:  10.1002/ldr.2709
    [16] Huang J L, Zhai J Q, Jiang T et al., 2018. Analysis of future drought characteristics in China using the regional climate model CCLM. Climate Dynamics, 50(1−2): 507–525. doi:  10.1007/s00382-017-3623-z
    [17] Huang J P, Yu H P, Guan X D et al., 2016a. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(2): 166–171. doi:  10.1038/nclimate2837
    [18] Huang L, He B, Chen A F et al., 2016b. Drought dominates the interannual variability in global terrestrial net primary production by controlling semi-arid ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 6: 24639. doi:  10.1038/srep24639
    [19] Li Xiaosong, Wang Hongyan, Zhou Shufang et al., 2016. Did ecological engineering projects have a significant effect on large-scale vegetation restoration in Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region, China? A remote sensing approach. Chinese Geographical Science, 26(2): 216–228. doi:  10.1007/s11769-016-0801-6
    [20] Liu X F, Zhu X F, Zhang Q et al., 2020. A remote sensing and artificial neural network-based integrated agricultural drought index: index development and applications. Catena, 186: 104394. doi:  10.1016/j.catena.2019.104394
    [21] Liu Y L, Lei H M, 2015. Responses of natural vegetation dynamics to climate drivers in China from 1982 to 2011. Remote Sensing, 7(8): 10243–10268. doi:  10.3390/rs70810243
    [22] Liu Y L, Kumar M, Katul G G et al., 2019. Reduced resilience as an early warning signal of forest mortality. Nature Climate Change, 9(11): 880–885. doi:  10.1038/s41558-019-0583-9
    [23] Liu Z P, Wang Y Q, Shao M G et al., 2016. Spatiotemporal analysis of multiscalar drought characteristics across the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology, 534: 281–299. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.003
    [24] Ma Zhiting, Wu Zhitao, Wei Jie, 2018. Spatial and temporal variations of droughts over the Beijing-Tianjin sand source region and their effects on vegetation change. Mountain Research, 36(4): 536–546. (in Chinese)
    [25] Mohammat A, Wang X H, Xu X T et al., 2013. Drought and spring cooling induced recent decrease in vegetation growth in Inner Asia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 178−179: 21–30. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.014
    [26] Pang G J, Wang X J, Yang M X, 2017. Using the NDVI to identify variations in, and responses of, vegetation to climate change on the Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2012. Quaternary International, 444: 87–96. doi:  10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.038
    [27] Piao S L, Fang J Y, Zhou L M et al., 2003. Interannual variations of monthly and seasonal normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in China from 1982 to 1999. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D14): 4401. doi:  10.1029/2002jd002848
    [28] Piao S L, Wang X H, Ciais P et al., 2011. Changes in satellite-derived vegetation growth trend in temperate and boreal Eurasia from 1982 to 2006. Global Change Biology, 17(10): 3228–3239. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02419.x
    [29] Piao S L, Wang X H, Park T et al., 2020. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1: 14–27. doi:  10.1038/s43017-019-0001-x
    [30] Schwalm C R, Anderegg W R L, Michalak A M et al., 2017. Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature, 548(7666): 202–205. doi:  10.1038/nature23021
    [31] Shan Lishan, Yu Xiang, Sun Lingxiao et al., 2018. Seasonal differences in climatic controls of vegetation growth in the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region of China. Journal of Arid Land, 10(6): 850–863. doi:  10.1007/s40333-018-0075-1
    [32] Shan N, Shi Z J, Yang X H et al., 2015. Spatiotemporal trends of reference evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project Region, China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200: 322–333. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.008
    [33] Shao D G, Chen S, Tan X Z et al., 2018. Drought characteristics over China during 1980-2015. International Journal of Climatology, 38(9): 3532–3545. doi:  10.1002/joc.5515
    [34] Su B D, Huang J L, Fischer T et al., 2018. Drought losses in China might double between the 1.5℃ and 2.0℃ warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(42): 10600–10605. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1802129115
    [35] The Study Team of the Second Stage of the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project, 2013. The Planning Thoughts on the Second Stage of the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 139. (in Chinese)
    [36] Trenberth K E, Dai A, van der Schrier G et al., 2014. Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Climate Change, 4(1): 17–22. doi:  10.1038/nclimate2067
    [37] Vicente-Serrano S M, Beguería S, López-Moreno J I, 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of Climate, 23(7): 1696–1718. doi:  10.1175/2009jcli2909.1
    [38] Vicente-Serrano S M, Gouveia C, Camarero J J et al., 2013. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(1): 52–57. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1207068110
    [39] Wu C Y, Hou X H, Peng D L et al., 2016. Land surface phenology of China’s temperate ecosystems over 1999-2013: spatial-temporal patterns, interaction effects, covariation with climate and implications for productivity. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 216: 177–187. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.10.015
    [40] Wu X C, Liu H Y, Li X Y et al., 2018. Differentiating drought legacy effects on vegetation growth over the temperate Northern Hemisphere. Global Change Biology, 24(1): 504–516. doi:  10.1111/gcb.13920
    [41] Wu Z T, Wu J J, He B et al., 2014. Drought offset ecological restoration program-induced increase in vegetation activity in the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region, China. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(20): 12108–12117. doi:  10.1021/es502408n
    [42] Xu H J, Wang X P, Zhang X X, 2016. Decreased vegetation growth in response to summer drought in Central Asia from 2000 to 2012. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 52: 390–402. doi:  10.1016/j.jag.2016.07.010
    [43] Xu H J, Wang X P, Zhao C Y et al., 2018. Diverse responses of vegetation growth to meteorological drought across climate zones and land biomes in northern China from 1981 to 2014. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 262: 1–13. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.027
    [44] Yuan X, Wang L Y, Wu P L et al., 2019. Anthropogenic shift towards higher risk of flash drought over China. Nature Communications, 10(1): 4661. doi:  10.1038/s41467-019-12692-7
    [45] Zhang M M, Wu X Q, 2020. The rebound effects of recent vegetation restoration projects in Mu Us Sandy land of China. Ecological Indicators, 113: 106228. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106228
    [46] Zhang Q, Kong D D, Singh V P et al., 2017. Response of vegetation to different time-scales drought across China: spatiotemporal patterns, causes and implications. Global and Planetary Change, 152: 1–11. doi:  10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.02.008
    [47] Zhang X Y, Zhang B Q, 2019. The responses of natural vegetation dynamics to drought during the growing season across China. Journal of Hydrology, 574: 706–714. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.084
    [48] Zhao A Z, Zhang A B, Cao S et al., 2018a. Responses of vegetation productivity to multi-scale drought in Loess Plateau, China. CATENA, 163: 165–171. doi:  10.1016/j.catena.2017.12.016
    [49] Zhao A Z, Yu Q Y, Feng L L et al., 2020. Evaluating the cumulative and time-lag effects of drought on grassland vegetation: a case study in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 261: 110214. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110214
    [50] Zhao Jing, Yan Denghua, Yang Zhiyong et al., 2015. Improvement and adaptability evaluation of standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Acta Physica Sinica, 64(4): 049202. (in Chinese)
    [51] Zhao L, Dai A G, Dong B, 2018b. Changes in global vegetation activity and its driving factors during 1982−2013. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 249: 198–209. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.013
    [52] Zhou Q W, Luo Y, Zhou X et al., 2018. Response of vegetation to water balance conditions at different time scales across the karst area of southwestern China: a remote sensing approach. Science of the Total Environment, 645: 460–470. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.148
  • [1] Kangwen ZHU, Yucheng CHEN, Sheng ZHANG, Zhimin YANG, Lei HUANG, Bo LEI, Hailing XIONG, Sheng WU, Xixi LI.  Risk Prevention and Control for Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Based on the Process of Pressure-Transformation-Absorption in Chongqing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(4): 735-750. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1221-9
    [2] Jinjian LI, Shu WANG, Ningsheng QIN, Xisheng LIU, Liya JIN.  Vegetation Index Reconstruction and Linkage with Drought for the Source Region of the Yangtze River Based on Tree-ring Data . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(4): 684-695. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1217-5
    [3] Xiaohui HE, Yipin YU, Zepeng CUI, Tian HE.  Climate Change and Ecological Projects Jointly Promote Vegetation Restoration in Three-River Source Region of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(6): 1108-1122. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1245-1
    [4] QU Lulu, HUANG Yunxin, YANG Lingfan, LI Yurui.  Vegetation Restoration in Response to Climatic and Anthropogenic Changes in the Loess Plateau, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(1): 89-100. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1093-4
    [5] WANG Liyan, ANNA Herzberger, ZHANG Liyun, XIAO Yi, WANG Yaqing, XIAO Yang, LIU Jianguo, OUYANG Zhiyun.  Spatial and Temporal Changes of Arable Land Driven by Urbanization and Ecological Restoration in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(5): 809-819. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0983-1
    [6] WANG Hao, LIU Guohua, LI Zongshan, YE Xin, FU Bojie, LV Yihe.  Impacts of Drought and Human Activity on Vegetation Growth in the Grain for Green Program Region, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(3): 470-481. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0952-8
    [7] JIA Yanqing, ZHANG Bo, MA Bin.  Daily SPEI Reveals Long-term Change in Drought Characteristics in Southwest China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(4): 680-693. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0973-3
    [8] MA Hongyuan, LI Jingpeng, YANG Fan, LÜ Xiaotao, PAN Yuepeng, LIANG Zhengwei.  Regenerative Role of Soil Seed Banks of Different Successional Stages in A Saline-alkaline Grassland in Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(4): 694-706. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0966-2
    [9] GONG Li, LIU Guohua, WANG Meng, YE Xin, WANG Hao, LI Zongshan.  Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Organic Carbon in China: A Meta-analysis . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(2): 188-200. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0858-x
    [10] LI Xianju, CHEN Gang, LIU Jingyi, CHEN Weitao, CHENG Xinwen, LIAO Yiwei.  Effects of RapidEye Imagery's Red-edge Band and Vegetation Indices on Land Cover Classification in an Arid Region . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(5): 827-835. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0894-6
    [11] ZHOU Jian, ZHANG Fengrong, XU Yan, GAO Yang, XIE Zhen.  Evaluation of Land Reclamation and Implications of Ecological Restoration for Agro-pastoral Ecotone:Case Study of Horqin Left Back Banner in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(5): 772-783. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0907-5
    [12] LI Xiaosong, WANG Hongyan, ZHOU Shufang, SUN Bin, GAO Zhihai.  Did Ecological Engineering Projects Have a Significant Effect on Large-scale Vegetation Restoration in Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region, China? A Remote Sensing Approach . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 216-228. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0801-6
    [13] RAO Enming, XIAO Yi, OUYANG Zhiyun, ZHENG Hua.  Changes in Ecosystem Service of Soil Conservation Between 2000 and 2010 and Its Driving Factors in Southwestern China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 165-173. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0759-9
    [14] SUN Binfeng, ZHAO Hong, WANG Xiaoke.  Effects of Drought on Net Primary Productivity: Roles of Temperature, Drought Intensity, and Duration . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 270-282. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0804-3
    [15] ZENG Xinhua, ZHANG Wanjun, LIU Xiuping, CAO Jiansheng, SHEN Huitao, ZHAO Xin, ZHANG Nannan, BAI Yuru, Yi Mei.  Change of Soil Organic Carbon after Cropland Afforestation in ‘Beijing- Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control’ Program Area in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(4): 461-470. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0701-6
    [16] WEN Bolong, LIU Xingtu, LI Xiujun, et al.  Restoration and Rational Use of Degraded Saline Reed Wetlands:A Case Study in Western Songnen Plain, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(2): 167-177.
    [17] CHEN Hongxia, LI Guoping.  Empirical Study on Effect of Industrial Structure Change on Regional Economic Growth of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(6): 708-714.
    [18] ZONG Yueguang, YANG Wei, MA Qiang, XUE Song.  Cassini Growth of Population Between Two Metropolitan Cities——A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin Region, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 203-210. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0203-0
    [19] WANG Liyan, LIU Yi, CHEN Tian.  Change of Ecological Footprint and Analysis of Ecological Sustainability——Taking Zhangjiakou City as an Example . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(1): 40-46. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0040-y
    [20] WANG Xu-gao, LI Xiu-zhen, HE Hong S, HU Yuan-man.  ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION:OUR HOPE FOR THE FUTURE? . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(4): 361-367.
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表ll (3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  80
  • HTML全文浏览量:  18
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-07-01
  • 录用日期:  2020-11-03
  • 刊出日期:  2021-05-05

Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41807177, 41701017), the Pioneer ‘Hundred Talents Program’ of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    通讯作者: SHEN Yan-Jun. E-mail: shenyanjun@sjziam.ac.cn

English Abstract

CAO Bo, KONG Xiaole, WANG Yixuan, LIU Hang, PEI Hongwei, SHEN Yan-Jun, 2021. Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(3): 491−505 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8
Citation: CAO Bo, KONG Xiaole, WANG Yixuan, LIU Hang, PEI Hongwei, SHEN Yan-Jun, 2021. Response of Vegetation Cover Change to Drought at Different Time-scales in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(3): 491−505 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1206-8
    • Droughts are among the most influential and complex disasters (Liu et al., 2020). Global warming can increase the intensity of droughts (Trenberth et al., 2014). Under the representative concentration pathways (RCPs) scenarios, dryland area is likely to continue to increase by 23% (RCP8.5) and 11% (RCP4.5) by 2100 compared to the baseline period (1961–1990) (Huang et al., 2016a). In China, areas affected by droughts increased from 1980 to 2015 (Shao et al., 2018), and drought frequency and intensity experienced an increasing tendency since the late 1990s (Chen and Sun, 2015). The magnitude and frequency of droughts are expected to increase in the future (Huang et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2019), leading to severe economic losses in China (Su et al., 2018).

      The impacts of droughts on the global terrestrial ecosystem increased in the 20th century. It was found that there will be more severe and frequent droughts in the 21st century and terrestrial ecosystems will need more time to recover (Schwalm et al., 2017). Vegetation ecosystems play a major role in the global water, energy, and carbon cycle (Guo et al., 2017a; Zhao et al., 2018b; Piao et al., 2020). However, droughts can lead to many negative effects on vegetation, such as reduced vegetation cover, decreased productivity, weakened carbon sink capacity, and increased mortality (Doughty et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016b; Xu et al., 2016), which may threaten the environment and the sustainable development of societies and economies. It is, therefore, of great importance to characterize the response of vegetation to droughts.

      A drought index is normally used as a quantitative indicator for monitoring and forecasting droughts. The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) is a statistical indicator that takes both the impacts of precipitation and evapotranspiration into account. It was found that SPEI is more appropriate for revealing the magnitude and frequency of drought than the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), which only relies on precipitation. SPEI has the advantage of being temporally scalable compared to the Palmer Drought Index (Huang et al., 2016b; Liu et al., 2016). SPEI has therefore been widely applied to characterize the sensitivity of vegetation to droughts. Vicente-Serrano et al. (2013) analyzed the relations between vegetation and droughts globally based on SPEI and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and found that the time-scales of droughts played important roles in determining the vulnerability of vegetation to droughts. Bunting et al. (2017) showed that different time-scales of climate impacts played important roles in assessing ecological droughts and predicting vulnerable vegetation communities in dryland plant communities of the United States Southwest under climate change scenarios. SPEI was also used to identify the main land cover types affected by drought in different regions (Gouveia et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2018). Zhang et al. (2017) found that the relations between SPEI and NDVI differed in different areas with diverse precipitation or water balance in China. Thus, the changes in vegetation activity and biomass were highly impacted by the change of water availability. Additionally, arid and semiarid regions were found more vulnerable to droughts in the northern China (Xu et al., 2018; Zhang and Zhang, 2019). As described previously, relations between vegetation and drought are impacted by the time-scales of drought, land cover types, and regional water availability. However, how the relations between vegetation and drought at different time-scales vary depending on the growth stage still need to be studied further.

      The Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project (BTSSCP) was initiated to address the problem of land desertification around the Beijing and Tianjin areas in China. Vegetation not only plays a key role in environmental protection, such as wind prevention, sand fixation, water and soil conservation, land degradation prevention; but is also the basis for the social and economic development in the BTSSR. Li et al. (2016) found that the accumulated NDVI in 59.30% of the BTSSR showed an increasing trend from 2000 to 2010. Shan et al. (2018) found that regional NDVI of BTSSR increased at the rate of 0.002/yr from 2000 to 2014. However, most areas of the BTSSR are characterized by arid and semiarid climate and have frequent drought disasters. Shan et al. (2015) found that both annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration in the BTSSR showed a downward trend from 1959 to 2011 (–13.4 mm/decade and –3.8 mm/decade, respectively), and a drier climate may limit regional vegetation restoration. Based on the relations of SPI and NDVI, Wu et al. (2014) found that although the ecological construction promoted the increase of vegetation cover from 2000 to 2010 in the BTSSR, drought had negative impacts on vegetation cover from southwest to northeast. A similar result showed that drought has seriously affected vegetation growth in the BTSSR, and drought events increased in the past 15 yr after the implementation of the BTSSCP (Ma et al., 2018). However, most previous studies were conducted in the region that was delimited during the first phase (2000–2010) of the project and covered 75 counties (Wu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2018; Shan et al., 2018). As the project advances, the extension of research to the whole BTSSR is particularly important. In addition, the Thornthwaite method was used to calculate potential evapotranspiration of SPEI in the BTSSR (Ma et al., 2018). When the potential evapotranspiration was calculated based on the Penman-Monteith method, SPEI could more accurately reflect drought change in the arid and semi-arid regions of China (Zhao et al., 2015). Additionally, existing studies on the relationship between vegetation and drought in the BTSSR were mainly focused on annual scales. There is still a lack of knowledge on the vegetation responses to drought at different time-scales and in different growth stages, subregions, and vegetation types.

      This study aims to analyze the relations between vegetation cover and drought conditions in the BTSSR after the implementation of the BTSSCP. The objectives are: 1) to estimate the spatio-temporal changes of vegetation cover (in terms of NDVI) from 2000 to 2017; 2) to characterize possible relationships between NDVI changes and drought at different time-scales and in different growth stages; 3) to obtain insights into which subregions, what vegetation types and when they are more susceptible to drought. This study is not only beneficial to the environmental protection of the BTSSR but is also helpful to understand the relationship between vegetation and drought.

    • According to the Plan of BTSSCP, the BTSSR was delimited to fight against sandstorms and improve the quality of the ecological environment of the Beijing-Tianjin areas in the north of China. The BTSSCP includes two phases: phase I, from 2000 to 2010 and which covered 75 counties; phase II, from 2013 to 2022, covering 138 counties across six provinces/municipalities/autonomous region (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, and Shaanxi), located between 36°48′N–46°46′N and 105°12′E–120°58′E, and divided into five subregions (Fig. 1a). The subregions were classified based on their physical geographical characteristics and the integrity of the administrative boundaries (The Study Team of the Second Stage of the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project, 2013).

      Figure 1.  Location of the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region (BTSSR) in China. Overview of the available data: (a) subregions (I: Water conservation regions in the Bashang Plateau and hilly regions of the northern China; II: The Hunshandak-Horqin sandy land region; III: Grassland degradation region in the Xilingol Plateau and Wuzhumuqin Basin; IV: Desert steppe degradation region in the Ulanqab Plateau; V: Sandy land region in the Ordos Plateau), elevation, and location of meteorological stations; (b) vegetation types

      The BTSSR is dominated by an arid and semiarid continental climate and elevations varying from –5 to 3054 m above sea level. The average annual temperature and precipitation in this region are 6.18℃ and 357 mm, respectively. Climate differs in different seasons, with the average summer (June to August) temperature reaching a high of 20.99℃, while the mean winter (December to February of next year) temperature is –10.32℃. About 65% of the average annual precipitation in this region occurs in summer (234.14 mm). Snow dominates the precipitation in winter and only accounts for 1.91% (6.83 mm) of the annual precipitation. Compared with two subregions (I, V) in the south, three subregions (II, III, IV) in the north of the BTSSR had a lower annual temperature and less precipitation (Table 1). The main vegetation types in the BTSSR are grassland and cultivated vegetation (58.58% and 23.43%, respectively) (Fig. 1b). Vegetation stops growing in winter due to low temperatures and many areas in the BTSSR are covered by snow or ice. Thus, only the growing season (April to October) in the BTSSR was analyzed in this study (Liu and Lei, 2015; Wu et al., 2016).

      Table 1.  Annual mean temperature and mean annual precipitation during 2000–2017 in five subregions of Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Region, China

      Climatic conditionIIIIIIIVV
      Temperature / ℃8.385.932.645.28.55
      Precipitation / mm436.36340.34240.07218.77365.86
      Note: Regions I−V see Fig. 1
    • Daily meteorological data from 75 stations covering the period of 1998–2017 in and around the BTSSR were downloaded from the China Meteorological Data Service Center (http://data.cma.cn/en), including precipitation, mean, maximum and minimum air temperature, relative humidity, sunshine duration, wind speed data (Fig. 1a).

      The NDVI data refer to MOD13Q1 in the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (http://ladsweb.nascom.nasa.gov/) data repositories, covers a time span of 18 yr (2000–2017), with a temporal resolution of 16-d and a spatial resolution of 250 m × 250 m. NDVI was combined at a monthly scale using the Maximum Value Composite (MVC) method (Holben, 1986). Growing-season NDVI in this study refers to the mean value of NDVI from April to October. However, only grid cells with NDVI above 0.1 during the growing season were defined as vegetated areas and were analyzed (Piao et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2017).

      The vegetation map was obtained from the 1∶1 000 000 Vegetation Atlas of China distributed from the Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn/). Grassland, forest, shrubland, and cultivated vegetation are the four major vegetation types in the BTSSR and were analyzed.

    • SPEI characterizes drought, including the roles of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET), objectively reflecting drought changes in the context of significant temperature changes (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2010). In SPEI, first the difference between precipitation and PET is calculated, and then the degree to which the difference deviates from the multi-year average state is used to indicate drought. A detailed description of the calculation procedure of SPEI can be found in the literature (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2010). Negative SPEI values indicate dryness and positive SPEI values indicate wetness. By using meteorological data, PET was calculated based on the FAO-Penman-Monteith method (Allen et al., 1998). The inverse distance weighted (IDW) method was used to perform the SPEI interpolation (Zhao et al., 2018a). The variation of growing-season NDVI was obtained by linear regression (An et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018).

      The relations between NDVI (pixel-based) and SPEI were explored using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. During the growing season, each pixel had seven NDVI series (from April to October); the correlation coefficients between each series and SPEI (time-scale of 1–24 mon) were calculated. Thus, each pixel had 168 (7 × 24) correlation coefficients. The maximum of correlation coefficients in the growing season was defined as Rmax and the corresponding time-scale of SPEI was defined as Tmax. The maximum of the correlation coefficients between monthly NDVI and SPEI (time-scale of 1–24 mon) was defined as monthly Rmax. Rmax can reflect the highest sensitivity degree of vegetation to the change of drought conditions (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2013).

    • The values of growing-season NDVI were higher in the southeast of the BTSSR. Higher values of NDVI were mainly distributed in the east of subregion I, middle of subregion II, east of subregion III, and north of subregion V (Fig. 2a). Vegetation cover in most areas of the BTSSR has increased in past decades (2000–2017). In the total vegetated area of the BTSSR, 88.19% of the pixels have experienced increased NDVI in the growing season, 48.3% of the pixels increased significantly (P < 0.05) and mainly took place in subregion I, subregion II, west and northeast of subregion III, west of subregion IV, and subregion V (Table 2, Fig. 2b). However, pixels in 11.81% of the total vegetated areas showed decreased NDVI in the growing season; these pixels were scattered and most of them decreased insignificantly. Approximately only 1.22% of the vegetated areas in the BTSSR experienced a significant decrease in NDVI (P < 0.05). The proportion of pixels with a significantly increased trend was the largest in subregion I, reaching 80.89%, followed by subregion V, II, III, and IV (Table 2). Although the proportion of pixels with increased trend showed little difference in different vegetation types, the proportion of pixels with significantly increased trend was more than 60% in shrubland, forest and cultivated vegetation, but only 38.04% in grassland (Table 3).

      Figure 2.  The spatial distribution (a) and trends (b) of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) in the growing season in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

      Table 2.  The proportions of pixels with different trends in different regions of BTSSR during 2000–2017 / %

      TrendBTSSRIIIIIIIVV
      Insignificant decrease 10.59 3.59 17.66 10.41 19.57 2.97
      Significant decrease 1.22 1.79 2.36 0.60 0.68 0.82
      Decrease 11.81 5.38 20.01 11.02 20.26 3.79
      Insignificant increase 39.88 13.73 40.14 67.79 64.30 19.46
      Significant increase 48.30 80.89 39.84 21.20 15.44 76.75
      Increase 88.19 94.62 79.99 88.98 79.74 96.21
      Notes: Regions I–V see Fig. 1

      Table 3.  The proportions of pixels with different trends for different vegetation types in the BTSSR during 2000–2017 / %

      TrendGrasslandShrublandForestCultivated vegetation
      Insignificant decrease 11.89 9.38 8.67 8.11
      Significant decrease 0.83 1.39 1.86 2.20
      Decrease 12.72 10.77 10.53 10.31
      Insignificant increase 49.24 23.07 26.62 21.42
      Significant increase 38.04 66.16 62.85 68.27
      Increase 87.28 89.23 89.47 89.69

      Fig. 3 shows NDVI anomalies and SPEI in the growing season from 2000 to 2017 in the BTSSR. SPEI in the growing season was represented by SPEI-7 in October, which was equivalent to the total water deficit degree from April to October. NDVI anomalies in the growing season in the BTSSR increased significantly (0.003/yr, P < 0.01) from 2000 to 2017 (Fig. 3a). SPEI in the growing season also increased since 2000, with an increasing trend of 0.03/yr (Fig. 3b). The correlation coefficient between NDVI anomalies and SPEI in the growing season was 0.685 (P < 0.01). The NDVI anomalies were relatively higher in 2003, 2008, 2012, and 2016, which was generally consistent with SPEI change dynamics. Meanwhile, the same held true for the lower NDVI anomalies and SPEI in 2001, 2009, and 2015. From 2005 to 2007, NDVI anomalies decreased continuously and corresponded to continuous negative values of SPEI. In general, the negative SPEI anomalies were consistent with the corresponding negative NDVI anomalies during 2000–2017, except for 2015 and 2017 when the NDVI anomalies were positive but also relatively lower than that in adjacent years.

      Figure 3.  Inter-annual variation of NDVI anomalies (a) and SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index) (b) in the growing season from 2000 to 2017 in the BTSSR

      The average Rmax of the whole vegetated areas was 0.746 and pixels with positive Rmax accounted for 99.99% of the vegetated areas (Fig. 4a). Pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) Rmax accounted for 97.84% of the vegetated areas, which indicated that vegetation in most areas was sensitive to the change of drought conditions. Pixels with positive but insignificant Rmax were mainly distributed in the northern part of subregion V. Fig. 4b shows the distribution of Tmax (only pixels with significant positive Rmax are shown). Pixels with Tmax of 1–3 mon occupied the largest proportion (33.9%) of the vegetated areas with significant positive Rmax, followed by Tmax of 10–12 mon, which accounted for 21.73% (Fig. 4b). Pixels with Tmax of 13–24 mon were mainly distributed in subregions I, central and western of subregion II, and subregion V, which were more widely distributed in the south of the BTSSR.

      Figure 4.  Spatial distribution of Rmax (maximum correlation coefficient in the growing season between NDVI and SPEI) (a) and Tmax (corresponding time-scale of SPEI) (b) in the BTSSR during 2000–2017 (Rmax > 0.4683 indicates significant positive (P < 0.05), Rmax > 0.5897 indicates extremely significant positive (P < 0.01), Rmax > 0.7084 indicates positive correlation at the significance level of 0.001)

    • Fig. 5 shows the proportions of pixels in vegetated areas that have positive monthly Rmax at different significance. The pixels with positive monthly Rmax in each month accounted for more than 98% of the vegetated areas (Fig. 5). However, the proportion of pixels with significant (P < 0.05) and extremely significant (P < 0.01) positive correlation experienced distinct temporal variation, which increased first from April to July and then decreased gradually. Area-averaged values of monthly Rmax in the area with significant positive monthly Rmax increased first and then decreased after July (Rmax = 0.696) (Fig. 6). In general, the impact of drought on vegetation increased first from April to July, reached the maximum in July, after which it decreased.

      Figure 5.  The proportions of pixels with positive monthly Rmax at different significance levels in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

      Figure 6.  Mean value of monthly Rmax in the area with significant positive monthly Rmax in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

      Monthly Rmax, which was significant positive, demonstrated that vegetation could be significantly affected by drought in that month. Thus, the distribution of significant (P < 0.05) positive monthly Rmax was spatially explored as well (Fig. 7). The significant positive monthly Rmax was distributed in most areas of the studied subregions in July. However, the significant positive monthly Rmax were mainly distributed in the middle of subregion I, west of subregion II, middle of subregion IV, middle and south of subregion V in April. In October, the pixels with significant positive monthly Rmax were mainly distributed in the east of subregion IV and east of subregion V.

      Figure 7.  Spatial distribution of monthly Rmax in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

      Fig. 8 shows the proportions of areas with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months. The proportions were higher in July than in other months except at the time scale of 22 mon, which demonstrated that vegetation in July could be more strongly affected by drought changes than in other months (Fig. 8). Proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed from June to August and at the time-scales of 1–15 mon, with the highest proportion in July at 2-month’ time-scale (76%). Additionally, with the increase in time-scale, the changes of the proportions were various in different months. In April and May, the proportions were higher when time-scales were longer than 8–9 mon. The proportions began to be greater than 27% in April when the time-scales were greater than 9 mon. In May, the proportions were higher at the time scales of 9–22 mon, which were above 39%. From June to August, the proportions were lower when time-scales were longer than 13–14 mon. In June and July, the proportions were higher at the time scales of 2–13 mon, which were greater than 49% and 64%, respectively. In August, the proportions were higher at the time scales of 2–14 mon, which were above 47%.

      Figure 8.  The proportions of pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    • Area-averaged Rmax in all subregions were above 0.72, with the highest area-averaged Rmax located in the subregion III (0.787), followed by the subregions IV, II, V, and I (Fig. 9). Generally, nearly all the pixels in all the subregions existed positive Rmax, except for the subregion V where positive Rmax accounted for 99.95% (Fig. 10). The proportion of areas with significant (P < 0.05) and extremely significant (P < 0.01) positive Rmax was the highest in the subregion III, followed by the subregion IV, II, I, and V. Comparatively, the vegetation of three subregions (II, III, IV) in the north of the BTSSR were more susceptible to the impacts of drought than subregion I and subregion V that in the south of the BTSSR. However, subregion III was the most sensitive area to the impact of drought change.

      Figure 9.  Area-averaged Rmax in five subregions of BTSSR during 2000–2017

      Figure 10.  The proportions of pixels with positive Rmax at different significance levels in five subregions during 2000–2017

      The proportions of areas with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients in different months differed with subregions (Fig. 11). When the proportions were greater than 50%, it indicated that more than half of the pixels were sensitive to the change of drought conditions. In subregion I, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed in July and August, with the highest proportion at 3-month’ time-scale in July (70%) (Fig. 11a). In subregion II, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed from June to August, with the highest proportion at 2-month’ time-scale in July (77%) (Fig. 11b). In subregion III, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed from May to September and at the time-scales shorter than 14 mon (Fig. 11c). The higher proportions were distributed in June and greater than 85% at the time-scales of 2–9 mon. In subregion IV, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed from June to September and at the time-scales shorter than 15 mon (Fig. 11d). The higher proportions were distributed in July and at the time-scales of 2–11 mon, which were greater than 80%. In subregion V, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed from April to July (Fig. 11e). From April to June, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed at the time-scales of 10–24 mon. In July, the proportions at all time-scales were greater than 50% (Fig. 11e).

      Figure 11.  The proportions of pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months of subregion I (a), subregion II (b), subregion III (c), subregion IV (d), and subregion V (e) during 2000–2017

    • Higher Rmax and higher proportions of pixels with significant positive Rmax indicate higher sensitivity of vegetation to drought variations. Generally, Rmax in all vegetation types were greater than 0.71; however, the highest Rmax occurred in grassland (0.762), followed by shrubland (0.736), cultivated vegetation (0.723), and forest (0.719) (Fig. 12). Except for cultivated vegetation, all pixels of other vegetation types existed positive Rmax (Fig. 13). The proportions of areas with a significant positive correlation (P < 0.05) were higher than 96% in all the vegetation types. However, the proportion of areas with extremely significant positive correlation (P < 0.01) was the highest in grassland, followed by shrubland, forest, and cultivated vegetation. Generally, the impacts of the variations of drought were significant in all vegetation types, while was strongest in grassland.

      Figure 12.  Area-averaged Rmax for different vegetation types in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

      Figure 13.  The proportions of pixels with positive Rmax at different significance levels in different vegetation types in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

      The proportions of areas with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients in different months differed with vegetation types (Fig. 14). For grassland, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed from May to August (Fig. 14a). The proportions greater than 70% were mainly distributed at the time-scales of 2–12 mon in July and with the highest proportion at the 2-month’ time-scale (80%). For shrubland, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed in July and August, and with the highest proportion at the 2-month’ time-scale in July (72%) (Fig. 14b). For forest, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed in July at the time-scales of 1–15 mon, and with the highest proportion at 2-month’ time-scale in July (68%) (Fig. 14c). For cultivated vegetation, the proportions greater than 50% were mainly distributed in July and August and with the highest proportion at 2-month’ time-scale in July (72%) (Fig. 14d).

      Figure 14.  The proportions of pixels with significant positive (P < 0.05) correlation coefficients between NDVI and SPEI in different months of grassland (a), shrubland (b), forest (c), and cultivated vegetation (d) in the BTSSR during 2000–2017

    • Vegetation cover during the growing season increased in the BTSSR from 2000 to 2017. This can be assessed from both the pixels with increased NDVI (which accounted for 88.19% of the vegetated areas) and the increased tendency of NDVI anomalies in the growing season. Previous studies also showed that more than half of the area in the BTSSR experienced increased vegetation (Wu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016). From 2000 to 2010, pixels with decreased NDVI distributed in the southwest-to-northeast area of the BTSSR (Wu et al., 2014). This phenomenon was not found in our study, which indicates that vegetation cover has improved after 2010. The phase II of the BTSSCP was started in 2013, which was conducive to vegetation restoration. Previous study found that drought increased in the BTSSR from 1960 to 2014, and drought events were frequent from 2000 to 2014 (Ma et al., 2018). We find the wetter trend of climate contributed to the increased vegetation cover in the BTSSR from 2000 to 2017. The differences in the results may be due to the differences in research periods.

    • Although the overall NDVI increased, years with negative SPEI usually had lower NDVI anomalies, which indicated that drought had negative impacts on vegetation. Pixels with significant positive Rmax accounted for 97.84% of the vegetated areas, which further showed that most vegetated areas were sensitive to the change of drought. Previous researches also reported that the vegetation cover in arid and semiarid areas of China was vulnerable to drought (Hua et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017).

      The sensitivity of vegetation to climate conditions differs depending on the growth stage (Guo et al., 2017b; Pang et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2018), thus, identifying the sensitive period of vegetation to drought and the changes in sensitivity during different growth stages are important. In the BTSSR, the impact of drought on vegetation was found to rise first and then decrease, and July was the most sensitive month. This phenomenon may be because the vegetation in the early and late growing season in the BTSSR is greatly affected by temperature rather than moisture factors, and the limitation of temperature on vegetation is weakened in summer and moisture factors become to the dominant factors. Piao et al. (2011) showed that spring and autumn NDVI were controlled by temperature in Eurasia, while NDVI in summer was more affected by precipitation. In dry regions of Inner Asia, Mohammat et al. (2013) also found that vegetation activity was constrained by temperature in spring while mainly negatively affected by drought in summer.

      Compared with two subregions (I and V) in the south, subregions in the north of the BTSSR (II, III, IV) were more sensitive to the effect of drought, which may be due to the drier climate in the northern region. Besides, there was a wide distribution of grassland in the north of the BTSSR. Relative to other vegetation types, grassland was more sensitive to the impacts of drought; this result is consistent with related research (Zhang et al., 2017). Grass with shallow roots usually absorbs moisture from the surface or middle layer of soil, while shallow soil moisture responds quickly to changes in meteorological drought (Wu et al., 2018). Even in light drought conditions, grass growth can respond quickly. In addition, the xylem system of grass has poor resistance to drought, with weak water and carbon storage capacity, which cannot guarantee normal growth during drought (Craine et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2018). The sensitivity of forest and cultivated vegetation to drought is lower than that of grassland. Deep-rooted forests can absorb water from deep soil to maintain growth during droughts (Wu et al., 2018). Human activities such as irrigation can reduce the impact of drought on cultivated vegetation.

      Vegetation growth is affected by cumulative water deficits of the current month and previous months. The multi-temporal scales of SPEI facilitated the analysis of the cumulative impacts (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2013; Ding et al., 2020). Pixels with Tmax of short time-scales (1–3 mon) were found to occupy the largest proportion (33.9%) of the vegetated areas with significant positive Rmax in the BTSSR. A previous study also found that drought at short time-scales had the most serious impact on vegetation in the arid areas of the Loess Plateau (Zhao et al., 2018a). The impacts of drought at a 1-mon time-scale did not have the largest impact on vegetation, which indicated that vegetation was not mostly affected by climate conditions in the current month, and the accumulation of climate impacts was important (Zhao et al., 2020). Therefore, when quantifying the contribution of climate change to vegetation change, we must take into account the cumulative effects of climate change; otherwise, we underestimate the impact of climate. Tmax was helpful to find the most sensitive time scales of vegetation to drought, but some details could be ignored. The time-scale of drought with higher impact was not fixed or unique. In addition to the time-scale with the highest impact, the other time-scales with high impacts should also be noted in drought prevention. For example, for grassland, the areas with significant impacts of drought on vegetation in July were more than 70% at the time-scales of 2–12 mon. In addition, the cumulative effects of drought on vegetation growth varied with growth stages, regions, and vegetation types.

    • The impact of drought on vegetation is complicated by the many factors involved, e.g., soil water storage, vegetation self-protection mechanism, or root depth (Craine et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). Correlation analysis allowed to analyze the relationship between vegetation and drought on large spatial scales, but it cannot reveal the response mechanism of vegetation under the impact of drought. Future research needs to combine a process-based model with experimental data to further understand the response mechanism of vegetation to drought. Revegetation was found to approach sustainable water resource limits in the Loess Plateau in China (Feng et al., 2016), and the high density of plants in the Mu Us Sandy Land was found to reduce groundwater storage (Zhang and Wu, 2020). The BTSSR is drier than the Loess Plateau, and thus the relation between vegetation increase and local water resources in the BTSSR needs further study. After the completion of the BTSSCP, the sensitivity of vegetation in the region to drought emphasizes the importance of further vegetation protection. Given the increasing risks of droughts in the future (Huang et al., 2016a; Huang et al., 2018; Su et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2019; Berdugo et al., 2020), we analyzed the relationships between vegetation cover and drought in the BTSSR and identified the time-scales, growth stages, subregions, and vegetation types that sensitive to drought. The findings of this study can provide references for ecological construction and drought prevention in the BTSSR and other ecologically fragile areas with limited water availability.

    • This study estimated the spatio-temporal changes of vegetation cover and its response to drought in the BTSSR after the implementation of the BTSSCP. The response characteristics of vegetation to drought at different time-scales, in different growth stages, in different subregions and for different vegetation types were analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows:

      (1) Vegetation cover increased in most areas of the BTSSR from 2000 to 2017. Pixels with increased NDVI accounted for 88.19% of the total vegetated areas. However, pixels with significant increased NDVI accounted for 48.3% of the total vegetated areas and were mainly distributed in subregions I and V. A wetter climate contributed to the increased vegetation cover in the BTSSR from 2000 to 2017.

      (2) During the growing season, NDVI anomalies were closely related to SPEI values. Pixels with significant positive Rmax accounted for 97.84% of the total vegetated areas, which indicated that most areas in the BTSSR were sensitive to changes in drought conditions. Pixels with Tmax at short time-scale (1–3 mon) accounted for the largest proportion (33.9%) in the vegetated areas with significant positive Rmax.

      (3) In the BTSSR, the impacts of drought variations on vegetation cover in the growing season rose first and then decreased, with the highest impact in July. Compared with two subregions (I and V) in the south, subregions in the north of the BTSSR (II, III, IV) were more sensitive to the impacts of drought, especially in subregion III. All four major vegetation types in the BTSSR were sensitive to the effects of drought variations, especially for grassland.

      (4) The time-scales of drought with higher impacts varied with growth stages, regions, and vegetation types. Vegetation is not only sensitive to drought at a fixed time scale. In addition to the time-scale with the highest impact, the other time-scales with high impacts should also be noted in drought prevention.

参考文献 (52)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回