Adv Search

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China

WEI Zongcai,  ZHEN Feng,  MO Haitong,  WEI Shuqing,  PENG Danli,  ZHANG Yuling

downloadPDF
文章导航 > Chinese Geographical Science  > 2021 >  31(1): 54-69
WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
引用本文: WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
shu
WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
Citation: WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
shu

Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3

  • 1. School of Architecture, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;

  • 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Smart City Design Simulation&Visualization, Nanjing 210093, China;

  • 3. Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangzhou 510070, China

基金项目: 

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41801150, 41571146, 41801144), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030310392), Guangdong Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science (No. GD17YGL01), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 201906010033), GDAS’ (Guangdong Academy of Sciences) Project of Science and Technology Development (No. 2020GDASYL-20200104007)

Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China

  • 1. School of Architecture, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;

  • 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Smart City Design Simulation&Visualization, Nanjing 210093, China;

  • 3. Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangzhou 510070, China

Funds: 

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41801150, 41571146, 41801144), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030310392), Guangdong Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science (No. GD17YGL01), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 201906010033), GDAS’ (Guangdong Academy of Sciences) Project of Science and Technology Development (No. 2020GDASYL-20200104007)

  • 摘要: Mobile information and communication technologies (MICTs) have fully penetrated everyday life in smart societies; this has greatly compressed time, space, and distance, and consequently, reshaped residents’ travel behaviour patterns. As a new mode of shared mobility, the sharing bicycle offers a variety of options for the daily travel of urban residents. Extant studies have mainly examined the travel characteristics and influencing factors of public bicycles with piles, while the travel patterns for sharing bicycles and their driving mechanisms have been largely ignored. Using one week’s travel data for Mobike, this study investigated the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of sharing bicycle travel behaviours in the central urban area of Guangzhou, China; furthermore, it identified the influences of built environment density factors on sharing bicycle travel behaviours based on the geographically weighted regression method. Obvious morning and evening peaks were observed in the sharing bicycle travel patterns for both weekdays and weekends. The old urban area, which had a high degree of mixed function, dense road networks, and cycling-friendly built environments, was the main travel area that attracted sharing bicycles on both weekdays and weekends. Furthermore, factors including the point of interest (POI) for the density of public transport stations, the functional mixing degree, and the density of residential POIs significantly affected residents’ travel behaviours. These findings could enrich discourse regarding shared mobility with a Chinese case characterised by rapidly developing MICTs and also provide references to local authorities for improving slow traffic environments.
    Abstract: Mobile information and communication technologies (MICTs) have fully penetrated everyday life in smart societies; this has greatly compressed time, space, and distance, and consequently, reshaped residents’ travel behaviour patterns. As a new mode of shared mobility, the sharing bicycle offers a variety of options for the daily travel of urban residents. Extant studies have mainly examined the travel characteristics and influencing factors of public bicycles with piles, while the travel patterns for sharing bicycles and their driving mechanisms have been largely ignored. Using one week’s travel data for Mobike, this study investigated the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of sharing bicycle travel behaviours in the central urban area of Guangzhou, China; furthermore, it identified the influences of built environment density factors on sharing bicycle travel behaviours based on the geographically weighted regression method. Obvious morning and evening peaks were observed in the sharing bicycle travel patterns for both weekdays and weekends. The old urban area, which had a high degree of mixed function, dense road networks, and cycling-friendly built environments, was the main travel area that attracted sharing bicycles on both weekdays and weekends. Furthermore, factors including the point of interest (POI) for the density of public transport stations, the functional mixing degree, and the density of residential POIs significantly affected residents’ travel behaviours. These findings could enrich discourse regarding shared mobility with a Chinese case characterised by rapidly developing MICTs and also provide references to local authorities for improving slow traffic environments.
  • [1] Brunsdon C, Fotheringham S, Charlton M, 1998. Geographically weighted regression-modelling spatial non-stationarity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 47(3): 431–443.
    [2] Carstensen T A, Olafsson A S, Bech N M et al., 2015. The spatio-temporal development of Copenhagen’s bicycle infrastructure 1912–2013. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 115(2): 142–156. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2015. 1034151
    [3] Castells M, 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: the Information Age: economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Black-well Publishers.
    [4] China Commercial Industry Research Institute, 2018. Title of subordinate document. In: Research Report on China’s Sharing Biycles Industry in 2018. Available at: http://www.askci.com/news/chanye/20180322/163554120290.shtml. Cited 20 Jun 2018. (in Chinese)
    [5] Cui Y C, Mishra S, Welch T F, 2014. Land use effects on bicycle ridership: a framework for state planning agencies. Journal of Transport Geography, 41: 220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo. 2014.10.004
    [6] De Chardon C M, Caruso G, 2015. Estimating bike-share trips using station level data. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 78: 260–279. doi:  10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.003
    [7] El-Assi W, Mahmoud M S, Habib K N, 2017. Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto. Transportation, 44(3): 589–613. doi:  10.1007/s11116-015-9669-z
    [8] Faghih-Imani A, Eluru N, El-Geneidy A M et al., 2014. How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of Transport Geography, 41: 306–314. doi:  10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.013
    [9] Fischer M M, Getis A, 2010. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: software Tools, Methods and Applications. Berlin:Springer.
    [10] García-Palomares J C, Gutiérrez J, Latorre M, 2012. Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: a GIS approach. Applied Geography, 35(1–2): 235–246. doi:  10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.002
    [11] Garcia-Gutierrez J, Romero-Torres J, Gaytan-Iniestra J, 2014.Dimensioning of a Bike Sharing System (BSS): a study case in Nezahualcoyotl, Mexico. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 162: 253–262. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.206
    [12] González F, Melo-Riquelme C, De Grange L, 2016. A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system. Transportation, 43(3): 407–423. doi:  10.1007/s11116-015-9581-6
    [13] Guo Suping, Zhen Feng, Yin Qiuyi, 2017. Analysis on spacetemporal characters of public bicycles. Planners, 33(6):112–118. (in Chinese)
    [14] He Suyan, Zhang Heping, Shi Yan, 2013. Discussion on the limited influence of public bicycles on the health condition of urban inhabitants. Journal of Sports and Science, 34(4): 5–6, 15.(in Chinese)
    [15] Huang Guoqing, Chen Xue, 2017. A study on the intention of bike-sharing usage based on context awareness theory and UTAUT Model. Consumer Economics, 33(3): 62–68, 16. (in Chinese)
    [16] Jun M J, Choi K, Jeong J E et al., 2015. Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul. Journal of Transport Geography, 48: 30–40.doi:  10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.002
    [17] Kaplan S, Manca F, Nielsen T A S et al., 2015. Intentions to use bike-sharing for holiday cycling: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Tourism Management, 47: 34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.017
    [18] Li Gang, Yang Lan, He Jianxiong et al., 2018. The spatial pattern and organization relation of the pickup points based on POI Data in Xi’an: focus on Cainiao Stations. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(12): 2024–2030. (in Chinese)
    [19] Li Huankun, 2018. Repeatedly advised without any change, 60 000 square meters of Zhongda Fabric market was torn down. Yangcheng Evening News, 2020-01-21. (in Chinese)
    [20] Li Miaoyi, Ma Yan, Sun Xiaoming et al., 2018. Application of spatial and temporal entropy based on multi-source data for measuring the mix degree of urban functions. City Planning Review, 42(2): 97–103. (in Chinese)
    [21] Li Weichi, Zeng Xuelan, Liang Xiaoyan et al., 2016. Research on carbon emission reduction calculation of urban public bicycle system based upon generalised carbon trading. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(12): 103–107. (in Chinese)
    [22] Lin J R, Yang T H, 2011. Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(2):284–294. doi:  10.1016/j.tre.2010.09.004
    [23] Lyu Xiongying, Pan Haixiao, 2018. Sharing bicycle riding characteristics analysis in Shanghai based on mobike opening data.Shanghai Urban Planning Review, (2): 46–51. (in Chinese)
    [24] Ma Hanqing, Lin Chanyu, 2017. A survey by Guangzhou municipal bureau of statistics showed that 41.7 percent of citizens choose to ride sharing bicycles. Yangcheng Evening News, 2019-03-21. (in Chinese)
    [25] McDonough J E, 2016. Shorter lives and poorer health on the campaign trail. American Journal of Public Health, 106(3):395–397. doi:  10.2105/AJPH.2016.303069
    [26] Meng Zhe, Yang Bo, 2018. Sharing bicycles should be regulated properly. Guangzhou Daily, 2020-01-21. (in Chinese)
    [27] Mo Haitong, Wei Zongcai, Zhai Qing, 2019. Travel behaviors and influencing factors of bike sharing in old town: the case of Guangzhou. South Architecture, (1): 7–12. (in Chinese)
    [28] Qian Jia, Wang Degen, Niu Yu, 2014. Analysis of the influencing factors of urban residents to use urban public bikes: a case study of Suzhou. Geographical Research, 33(2): 358–371. (in Chinese)
    [29] Qianzhan Industry Research Institute, 2019. An analysis of the development status and market pattern of China’s bicycle-sharing industry in 2018 shows that raising prices may become another way for enterprises to develop. Available at:https://bg.qianzhan.com/trends/detail/506/190111-e77b3ed6.html. Cited 22 April 2020. (in Chinese)
    [30] Vogel M, Hamon R, Lozenguez G et al., 2014. From bicycle sharing system movements to users: a typology of Vélo’v cyclists in Lyon based on large-scale behavioural dataset. Journal of Transport Geography, 41: 280–291. doi:  10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.005
    [31] Vogel P, Greiser T, Mattfeld D C, 2011. Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: exploring activity patterns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20:514–523. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.058
    [32] Wang Bo, Zhen Feng, Wei Zongcai et al., 2015. A theoretical framework and methodology for urban activity spatial structure in e-society: empirical evidence for Nanjing city, China.Chinese Geographical Science, 25(6): 672–683. doi:  10.1007/s11769-015-0751-4
    [33] Wang X Z, Lindsey G, Schoner J E et al., 2016. Modeling bike share station activity: effects of nearby businesses and jobs on trips to and from stations. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(1): 04015001. doi:  10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000273
    [34] Wei Zongcai, Mo Haitong, Liu Yuting, 2018. Spatiotemporal characteristics of bike-sharing: an empirical study of Tianhe District, Guangzhou. Science & Technology Review, 36(18):71–80. (in Chinese)
    [35] Xi Guangliang, Zhen Feng, Gilles P et al., 2017. Spatio-temporal fragmentation of leisure activities in information era: empirical evidence from Nanjing, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(1): 137–150. doi:  10.1007/s11769-017-0851-4
    [36] Yu Qiuliang, Fu Chaojun, 2017. Guangzhou has stopped adding sharing bicycles: ban them as soon as find them. Yangcheng Evening News, 2018-06-21. (in Chinese)
    [37] Zhen Feng, Wei Zongcai, 2008. Influence of information technology on social spatial behaviors of urban residents: case of Nanjing City in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 18(4):316–322. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0316-x Zhen F, Wang B, Wei Z C, 2015. The rise of the internet city in China: production and consumption of internet information.Urban Studies, 52(13): 2313–2329. doi: 10.1177/00420980 14547369
    [38] Zhen Feng, Qin Xiao, Jiang Yupei et al., 2019. Effects of community community communication technology (ICT) usage on community satisfaction: case study in Nanjing, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 29(5): 834–847. doi:  10.1007/s11769-019-1072-9
    [39] Zhou Yang, Zhang Bingqi, Li Qiang et al., 2015. Suitability evaluation on the site choosing for urban public bicycle system: taking subway line 1 of Beijing City for example. Urban Problems, 10: 43–48. (in Chinese)
  • [1] Bo WANG, Yaqin LEI, Desheng XUE, Jixiang LIU, Chunzhu WEI.  Elaborating Spatiotemporal Associations Between the Built Environment and Urban Vibrancy: A Case of Guangzhou City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(3): 480-492. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1272-6
    [2] MA Shifa, ZHAO Yabo, TAN Xiaohong.  Exploring Smart Growth Boundaries of Urban Agglomeration with Land Use Spatial Optimization: A Case Study of Changsha- Zhuzhou-Xiangtan City Group, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(4): 665-676. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1140-1
    [3] SUN Wu, LI Tao.  Building Height Trends and Their Influencing Factors under China's Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Guangzhou, 1960-2017 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 993-1004. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1162-8
    [4] WANG Li, CAO Xiaoshu, LI Tao, GAO Xingchuan.  Accessibility Comparison and Spatial Differentiation of Xi'an Scenic Spots with Different Modes Based on Baidu Real-time Travel . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(5): 848-860. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1073-8
    [5] ZHAO Yi, ZHONG Kaiwen, XU Jianhui, SUN Caige, WANG Yunpeng.  Directional Analysis of Urban Expansion Based on Sub-pixel and Regional Scale: A Case Study of Main Districts in Guangzhou, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 652-666. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1048-9
    [6] LI Yungang, ZHANG Yueyuan, HE Daming, LUO Xian, JI Xuan.  Spatial Downscaling of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Pre-cipitation Using Geographically Weighted Regression Kriging over the Lancang River Basin, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 446-462. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1033-3
    [7] CHEN Xiaohong, WEI Luyao, ZHANG Haifeng.  Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Urban Smart Development in China and Its Driving Mechanism . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(4): 584-599. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0976-0
    [8] YANG Jun, BAO Yajun, ZHANG Yuqing, LI Xueming, GE Quansheng.  Impact of Accessibility on Housing Prices in Dalian City of China Based on a Geographically Weighted Regression Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(3): 505-515. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0954-6
    [9] Samad EMAMGHOLIZADEH, Shahin SHAHSAVANI, Mohamad Amin ESLAMI.  Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks, Geographically Weighted Regression and Cokriging Methods for Predicting the Spatial Distribution of Soil Macronutrients (N, P, and K) . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(5): 747-759. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0906-6
    [10] DAI Dandan, ZHOU Chunshan, YE Changdong.  Spatial-temporal Characteristics and Factors Influencing Commuting Activities of Middle-class Residents in Guangzhou City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(3): 410-428. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0806-1
    [11] LIU Wangbao, HOU Quan.  Excess Commuting in Transitional Urban China: A Case Study of Guangzhou . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(5): 599-608. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0793-7
    [12] ZHANG Haitao, GUO Long, CHEN Jiaying, FU Peihong, GU Jianli, LIAO Guangyu.  Modeling of Spatial Distributions of Farmland Density and Its Temporal Change Using Geographically Weighted Regression Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(2): 191-204. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0631-8
    [13] ZHAO Ying, CHAI Yanwei.  Residents’ Activity-travel Behavior Variation by Communities in Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(4): 492-505. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0616-7
    [14] ZHOU Suhong, DENG Lifang, HUANG Meiyu.  Spatial Analysis of Commuting Mode Choice in Guangzhou, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(3): 353-364. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0569-2
    [15] JIANG Yan, LIU Changming, ZHENG Hongxing, LI Xuyong, WU Xianing.  Responses of River Runoff to Climate Change Based on Nonlinear Mixed Regression Model in Chaohe River Basin of Hebei Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(2): 152-158. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0152-7
    [16] LIU Xuan.  Evolution of Transitional Institutions for Urban Land Redevelopment in China——Case in Guangzhou . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0001-8
    [17] CAO Xiaoshu, CHEN Hemei, LI Linna, ZHEN Feng.  Private Car Travel Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Chinese Cities——A Case Study of Guangzhou in Guangdong, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(4): 325-332. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0325-4
    [18] MA Yao-dong, ZHOU Chun-shan, FANG Yuan-ping.  ANALYSIS ON THE PRESENT SITUATION AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS OF VACANT COMMERCIAL HOUSING IN GUANGZHOU URBAN DISTRICT . Chinese Geographical Science, 2003, 13(2): 182-189.
    [19] ZHANG Xin-chang, PAN Qiong, ZHAO Ling-ling, YE Shen-tao.  GIS-BASED ANALYSIS OF URBAN LAND-USE CHANGES—A Case Study of Haizhu District of Guangzhou City,China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(4): 339-345.
    [20] 李玲.  PRIMARY ANALYSIS ON WOMEN'S STATUS OF RENHE TOWN, BAIYUN DISTRICT, GUANGZHOU . Chinese Geographical Science, 1995, 5(2): 175-184.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  143
  • HTML全文浏览量:  28
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-02-10

Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
  • 1. School of Architecture, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;
  • 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Smart City Design Simulation&Visualization, Nanjing 210093, China;
  • 3. Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangzhou 510070, China
    • 基金项目:

    Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41801150, 41571146, 41801144), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030310392), Guangdong Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science (No. GD17YGL01), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 201906010033), GDAS’ (Guangdong Academy of Sciences) Project of Science and Technology Development (No. 2020GDASYL-20200104007)

  • 收稿日期: 2020-02-10

摘要: Mobile information and communication technologies (MICTs) have fully penetrated everyday life in smart societies; this has greatly compressed time, space, and distance, and consequently, reshaped residents’ travel behaviour patterns. As a new mode of shared mobility, the sharing bicycle offers a variety of options for the daily travel of urban residents. Extant studies have mainly examined the travel characteristics and influencing factors of public bicycles with piles, while the travel patterns for sharing bicycles and their driving mechanisms have been largely ignored. Using one week’s travel data for Mobike, this study investigated the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of sharing bicycle travel behaviours in the central urban area of Guangzhou, China; furthermore, it identified the influences of built environment density factors on sharing bicycle travel behaviours based on the geographically weighted regression method. Obvious morning and evening peaks were observed in the sharing bicycle travel patterns for both weekdays and weekends. The old urban area, which had a high degree of mixed function, dense road networks, and cycling-friendly built environments, was the main travel area that attracted sharing bicycles on both weekdays and weekends. Furthermore, factors including the point of interest (POI) for the density of public transport stations, the functional mixing degree, and the density of residential POIs significantly affected residents’ travel behaviours. These findings could enrich discourse regarding shared mobility with a Chinese case characterised by rapidly developing MICTs and also provide references to local authorities for improving slow traffic environments.

English Abstract

WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
引用本文: WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
shu
WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
Citation: WEI Zongcai, ZHEN Feng, MO Haitong, WEI Shuqing, PENG Danli, ZHANG Yuling. Travel Behaviours of Sharing Bicycles in the Central Urban Area Based on Geographically Weighted Regression: The Case of Guangzhou, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (39)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © Editorial office of Chinese Geographical Science

    Tel: +86-0431-85542219   Email: egeoscien@neigae.ac.cn