留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

WEI Jianfei DING Zhiwei MENG Yiwei LI Qiang

WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
引用本文: WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
Citation: WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
基金项目: 

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701130), The Decision-making Bidding Project of Henan Provincial Government in 2018 (No. 2018B163)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    DING Zhiwei.E-mail:dingzhiwei1216@163.com

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

Funds: 

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701130), The Decision-making Bidding Project of Henan Provincial Government in 2018 (No. 2018B163)

  • 摘要: The core issue of sustainable development refers to the coordinated development of economic-social-environmental issues. In the present study, by complying with the China Sustainable Development Indicator System (CSDIS) concept, a comprehensive index system was built; besides, Natural Breaks (Jenks) Classification Method, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Geographic Detector Analysis were conducted to delve into the sustainability and coordinated degree at city level in China from 2007 to 2017. The achieved results are presented as follows. First, for spatial differentiation, the overall spatial distribution pattern was characterized by the high-value units in eastern China and the low-value units in western China from 2007 to 2017. To be specific, the high-value units were radiated along the Beijing-Guangdong Axis (Jing-Guang Axis) centered on the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the middle-value units were distributed in strips along the coast, and the low-value units were vastly gathered in western China and gradually break via the Hu Huanyong line (Hu Line) in south China from 2007 to 2017. More specifically, based on the five subsystems, the pattern of each system was consistent with the whole, whereas the degree of concentration was different. Second, for spatial correlation, the significant High-High (HH) areas were primarily distributed in the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions. The significant Low-Low (LL) areas were continuously distributed in the southwest China and broke through the Hu Line from 2007 to 2017. There were insufficient number of significant High-Low (HL) and significant Low-High (LH) areas, whereas the spatial agglomeration of them was less obvious. Third, for internal coupling coordination, the spatial differentiation between the coupling degree and the coupling coordinated degree was significantly consistent in 2007 and 2017. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions have demonstrated a high level of coordinated evolution, and the pattern of western mountainous areas exhibited a low degree of coordinated growth. Lastly, based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative, its factors were underpinned by robust economic strength, the vitality support of the information level and the basic support function of the topography, active guidance of national policies and path dependence and industrial transfer.
  • [1] Ali-Toudert F, Ji L M, 2017. Modeling and measuring urban sustainability in multi-criteria based systems:a challenging issue. Ecological Indicators, 73:597-611. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2016.09.046
    [2] Asomani-Boateng R, 2011. Borrowing from the past to sustain the present and the future:indigenous African urban forms, architecture, and sustainable urban development in contemporary Africa. Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 4(3):239-262. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2011.634573
    [3] Boggia A, Massei G, Pace E et al., 2018. Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment:a new model for decision making. Land Use Policy, 71:281-292. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.036
    [4] Chen Chunfeng, Wang Hongyan, Xiao Du'ning et al., 2008. Comparison of sustainable development status in Heilongjiang Province based on traditional ecological footprint method and emergy ecological footprint method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19(11):2544-2549. (in Chinese)
    [5] Cheng Mingyang, Liu Yansui, Jiang Ning, 2019. Study on the spatial pattern and mechanism of rural population-land-industry coordinating development in Huang-Huai-Hai area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(8):1576-1589. (in Chinese)
    [6] Guan Wei, 2007. The data analysis of regional water resources and economic society coupling system sustainable development. Geographical Research, 26(4):685-692. (in Chinese)
    [7] He J Q, Wang S J, Liu Y S et al., 2017. Examining the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment using a coupling analysis:case study of Shanghai, China. Ecological Indicators, 77:185-193. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind. 2017.01.017
    [8] Jeníček V, 2013. Sustainable development indicators. Agricultural Economics, 59(2):74-80. doi: 10.17221/11/2012-AGRICECON
    [9] Jiang Xiaojun, Yang Qingshan, Liu Jian, 2017. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of the ‘Five Modernizations’ coordinated development of prefecture level and above cities in China. Progress in Geography, 36(7):806-819. (in Chinese)
    [10] Khlobystov E, 2009. Modern approaches to sustainability and spatial development:educational aspects. In:Allen-Gil S, Stelljes L, Borysova O. Addressing Global Environmental Security Through Innovative Educational Curricula. Dordrecht:Springer, 51-56. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9314-2_6
    [11] Lele Sharachandra, 1991. Sustainable development:a critical review. World Development, 19(6):607-621. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
    [12] Lu H Y, Wei Y Q, Yang S C, et al., 2019. Regional spatial patterns and influencing factors of environmental auditing for sustainable development:summaries and illuminations from international experiences. Environment, Development and Sustainability, (1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00357-w
    [13] Jabareen Yosef, 2008. A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environment Development &Sustainability, 10(2):179-192. doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
    [14] Li Y C, Zhao L, Suo J J, 2014. Comprehensive assessment on sustainable development of highway transportation capacity based on entropy weight and TOPSIS. Sustainability, 6(7):4685-4693. doi: 10.3390/su6074685
    [15] Li Y F, Li Y, Zhou Y et al., 2012. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 98:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
    [16] Lin C W, Jeng S Y, Tseng M et al., 2019. Sustainable development for zero-wastewater-discharge reproduction planning under quantitative and qualitative information. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(5):1114-1131. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0213
    [17] Lind N, 2014. Human development index (HDI). In:Michalos A C (ed). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht:Springer, 3012-3013. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1342
    [18] Liu Jing, Fang Chuanglin, He Lunzhi et al., 2019. Evaluation index system of urbanization development quality in countries along the belt and road:based on economic, institutional and social perspectives. Economic Geography, 39(4):59-66. (in Chinese)
    [19] Liu Zhaode, Liu Cong, Liu Qiang et al., 2017. Regional comprehensive development level and its types of prefecture level cities or above in China. Economic Geography, 37(3):25-31, 39. (in Chinese)
    [20] Lyu L C, Sun F X, Huang R, 2019. Innovation-based urbanization:evidence from 270 cities at the prefecture level or above in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 29(8):1283-1299. doi: 10.1007/s11442-019-1659-1
    [21] Ma Yanji, Ai Xiaoping, 2019. Evaluation of sustainable urbanization development in Jilin Province based on the 2030 sustainable development goals. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 39(3):487-495. (in Chinese)
    [22] Mao J S, Li C H, Pei Y S et al., 2018. Sustainable development enterprise. In:Mao J S, Li C H, Pei Y S et al. (eds). Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Enterprises. Singapore:Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8524-6_11
    [23] Mishra S, Deshmukh S G, Vrat P, 2002. Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(1):1-27. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00123-8
    [24] Mu Naixia, Liu Wenbao, Wang Haiyin et al., 2014. ArcGIS 10 Tutorial:from Beginner to Master. Beijing:Surveying and Mapping Press. (in Chinese)
    [25] Nyerges T, Roderick M, Prager S et al., 2014. Foundations of sustainability information representation theory:spatial-temporal dynamics of sustainable systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(5):1165-1185. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2013.853304
    [26] National Bureau of Statistics. China Urban Statistical Yearbook, China Environmental Statistics Yearbook. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2008 and 2018.
    [27] Pan Jinghu, Hu Yanxing, Liu Xiao et al., 2016. Spatial-temporal pattern of the coordinated development efficiency of the ‘four modernizations’ of prefecture level cities or above in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36(4):512-520. (in Chinese)
    [28] Pu Yingxia, Ge Ying, Ma Ronghua M et al., 2005. Analyzing regional economic disparities based on ESDA. Geographical Research, 24(6):965-974. (in Chinese)
    [29] Rodriguez R, Svensson G, Otero-Neira C, 2019. Framing sustainable development through descriptive determinants in private hospitals-Orientation and organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 75:78-88. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan. 2019.05.006
    [30] Sobhanifard Y, Vaeysi M, 2020. Mixed modeling of the social network mechanisms for the sustainable development of tourism:the case of Iranian Kurdistan. Sustainable Development, 28(1):187-196. doi: 10.1002/sd.1981
    [31] Tang Qing, Li Yang, Chen Mingxing et al., 2018. Sustainable livelihoods of semi-urbanized farmers and sustainable rural development:theoretical framework, research progress and future prospect. Progress in Geography, 37(8):1022-1030. (in Chinese)
    [32] Uğurlu E, 2019. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development in the European Union. In:Kurochkin D, Shabliy E V, Shittu E (eds). Renewable Energy. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14207-0_3
    [33] Vučetić A Š, 2018. Importance of environmental indicators of sustainable development in the transitional selective tourism destination. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(3):317-325. doi: 10.1002/jtr.2183
    [34] Wang Fang, Wang Shunyi, Prominski M, 2018. Water-related urbanization and locality:protection and utilization of water environment as well as planning and design of water space in a sustainable perspective. Geographical Research, 37(12):2576-2584. (in Chinese)
    [35] Wang S J, Ma H T, Zhao Y B, 2014. Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecological Indicators, 45:171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006
    [36] Wong C, 2014. Sustainable development indicators. In:Michalos A C (ed). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht:Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2948
    [37] Yang Y, Fan M D, 2019. Analysis of the spatial-temporal differences and fairness of the regional energy ecological footprint of the Silk Road Economic Belt (China Section). Journal of Cleaner Production, 215:1246-1261. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.01.170
    [38] Zhang Donghai, Ren Zhiyuan, Feng Xueming et al., 2013. Dynamic change and spatial difference of coordinated development on economy-society and ecology of western area in China. Arid Land Geography, 36(3):545-552. (in Chinese)
    [39] Zhang Jinping, Qin Yaochen, Zhang Erxun, 2009. Quantitative study methods of regional sustainable development in China:a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(12):6702-6711. (in Chinese)
    [40] Zhang Liguo, Bao Bingfei, Yang Shengsu, 2019. Spatial exploratory analysis of agricultural sustainable development in China. Economic Geography, 39(11):159-164. (in Chinese)
    [41] Zhao Chuansong, Ren Jianlan, Chen Yanbin et al., 2018. Coupling coordination and spatio-temporal differentiation of scientific and technological innovation and sustainable development in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(2):214-222. (in Chinese)
    [42] Zhou Liang, Che Lei, Zhou Chenghu, 2019. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(10):2027-2044. (in Chinese)
  • [1] YE Xinyue, GONG Junfang, LI Shengwen.  Analyzing Asymmetric City Connectivity by Toponym on Social Media in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(1): 14-26. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1172-6
    [2] ZHANG Suwen, LI Chenggu, MA Zuopeng, LI Xin.  Influences of Different Transport Routes and Road Nodes on Industrial Land Conversion: A Case Study of Changchun City of Jilin Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(3): 544-556. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1126-z
    [3] SUN Zhe, ZHAN Dongsheng, JIN Fengjun.  Spatio-temporal Characteristics and Geographical Determinants of Air Quality in Cities at the Prefecture Level and Above in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 316-324. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1031-5
    [4] YANG Zhen, ZHANG Xiaolei, LEI Jun, DUAN Zuliang, LI Jiangang.  Spatio-temporal Pattern Characteristics of Relationship Between Ur-banization and Economic Development at County Level in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 553-567. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1053-z
    [5] CHEN Xiaohong, WEI Luyao, ZHANG Haifeng.  Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Urban Smart Development in China and Its Driving Mechanism . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(4): 584-599. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0976-0
    [6] YIN Guanwen, LIU Yungang.  Administrative Urbanization and City-making in Post-reform China:A Case Study of Ordos City, Inner Mongolia . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(6): 891-903. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0919-1
    [7] WANG Cheng, WANG Liping, JIANG Fuxia, LU Zhangwei.  Differentiation of Rural Households' Consciousness in Land Use Activities: A Case from Bailin Village, Shapingba District of Chongqing Municipality, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(1): 124-136. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0688-z
    [8] TONG De, LIU Tao, LI Guicai, YU Lei.  Empirical Analysis of City Contact in Zhujiang (Pearl) River Delta, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(3): 384-392. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0667-4
    [9] TAN Minghong, Guy M ROBINSON, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie.  Spatial and Temporal Variability of Farm Size in China in Context of Rapid Urbanization . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(5): 607-619. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0610-0
    [10] ZHOU Suhong, DENG Lifang, HUANG Meiyu.  Spatial Analysis of Commuting Mode Choice in Guangzhou, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(3): 353-364. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0569-2
    [11] WANG Bei, LIU Weidong, LU Dadao, ZHANG Jianbo.  Spatial Disparity and Efficiency of Science and Technology Resources in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(6): 730-741.
    [12] WANG Yi, SUN Honglie, ZHAO Jingzhu.  Policy Review and Outlook on China′s Sustainable Development since 1992 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(4): 381-389.
    [13] FAN Jie, SUN Wei, ZHOU Kan, CHEN Dong.  Major Function Oriented Zone: New Method of Spatial Regulation for Reshaping Regional Development Pattern in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(2): 196-209.
    [14] ZHONG Taiyang, ZHANG Xiuying, HUANG Xianjin.  Impact of Labor Transfer on Agricultural Land Use Conversion at Rural Household Level Based on Logit Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(4): 300-307. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0300-5
    [15] FANG Chuanglin, SONG Jitao, SONG Dunjiang.  Stability of Spatial Structure of Urban Agglomeration in China Based on Central Place Theory . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(3): 193-202. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0193-8
    [16] LIU Chen, Kuninori OTSUBO, WANG Qinxue, Toshiaki ICHINOSE, Sadao ISHIMURA.  Spatial and Temporal Changes of Floating Population in China Between 1990 and 2000 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(2): 99-109. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0099-5
    [17] SUN Yifei, WANG Hongyang.  Spatial Strategy for Quality Labor in Rural Development——A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(2): 117-126. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0117-7
    [18] ZHU Xiao-hua, Patel NILANCHAL, ZUO Wei, YANG Xiu-chun.  FRACTAL ANALYSIS APPLIED TO SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF CHINA'S VEGETATION . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(1): 48-55.
    [19] DU Wen-xing, HUANG Xian-jin, ZHAI Wen-xia, PENG Bu-zhuo.  SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF LAND TRANSFER——Case Study of Shanghai, Nanjing and Taizhou in Changjiang River Delta . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(1): 24-31.
    [20] LU He-li, LIU Gui-fang, QIAN Le-xiang.  SPATIAL-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL DISPARITIES OF INTERNET DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(4): 314-319.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-12-10

Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
    基金项目:

    Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701130), The Decision-making Bidding Project of Henan Provincial Government in 2018 (No. 2018B163)

    通讯作者: DING Zhiwei.E-mail:dingzhiwei1216@163.com

摘要: The core issue of sustainable development refers to the coordinated development of economic-social-environmental issues. In the present study, by complying with the China Sustainable Development Indicator System (CSDIS) concept, a comprehensive index system was built; besides, Natural Breaks (Jenks) Classification Method, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Geographic Detector Analysis were conducted to delve into the sustainability and coordinated degree at city level in China from 2007 to 2017. The achieved results are presented as follows. First, for spatial differentiation, the overall spatial distribution pattern was characterized by the high-value units in eastern China and the low-value units in western China from 2007 to 2017. To be specific, the high-value units were radiated along the Beijing-Guangdong Axis (Jing-Guang Axis) centered on the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the middle-value units were distributed in strips along the coast, and the low-value units were vastly gathered in western China and gradually break via the Hu Huanyong line (Hu Line) in south China from 2007 to 2017. More specifically, based on the five subsystems, the pattern of each system was consistent with the whole, whereas the degree of concentration was different. Second, for spatial correlation, the significant High-High (HH) areas were primarily distributed in the core of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions. The significant Low-Low (LL) areas were continuously distributed in the southwest China and broke through the Hu Line from 2007 to 2017. There were insufficient number of significant High-Low (HL) and significant Low-High (LH) areas, whereas the spatial agglomeration of them was less obvious. Third, for internal coupling coordination, the spatial differentiation between the coupling degree and the coupling coordinated degree was significantly consistent in 2007 and 2017. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Regions have demonstrated a high level of coordinated evolution, and the pattern of western mountainous areas exhibited a low degree of coordinated growth. Lastly, based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative, its factors were underpinned by robust economic strength, the vitality support of the information level and the basic support function of the topography, active guidance of national policies and path dependence and industrial transfer.

English Abstract

WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
引用本文: WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
Citation: WEI Jianfei, DING Zhiwei, MENG Yiwei, LI Qiang. Regional Sustainable Assessment at City Level Based on CSDIS (China Sustainable Development Indicator System) Concept in the New Era, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 976-992. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1158-4
参考文献 (42)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回