留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China

WANG Guiling YANG Degang XIA Fuqiang ZHONG Ruisen XIONG Chuanhe

WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
引用本文: WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
Citation: WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6

Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
基金项目: Under the auspices of Grant Program of Clean Development Mechanism Fund of China (CDMF) (No. 2014092), Task 2 of Key Service Project 5 for the Characteristic Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. TSS-2015-014-FW-5-2), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571159), The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA20010301), Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (No. BK20181105)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    YANG Degang.E-mail:dgyang@ms.xjb.ac.cn

Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China

Funds: Under the auspices of Grant Program of Clean Development Mechanism Fund of China (CDMF) (No. 2014092), Task 2 of Key Service Project 5 for the Characteristic Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. TSS-2015-014-FW-5-2), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571159), The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA20010301), Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (No. BK20181105)
More Information
    Corresponding author: YANG Degang.E-mail:dgyang@ms.xjb.ac.cn
  • 摘要: Three types of spatial function zoning is an effective measure for regional environmental protection and orderly development. For ecological and economic coordinated development, spatial function zones should be divided scientifically to clear its direction of development and protection. Therefore, based on ecological constraints, a beneficial discussion would be about the key ecological function areas adopting the concept of ecological protection restriction and supporting socioeconomic development for spatial function zoning. In this paper, the researchers, taking Tacheng Basin, Xinjiang of China as an example, choose township as basic research unit and set up an evaluation index system from three aspects, namely, ecological protection suitability, agricultural production suitability, and urban development suitability, which are analyzed by using spatial analysis functions and exclusive matrix method. The results showed that:1) This paper formed a set of multilevel evaluation index systems for three types of spatial function zoning of the key ecological function areas based on a novel perspective by scientifically dividing Tacheng Basin into ecological space, agricultural space, and urban space, which realized the integration and scientific orientation for spatial function at the township scale. 2) Under the guidance of three types of spatial pattern, the functional orientation and suggestions of development and protection was clearly defined for ecological protection zones, ecological economic zones, agricultural production zones, and urban development zones. 3) A new idea of space governance is provided to promote the coordinated and sustainable development between ecology and economy, which can break the traditional mode of thinking about regional economic development, and offers a scientific basis and reference for macro decision-making.
  • [1] Albrechts L, Healey P, Kunzmann K R, 2003. Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of America Planning Association, 69(2):113-129. doi: 10.1080/01944-360308976301
    [2] Baral N, Dhungana A, 2014. Diversifying finance mechanisms for protected areas capitalizing on untapped revenues. Forest Policy and Economics, 41(3):60-67. doi:10.1016/j.forpol. 20-14.01.002
    [3] Baur J W R, Tynon J F, Ries P et al., 2016. Public attitudes abouturban forest ecosystem services management:a case study in Oregon cities. Urban For Urban Greening, 17:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.012
    [4] Brian H R, Alan T M, 2002. National and regional corporate spatial structure. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(2):347-368. doi: 10.1007/s001680200082
    [5] Carranza T, Manica A,Kapos V et al., 2014. Mismatches between conservation outcomes and management evaluation in protected areas:a case study in the Brazilian Cerrado. Biological Conser-vation, 173(8):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.0-3.004
    [6] Chen W, Duan X J, Chen J L et al., 2004. The methods of spatial development function regionalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59(Z1), 53-58.
    [7] Gualini E, 2004. Regionalization as experimental regionalism:the rescaling of territorial policy-making in Germany. International Journal of Urban and Research, 28(2):329-353. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00522.x
    [8] European Commission, 2003. European Spatial Development Perspective. European Commission.
    [9] Fan Jie, Tao Anjun, Ren Qing, 2010. On the historical background, scientific intentions, goal orientation, and policy framework of major function-oriented zone planning in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 4:289-299. (in Chinese)
    [10] Fan J, 2015. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2):186-201.
    [11] Fan Shuping, Cheng Jiumiao, Xiang Sike, 2011. Major function oriented zoning in Wuhu urban area:an approach based on the model of Three-dimensional Rubik's Cube. Journal of Sub-tropical Resources and Environment, 7(2):66-74. (in Chinese)
    [12] Farnworth E G H, Golley F B, 1975. Fragile ecosystems:evalua-tion of research and applications in the Neotropics. Journal of Ecology, 64(1):384-384. doi: 10.2307/2258706
    [13] Friedmann J, 1998. Urban and Regional Governance in the Asia Pacific. Vancouver:The University of British Columbia.
    [14] Greater L A, 2011. The London Plan, Spatial Development Strat-egy for Greater London. London:Greater London Authority.
    [15] Gu Linsheng, 2003. The characteristics and new trend of foreign land planning. The World Geography Research, 12(1):60-70. (in Chinese)
    [16] Higgins A J, Hajkowicz S, 2008. A model for landscape planning under complex spatial conditions. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 13(4):459-471. doi: 10.1007/s10666-007-91-17-3
    [17] Hong W Y, Guo R Z, 2017. Indicators for quantitative evaluation of the social services function of urban greenbelt systems:a case study of shenzhen, China. Ecological Indicators, 75:259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.044
    [18] Liu X H, Liu L, Peng Y, 2017. Ecological zoning for regional sustainable development using an integrated modeling approach in the Bohai Rim, China. Ecological Modeling, 353(10):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.027
    [19] Lu Dadao, Liu Yi, Fan Jie, 1999. The regional policy effects and regional development states in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 54(6):496-508. (in Chinese)
    [20] Ma Suisui, Zhu Chuangeng, Qiu Fangdao, 2010. Progress and prospect of study on major function regionalization of China. The World Geography Research, 19(4):91-97. (in Chinese)
    [21] Mamat K, Du P J, Ding J L, 2017. Ecological function regionali-zation of cultural heritage sites in Turpan, China, based on GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(4):1-12. doi:10. 1007/s1-2517-017-2892-5
    [22] Mi N, Yang M L, Fan X G et al., 2016. Theory and application of the main functional subdivision of limited development eco-logical zones. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(16):5058-5066. doi: 10.5846/stxb201501290239
    [23] Petrosillo I, Zurlini G,Grato E et al., 2006. Indicating fragility of socio-ecological tourism-based systems. Ecological Indicators, 6(1):104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.008
    [24] Roberts B H, Murray A T, 2002. National and regional corporate spatial structure. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(2):347-368. doi: 10.1007/s001680200082
    [25] Shaw D, Sykes O, 2005. Addressing connectivity in spatial plan-ning:the case of the English regions. Planning Theory and Practice, 6(1):11-33. doi: 10.1080/1464935042000334949
    [26] Stephen, 2013. Health workforce planning and innovations in service delivery. Brain Research, 348(1):201-203.
    [27] Tang Changchun, 2011. Construction of method and index system of MFOZ in a river basin:a case study of Yangtze River Basin. Geographical Research, 30(12):2173-2185. (in Chinese)
    [28] Tian Lingling, 2014. The Research of Major Function Oriented Zone Planning in Important Eco-function County. Wuhan:Central China Normal University. (in Chinese)
    [29] Tonts M, Martinus K, Plummer P, 2013. Regional development, redistribution and the extraction of mineral resources:the Western Australinan Goldfields as a resource bank. Applied Geography, 45(5):365-374. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.004
    [30] Wang Li, Zhang Zhuo,Wang Dan et al., 2012. Research on division of the major function oriented zoning of Liaoning Province. Areal Research and Development, 29(6):8-11. (in Chinese)
    [31] Wang Tianfu, 2015. The ‘Ecological’ Landscape Construction of Eco-Village. Tianjin:Tianjin University. (in Chinese)
    [32] Yang Qinye, Wu Shaohong, Zheng Du, 2002. A retrospect and prospect of researches on regional physiogeographical system (RPGS). Geographical Research. 21(4):407-417. (in Chinese)
    [33] Yang Meiling, 2014. Research on the Main Functional Subdivision of Limited Development Ecological Zones and Regional Development Mode. Xian:Northwest University. (in Chinese)
    [34] Zhang Li, 2009. Research on the County Land Use Planning Based on the ‘Anti-planning’ Theory:A Case Study of Biyang County, Henan Province. Beijing:China University of Geo-sciences. (in Chinese)
    [35] Zhang Lihua, Zou Bo, Huang Baorong, 2012. New perspective of comprehensive evaluation research on urban green space Ecosystem. China Population Resource and Environment, 22(4):67-71. (in Chinese)
    [36] Zhao Yongjiang, Dong Jianguo, Zhang Li, 2007. Researches of index system for planning the main functional regions:a case study of Henan Province. Geographical Research and Devel-opment, 26(6):39-42. (in Chinese)
    [37] Zhu Lijuan, 2016. County Functional Division in the Important Eco-function Areas:A Case Study in Guangze, Fujian Province. Fuzhou:Fujian Normal University. (in Chinese)
  • [1] Wei WEI, Congying LIU, Libang MA, Xueyuan ZHANG, Binbin XIE.  Ecological Land Suitability for Arid Region at River Basin Scale: Framework and Application Based on Minmum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(2): 312-323. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1261-9
    [2] Li MA, Lei KANG, Huazheng TIAN, Die XU.  Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Cumulative Effects and Zoning Regulations for Prefectural Mining Units in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(1): 49-63. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1258-4
    [3] Fuyou GUO, Siqi GAO, Lianjun TONG, Fangdao QIU, Hengzhou YAN.  Spatio-temporal Differentiation and Driving Factors of Industrial Ecology of Restricted Development Zone from Adaptive Perspective: A Case Study of Shandong, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(2): 329-341. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1184-x
    [4] FENG Xinghua, LEI Jing, XIU Chunliang, LI Jianxin, BAI Limin, ZHONG Yexi.  Analysis of Spatial Scale Effect on Urban Resilience: A Case Study of Shenyang, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 1005-1021. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1163-7
    [5] SUN Wei, CHEN Wen, JIN Zhifeng.  Spatial Function Regionalization Based on an Ecological-economic Analysis in Wuxi City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 352-362. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1032-4
    [6] YE Xin, LIU Guohua, LI Zongshan, GONG Li, WANG Meng, WANG Hao.  Evaluation of Ecological Effectiveness of Protected Areas in Northwest China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(2): 259-272. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0854-1
    [7] FANG Zhongquan, ZHANG Ying, WANG Zhangjun, ZHANG Lifeng.  Spatial Agglomeration of Exhibition Enterprises on a Regional Scale in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(3): 497-506. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0879-5
    [8] NING Jia, LIU Jiyuan, ZHAO Guosong.  Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(5): 523-536. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8
    [9] LIU Guohua, WU Xing.  Carbon Storage and Sequestration of National Key Ecological Restora-tion Programs in China: An Introduction to Special Issue . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(4): 393-396. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0695-0
    [10] FAN Jie, SUN Wei, ZHOU Kan, CHEN Dong.  Major Function Oriented Zone: New Method of Spatial Regulation for Reshaping Regional Development Pattern in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(2): 196-209.
    [11] FU Bojie, LIANG Di, LU Nan.  Landscape Ecology: Coupling of Pattern, Process, and Scale . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(4): 385-391.
    [12] ZHANG Xiang, HU Hong, XU Jiangang, YIN Haiwei.  Coordination of Urbanization and Water Ecological Environment in Shayinghe River Basin, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(4): 476-495.
    [13] CHEN Liding, TIAN Huiying, FU Bojie, ZHAO Xinfeng.  Development of a New Index for Integrating Landscape Patterns with Ecological Processes at Watershed Scale . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(1): 37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0037-9
    [14] TANG Yanling, ZHANG Guangxin, YANG Yuesuo, GAO Yingzhi.  Identifying Key Environmental Factors Influencing Spatial Variation of Water Quality in Upper Shitoukoumen Reservoir Basin in Jilin Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(4): 365-374. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0365-9
    [15] YUAN Wen, Philip JAMES, YANG Kai.  IMPACT OF URBANIZATION ON STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF RIVER SYSTEM—Case Study of Shanghai, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(2): 102-108.
    [16] ZHONG Yun, PENG Hua.  STUDY ON FUNCTION OF COMPONENTS OF DYNAMIC SYSTEM OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPED REGION―A Case Study of Foshan in Guangdong Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(3): 226-232.
    [17] ZHANG Ping-yu, MA Yan-ji, YU Zhen-han.  BORDER PORT MANZHOULI: URBAN FUNCTION AND SPACE DEVELOPMENT . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(4): 315-320.
    [18] LIAO Chi-mei, LI Lan, ZENG Ling-yun.  THE DIFFERENCE OF ECONOMIC FUNCTION AND THE TRENDS OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN CENTRAL CITIES ALONG THE XIJIANG RIVER . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(4): 335-342.
    [19] WANG Yan-ping, YAMAMURA J..  FUNCTION OF SPA DEVELOPMENT IN COUNTRYSIDE FOR DOMESTIC TOURISM IN CHINA──A Case Study of Some Spas in Liaoning Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(2): 168-176.
    [20] 曾菊新.  STUDY ON THE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS IN CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 1995, 5(1): 24-29.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  219
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • PDF下载量:  493
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-03-09
  • 修回日期:  2017-11-16
  • 刊出日期:  2019-08-27

Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of Grant Program of Clean Development Mechanism Fund of China (CDMF) (No. 2014092), Task 2 of Key Service Project 5 for the Characteristic Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. TSS-2015-014-FW-5-2), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571159), The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA20010301), Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (No. BK20181105)
    通讯作者: YANG Degang.E-mail:dgyang@ms.xjb.ac.cn

摘要: Three types of spatial function zoning is an effective measure for regional environmental protection and orderly development. For ecological and economic coordinated development, spatial function zones should be divided scientifically to clear its direction of development and protection. Therefore, based on ecological constraints, a beneficial discussion would be about the key ecological function areas adopting the concept of ecological protection restriction and supporting socioeconomic development for spatial function zoning. In this paper, the researchers, taking Tacheng Basin, Xinjiang of China as an example, choose township as basic research unit and set up an evaluation index system from three aspects, namely, ecological protection suitability, agricultural production suitability, and urban development suitability, which are analyzed by using spatial analysis functions and exclusive matrix method. The results showed that:1) This paper formed a set of multilevel evaluation index systems for three types of spatial function zoning of the key ecological function areas based on a novel perspective by scientifically dividing Tacheng Basin into ecological space, agricultural space, and urban space, which realized the integration and scientific orientation for spatial function at the township scale. 2) Under the guidance of three types of spatial pattern, the functional orientation and suggestions of development and protection was clearly defined for ecological protection zones, ecological economic zones, agricultural production zones, and urban development zones. 3) A new idea of space governance is provided to promote the coordinated and sustainable development between ecology and economy, which can break the traditional mode of thinking about regional economic development, and offers a scientific basis and reference for macro decision-making.

English Abstract

WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
引用本文: WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
Citation: WANG Guiling, YANG Degang, XIA Fuqiang, ZHONG Ruisen, XIONG Chuanhe. Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1022-6
参考文献 (37)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回