留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

QIAO Xuning GU Yangyang ZOU Changxin WANG Lei LUO Juhua HUANG Xianfeng

QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
引用本文: QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
Citation: QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y

Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
基金项目: Under the auspices of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 14BJY021), National Natural Science Foundation of China (40901296, U1404402), Youth backbone teachers of Henan province's universities (No. 2014GGJS-044)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    GU Yangyang

Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 14BJY021), National Natural Science Foundation of China (40901296, U1404402), Youth backbone teachers of Henan province's universities (No. 2014GGJS-044)
More Information
    Corresponding author: GU Yangyang
  • 摘要: Understanding the spatial interactions among multiple ecosystem services is crucial for ecosystem services management. Ecosystem services, including crop production, freshwater supply, aquatic production, net primary production, soil conservation, water conservation, flood regulation, forest recreation, were measured at 1-km grid scale covering the Taihu Lake Basin (TLB) of China. Our objective is to get a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distributions, trade-offs, synergies of multiple ecosystem services across the TLB. Our results found that:1) majority of ecosystem services were clustered in space and had a similar spatial distribution pattern with the geographical resource endowment. Most of the landscape contributed a high supply of no services, one or two, and a low supply of three to seven services. 2) There were high correlation between forest recreation and freshwater supply and regulating services. Aquatic production had low correlation with other services. 3) The changes of provisioning services led to trade-offs between regulating services and cultural services in the TLB, while synergies mainly occurred among the provisioning service. 4) The spatial relationships of multiple services are consistent at 1-km spatial scale, counties and provinces. This research could help integrate multiple ecosystem services across scales and serve as a reference for decision making.
  • [1] APBS (Anhui Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Anhui Sta-tistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China:China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
    [2] Bateman I J, Harwood A R, Mace G M et al., 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making:land use in the United Kingdom. Science, 341(6141):45-50. doi:10. 1126/science.1234379
    [3] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Let-ters, 12(12):1394-1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387. x
    [4] Brauman K A, Daily G C, Duarte T K et al., 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services:an overview highlighting hydro-logic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1):67-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758
    [5] Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J et al., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services:beyond the millennium ecosys-tem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci-ences of the United States of America, 106(5):1305-1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
    [6] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630):253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
    [7] DeFries R S, Foley J A, Asner G P, 2004. Land-use choices:bal-ancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5):249-257. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2
    [8] Derissen S, Latacz-Lohmann U, 2013. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosystem Services, 6:12-15. doi:10. 1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.002
    [9] Fan Yulong, Hu Nan, Ding Shengyan et al., 2016. Progress in terrestrial ecosystem services and biodiversity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(15):4583-4593. (in Chinese).
    [10] Field C B, Randerson J T, Malmström C M, 1995. Global net primary production:combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1):74-88. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-V
    [11] Fischer G, Nachtergaele F, Prieler S et al., 2008. Global agro-ecological zones assessment for agriculture (GAEZ 2008). Rome, Italy:ⅡASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO.
    [12] Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734):570-574. doi:10. 1126/science.1111772
    [13] Fu B J, Gulinck H, 1994. Land evaluation in an area of severe erosion:the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation and Development, 5(1):33-40. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3400050105
    [14] Fu B J, Wang S, Su C H et al., 2013. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1):4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002
    [15] Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K et al., 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19):7565-7570. doi:10.1073/pnas.120104 0109
    [16] Guo L, 2007. Ecology:doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science, 317(5842):1166-1166. doi:10.1126/science.317.5842. 1166
    [17] Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M et al., 2012. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions:an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17(3):22. doi: 10.5751/es-04853-170322
    [18] Jiao Y Y, Chen Q K, Chen X et al., 2014. Occurrence and transfer of a cyanobacterial neurotoxin β-methylamino-L-alanine within the aquatic food webs of Gonghu Bay (Lake Taihu, China) to evaluate the potential human health risk. Science of the Total Environment, 468-469:457-463. doi:10.1016/j. sci-totenv.2013.08.064
    [19] Jin Yan, Huang Jingfeng, Peng Dailiang, 2009. A new quantitative model of ecological compensation based on ecosystem capital in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 10(4):301-305. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820222
    [20] JPBS (Jiangsu Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China:China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
    [21] Legendre P, Legendre L, 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd ed. Am-sterdam:Elsevier.
    [22] Li J, Ren Z Y, Zhou Z X, 2006. Ecosystem services and their values:a case study in the Qinba mountains of China. Ecolog-ical Research, 21(4):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0148-z
    [23] Li J, Zhou Z X, 2016. Natural and human impacts on ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(7):6803-6815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5867-7
    [24] Li Z F, Luo C, Xi Q et al., 2015. Assessment of the AnnAGNPS model in simulating runoff and nutrients in a typical small watershed in the Taihu Lake basin, China. Catena, 133:349-361. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.007
    [25] Liu G L, Zhang L C, Zhang Q et al., 2015. The response of grain production to changes in quantity and quality of cropland in Yangtze River Delta, China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(3):480-489. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6745
    [26] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Synthesis. 2nd ed. Washington, DC:Island Press.
    [27] Piao S L, Fang J Y, Ciais P et al., 2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature, 458(7241):1009-1013. doi: 10.1038/nature07944
    [28] Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E et al., 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33:118-129. doi:10.1016/j. landusepol.2012.12.013
    [29] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial eco-system production:a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4):811-841. doi: 10.1029/93gb02725
    [30] Qiu J X, Turner M G, 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(29):12149-12154. doi:10.1073/pnas.1310539 110
    [31] Rangel T F, Diniz-Filho J A F, Bini L M, 2010. SAM:a compre-hensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33(1):46-50. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009. 06299.x
    [32] Rao Enming, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun, 2014. Assessment of flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs in china. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(8):1356-1365. (in Chinese).
    [33] Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M, 2010. Ecosys-tem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse land-scapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11):5242-5247. doi:10. 1073/pnas.0907284107
    [34] Ricketts T H, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R et al., 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(34):12579-12582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405147101
    [35] Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M et al., 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Soci-ety, 11(1):28. doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128
    [36] Rounsevell M D A, Annetts J E, Audsley E et al., 2003. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(2-3):465-479. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00217-7
    [37] Sayer J, Cassman K G, 2013. Agricultural innovation to protect the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(21):8345-8348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208054110
    [38] SBS (Shanghai Bureau of Statistic), 2011. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China:China Statistic Press. (in Chi-nese)
    [39] State Council of China, 2014. National New-Type Urbanization Plan 2014-2020. Beijing, China:People's Publishing House. (in Chinese)
    [40] Su C H, Fu B J, He C S et al., 2012a. Variation of ecosystem ser-vices and human activities:a case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China. Acta Oecologica, 44:46-57. doi:10.1016/j. actao.2011.11.006
    [41] Su C H, Fu B J, Wei Y P et al., 2012b. Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities:a case study in the Yanhe watershed. Sustainability Science, 7(1):17-32. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0145-1
    [42] Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bøcher P K et al., 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark:trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125:89-104. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
    [43] USGS, 2004. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 1 Arc Second scene SRTM_u03_n008e004, Unfilled Unfinished 2.0, Global Land Cover Facility. College Park, MD:University of Mary-land.
    [44] Vos W, Meekes H, 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development:perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46(1-3):3-14. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046 (99)00043-2
    [45] Wang G X, Zhang L M, Zhuang Q L et al., 2016. Quantification of the soil organic carbon balance in the Tai-Lake paddy soils of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 155:95-106. doi:10. 1016/j.still.2015.08.003
    [46] Wang Liyan, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun et al., 2017. Gross ecosys-tem product accounting in the national key ecological function area:an example of Arxan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(3):146-154. (in Chinese).
    [47] Wen Yuanguang, Liu Shirong, 1995. Quantitative analysis of the characteristics of rainfall interception of main forest ecosystems in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 31(4):289-298. (in Chinese)
    [48] Xu X B, Yang G S, Tan Y et al., 2016. Ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2020. Science of the Total Environment, 554-555:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.120
    [49] Yang G F, Ge Y, Xue H et al., 2015. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136:110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006
    [50] Yin Y X, Xu Y P, Chen Y, 2009. Relationship between flood/drought disasters and ENSO from 1857 to 2003 in the Taihu Lake basin, China. Quaternary International, 208(1-2):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2008.12.016
    [51] Yu T, Zhang Y, Hu X N et al., 2012. Distribution and bioaccumu-lation of heavy metals in aquatic organisms of different trophic levels and potential health risk assessment from Taihu lake, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 81:55-64. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv. 2012.04.014
    [52] Zhao M S, Running S W, 2010. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 Through 2009. Science, 329(5994):940-943. doi:10.1126/science. 1192666
    [53] ZPBS (Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Zhejiang Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China:China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
  • [1] Qing LI, Yong ZHOU, Tao XU, Li WANG, Qian ZUO, Jingyi LIU, Xueping SU, Nan HE, Zhengxiang WU.  Trade-offs/Synergies in Land-use Function Changes in Central China from 2000 to 2015 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(4): 711-726. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1219-3
    [2] WANG Xiaofeng, ZHANG Xinrong, FENG Xiaoming, LIU Shirong, YIN Lichang, CHEN Yongzhe.  Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of China Driven by Grain-for-Green Program . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(1): 101-114. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1098-z
    [3] TONG Huali, SHI Peiji, LUO Jun, LIU Xiaoxiao.  The Structure and Pattern of Urban Network in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(1): 59-74. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1090-7
    [4] DU Yan, QIN Weishan, SUN Jianfeng, WANG Xiaohui, GU Haoxin.  Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Regional Ecological Civilisa-tion Construction in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(5): 776-790. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1145-9
    [5] ZHOU Yangming, DOU Yuehan, YU Xiubo, ZHANG Li, HUANG Chong, WANG Yuyu, LI Xiaowei, LI He, JIA Yifei, BAKKER Martha, CARSJENS Gerrit Jan, ZHOU Yan, DUAN Houlang.  Examining Health of Wetlands with Multiple Ecosystem Services as Targets in China’s Coastal Regions . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(4): 600-613. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1137-9
    [6] NAN Ying, WANG Bingbing, ZHANG Da, LIU Zhifeng, QI Dekang, ZHOU Haohao.  Spatial Patterns of LULC and Driving Forces in the Transnational Area of Tumen River: A Comparative Analysis of the Sub-regions of China, the DPRK, and Russia . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(4): 588-599. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1136-x
    [7] CHU Nanchen, ZHANG Pingyu, LI He.  Transnational Economic Connection Analysis Based on Railway Class Ac-cessibility Between China and Russia . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(5): 872-886. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1064-9
    [8] XUE Shuyan, LI Gang, YANG Lan, LIU Ling, NIE Qifan, Muhammad Sajid MEHMOOD.  Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factor Analysis of Attended Collection and Delivery Points in Changsha City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 29(6): 1078-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1086-3
    [9] Aznarul ISLAM, Sanat Kumar GUCHHAIT.  Analysis of Social and Psychological Terrain of Bank Erosion Victims: A Study Along the Bhagirathi River, West Bengal, India . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(6): 1009-1026. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0937-7
    [10] LIU Xiaopeng, CHEN Xiao, HUA Kaiping, WANG Yajuan, WANG Peng, HAN Xiaojia, YE Junyan, WEN Shengqiang.  Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Area Eco-logical Migration . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(5): 894-906. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0971-5
    [11] XIAO Yang, OUYANG Zhiyun, XU Weihua, XIAO Yi, ZHENG Hua, XIAN Chaofan.  Optimizing Hotspot Areas for Ecological Planning and Management Based on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 256-269. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0803-4
    [12] ZHEN Nahui, FU Bojie, LU Yihe, WANG Shuai.  Poverty Reduction, Environmental Protection and Ecosystem Services:A Prospective Theory for Sustainable Development . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(1): 83-92. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0658-5
    [13] ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao.  Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
    [14] MA Xiaodong, QIU Fangdao, LI Quanlin, SHAN Yongbin, CAO Yong.  Spatial Pattern and Regional Types of Rural Settlements in Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(4): 482-491. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0615-8
    [15] WANG Bo, GUO Qinghai, Dou Sen.  Urbanization of Jilin Province and Its Spatial Pattern . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(4): 359-364.
    [16] KONG Fan-hua, Nobukazu NAKAGOSHI, YIN Hai-wei, Akira KIKUCHI.  SPATIAL GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF URBAN GREEN SPACES COMBINED WITH LANDSCAPE METRICS IN JINAN CITY OF CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2005, 15(3): 254-261.
    [17] 张佳华.  REANALYSIS OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS TO RESUME PAST VEGETATION AND ENVIRONMENT ——Taking Fenzhuang Profile in Beijing as an Example . Chinese Geographical Science, 1998, 8(3): 225-231.
    [18] 蔡启铭, 高锡芸, 陈宇炜, 马生伟, Martin Dokulil.  DYNAMIC VARIATIONS OF WATER QUALITY IN TAIHU LAKE AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF ITS INFLUENTIAL FACTORS . Chinese Geographical Science, 1996, 6(4): 364-374.
    [19] 王俊, 赵宝中.  WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF RIVERS IN JILIN PROVINCE OF CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 1995, 5(1): 87-96.
    [20] 肖笃宁, 赵羿, 郭林海.  LANDSCAPE PATTERN CHANGES IN WEST SUBURBS OF SHENYANG . Chinese Geographical Science, 1994, 4(3): 277-288.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  181
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  383
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-05-12
  • 修回日期:  2017-09-04
  • 刊出日期:  2018-02-27

Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 14BJY021), National Natural Science Foundation of China (40901296, U1404402), Youth backbone teachers of Henan province's universities (No. 2014GGJS-044)
    通讯作者: GU Yangyang

摘要: Understanding the spatial interactions among multiple ecosystem services is crucial for ecosystem services management. Ecosystem services, including crop production, freshwater supply, aquatic production, net primary production, soil conservation, water conservation, flood regulation, forest recreation, were measured at 1-km grid scale covering the Taihu Lake Basin (TLB) of China. Our objective is to get a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distributions, trade-offs, synergies of multiple ecosystem services across the TLB. Our results found that:1) majority of ecosystem services were clustered in space and had a similar spatial distribution pattern with the geographical resource endowment. Most of the landscape contributed a high supply of no services, one or two, and a low supply of three to seven services. 2) There were high correlation between forest recreation and freshwater supply and regulating services. Aquatic production had low correlation with other services. 3) The changes of provisioning services led to trade-offs between regulating services and cultural services in the TLB, while synergies mainly occurred among the provisioning service. 4) The spatial relationships of multiple services are consistent at 1-km spatial scale, counties and provinces. This research could help integrate multiple ecosystem services across scales and serve as a reference for decision making.

English Abstract

QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
引用本文: QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
Citation: QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
参考文献 (53)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回