Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

NING Jia; LIU Jiyuan; ZHAO Guosong

doi:10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

1.
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
2.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

基金项目: Under the auspices of National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CB954302), National Science and Technology Support Plan Project of China (No. 2013BAC03B04)

详细信息

通讯作者:
LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

1.
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
2.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CB954302), National Science and Technology Support Plan Project of China (No. 2013BAC03B04)

More Information

Corresponding author: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

摘要: In recent years, because of increasing human activities, ecosystems have been substantially disturbed and their service functions have been greatly compromised. Based on the effect of land use changes on the major ecosystem services, we estimated the ecosystem comprehensive anthropogenic disturbance index (ECADI) and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics of changes in the ECADI in China from 1990 to 2010. The average ECADI of the major ecosystem function zones in China in 2010 is approximately 0.382. The ECADI of Northeast China and North China is slightly higher than that of Northwest China and Southwest China. Most zones have slight changes in the ECADI. The average increases of ECADI in the major ecosystem function zones in China from 1990 to 2000 and from 2000 to 2010 are 0.0024 and 0.0002, respectively. The increase is mainly due to reclamation and urbanization, whereas the decrease is due to the implementation of ecosystem protection policies. During the last 20 years, the ECADI of water resources conservation zones increased first, and then stopped. The ECADI of soil conservation zones increased first, and then declined. The ECADI of sandstorm prevention zones, biodiversity conservation zones and flooding mitigation zones increased continuously. Our results may provide proposals to the government regarding land use planning and ecosystem protection plans in the major ecosystem zones. The major ecosystem function zones in the western part of China have been protected effectively. However, the major ecosystem function zones in the eastern part of China require more protection in the future.
- land use change /
- major ecosystems services /
- disturbance /
- spatiotemporal patterns /
- China
Abstract: In recent years, because of increasing human activities, ecosystems have been substantially disturbed and their service functions have been greatly compromised. Based on the effect of land use changes on the major ecosystem services, we estimated the ecosystem comprehensive anthropogenic disturbance index (ECADI) and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics of changes in the ECADI in China from 1990 to 2010. The average ECADI of the major ecosystem function zones in China in 2010 is approximately 0.382. The ECADI of Northeast China and North China is slightly higher than that of Northwest China and Southwest China. Most zones have slight changes in the ECADI. The average increases of ECADI in the major ecosystem function zones in China from 1990 to 2000 and from 2000 to 2010 are 0.0024 and 0.0002, respectively. The increase is mainly due to reclamation and urbanization, whereas the decrease is due to the implementation of ecosystem protection policies. During the last 20 years, the ECADI of water resources conservation zones increased first, and then stopped. The ECADI of soil conservation zones increased first, and then declined. The ECADI of sandstorm prevention zones, biodiversity conservation zones and flooding mitigation zones increased continuously. Our results may provide proposals to the government regarding land use planning and ecosystem protection plans in the major ecosystem zones. The major ecosystem function zones in the western part of China have been protected effectively. However, the major ecosystem function zones in the eastern part of China require more protection in the future.
- land use change /
- major ecosystems services /
- disturbance /
- spatiotemporal patterns /
- China

[1]	Ba?nou C, Alvarez E, Bagaria G et al., 2013. Spatial patterns of land use changes across a Mediterranean metropolitan landscape: implications for biodiversity management. Environmental Management, 52(4): 971-980. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0150-5
[2]	Battin J, Wiley M W, Ruckelshaus M H et al., 2007. Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 104(16): 6720-6725. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.0701685104
[3]	Chen Liding, Fu Bojie, 2000. Ecological signif icance, characteristics and types of disturbance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 20(4): 581-586. (in Chinese)
[4]	Chen Xiaoyan, Liang Zongsuo, Du Feng et al., 2007. The effect of disturbance on the structure and form of three typical communities in Loess hilly region of the northern of Shanxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(7): 3061-3071. (in Chinese)
[5]	Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[6]	Daily G C, 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D. C.: Island Press.
[7]	Daily G C, Matson P A, 2008. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. PNAS, 105(28): 9455-9456. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0804960105
[8]	Daily G C, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al., 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 21-28. doi: 10.1890/080025
[9]	Du Z, Shen Y, Wang J et al., 2009. Land-use change and its ecological responses: a pilot study of typical agro-pastoral region in the Heihe River, Northwest China. Environmental Geology, 58(7): 1549-1556. doi: 10.1007/s00254-008-1656-7
[10]	Ehrlich P R, Kareiva P M, Daily G C, 2012. Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization. Nature, 486: 68-73. doi: 10.1038/nature11157
[11]	Farina A, 1998. Principles and Method in Landscape Ecology. London: Chapman and Hall.
[12]	Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T et al., 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5): 437-440. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437
[13]	Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, Ouyang Zhiyun, 2013. Ecological Regionalization in China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
[14]	Gascoigne W R, Hoag D, Koontz L et al., 2011. Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecological Economics, 70(10): 1715-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04. 010
[15]	Hobbs R J, Huenneke L F, 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology, 6(3): 324-337. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030324.x
[16]	Hu Haiqing, Wei Shujing, Sun Long et al., 2013. Interaction among climate change, fire disturbance and ecosystem carbon cycle. Arid Land Geography, 36(1): 57-75. (in Chinese)
[17]	Lee Hannah, David Lohse, Charles Hutchinson et al., 1994. A Preliminary Inventory of Human Disturbance of World Ecosystems. Ambio, 23(4-5): 246-250.
[18]	Li J, 2012. Rural Household Livelihoods and Environmental Sustainability in the West of China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese)
[19]	Li J, Feldman M, Li S et al., 2011. Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China. PNAS, 108(19): 7721-7726. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1101018108
[20]	Li T, Li W, Qian Z, 2010. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecological Economics, 69(7): 1427-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05. 018
[21]	Li Yanmei, Niu Dong, Zhang Zhiqiang et al., 2009. Review of international scientific programmes and frontiers of biodiversity research. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(4): 2115-2123. (in Chinese)
[22]	Li Yifeng, Luo Yuechu, Liu Gang et al., 2013. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services, a case study in Miyun reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 726-736. (in Chinese)
[23]	Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z Y et al., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. PNAS, 105(28): 9477-9482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706436105
[24]	Liu Jiyuan, 1992. Land Use in the Tibet Autonomous Region. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
[25]	Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Xu Xinliang et al., 2010. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(4): 483-494. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0483-4
[26]	Lv Aifeng, Tian Hanqin, 2007. Interaction among climatic change, fire disturbance and ecosystem productivity. Journal of Plant Ecology, 31(2): 242-251. (in Chinese)
[27]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington D. C.: Island Press.
[28]	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People￠s Republic of China (MEPC), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 2008. National Ecosystem Function Regionalization. (in Chinese)
[29]	Mooney H A, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, 2013. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. PNAS, 110(supp. 1): 3665-3672. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.1107484110
[30]	Nelson E, Sander H, Hawthorne P et al., 2010. Projecting global land-use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models. PLoS ONE, 5(12): e14327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014327
[31]	Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Rusong, Zhao Jingzhu, 1999. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 10(5): 635-640. (in Chinese)
[32]	Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua, Huang Baorong et al., 2009. Regional Ecological Assessment and Ecosystem Service Zoning. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese)
[33]	Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D et al., 2011. The Impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental & Resource Economics, 48(2): 219-242. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0
[34]	Polasky S, Segerson K, 2009. Integrating ecology and economics in the study of ecosystem services: some lessons learned. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1: 409-434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144110
[35]	Swetnam R D, Fisher B, Mbilinyi B P et al., 2011. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3): 563-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2010.09.007
[36]	Tian H Q, Chen G, Zhang C et al., 2012. Century-scale response of ecosystem carbon storage to multifactorial global change in the southern United States. Ecosystems, 15: 674-694.
[37]	Wardrop D H, Glasmeier A K, Peterson-Smith J et al., 2011. Wetland ecosystem services and coupled socioeconomic benefits through conservation practices in the Appalachian Region. Ecological Applications, 21(3): S93-S115.
[38]	Xu H G, Tang X P, Liu J Y et al., 2009. China's progress toward the significant reduction of the rate of biodiversity loss. BioScience, 59(10): 843-852. doi: 10.1525/bio.2009. 59.10.6
[39]	Zhang Zengxiang, Zhao Xiaoli, Wang Xiao, 2012. Land Use Remote Sensing Monitoring in China. Beijing: Star Map Press. (in Chinese)
[40]	Zhao Guosong, Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui et al., 2014. Disturbance impacts of land use change on biodiversity conservation priority areas across China during 1990-2010. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(11): 1640-1650. (in Chinese)
[41]	Zhao Shidong, Zhang Yongmin, 2006. Ecosystems and human well-being: the achievements, contributions and prospects of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Advances in Earth Science, 21(9): 865-872. (in Chinese)
[42]	Zhou Ling, Shangguan Tieliang, Guo Donggang et al., 2012. Response of species diversity in Caragana Korshinskii communities to climate factors and grazing disturbance in Shanxi, Shaanxi, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(1): 111-122. (in Chinese)

[1]	Zhi WANG, Lihua XU, Yijun SHI, Qiwei MA, Yaqi WU, Zhangwei LU, Liwei MAO, Enqi PANG, Qi ZHANG. Impact of Land Use Change on Vegetation Carbon Storage During Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(2): 209-222. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1183-y
[2]	XU Jie, XIAO Yu, XIE Gaodi, JIANG Yuan. Ecosystem Service Flow Insights into Horizontal Ecological Compensation Standards for Water Resource: A Case Study in Dongjiang Lake Basin, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 214-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1025-3
[3]	HE Qingsong, TAN Shukui, XIE Peng, LIU Yaolin, LI Jing. Re-assessing Vegetation Carbon Storage and Emissions from Land Use Change in China Using Surface Area . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 601-613. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1058-7
[4]	LIU Xiaopeng, CHEN Xiao, HUA Kaiping, WANG Yajuan, WANG Peng, HAN Xiaojia, YE Junyan, WEN Shengqiang. Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Area Eco-logical Migration . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(5): 894-906. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0971-5
[5]	LU Yi, CAO Min, ZHANG Lei. A Vector-based Cellular Automata Model for Simulating Urban Land Use Change . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(1): 74-84. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0719-9
[6]	LUO Shanghua, MAO Qizheng, MA Keming. Comparison on Soil Carbon Stocks Between Urban and Suburban Topsoil in Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(5): 551-561. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0709-y
[7]	ZHU Likai, MENG Jijun, MAO Xiyan. Analyzing Land-use Change in Farming-pastoral Transitional Region Using Autologistic Model and Household Survey Approach . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(6): 716-728. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0642-5
[8]	ZHANG Runsen, PU Lijie, ZHU Ming. Impacts of Transportation Arteries on Land Use Patterns in Urbanrural Fringe：A Comparative Gradient Analysis of Qixia District, Nanjing City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(3): 378-388. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0582-5
[9]	LI Huixia, LIU Guohua, FU Bojie. Estimation of Regional Evapotranspiration in Alpine Area and Its Response to Land Use Change: A Case Study in Three-River Headwaters Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(4): 437-449.
[10]	PAN Yun, GONG Huili, ZHOU Demin, et al.. Impact of Land Use Change on Groundwater Recharge in Guishui River Basin, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(6): 734-743.
[11]	CHEN Hongwei, HU Yuanman, CHANG Yu, BU Rencang, LI Yuehui, LIU Miao. Simulating Impact of Larch Caterpillar (Dendrolimus superans) on Fire Regime and Forest Landscape in Da Hinggan Mountains, Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(5): 575-.
[12]	ZHANG Shumin, ZHANG Baolei, ZHANG Lei, LU Chunxia, CHENG Xiaoling. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Land Uses in Modern Urbanization of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(2): 132-138. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0132-y
[13]	WANG Zongming, LIU Zhiming, SONG Kaishan, ZHANG Bai, ZHANG Sumei, LIU Dianwei, REN Chunying, YANG Fei. Land Use Changes in Northeast China Driven by Human Activities and Climatic Variation . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 225-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0225-7
[14]	LIU Dianwei, WANG Zongming, SONG Kaishan, ZHANG Bai, HU Liangjun, HUANG Ni, ZHANG Sumei, LUO Ling, ZHANG Chunhua, JIANG Guangjia. Land Use/Cover Changes and Environmental Consequences in Songnen Plain, Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(4): 299-305. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0299-2
[15]	YAN Jianzhong, ZHANG Yili, ZHANG Liping, WU Yingying. Livelihood Strategy Change and Land Use Change——Case of Danzam Village in Upper Dadu River Watershed, Tibetan Plateau of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 231-240. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0231-9
[16]	WANG Zongming, ZHANG Yubo, ZHANG Bai, SONG Kaishan, GUO Zhixing, LIU Dianwei, LI Fang. Landscape Dynamics and Driving Factors in Da'an County of Jilin Province in Northeast China During 1956–2000 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(2): 137-145. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0137-y
[17]	XIAO Sisi, HUANG Xianjin, PENG Buzhuo. Coordinative Development Between Land Use Change and Regional Population-Resources-Environment-Development System—A Case Study of Jiangsu Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(4): 289-296. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0289-1
[18]	SHAO Jing-an, WEI Chao-fu, XIE De-ti. AN INSIGHT ON DRIVERS OF LAND USE CHANGE AT REGIONAL SCALE . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(2): 176-182.
[19]	XU Han-qiu. AN ASSESSMENT OF LAND USE CHANGES IN FUQING COUNTY OF CHINA USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(2): 126-135.
[20]	HUANG Fang, LIU Xiang-nan, XU Hong-mei, ZHANG Shu-wen, ZHANG Yang-zhen. ANALYSIS ON SPATIAL DIFFERENCE OF LAND USE CHANGE BASED ON PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL LANDSCAPE ATTRIBUTES ──A Case Study at Mongolian Autonomous County of Qian Gorlos, Jilin Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2001, 11(1): 50-56.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 549
HTML全文浏览量: 9
PDF下载量: 1410
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

通讯作者:
LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

Corresponding author: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

计量

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

通讯作者: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

English Abstract

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

全文HTML

目录

留言板

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

通讯作者: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

Corresponding author: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

计量

出版历程

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

通讯作者: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

English Abstract

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author: LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

全文HTML

目录

通讯作者:
LIU Jiyuan.E-mail:liujy@igsnrr.ac.cn

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China