留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China

ZHANG Xiaorui FANG Chuanglin WANG Zhenbo MA Haitao

ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
引用本文: ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
Citation: ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6

Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
基金项目: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41201168), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2013HGXJ0207)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    FANG Chuanglin. E-mail: fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn

Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41201168), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2013HGXJ0207)
More Information
    Corresponding author: FANG Chuanglin. E-mail: fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 摘要: Urban construction land suitability evaluation (UCLSE) is a complex system engineering and the basis for rational use of the limited urban land resources in China. It has an important practical value on urban construction land use planning and management from the angle of methodology. As a widely used technique, traditional multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS), is not suitable for UCLSE. This study develops an improved MCE-GIS method which could be more suitable for UCLSE based on urban complex ecological system theory and the summary of the shortcomings of traditional MCE-GIS. The improvements include three aspects: a composite evaluation index system rather than natural indexes alone, an index weight calculated by using fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method rather than the common AHP method, and the integrated overlay rule, which includes selecting the minimum value, weighted linear combination (WLC) and simple summation. The main advantage of this improved technique is that it can make UCLSE more comprehensive, more operational and more reasonable. It can provide a scientific basis for decision making in the planning and management of urban construction land use. The improved MCE-GIS system has been adopted in the New Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. Based on the results of UCLSE in New Hefei, three functional areas including construction-appropriate areas, construction-restricted areas and construction-forbidden areas could be worked out, in which 36.90% of the total study area could be developed as urban construction land and the remaining 63.10% should be protected as reserves land or as ecological land. Furthermore, the results can provide scientific decision support for spatial planning and eco-environment protection in New Hefei.
  • [1] Banai R, 1993. Fuzziness in geographic information systems: Contributions from the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(4): 315-329. doi:  10.1080/02693799308901964
    [2] Brail R, Klosterman R, 2001. Planning Support Systems: Inte-grating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visua-lization Tools. Redlands: ESRI Press.
    [3] Burrough P, McDonnell R A, 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [4] Cao Yongqing, Tang Fanghua, 2005. Systems Engineering and Information Technology of Urban Planning. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House. (in Chinese)
    [5] Carver S J, 1991. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geo-graphical information systems. International Journal of Geo-graphical Information Systems, 5(3): 321-339. doi:  10.1080/02693799108927858
    [6] Chen Gangqiang, Li Xun, Xu Xueqiang, 2008. Spatial agglome-ration and evolution of urban population in China. Acta Geo-graphica Sinica, 63(10): 1045-1054. (in Chinese)
    [7] Collins M G., Steiner F R, Rushman M J, 2001. Land-use suita-bility analysis in the United States: historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Man-agement, 28 (5): 611-621. doi:  10.1007/s002670010247
    [8] Fan Jie, Sun Wei, Zhou Kan et al., 2012. Major function oriented zone: New method of spatial regulation for reshaping regional development pattern in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(2): 196-209. doi:  10.1007/s11769-012-0528-y
    [9] Fisher P, 2000. Fuzzy modeling. In: Openshaw S et al. (eds.). Geo-Computation. London: Taylor and Francis, 161-186.
    [10] He Dan, Jin Fengjun, Zhou Jing, 2011. Urban construction land suitability evaluation in resource-based cities: Taking the Grand Canal Ecologic and Economic Area as an example. Geographical Research, 30(4): 655-666. (in Chinese)
    [11] Hu Yecui, Liu Yansui, Deng Xusheng, 2004. Relativity analysis on land use and land cover change and optimal allocation of land resources. Progress in Geography, 23(2): 51-57. (in Chinese)
    [12] Jankowski P, 1995. Integrating Geographical information system and multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(3): 251-273. doi:  10.1080/02693799508902036
    [13] Jiang H, Eastman J R, 2000. Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 14 (2): 173-184. doi:  10.1080/136588100240903
    [14] Jiang Yifan, Deng Gang, Lu Dongai, 2011. Land suitability as-sessment in alpine and canyon area based on GIS: a case study of Lancang county of Yunnan Province. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 36(1): 155-157. (in Chinese)
    [15] Jin Dongxiao, 2006. Some thoughts over land control. City Plan-ning Review, 30(2): 34-38. (in Chinese)
    [16] Joerin F, Theriault M, Musy A, 2001. Using GIS and outranking multi-criteria analysis for land use suitability assessment. In-ternational Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 15(2): 153-174. doi:  10.1080/13658810051030487
    [17] Krzanowski R, Raper J, 2001. Spatial Evolutionary Modeling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [18] Li X, Yeh A G., 2000. Modeling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (2): 131-152. doi:  10.1080/136588100240886
    [19] Li You, Wang Yanglin, Peng Jian et al., 2010. Assessment of ur-ban land suitability for construction in view of landscape ecology: A case study of Dandong city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(8): 2141-2150. (in Chinese)
    [20] Li Zhi, Li Guoping, 2008. An empirical study of China's urban expansion factors. Tongji University Journal (Social Science Section), 19(6): 30-34. (in Chinese)
    [21] Ligtenberg A, Bregt A K, Van lammeren R, 2001. Multi-ac-tor-based land use modeling: spatial planning using agents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 56(1): 21-33. doi: http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00162-1
    [22] Malczewski J, 1999. Multi-criteria GIS and Decision Analysis. London: John Wiley and Sons.
    [23] Malczewski J, 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, (62): 3-65. doi:  10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002
    [24] McHarg I L, 1969. Design with Nature. New York: Natural His-tory Press.
    [25] Openshaw S, Abrahart R J, 2000. Geo-Computation. London: Taylor and Francis.
    [26] Pereira J M C, Duckstein L, 1993. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. In-ternational Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(5): 407-424. doi:  10.1080/02693799308901971
    [27] Qu Yanbo, Zhang Fengrong, Du Suqin et al., 2010. Assessment method for ecological and economic suitability of urban con-struction land in Pinggu District, Beijing. China Land Science, 24(12): 21-27. (in Chinese)
    [28] Saaty T L, 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [29] Statistical Bureau of Anhui, 2011. Anhui Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
    [30] Statistical Bureau of Hefei, 2011. Hefei Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
    [31] Steinitz C, Parker P, Jordan L, 1976. Hand-drawn overlays: Their history and prospective uses. Landscape Architect, 66(5): 444-454.
    [32] Stewart T J, Janssen R, van Herwijnen M, 2003. A genetic algo-rithm approach to multi objective land use planning. Computers and Operations Research, 31(14): 2293-2313. doi:  10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00188-6
    [33] Tan Minghong, Lu Changhe, 2005. Urban land expansion and farmland loss in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 20(1): 52-58. (in Chinese)
    [34] Thill J C. 1999. Multicriteria Decision-making and Analysis: A Geographic Information Sciences Approach. New York: Ash-gate.
    [35] Wang Quan, Xu Jiangang, Xu Wenwen, 2005. A GIS approach to the urban land suitability evaluation. Progress in Geophysics, 20(3): 877-880. (in Chinese)
    [36] Wang Rusong, Hu Dan, Li Feng et al., 2010. Complex Ecological Management of the Regional Urban Development. Beijing: China Meteorological Press. (in Chinese)
    [37] Wang Yan, Song Zhenbai, Wu Peilin, 2008. Land suitability evaluation of high and new technology industry based on BP network. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 15(4): 248-250. (in Chinese)
    [38] Xu Zeshui, 2001. Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Journal of Systems Engineering, 16(4): 311-314. (in Chinese)
    [39] Ye Jiaan, Song Xiaodong, Niu Xinyi et al., 2006. Geographical Information and Planning Support System. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
    [40] Yin Haiwei, Xu Jiangang, Chen Changyong et al., 2006. GIS-based ecological sensitivity analysis in the east of Wujiang city. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 26(1): 64-69. (in Chinese)
    [41] Zadeh L A, 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3): 338-353. doi:  10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    [42] Zhang Xiaorui, Zhou Guoyan, 2009. Land suitability evaluation in master plan of development zone. Modern Urban Research, (12): 57-61. (in Chinese)
    [43] Zhou J, Civco D L, 1996. Using Genetic learning neural networks for spatial decision making in GIS. Photogram metric Engi-neering and Remote Sensing, 62(11): 1287-1295. doi:  0099-1112/96/6211-1287
    [44] Zong Yueguang, Wang Rong, Wang Chenggang et al., 2007. Ecological suitability assessment on land use based on poten-tial-constrain approach: the case of urbanized areas in Dalian city, China. Geographical Research, 26(6): 1117-1125. (in Chinese)
    [45] Zong Yueguang, Zhang Xiaorui, He Jinliao et al., 2011. Spatial Planning Decision Support Technology and Its Applications. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
  • [1] Qingke YANG, Linlin DING, Lei WANG, Chao LIU, Yeting FAN, Ying LI, Yazhu WANG.  Influence Mechanism of New-type Urbanization on Urban Land Use Efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(3): 474-488. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1354-0
    [2] Wei WEI, Congying LIU, Libang MA, Xueyuan ZHANG, Binbin XIE.  Ecological Land Suitability for Arid Region at River Basin Scale: Framework and Application Based on Minmum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(2): 312-323. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1261-9
    [3] Tianshi GU, Peng ZHANG, Xujia ZHANG.  Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of the New Infrastructure Construction Development Potential in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(4): 646-658. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1214-8
    [4] Wen WU, Yiquan WANG.  Evaluation and Promotion of the Service Capacity of Urban Public Open Spaces Based on Improving Accessibility: A Case Study of Shenyang City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(6): 1045-1056. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1238-0
    [5] DIAO Shuo, YUAN Jiadong, WU Yanyan.  Performance Evaluation of Urban Comprehensive Carrying Capacity of Harbin, Heilongjiang Province in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(4): 579-590. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1056-9
    [6] DU Jia, SONG Kaishan, YAN Baohua.  Impact of the Zhalong Wetland on Neighboring Land Surface Temper-ature Based on Remote Sensing and GIS . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(5): 798-808. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1050-2
    [7] WEI Ye, CHEN Zuoqi, XIU Chunliang, YU Bailang, LIU Hongxing.  Siting of Dark Sky Reserves in China Based on Multi-source Spatial Data and Multiple Criteria Evaluation Method . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 29(6): 949-961. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1079-2
    [8] WANG Jinzhu, GAO Ming, HE Xinhua, ZHANG Qian, Natamba LEO, XU Chang.  Evaluation of Potential Productivity of Woody Energy Crops on Marginal Land in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(6): 963-973. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0916-4
    [9] QIAO Weifeng, GAO Junbo, LIU Yansui, QIN Yueheng, LU Cheng, JI Qingqing.  Evaluation of Intensive Urban Land Use Based on an Artificial Neural Network Model:A Case Study of Nanjing City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(5): 735-746. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0905-7
    [10] LIU Yaolin, YE Qingqing, LI Jiwei, KONG Xuesong, JIAO Limin.  Suitability Evaluation of Rural Settlements Based on Accessibility of Production and Living: A Case Study of Tingzu Town in Hubei Province of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(4): 550-565. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0771-0
    [11] LIU Yansui, GUO Yanjun, LI Yurui, LI Yuheng.  GIS-based Effect Assessment of Soil Erosion Before and After Gully Land Consolidation: A Case Study of Wangjiagou Project Region, Loess Plateau . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(2): 137-146. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0742-5
    [12] ZHANG Zuo, TAN Shukui, TANG Wenwu.  A GIS-based Spatial Analysis of Housing Price and Road Density in Proximity to Urban Lakes in Wuhan City, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(6): 775-790. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0788-4
    [13] YIN Kai, ZHAO Qianjun, LI Xuanqi, CUI Shenghui, HUA Lizhong, LIN Tao.  A New Carbon and Oxygen Balance Model Based on Ecological Service of Urban Vegetation . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(2): 144-151. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0144-7
    [14] CAI Chunmiao, SHANG Jincheng.  Comprehensive Evaluation on Urban Sustainable Development of Harbin City in Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(2): 144-150. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0144-7
    [15] REN Chunying, ZHANG Bai, WANG Zongming, SONG Kaishan, LIU Dianwei, LIU Zhiming.  A GIS-based Tupu Analysis of Dynamics of Saline-alkali Land in Western Jilin Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(4): 333-340. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0333-1
    [16] CHU Jinlong, XU Jiangang, GAO Shu.  Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Residential Land Growth in Hefei of Anhui Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(2): 135-142. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0135-5
    [17] LI Jiang, WANG Xiao-yan, GUO Qing-sheng.  RESEARCH ON FRACTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN TRAFFIC NETWORK STRUCTURE BASED ON GIS . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(4): 346-349.
    [18] ZHANG Xin-chang, PAN Qiong, ZHAO Ling-ling, YE Shen-tao.  GIS-BASED ANALYSIS OF URBAN LAND-USE CHANGES—A Case Study of Haizhu District of Guangzhou City,China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(4): 339-345.
    [19] ZHANG Jing-xiang, WU Qi-yan, RUI Fu-hong.  EVOLUTION OF URBAN SYSTEM IN NEW ECONOMIC CIRCUMSTANCES AND PLANNING COUNTERMEASURES . Chinese Geographical Science, 2001, 11(2): 129-136.
    [20] ZHU Zhen-guo, YAO Shi-mou.  NEW PATTERNS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(1): 20-29.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  318
  • HTML全文浏览量:  10
  • PDF下载量:  1296
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-08-20
  • 修回日期:  2012-12-14
  • 刊出日期:  2013-11-10

Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41201168), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2013HGXJ0207)
    通讯作者: FANG Chuanglin. E-mail: fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn

摘要: Urban construction land suitability evaluation (UCLSE) is a complex system engineering and the basis for rational use of the limited urban land resources in China. It has an important practical value on urban construction land use planning and management from the angle of methodology. As a widely used technique, traditional multi-criteria evaluation based on GIS (MCE-GIS), is not suitable for UCLSE. This study develops an improved MCE-GIS method which could be more suitable for UCLSE based on urban complex ecological system theory and the summary of the shortcomings of traditional MCE-GIS. The improvements include three aspects: a composite evaluation index system rather than natural indexes alone, an index weight calculated by using fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method rather than the common AHP method, and the integrated overlay rule, which includes selecting the minimum value, weighted linear combination (WLC) and simple summation. The main advantage of this improved technique is that it can make UCLSE more comprehensive, more operational and more reasonable. It can provide a scientific basis for decision making in the planning and management of urban construction land use. The improved MCE-GIS system has been adopted in the New Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. Based on the results of UCLSE in New Hefei, three functional areas including construction-appropriate areas, construction-restricted areas and construction-forbidden areas could be worked out, in which 36.90% of the total study area could be developed as urban construction land and the remaining 63.10% should be protected as reserves land or as ecological land. Furthermore, the results can provide scientific decision support for spatial planning and eco-environment protection in New Hefei.

English Abstract

ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
引用本文: ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
Citation: ZHANG Xiaorui, FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, MA Haitao. Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS (MCE-GIS): Case of New Hefei City, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(6): 740-753. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0609-6
参考文献 (45)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回