[1]
|
Bao H J, Zhao L N, He Y et al., 2011. Coupling ensemble weather predictions based on TIGGE database with Grid-Xinanjiang model for flood forecast. Advances in Geosciences, 29:61-67. doi: 10.5194/adgeo-29-61-2011 |
[2]
|
Bekele E G, Nicklow J W, 2007. Multi-objective automatic cali-bration of SWAT using NSGA-II. Journal of Hydrology, 341(3-4):165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.014 |
[3]
|
Booij M J, Krol M S, 2010. Balance between calibration objectives in a conceptual hydrological model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55(6):1017-1032. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2010.505892 |
[4]
|
Box G E P, Cox D R, 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodo-logical), 26(2):211-252. |
[5]
|
Boyle D P, Gupta H V, Sorooshian S, 2000. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models:combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resources Research, 36(12):3663-3674. doi: 10.1029/2000WR900207 |
[6]
|
Cheng C T, Zhao M Y, Chau K W et al., 2006. Using genetic al-gorithm and TOPSIS for Xinanjiang model calibration with a single procedure. Journal of Hydrology, 316(1-4):129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.022 |
[7]
|
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S et al., 2002. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm:NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182-197. doi: 10.1109/4235.996017 |
[8]
|
Duan Q, Schaake J, Andréassian V et al., 2006. Model parameter estimation experiment (MOPEX):an overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third work-shops. Journal of Hydrology, 320(1-2):3-17. doi:10.1016/j. jhydrol.2005.07.031 |
[9]
|
Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D, 2010. One decade of multi-ob-jective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling:a re-view. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55(1):58-78. doi: 10.1080/02626660903526292 |
[10]
|
Faustini J M, Kaufmann P R, Herlihy A T, 2009. Downstream variation in bankfull width of wadeable streams across the conterminous United States. Geomorphology, 108(3-4):292-311. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.005 |
[11]
|
Fenicia F, Savenije H H G, Matgen P et al., 2007. A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research, 43(3):W03434. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005098 |
[12]
|
Gan T Y, Dlamini E M, Biftu G F, 1997. Effects of model com-plexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 192(1-4):81-103. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03114-9 |
[13]
|
Gill M K, Kaheil Y H, Khalil A et al., 2006. Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology. Water Resources Research, 42(7):W07417. doi:10.1029/2005 WR004528 |
[14]
|
Guinot V, Cappelaere B, Delenne C et al., 2011. Towards improved criteria for hydrological model calibration:theoretical analysis of distance-and weak form-based functions. Journal of Hydrology, 401(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.004 |
[15]
|
Gupta H V, Sorooshian S, Yapo P O, 1998. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models:multiple and noncommen-surable measures of information. Water Resources Research, 34(4):751-763. doi: 10.1029/97WR03495 |
[16]
|
Gupta H V, Kling H, Yilmaz K K et al., 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria:impli-cations for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hy-drology, 377(1-2):80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003 |
[17]
|
Hall J W, Tarantola S, Bates P D et al., 2005. Distributed sensitiv-ity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131(2):117-126. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:2(117) |
[18]
|
Jain S K, Sudheer K P, 2008. Fitting of hydrologic models:a close look at the Nash-Sutcliffe index. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13(10):981-986. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:10(981) |
[19]
|
Ju Q, Yu Z B, Hao Z C et al., 2009. Division-based rainfall-runoff simulations with BP neural networks and Xinanjiang model. Neurocomputing, 72(13-15):2873-2883. doi:10.1016/j. neu-com.2008.12.032 |
[20]
|
Khu S T, Madsen H, di Pierro F, 2008. Incorporating multiple observations for distributed hydrologic model calibration:an approach using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and clustering. Advances in Water Resources, 31(10):1387-1398. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.011 |
[21]
|
Kollat J B, Reed P M, 2006. Comparing state-of-the-art evolu-tionary multi-objective algorithms for long-term groundwater monitoring design. Advances in Water Resources, 29(6):792-807. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.010 |
[22]
|
Kollat J B, Reed P M, Wagener T, 2012. When are multiobjective calibration trade-offs in hydrologic models meaningful? Water Resources Research, 48(3):03520. doi:10.1029/2011WR 011534 |
[23]
|
Krause P, Boyle D P, Bäse F, 2005. Comparison of different effi-ciency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5:89-97. doi: 10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005 |
[24]
|
Laumanns M, Thiele L, Deb K et al., 2002. Combining conver-gence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 10(3):263-282. doi: 10.1162/106365602760234108 |
[25]
|
Li H X, Zhang Y Q, Chiew F H S et al., 2009. Predicting runoff in ungauged catchments by using Xinanjiang model with MODIS leaf area index. Journal of Hydrology, 370(1-4):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.003 |
[26]
|
Li H Y, Wigmosta M S, Wu H et al., 2013. A physically based runoff routing model for land surface and earth system models. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14(3):808-828. doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-12-015.1 |
[27]
|
Madsen H, 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rain-fall-runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hy-drology, 235(3-4):276-288. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00) 00279-1 |
[28]
|
Madsen H, Wilson G, Ammentorp H C 2002. Comparison of dif-ferent automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 261(1-4):48-59. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00619-9 |
[29]
|
Madsen H, 2003. Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Advances in Water Resources, 26(2):205-216. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00092-1 |
[30]
|
Matott L S, Babendreier J E, Purucker S T, 2009. Evaluating un-certainty in integrated environmental models:a review of concepts and tools. Water Resources Research, 45(6):W06421. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007301 |
[31]
|
McCuen R H, Knight Z, Cutter A G, 2006. Evaluation of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index. Journal of Hydrologic Engi-neering, 11(6):597-602. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699 (2006)11:6(597) |
[32]
|
Muleta M K, 2012. Model performance sensitivity to objective function during automated calibrations. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(6):756-767. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000497 |
[33]
|
Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3):282-290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70) 90255-6 |
[34]
|
Pokhrel P, Gupta H V, 2010. On the use of spatial regularization strategies to improve calibration of distributed watershed models. Water Resources Research, 46(1):W01505. doi: 10.1029/2009WR008066 |
[35]
|
Price K, Purucker S T, Kraemer S R et al., 2012. Tradeoffs among watershed model calibration targets for parameter estimation. Water Resources Research, 48(10):W10542. doi: 10.1029/2012WR012005 |
[36]
|
Reed P, Minsker B S, Goldberg D E, 2003. Simplifying multi-objective optimization:an automated design methodology for the nondominated sorted genetic algorithm-II. Water Resources Research, 39(7):1196. doi: 10.1029/2002WR001483 |
[37]
|
Schaefli B, Gupta H V, 2007. Do Nash values have value? Hy-drological Processes, 21(15):2075-2080. doi:10.1002/hyp. 6825 |
[38]
|
Sun Y, Tian F Q, Yang L et al., 2014. Exploring the spatial varia-bility of contributions from climate variation and change in catchment properties to streamflow decrease in a mesoscale basin by three different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 508:170-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.004 |
[39]
|
Tang Y, Reed P, Wagener T, 2006. How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(2):289-307. doi: 10.5194/hess-10-289-2006 |
[40]
|
Tang Y, Reed P M, Kollat J B, 2007. Parallelization strategies for rapid and robust evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources applications. Advances in Water Resources, 30(3):335-353. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.06.006 |
[41]
|
Tekleab S, Uhlenbrook S, Mohamed Y et al., 2011. Water balance modeling of Upper Blue Nile catchments using a top-down approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(7):2179-2193. doi: 10.5194/hess-15-2179-2011 |
[42]
|
van Griensven A, Bauwens W, 2003. Multiobjective autocalibra-tion for semidistributed water quality models. Water Resources Research, 39(12):1348. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002284 |
[43]
|
van Werkhoven K, Wagener T, Reed P et al., 2009. Sensitivi-ty-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for mul-ti-objective calibration of watershed models. Advances in Water Resources, 32(8):1154-1169. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres. 2009.03.002 |
[44]
|
Vrugt J A, Bouten W, Gupta H V et al., 2002. Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters:the information content of experimental data. Water Resources Research, 38(12):1312. doi: 10.1029/2001WR001118 |
[45]
|
Vrugt J A, Gupta H V, Bastidas L A et al., 2003. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 39(8):1214-1232. doi: 10.1029/2002WR001746 |
[46]
|
Wagener T, 2003. Evaluation of catchment models. Hydrological Processes, 17(16):3375-3378. doi: 10.1002/hyp.5158 |
[47]
|
Yapo P O, Gupta H V, Sorooshian S, 1998. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology, 204(1-4):83-97. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00107-8 |
[48]
|
Zhao R J, 1992. The Xinanjiang model applied in China. Journal of Hydrology, 135(1-4):371-381. doi:10.1016/0022-1694 (92)90096-E |