-
Overall, the CENTURY-modelled SOC storage and the associated uncertainty changed over time (Fig. 2a). During the past three decades, the SOC storage in topsoils (up to a depth of 20 cm) of Chinese uplands had increased from 3.03 Pg C to 3.40 Pg C. The uncertainty intervals were from 1.59 to 4.78 Pg C in 1980 and from 2.39 to 4.62 Pg C in 2010. The SOC storage increment during this period was 370 Tg C with the uncertainty interval ranging from –440 to 1110 Tg C. The mean percentage uncertainty of SOC storage estimated according to method in 2.4 was 41%, which decreased from 52% in 1980 to 33% in 2010. The rates of SOC change underwent three distinct stages. To be specific, SOC storage declined whilst the decrease rate of SOC gradually reached to 0 in the late 1980s, and then, the increase rate of SOC persistently increased in the 1990s, finally reaching to a relatively stable level in the 2000s (Fig. 2b). Mean changing rates of SOC in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s were –5, 18 and 24 Tg C/yr, respectively, with mean 95% confidence intervals ranging from –40 to 24, –6 to 41 and 2 to 45 Tg C/yr, respectively.
Figure 2. CENTURY-modelled soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics for Chinese upland soils. a) SOC storage, b) changes in SOC storage
The estimated mean SOC storage for Chinese uplands (upper 20 cm) over the past three decades was 3.11 Pg C, representing an average soil organic carbon density (SOCD) of 29.4 Mg C/ha. The median value of the simulated SOCD as a robust estimator was utilized to figure out the area proportions of different SOCD levels in Chinese uplands (Fig. 3). The area percentage for SOCD being lower than 20 Mg C/ha decreased from 35% in 1980 to 11% to 2010, whilst for SOCD between 20 and 50 Mg C/ha, this figure increased from 50% in 1980 to 82% in 2010 (Fig. 3a). Overall, SOCD for approximately 74% of the Chinese uplands increased during the period of 1980–2010, and 31% of the uplands had a SOCD increment of 5–10 Mg C/ha (Fig. 3b). Additionally, the mean simulated SOCD of 1600 modelling units also increased by 4 Mg C/ha from 1980 to 2010, implying that Chinese upland soils served as a crucial carbon sink during this period.
-
The spatial distribution maps of the mean rate of changes in SOCD between 1980 and 2010 were shown in Fig. 4. A dramatic SOCD increase in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China (including Beijing, Tianjin municipalities, Shandong, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces) can be obviously observed, while the SOCD decrease was mainly witnessed in Heilongjiang Province of the northeastern China (Fig. 4). Upland soils in the northern, eastern, and south central China had sequestrated 118, 132 and 97 Tg C over the past three decades, respectively, whereas upland soil in the northeastern China lost 113 Tg C during that period. SOC accumulation in Hebei, Shandong, Henan, and Sichuan provinces was most significant (Fig. 5). On contrast, SOC in upland soils of Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Guizhou declined by 136, 21 and 1 Tg C, respectively.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of the mean rate of changes in SOCD (ΔSOCD) of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) between 1980 and 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1
Figure 5. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and their changes in the provinces of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) from 1980 to 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1
The regional discrepancies in SOC storages for different time periods were also considerable (Fig. 6). During the 1980s, the possibility of SOC loss in the northern, northeastern, and northwestern China was high, while SOC accumulation mainly occurred in the eastern, south central, and southwestern China. During the 1990s, only the northeastern China was highly likely to suffer from SOC lost, while SOC in the northern, northwestern, and south central China tended to rise. The SOC storages in the eastern and southwestern China rose by 57 and 40 Tg C, with the uncertainty intervals ranging from 23 to 85 Tg C, and 6 to 72 Tg C, respectively. The SOC in the northeastern China kept declining during the 2000s, whereas SOC storages in the other five regions showed a rising trend. Over the entire 30 years, the amounts of SOC accumulation were ranked as: eastern China (132, from 26 to 220 Tg C) > northern China (118, from –75 to 284 Tg C) > south central China (97, from –38 to 209) > southwestern China (82, from –25 to 187 Tg C) > northwestern China (54, from –44 to 141 Tg C) > northeastern China (–113, from –237 to 12 Tg C). The uplands in eastern China functioned as a crucial carbon sink, and accounted for 35% of the total SOC increment in China, while SOC lost in the northeastern China represented –29% of the total change in SOC of China (Table 1). When uncertainties associated with the estimated SOC changes were taken into account, however, only the eastern China could be confirmed to function as a carbon sink over the 30 years. The changing trend of SOC in upland soils of the other five regions remained to be determined.
Figure 6. Soil organic carbon (SOC) changes and uncertainties among regions in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and three decades from 1980 to 2010. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals
Table 1. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and SOC change (ΔSOC) percentage of the total in six regions
Region Area / Mha SOC storage in 1980 / Pg C SOC storage in 2010 / Pg C ΔSOC percentage of total / % 1980s 1990s 2000s 1980–2010 NE 22.67 1.00 (0.62 to 1.40) 0.89 (0.62 to 1.18) 155.78 –12.77 –6.09 –28.68 N 23.45 0.59 (0.27 to 1.01) 0.71 (0.47 to 1.01) 23.88 28.25 31.70 30.92 NW 15.93 0.36 (0.20 to 0.56) 0.41 (0.30 to 0.55) 22.95 11.12 18.65 14.44 E 17.54 0.32 (0.15 to 0.55) 0.45 (0.34 to 0.60) –64.11 30.47 19.58 34.86 SC 13.73 0.34 (0.14 to 0.60) 0.44 (0.31 to 0.60) –27.86 21.66 19.44 26.22 SW 12.45 0.42 (0.21 to 0.66) 0.50 (0.35 to 0.68) –10.64 21.27 16.72 22.24 China 105.77 3.03 (1.59 to 4.78) 3.40 (2.39 to 4.62) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Notes: ‘–’ means that the SOC change in the region is opposite to the total SOC change in China. NE represents northeastern China, N represents northern China, NW represents northwestern China, E represents eastern China, SC represents south central China, and SW represents southwestern China. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC storages -
In 1980, the area-weighted means of SOCD (0–20 cm) for 50 major soil types of Chinese uplands varied from 10.4 Mg C/ha (Aeolian soils) to 125.8 Mg C/ha (Peat soils). SOC storages in 1980 for the 50 soil types ranged from 463 Tg C (Fluvo-aquic soils) to 0.015 Tg C (Red earths). Nevertheless, by 2010, the area-weighted mean of SOCD for the 50 soil types ranged from 13.6 Mg C/ha (Aeolian soils) to 97.2 Mg C/ha (Peat soils). The SOC storages for the 50 soil types ranged from 652 Tg C (Fluvo-aquic soils) to 0.027Tg C (Red earths). The soil types with top 10 highest SOCDs and SOC storages were manifested in Figs. 7a–7d. The total SOC storages for the top 10 soil types in 1980 and 2010 were 2.17 and 2.43 Pg C, respectively, both taking up 71% of the total SOC storage in topsoils of Chinese uplands.
Figure 7. Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in 1980 (a) and 2010 (b), SOC storage in 1980 (c) and 2010 (d) of top 10 soil types. PS: Peat soils; AS: Albic soils; DFS: Dark felty soils; BS: Black soils; DBE: Dark-brown earths; MS: Meadow soils; YBE: Yellow-brown earths; LS: Limestone soils; RE: Red earths; YCS: Yellow-cinnamon soils; LRE: Lateritic red earths; CBS: Cold brown calcic soils; FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; C: Chernozems; PuS: Purplish soils; CA: Castanozems; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BrE: Brown earths. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals
Over the past three decades, changes in SOC differed dramatically among soil types (Fig. 8). To be specific, SOCD for Peat soils, Albic soils, and Black soils declined most evidently (decreased by 28.5, 12.1 and 8.3 Mg C/ha, respectively), while SOCD for Red earths, Lime concretion black soils and Purplish soils increased most significantly (increased by 11.3, 11.0 and 10.0 Mg C/ha, respectively). SOC lost from Meadow soils, Black soils and Chernozems during these 30 years was most severe (decreased by 40.5, 36.6 and 31.5 Tg C, respectively), while SOC accumulation in Fluvo-aquic soils, Cinnamon soils and Purplish soils was most considerable (increased by 188.4, 69.6 and 66.6 Tg C, respectively).
Figure 8. Decline and increase in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) (a) and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage (b) from 1980 to 2010 in the top three types of soil. Full names for soil types refer to caption of Fig. 7
-
Although many researches have explored the rate of the SOC change in croplands of China, most of them were implemented within the local or regional range (Zhao et al., 2018). The nationwide estimate of upland SOC changes is still rare. Some of the existing national-scale estimates were based on the meta-analysis of literature data (Xie et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2010). However, other researchers (Wang et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2013) used process-based models (Table 2). There are differences between the results of the previous and current studies due to the considerable uncertainties originating from the limited sample size, multiple data sources, inconsistent analysis methods, and the inherent spatial heterogeneities of model inputs (Tang et al., 2018). Estimates derived from a meta-analysis of literature data would inevitably bring about a high level of uncertainty due to the spatial coverage limits of the literature data in the study area and the assumed changes in the SOC density, but quantifying such uncertainty is still hard (Sun et al., 2010). While for SOC estimates using the process-based model, uncertainties associated with the spatial heterogeneity of available model input data were usually overlooked (Liu et al., 2019). Nonetheless, this study provided not only the estimates of SOC but also their uncertainty intervals. Given the uncertainties resulting from the spatial heterogeneity of available model input data, our CENTURY model estimated the rate of SOC change for Chinese uplands during 1980–2010 was 12.3 Tg C/yr, with an uncertainty interval of –14.6 to 37.0 Tg C/yr. Even if the medians of SOC estimates were comparable to those of existing studies (Table 2), the ranges of estimated uncertainty intervals were still large owing to the availabilities of detailed model input data and inherent spatial heterogeneity of available input data for the model.
Table 2. Estimated soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in uplands of China reported by different studies
Period Area / Mha Soil depth/cm Change rate in SOC storage / (Tg C/yr) SOC storage / Pg C SOCD in 2010 / (Mg C/ha) Method Reference 1980–2000 125.9 19.4 18.5 3.07 – Meta-analysis Xie et al. (2007) 1985–2006 106.4 20.0 17.5 – – Meta-analysis Pan et al. (2010) 1980–2000 100.2 –20.0 10.7 (8.9 to 12.5) – – Meta-analysis Sun et al. (2010) 1980–2020 105.8 20.0 12.4 – – CENTURY model Wang et al. (2011) 1980–2010 87.3 30.0 – – 35.4 Agro-C model Yu et al. (2013) 1980–2010 105.8 20.0 12.3 (–14.6 to 37.0) 3.11 (2.1 to 4.5) 32.1 (22.0 to 42.6) CENTURY model The current study Notes: ‘–’ means no data. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC stocks -
The estimated uncertainty intervals for SOC storage change during the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were –40 to 24, –6 to 41, and 2 to 45 Tg C/yr, respectively. In this way, it was concluded that whether Chinese upland soils functioned as a carbon source or sink during the first two decades (1980–2000) remained uncertain, but it was definite that they acted as a carbon sink during the subsequent 10 years. Although SOC storage over the past three decades increased by 370 Tg C, the uncertainties associated with the spatial heterogeneity of model inputs remained high (from –440 to 1110 Tg C). Such uncertainties may exert a profound impact on decision–making and policy development. Thus, identifying the sources of uncertainties and developing strategies for reducing such uncertainties are vital in future modelling.
The initial SOC and clay content have been identified as the two most influential soil properties affecting the CENTURY-modelled SOC dynamics in Chinese uplands and such influences on CENTURY-modelled SOC were time-varying (Liu et al., 2017; 2019), which may explain why the uncertainties associated with the estimated SOC storage changed over time (Fig. 2a). Consequently, collecting more detailed information on the soil properties, especially initial SOC and clay content from legacy soil investigation data, is of great significance to provide credible and meaningful estimates of SOC for decision-making regarding soil fertility and carbon management. Besides, the estimated changes in SOC in northeastern China are slightly different from those in Liu et al. (2019) (–106 Tg C, with an uncertainty interval ranging from –207 to –9). This difference is mainly attributed to the data aggregation effect of the modelling units. Liu et al. (2019) divided uplands of northeastern China into 1037 modeling units by spatially overlaying soil subgroup boundary polygons with the county-level land-use boundary polygons. Furthermore, in this national-scale study, this region was categorized into 199 modelling units by spatially overlaying soil type boundary polygons with the city-level land-use boundary polygons. Despite this, estimated trends of SOC changes in uplands of northeastern China were consistent, indicating that the upland SOC lost in Northeastern China was definite.
-
Over the past 30 years, significant upland SOC accumulation mainly showed up in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China (including Beijing, Tianjin municipalities, Shandong, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, Figs. 4, 5), while SOC in Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China declined significantly (Figs. 4, 5). Upland soils in northeastern China lost 113 Tg C over this period, and the carbon loss in Black soils of the northeastern China was most serious. For instance, the fertile Black soils in the northeastern China lost 8.3 Mg C/ha, equivalent to approximately 15% of the baseline SOCD in 1980 (~55 Mg C/ha). The decline of SOC in black soils of the northeastern China was mainly attributed to their relatively higher initial SOC content and shorter period of reclamation for agricultural purposes (Xie et al., 2007; Mao et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019). Overall, despite significant SOC accumulation in Chinese uplands, the mean SOCD in 2010 (34.75 Mg C/ha) was still significantly smaller than those in croplands of developed countries like the United States (44 Mg C/ha) and those in Europe (53 Mg C/ha) (Chiti et al., 2012; Adhikari et al., 2019). The relatively low SOC levels in Chinese uplands provided a prerequisite for further sequestration of more carbon in the soils, as the changes of SOC stock were greatly related to the initial SOC levels (Stewart et al., 2007; 2008, Jin et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2012; Korsaeth et al., 2014). For example, across the six major agronomic regions of China, the relationship between change in SOC and the initial SOC levels in 1980 (r = –0.86, P < 0.05) was significantly negative. This negative baseline effect could be accounted for by the method of soil carbon saturation, as low SOCD that is far from the saturation level may have higher potential and efficiency to store added C (Stewart et al., 2007; 2008). Also, soils with a high initial SOC level (i.e., the northeastern China) are liable to lose carbon as it can generate higher CO2 equivalents originating from SOC mineralisation (Korsaeth et al., 2014). This implies that Chinese upland soils are still highly likely to sequestrate more carbon in the soils, providing suitable management practices such as reduced tillage, rational fertilization, crop residue incorporation, and manure amendment. Moreover, economic and policy incentives to farmers for improving soil fertility are also indispensable (Chiti et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). Also, this reveals that soils on a declining path can furthermore lose a lot of carbon if the management is not adapted. The first step should be stopping losses (especially on such fertile soils as black soils).
Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010
-
Abstract: Detailed information on the spatio-temporal changes of cropland soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly contribute to the improvement of soil fertility and mitigate climate change. Nonetheless, information and knowledge on the national scale spatio-temporal changes and the corresponding uncertainties of SOC in Chinese upland soils remain limited. The CENTURY model was used to estimate the SOC storages and their changes in Chinese uplands from 1980 to 2010. With the Monte Carlo method, the uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC dynamics associated with the spatial heterogeneous model inputs were quantified. Results revealed that the SOC storage in Chinese uplands increased from 3.03 (1.59 to 4.78) Pg C in 1980 to 3.40 (2.39 to 4.62) Pg C in 2010. Increment of SOC storage during this period was 370 Tg C, with an uncertainty interval of –440 to 1110 Tg C. The regional disparities of SOC changes reached a significant level, with considerable SOC accumulation in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China and SOC loss in the northeastern China. The SOC lost from Meadow soils, Black soils and Chernozems was most severe, whilst SOC accumulation in Fluvo-aquic soils, Cinnamon soils and Purplish soils was most significant. In modelling large-scale SOC dynamics, the initial soil properties were major sources of uncertainty. Hence, more detailed information concerning the soil properties must be collected. The SOC stock of Chinese uplands in 2010 was still relatively low, manifesting that recommended agricultural management practices in conjunction with effectively economic and policy incentives to farmers for soil fertility improvement were indispensable for future carbon sequestration in these regions.
-
Figure 1. Upland soils. a) Distribution in China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were excluded); and b) Area percentages of Top 10 soil types. Northeastern China includes Heilongjiang (HLJ), Jilin (JL) and Liaoning (LN); northern China includes Beijing (BJ), Hebei (HeB), Shanxi (SX), Inner Mongolia (IM) and Tianjin (TJ); northwestern China covers Gansu (GS), Shaanxi (SaX), Ningxia (NX), Qinghai (QH) and Xinjiang (XJ); eastern China includes Shanghai (SH), Jiangsu (JS), Zhejiang (ZJ), Anhui (AH), Fujian (FJ), Jiangxi (JX) and Shandong (SD); south central China includes Henan (HeN), Hubei (HuB), Hunan (HuN), Guangdong (GD), Guangxi (GX) and Hainan (HaN); southwestern China includes Chongqing (CQ), Sichuan (SC), Guizhou (GZ), Yunnan (YN) and Tibet (T); TW: Taiwan; HK: Hong Kong; MC: Macao. FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; MS: Meadow soils; PuS: Purplish soils; ClS: Cultivated loessial soils; BrE: Brown earths; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BS: Black soils; C: Chernozems; CA: Castanozems; OS: Other soils
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of the mean rate of changes in SOCD (ΔSOCD) of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) between 1980 and 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1
Figure 5. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and their changes in the provinces of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) from 1980 to 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1
Figure 7. Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in 1980 (a) and 2010 (b), SOC storage in 1980 (c) and 2010 (d) of top 10 soil types. PS: Peat soils; AS: Albic soils; DFS: Dark felty soils; BS: Black soils; DBE: Dark-brown earths; MS: Meadow soils; YBE: Yellow-brown earths; LS: Limestone soils; RE: Red earths; YCS: Yellow-cinnamon soils; LRE: Lateritic red earths; CBS: Cold brown calcic soils; FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; C: Chernozems; PuS: Purplish soils; CA: Castanozems; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BrE: Brown earths. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals
Figure 8. Decline and increase in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) (a) and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage (b) from 1980 to 2010 in the top three types of soil. Full names for soil types refer to caption of Fig. 7
Table 1. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and SOC change (ΔSOC) percentage of the total in six regions
Region Area / Mha SOC storage in 1980 / Pg C SOC storage in 2010 / Pg C ΔSOC percentage of total / % 1980s 1990s 2000s 1980–2010 NE 22.67 1.00 (0.62 to 1.40) 0.89 (0.62 to 1.18) 155.78 –12.77 –6.09 –28.68 N 23.45 0.59 (0.27 to 1.01) 0.71 (0.47 to 1.01) 23.88 28.25 31.70 30.92 NW 15.93 0.36 (0.20 to 0.56) 0.41 (0.30 to 0.55) 22.95 11.12 18.65 14.44 E 17.54 0.32 (0.15 to 0.55) 0.45 (0.34 to 0.60) –64.11 30.47 19.58 34.86 SC 13.73 0.34 (0.14 to 0.60) 0.44 (0.31 to 0.60) –27.86 21.66 19.44 26.22 SW 12.45 0.42 (0.21 to 0.66) 0.50 (0.35 to 0.68) –10.64 21.27 16.72 22.24 China 105.77 3.03 (1.59 to 4.78) 3.40 (2.39 to 4.62) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Notes: ‘–’ means that the SOC change in the region is opposite to the total SOC change in China. NE represents northeastern China, N represents northern China, NW represents northwestern China, E represents eastern China, SC represents south central China, and SW represents southwestern China. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC storages Table 2. Estimated soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in uplands of China reported by different studies
Period Area / Mha Soil depth/cm Change rate in SOC storage / (Tg C/yr) SOC storage / Pg C SOCD in 2010 / (Mg C/ha) Method Reference 1980–2000 125.9 19.4 18.5 3.07 – Meta-analysis Xie et al. (2007) 1985–2006 106.4 20.0 17.5 – – Meta-analysis Pan et al. (2010) 1980–2000 100.2 –20.0 10.7 (8.9 to 12.5) – – Meta-analysis Sun et al. (2010) 1980–2020 105.8 20.0 12.4 – – CENTURY model Wang et al. (2011) 1980–2010 87.3 30.0 – – 35.4 Agro-C model Yu et al. (2013) 1980–2010 105.8 20.0 12.3 (–14.6 to 37.0) 3.11 (2.1 to 4.5) 32.1 (22.0 to 42.6) CENTURY model The current study Notes: ‘–’ means no data. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC stocks -
[1] Adhikari K, Owens P R, Libohova Z et al., 2019. Assessing soil organic carbon stock of Wisconsin, USA and its fate under future land use and climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 667: 833–845. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.420 [2] Ardö J, Olsson L, 2003. Assessment of soil organic carbon in semi-arid Sudan using GIS and the CENTURY model. Journal of Arid Environments, 54(4): 633–651. doi: 10.1006/jare.2002.1105 [3] Chiti T, Gardin L, Perugini L et al., 2012. Soil organic carbon stock assessment for the different cropland land uses in Italy. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 48(1): 9–17. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0599-4 [4] Fitton N, Datta A, Smith K et al., 2014. Assessing the sensitivity of modelled estimates of N2O emissions and yield to input uncertainty at a UK cropland experimental site using the DailyDayCent model. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 99(1–3): 119–133. [5] Huang S, Sun Y, Zhang W, 2012. Changes in soil organic carbon stocks as affected by cropping systems and cropping duration in China’s paddy fields: a meta–analysis. Climatic Change, 112(3–4): 847–858. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0255-x [6] Jenkinson D S, Rayner J H, 1977. The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Science, 123(5): 298–305. doi: 10.1097/00010694-197705000-00005 [7] Jin L, Li Y, Gao Q et al., 2008. Estimate of carbon sequestration under cropland management in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 41(3): 734–743. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2008.01083 [8] Korsaeth A, Henriksen T M, Roer A G et al., 2014. Effects of regional variation in climate and SOC decay on global warming potential and eutrophication attributable to cereal production in Norway. Agricultural Systems, 127: 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.007 [9] Lal R, 2002. Soil carbon sequestration in China through agricultural intensification, and restoration of degraded and desertified ecosystems. Land Degradation & Development, 13(6): 469–478. doi: 10.1002/ldr.531 [10] Li C S, Frolking S, Frolking T A, 1992. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 97(D9): 9759–9776. doi: 10.1029/92JD00510 [11] Liu X Y, Zhao Y C, Shi X Z et al., 2017. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of CENTURY-modeled SOC dynamics in upland soils under different climate-soil-management conditions: a case study in China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 17(1): 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1516-0 [12] Liu X Y, Zhao Y C, Shi X Z et al., 2019. Uncertainty in CENTURY-modelled changes in soil organic carbon stock in the uplands of Northeast China, 1980–2050. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 113(1): 77–93. doi: 10.1007/s10705-018-9963-1 [13] Lugato E, Panagos P, Bampa F et al., 2014. A new baseline of organic carbon stock in European agricultural soils using a modelling approach. Global Change Biology, 20(1): 313–326. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12292 [14] Mao D H, He X Y, Wang Z M et al., 2019. Diverse policies leading to contrasting impacts on land cover and ecosystem services in Northeast China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240: 117961. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117961 [15] Necpalova M, Anex R P, Fienen M N et al., 2015. Understanding the DayCent model: calibration, sensitivity, and identifiability through inverse modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 66(apr.): 110–130. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.011 [16] Ogle S M, Breidt F J, Easter M et al., 2010. Scale and uncertainty in modeled soil organic carbon stock changes for US croplands using a process–based model. Global Change Biology, 16(2): 810–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01951.x [17] Pan G X, Xu X X, Smith P et al., 2010. An increase in topsoil SOC stock of China's croplands between 1985 and 2006 revealed by soil monitoring. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 136(1–2): 133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.011 [18] Parton W J, Schimel D S, Cole C V et al., 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51(5): 1173–1179. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x [19] Qin Falyu, Shi Xuezheng, Xu Shengxiang et al., 2016. Zonal differences in correlation patterns between soil organic carbon and climate factors at multi-extent. Chinese Geographical Science, 26(5): 670–678. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0736-3 [20] Stewart C E, Paustian K, Conant R T et al., 2007. Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation. Biogeochemistry, 86(1): 19–31. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0 [21] Stewart C E, Paustian K, Conant R T et al., 2008. Soil carbon saturation: evaluation and corroboration by long-term incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(7): 1741–1750. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.014 [22] Sun W J, Huang Y, Zhang W et al., 2010. Carbon sequestration and its potential in agricultural soils of China. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24(3): GB3001. doi: 10.1029/2009GB003484 [23] Tang X L, Zhao X, Bai Y F et al., 2018. Carbon pools in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: new estimates based on an intensive field survey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16): 4021–4026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700291115 [24] Tornquist C G, Gassman P W, Mielniczuk J et al., 2009. Spatially explicit simulations of soil C dynamics in Southern Brazil: integrating century and GIS with i_Century. Geoderma, 150(3–4): 404–414. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.001 [25] WANG Dandan, LI Xinhui, SHI Xuezheng et al., 2017. Influence of Climate on Soil Organic Carbon in Chinese Paddy Soils. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(3): 351–361. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0868-8 [26] Wang S H, Shi X Z, Zhao Y C et al., 2011. Regional simulation of soil organic carbon dynamics for dry farmland in east China by cou-pling a 1:500 000 soil database with the Century model. Pedosphere, 21(3): 277–287. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60128-8 [27] Xie E Z, Zhang Y X, Huang B et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal variations in soil organic carbon and their drivers in southeastern China during 1981-2011. Soil & Tillage Research, : 205. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104763 [28] Xie Z B, Zhu J G, Liu G et al., 2007. Soil organic carbon stocks in China and changes from 1980s to 2000s. Global Change Biology, 13(9): 1989–2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01409.x [29] Yu Dongsheng, Panyue, Zhang Haidong et al., 2017. Equality testing for soil grid unit resolutions to polygon unit scales with DNDC modeling of regional SOC pools. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4): 552–568. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0887-5 [30] Yu Y Q, Huang Y, Zhang W, 2012. Modeling soil organic carbon change in croplands of China, 1980–2009. Global and Planetary Change, 82–83: 115–128. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.12.005 [31] Yu Y Q, Huang Y, Zhang W, 2013. Projected changes in soil organic carbon stocks of China’s croplands under different agricultural managements, 2011–2050. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 178: 109–120. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.008 [32] Zhang L M, Wang G X, Zheng Q F et al., 2017. Quantifying the impacts of agricultural management and climate change on soil organic carbon changes in the uplands of Eastern China. Soil & Tillage Research, 174: 81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.06.005 [33] Zhao C X, Shan L, Deng X P et al., 2004. Current situation and counter-measures of the development of dryland farming in China. Trans. CSAE, 20(4): 280–285. doi: 10.1300/J064v24n01_09 [34] Zhao Y C, Wang M Y, Hu S J et al., 2018. Economics-and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16): 4045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700292114 [35] Zhou Y, Hartemink A E, Shi Z et al., 2019. Land use and climate change effects on soil organic carbon in North and Northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 647: 1230–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.016