留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010

Xiaoyu LIU Yongcun ZHAO Xuezheng SHI Shihang WANG Xiang FENG Fang YAN

LIU Xiaoyu, ZHAO Yongcun, SHI Xuezheng, WANG Shihang, FENG Xiang, YAN Fang, 2021. Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(1): 126−136 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1179-7
Citation: LIU Xiaoyu, ZHAO Yongcun, SHI Xuezheng, WANG Shihang, FENG Xiang, YAN Fang, 2021. Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(1): 126−136 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1179-7

doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1179-7

Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010

Funds: Under the auspices of National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0603002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31800358, 31700369), Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (No. CX(19)3099), the Foundation of Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry (No. 2019kj014)
More Information
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
  • Figure  1.  Upland soils. a) Distribution in China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were excluded); and b) Area percentages of Top 10 soil types. Northeastern China includes Heilongjiang (HLJ), Jilin (JL) and Liaoning (LN); northern China includes Beijing (BJ), Hebei (HeB), Shanxi (SX), Inner Mongolia (IM) and Tianjin (TJ); northwestern China covers Gansu (GS), Shaanxi (SaX), Ningxia (NX), Qinghai (QH) and Xinjiang (XJ); eastern China includes Shanghai (SH), Jiangsu (JS), Zhejiang (ZJ), Anhui (AH), Fujian (FJ), Jiangxi (JX) and Shandong (SD); south central China includes Henan (HeN), Hubei (HuB), Hunan (HuN), Guangdong (GD), Guangxi (GX) and Hainan (HaN); southwestern China includes Chongqing (CQ), Sichuan (SC), Guizhou (GZ), Yunnan (YN) and Tibet (T); TW: Taiwan; HK: Hong Kong; MC: Macao. FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; MS: Meadow soils; PuS: Purplish soils; ClS: Cultivated loessial soils; BrE: Brown earths; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BS: Black soils; C: Chernozems; CA: Castanozems; OS: Other soils

    Figure  2.  CENTURY-modelled soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics for Chinese upland soils. a) SOC storage, b) changes in SOC storage

    Figure  3.  Changes in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) from 1980 to 2010. (a) Distribution of SOCD in 1980 and 2010. (b) Distribution of changes in SOCD (ΔSOCD) from 1980 to 2010. ΔSOCD = SOCD2010 – SOCD1980. Uplands: upper 20 cm

    Figure  4.  Spatial distribution of the mean rate of changes in SOCD (ΔSOCD) of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) between 1980 and 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1

    Figure  5.  Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and their changes in the provinces of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) from 1980 to 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1

    Figure  6.  Soil organic carbon (SOC) changes and uncertainties among regions in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and three decades from 1980 to 2010. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals

    Figure  7.  Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in 1980 (a) and 2010 (b), SOC storage in 1980 (c) and 2010 (d) of top 10 soil types. PS: Peat soils; AS: Albic soils; DFS: Dark felty soils; BS: Black soils; DBE: Dark-brown earths; MS: Meadow soils; YBE: Yellow-brown earths; LS: Limestone soils; RE: Red earths; YCS: Yellow-cinnamon soils; LRE: Lateritic red earths; CBS: Cold brown calcic soils; FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; C: Chernozems; PuS: Purplish soils; CA: Castanozems; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BrE: Brown earths. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals

    Figure  8.  Decline and increase in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) (a) and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage (b) from 1980 to 2010 in the top three types of soil. Full names for soil types refer to caption of Fig. 7

    Table  1.   Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and SOC change (ΔSOC) percentage of the total in six regions

    RegionArea / MhaSOC storage in 1980 / Pg CSOC storage in 2010 / Pg CΔSOC percentage of total / %
    1980s1990s2000s1980–2010
    NE22.671.00 (0.62 to 1.40)0.89 (0.62 to 1.18)155.78 –12.77 –6.09 –28.68
    N23.450.59 (0.27 to 1.01)0.71 (0.47 to 1.01)23.8828.2531.7030.92
    NW15.930.36 (0.20 to 0.56)0.41 (0.30 to 0.55)22.9511.1218.6514.44
    E17.540.32 (0.15 to 0.55)0.45 (0.34 to 0.60)–64.1130.4719.5834.86
    SC13.730.34 (0.14 to 0.60)0.44 (0.31 to 0.60)–27.8621.6619.4426.22
    SW12.450.42 (0.21 to 0.66)0.50 (0.35 to 0.68)–10.6421.2716.7222.24
    China105.773.03 (1.59 to 4.78)3.40 (2.39 to 4.62)100.00100.00100.00100.00
    Notes: ‘–’ means that the SOC change in the region is opposite to the total SOC change in China. NE represents northeastern China, N represents northern China, NW represents northwestern China, E represents eastern China, SC represents south central China, and SW represents southwestern China. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC storages
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   Estimated soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in uplands of China reported by different studies

    PeriodArea / MhaSoil depth/cmChange rate in SOC storage / (Tg C/yr)SOC storage / Pg CSOCD in 2010 / (Mg C/ha)MethodReference
    1980–2000125.919.418.53.07Meta-analysisXie et al. (2007)
    1985–2006106.420.017.5Meta-analysisPan et al. (2010)
    1980–2000100.2–20.010.7 (8.9 to 12.5)Meta-analysisSun et al. (2010)
    1980–2020105.820.012.4CENTURY modelWang et al. (2011)
    1980–201087.330.035.4Agro-C modelYu et al. (2013)
    1980–2010105.820.012.3 (–14.6 to 37.0)3.11 (2.1 to 4.5)32.1 (22.0 to 42.6)CENTURY modelThe current study
    Notes: ‘–’ means no data. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC stocks
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Adhikari K, Owens P R, Libohova Z et al., 2019. Assessing soil organic carbon stock of Wisconsin, USA and its fate under future land use and climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 667: 833–845. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.420
    [2] Ardö J, Olsson L, 2003. Assessment of soil organic carbon in semi-arid Sudan using GIS and the CENTURY model. Journal of Arid Environments, 54(4): 633–651. doi:  10.1006/jare.2002.1105
    [3] Chiti T, Gardin L, Perugini L et al., 2012. Soil organic carbon stock assessment for the different cropland land uses in Italy. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 48(1): 9–17. doi:  10.1007/s00374-011-0599-4
    [4] Fitton N, Datta A, Smith K et al., 2014. Assessing the sensitivity of modelled estimates of N2O emissions and yield to input uncertainty at a UK cropland experimental site using the DailyDayCent model. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 99(1–3): 119–133.
    [5] Huang S, Sun Y, Zhang W, 2012. Changes in soil organic carbon stocks as affected by cropping systems and cropping duration in China’s paddy fields: a meta–analysis. Climatic Change, 112(3–4): 847–858. doi:  10.1007/s10584-011-0255-x
    [6] Jenkinson D S, Rayner J H, 1977. The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Science, 123(5): 298–305. doi:  10.1097/00010694-197705000-00005
    [7] Jin L, Li Y, Gao Q et al., 2008. Estimate of carbon sequestration under cropland management in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 41(3): 734–743. doi:  10.3724/SP.J.1005.2008.01083
    [8] Korsaeth A, Henriksen T M, Roer A G et al., 2014. Effects of regional variation in climate and SOC decay on global warming potential and eutrophication attributable to cereal production in Norway. Agricultural Systems, 127: 9–18. doi:  10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.007
    [9] Lal R, 2002. Soil carbon sequestration in China through agricultural intensification, and restoration of degraded and desertified ecosystems. Land Degradation & Development, 13(6): 469–478. doi:  10.1002/ldr.531
    [10] Li C S, Frolking S, Frolking T A, 1992. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 97(D9): 9759–9776. doi:  10.1029/92JD00510
    [11] Liu X Y, Zhao Y C, Shi X Z et al., 2017. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of CENTURY-modeled SOC dynamics in upland soils under different climate-soil-management conditions: a case study in China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 17(1): 1–12. doi:  10.1007/s11368-016-1516-0
    [12] Liu X Y, Zhao Y C, Shi X Z et al., 2019. Uncertainty in CENTURY-modelled changes in soil organic carbon stock in the uplands of Northeast China, 1980–2050. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 113(1): 77–93. doi:  10.1007/s10705-018-9963-1
    [13] Lugato E, Panagos P, Bampa F et al., 2014. A new baseline of organic carbon stock in European agricultural soils using a modelling approach. Global Change Biology, 20(1): 313–326. doi:  10.1111/gcb.12292
    [14] Mao D H, He X Y, Wang Z M et al., 2019. Diverse policies leading to contrasting impacts on land cover and ecosystem services in Northeast China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240: 117961. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117961
    [15] Necpalova M, Anex R P, Fienen M N et al., 2015. Understanding the DayCent model: calibration, sensitivity, and identifiability through inverse modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 66(apr.): 110–130. doi:  10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.011
    [16] Ogle S M, Breidt F J, Easter M et al., 2010. Scale and uncertainty in modeled soil organic carbon stock changes for US croplands using a process–based model. Global Change Biology, 16(2): 810–822. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01951.x
    [17] Pan G X, Xu X X, Smith P et al., 2010. An increase in topsoil SOC stock of China's croplands between 1985 and 2006 revealed by soil monitoring. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 136(1–2): 133–138. doi:  10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.011
    [18] Parton W J, Schimel D S, Cole C V et al., 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51(5): 1173–1179. doi:  10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x
    [19] Qin Falyu, Shi Xuezheng, Xu Shengxiang et al., 2016. Zonal differences in correlation patterns between soil organic carbon and climate factors at multi-extent. Chinese Geographical Science, 26(5): 670–678. doi:  10.1007/s11769-015-0736-3
    [20] Stewart C E, Paustian K, Conant R T et al., 2007. Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation. Biogeochemistry, 86(1): 19–31. doi:  10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0
    [21] Stewart C E, Paustian K, Conant R T et al., 2008. Soil carbon saturation: evaluation and corroboration by long-term incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(7): 1741–1750. doi:  10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.014
    [22] Sun W J, Huang Y, Zhang W et al., 2010. Carbon sequestration and its potential in agricultural soils of China. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24(3): GB3001. doi:  10.1029/2009GB003484
    [23] Tang X L, Zhao X, Bai Y F et al., 2018. Carbon pools in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: new estimates based on an intensive field survey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16): 4021–4026. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1700291115
    [24] Tornquist C G, Gassman P W, Mielniczuk J et al., 2009. Spatially explicit simulations of soil C dynamics in Southern Brazil: integrating century and GIS with i_Century. Geoderma, 150(3–4): 404–414. doi:  10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.001
    [25] WANG Dandan, LI Xinhui, SHI Xuezheng et al., 2017. Influence of Climate on Soil Organic Carbon in Chinese Paddy Soils. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(3): 351–361. doi:  10.1007/s11769-017-0868-8
    [26] Wang S H, Shi X Z, Zhao Y C et al., 2011. Regional simulation of soil organic carbon dynamics for dry farmland in east China by cou-pling a 1:500 000 soil database with the Century model. Pedosphere, 21(3): 277–287. doi:  10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60128-8
    [27] Xie E Z, Zhang Y X, Huang B et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal variations in soil organic carbon and their drivers in southeastern China during 1981-2011. Soil & Tillage Research, : 205. doi:  10.1016/j.still.2020.104763
    [28] Xie Z B, Zhu J G, Liu G et al., 2007. Soil organic carbon stocks in China and changes from 1980s to 2000s. Global Change Biology, 13(9): 1989–2007. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01409.x
    [29] Yu Dongsheng, Panyue, Zhang Haidong et al., 2017. Equality testing for soil grid unit resolutions to polygon unit scales with DNDC modeling of regional SOC pools. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4): 552–568. doi:  10.1007/s11769-017-0887-5
    [30] Yu Y Q, Huang Y, Zhang W, 2012. Modeling soil organic carbon change in croplands of China, 1980–2009. Global and Planetary Change, 82–83: 115–128. doi:  10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.12.005
    [31] Yu Y Q, Huang Y, Zhang W, 2013. Projected changes in soil organic carbon stocks of China’s croplands under different agricultural managements, 2011–2050. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 178: 109–120. doi:  10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.008
    [32] Zhang L M, Wang G X, Zheng Q F et al., 2017. Quantifying the impacts of agricultural management and climate change on soil organic carbon changes in the uplands of Eastern China. Soil & Tillage Research, 174: 81–91. doi:  10.1016/j.still.2017.06.005
    [33] Zhao C X, Shan L, Deng X P et al., 2004. Current situation and counter-measures of the development of dryland farming in China. Trans. CSAE, 20(4): 280–285. doi:  10.1300/J064v24n01_09
    [34] Zhao Y C, Wang M Y, Hu S J et al., 2018. Economics-and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16): 4045. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1700292114
    [35] Zhou Y, Hartemink A E, Shi Z et al., 2019. Land use and climate change effects on soil organic carbon in North and Northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 647: 1230–1238. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.016
  • [1] Hongjiao QU, Yajing YIN, Junli LI, Wenwen XING, Weiyin WANG, Cheng ZHOU, Yunhua ZHANG.  Spatio-temporal Evolution of the Agricultural Eco-efficiency Network and Its Multidimensional Proximity Analysis in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(4): 724-744. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1296-y
    [2] Wenpeng DU, Huimin YAN, Zhiming FENG, Chao ZHANG, Yanzhao YANG.  Spatio-temporal Pattern of Ecosystem Pressure in Countries Along the Belt and Road: Combining Remote Sensing Data and Statistical Data . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(5): 745-758. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1298-9
    [3] Hanyu LI, Hermann KAUFMANN, Guochang XU.  Modeling Spatio-temporal Drought Events Based on Multi-temporal, Multi-source Remote Sensing Data Calibrated by Soil Humidity . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(1): 127-141. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1250-4
    [4] XU Pengfei, LIN Muying, JIN Pingbin.  Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Urbanization in China Using DMSP/OLS Nighttime Light Data from 1992-2013 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(1): 70-80. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1169-1
    [5] Xingjie WANG, Ke GUO, Yuan LIANG, Tingbin ZHANG, Guxi WANG.  Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Atmospheric Pollution and Cause Analysis of Haze Events in Sichuan Basin, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(3): 539-557. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1209-5
    [6] ZHU Shanyou, LIU Yi, HUA Junwei, ZHANG Guixin, ZHOU Yang, XIANG Jiamin.  Monitoring Spatio-temporal Variance of an Extreme Heat Event Using Multiple-source Remote Sensing Data . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(5): 744-757. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0989-8
    [7] GONG Li, LIU Guohua, WANG Meng, YE Xin, WANG Hao, LI Zongshan.  Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Organic Carbon in China: A Meta-analysis . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(2): 188-200. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0858-x
    [8] Yu Dongsheng, Pan Yue, Zhang Haidong, Wang Xiyang, Ni Yunlong, Zhang Liming, Shi Xue­zheng.  Equality Testing for Soil Grid Unit Resolutions to Polygon Unit Scales with DNDC Modeling of Regional SOC Pools . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(4): 552-568. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0887-5
    [9] WU Qiulan, LIANG Yong, LI Ying, WANG Xizhi, YANG Lei, WANG Xiaotong.  Factors Acquisition and Content Estimation of Farmland Soil Organic Carbon Based upon Internet of Things . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(3): 431-440. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0875-9
    [10] QIN Falyu, SHI Xuezheng, XU Shengxiang, YU Dongsheng, WANG Dandan.  Zonal Differences in Correlation Patterns Between Soil Organic Carbon and Climate Factors at Multi-extent . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(5): 670-678. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0736-3
    [11] FANG Xiangmin, WANG Qingli, ZHOU Wangming, ZHAO Wei, WEI Yawei, NIU Lijun, DAI Limin.  Land Use Effects on Soil Organic Carbon, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Activity in Changbai Mountains of Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(3): 297-306. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0670-9
    [12] LI Taijun, LIU Guobin.  Age-related Changes of Carbon Accumulation and Allocation in Plants and Soil of Black Locust Forest on Loess Plateau in Ansai County, Shaanxi Province of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(4): 414-422. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0704-3
    [13] XIONG Dingpeng, SHI Peili, SUN Yinliang, WU Jianshuang, ZHANG Xianzhou.  Effects of Grazing Exclusion on Plant Productivity and Soil Carbon, Nitrogen Storage in Alpine Meadows in Northern Tibet, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(4): 488-498. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0697-y
    [14] LUO Shanghua, MAO Qizheng, MA Keming.  Comparison on Soil Carbon Stocks Between Urban and Suburban Topsoil in Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(5): 551-561. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0709-y
    [15] ZENG Xinhua, ZHANG Wanjun, LIU Xiuping, CAO Jiansheng, SHEN Huitao, ZHAO Xin, ZHANG Nannan, BAI Yuru, Yi Mei.  Change of Soil Organic Carbon after Cropland Afforestation in ‘Beijing- Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control’ Program Area in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(4): 461-470. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0701-6
    [16] YE Hanfeng, GUO Shuhai, LI Fengmei, LI Gang.  Water Quality Evaluation in Tidal River Reaches of Liaohe River Estuary, China Using a Revised QUAL2K Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(3): 301-311. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0586-9
    [17] WU Huisheng, LIU Zhaoli, ZHANG Shuwen, ZUO Xiuling.  A Spatio-temporal Data Model for Road Network in Data Center Based on Incremental Updating in Vehicle Navigation System . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(3): 346-353.
    [18] WU Wenjie, ZHANG Wenzhong, JIN Fengjun, DENG Yu.  Spatio-temporal Analysis of Urban Spatial Interaction in Globalizing China—A Case Study of Beijing-Shanghai Corridor . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(2): 126-134. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0126-9
    [19] WANG Peifa, DU Jinkang, FENG Xuezhi, KANG Guoding.  Effect of Uncertainty of Grid DEM on TOPMODEL:Evaluation and Analysis . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(4): 320-326.
    [20] CHENG Shu-lan, OUYANG Hua, NIU Hai-shan, WANG Lin, ZHANG Feng, GAO Jun-qin, TIAN Yu-qiang.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON IN RESERVED DESERTIFICATION AREA——A Case Study in Yulin City, Shaanxi Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(3): 245-250.
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表ll (2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  163
  • HTML全文浏览量:  47
  • PDF下载量:  15
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-07-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-11-27
  • 刊出日期:  2021-01-05

Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010

doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1179-7
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0603002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31800358, 31700369), Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (No. CX(19)3099), the Foundation of Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry (No. 2019kj014)
    通讯作者: ZHAO Yongcun. E-mail: yczhao@issas.ac.cn

English Abstract

LIU Xiaoyu, ZHAO Yongcun, SHI Xuezheng, WANG Shihang, FENG Xiang, YAN Fang, 2021. Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(1): 126−136 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1179-7
Citation: LIU Xiaoyu, ZHAO Yongcun, SHI Xuezheng, WANG Shihang, FENG Xiang, YAN Fang, 2021. Spatio-temporal Changes and Associated Uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for Chinese Upland Soils, 1980−2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(1): 126−136 doi:  10.1007/s11769-021-1179-7
    • The upland as a major source of land use takes up over 70% of the total croplands in China (Wang et al., 2011). Due to its vast area and relatively low soil organic carbon (SOC) levels, Chinese uplands have a large potential in terms of sequestrating more carbon in soils to enhance soil fertility and mitigating CO2 emissions via recommended management practices (Lal 2002; Xie et al., 2021, Zhang et al., 2017). Consequently, the precise quantification of the spatio-temporal changes in Chinese upland SOC has become vital for decision-making to maintain sustainable soil fertility management and mitigate climate change.

      Concerning the significance of SOC for food production, soil and water quality enhancement, and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation (Qin et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2018), many previous studies have examined the size and change in SOC of Chinese uplands through the meta-analysis of SOC data collected from published literature (Xie et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2010). However, the meta-analysis method has some inherent limitations, especially in representing the long-term time series of SOC dynamics and the impacts of heterogeneous soil conditions and management practices on SOC dynamics (Sun et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2012). Hence, process-based models, such as CENTURY, DNDC and RothC model (Jenkinson and Rayner 1977, Parton et al., 1987; Li et al., 1992) are often adopted for SOC simulation at a larger scale or area extent for a comprehensive and quantitative understanding of SOC spatio-temporal dynamics.

      Process-based models have been recognized as a powerful tool in SOC dynamics estimates at various scales (Necpalova et al., 2015). Process-based models, such as CENTURY, RothC and DNDC, were developed on the strength of the mathematic relationships of soil organic matter (SOM) turnover mechanisms, and have been successfully applied in cropland SOC dynamics modelling worldwide (Yu et al., 2017). Nevertheless, considerable uncertainties caused by lacking spatially explicit model input data may be brought into the extrapolations of the process model which predicts SOC at regional-or national-scale. Consequently, quantitative uncertainty information originated from the heterogeneous input data of the model is indispensable to increase the credibility of SOC estimation at large-scales (Fitton et al., 2014). To be specific, the CENTURY model has been widely employed in regional-and national-scale estimates of SOC dynamics in upland soils (Ardö and Olsson 2003; Tornquist et al., 2009; Lugato et al., 2014). However, there are still limitations caused by quantitative uncertainty information on CENTURY-modelled SOC dynamics, especially the uncertainties resulting from the uncertain heterogeneous input data of the model, even though such quantitative uncertainty information is particularly crucial when the simulation results are used in decision-making and management practice recommendation development. After quantifying the uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC for US croplands between 1990 and 2000, Ogle et al. (2010) found that the uncertainties of the estimated SOC sequestration rates (represented as 95% confidential interval) were 11.5–17.8 Tg C/yr for the period of 1990–1995, and 14.7–20.4 Tg C/yr for the period of 1995–2000, respectively. The uncertainties of the estimated changes in SOC in the uplands of northeastern China by Liu et al. (2019) were –207 to –9 Tg C and –76 to 56 Tg C during the periods of 1980–2010 and 2010–2050, respectively. Thus, based on the estimated uncertainty intervals, it was safe to conclude that in uplands of northeastern China, SOC loss over the period of 1980–2010 was certain while SOC increase/decline in the next four decades remained uncertain. The method adopted by Liu et al. (2019) can be adjusted to use in the nationwide SOC estimation to obtain more reliable modelling SOC and contribute to national decision-making and policy development on soil fertility improvement and carbon management.

      Uplands are predominant cropland types for supporting staple food production in China. Detailed information on the spatio-temporal changes in SOC plays a significantly positive role in improving soil fertility and mitigating carbon loss of Chinese upland soils. However, the knowledge of the spatio-temporal changes in SOC and the corresponding uncertainties of SOC in Chinese upland soils remains limited at the national scale. As a result, this study aims to: 1) estimate the spatio-temporal changes in SOC of Chinese uplands during the period of 1980–2010 using the CENTURY model; 2) characterize the regional differences of SOC changes and explore the influences of soil types on changes in SOC; and 3) get insights into the uncertainties of SOC simulation, especially the uncertainties caused by a lack of spatially explicit model input data.

    • Upland soils in China can be categorized into 50 major soil types covering an area of approximately 1.0 × 108 ha (Zhao et al., 2004). To investigate the spatial variety of SOC in uplands of China, they were classified into six regions, including the northeastern, northern, northwestern, eastern, south central and southwestern regions according to the environmental and farming conditions, as well as administrative areas in this study. Upland soils are mainly distributed in northeastern, northern, eastern, and south central China. Predominant upland soils are Meadow soils and Black soils in northeastern China, Fluvo-aquic soils in northern, eastern and south central China, Purplish soils in south central and southwestern China, and Cultivated loessial soils and Cinnamon soils in northwestern China (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1.  Upland soils. a) Distribution in China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were excluded); and b) Area percentages of Top 10 soil types. Northeastern China includes Heilongjiang (HLJ), Jilin (JL) and Liaoning (LN); northern China includes Beijing (BJ), Hebei (HeB), Shanxi (SX), Inner Mongolia (IM) and Tianjin (TJ); northwestern China covers Gansu (GS), Shaanxi (SaX), Ningxia (NX), Qinghai (QH) and Xinjiang (XJ); eastern China includes Shanghai (SH), Jiangsu (JS), Zhejiang (ZJ), Anhui (AH), Fujian (FJ), Jiangxi (JX) and Shandong (SD); south central China includes Henan (HeN), Hubei (HuB), Hunan (HuN), Guangdong (GD), Guangxi (GX) and Hainan (HaN); southwestern China includes Chongqing (CQ), Sichuan (SC), Guizhou (GZ), Yunnan (YN) and Tibet (T); TW: Taiwan; HK: Hong Kong; MC: Macao. FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; MS: Meadow soils; PuS: Purplish soils; ClS: Cultivated loessial soils; BrE: Brown earths; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BS: Black soils; C: Chernozems; CA: Castanozems; OS: Other soils

    • The CENTURY model (v. 4.6) is a computer plant-soil ecosystem model developed by Natural Resources Ecology Lab of Colorado State University. Its suitability in modelling SOC dynamics at plot and regional scale for Chinese upland soils has been examined in our earlier research (Liu et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2019). In the previous studies, it was found that the linear relationship between the estimated and observed SOCs was significant (R2 = 0.97, P < 0.001) in China (across 21 long-term monitoring sites with different climates, soils and management conditions) (Liu et al., 2017). Moreover, the regional scale validation of CENTURY in the northeastern China also implied that the modelled SOC was reliable at county level as most of the estimated intervals overlapped with observed intervals and the mean observed SOC was significantly correlated with the simulated SOC (r = 0.96, P < 0.01) (Liu et al., 2019).

    • The input data used to drive the CENTURY model are mainly classified into three types: 1) soil properties, including the initial SOC level, soil texture, bulk density and pH; 2) climate data, covering the monthly precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures; 3) management practices, such as tillage, irrigation, manure and nitrogen fertilizer additions, residue removal ratio and crop rotation (Parton et al., 1987). Some key input data of soil properties (the initial SOC content, clay content, bulk density, pH) and management practices (residue removal ratio, nitrogen fertilizer and manure additions) that exhibit great heterogeneity were chosen and compiled to drive the CENTURY model to quantify the SOC dynamics and the uncertainty correlated with the model input data. The uncertain input data denoted by the probability distribution functions (PDFs) were organized by the observations of these data.

      Soil properties in the topsoil (to 20 cm depth) were derived from 3062 measurements of the Second National Soil Survey of China (implemented from the late 1970s to the early 1980s). The normal probability distribution (each soil type in each province) was employed to represent the prior uncertainties of soil properties except in 150 modelling units (soil type in a province), where merely one measurement is available.

      The spatial distributions of SOC were represented by 1600 soil polygons (modelling units) through the spatial overlay of the 1∶1 000 000 soil map (group level), the 1∶1 000 000 land use map, and administrative boundary polygons with the application of ArcGIS 9.3 software. Subsequently, the initial fractions of SOC compartments for each soil type within each province (sum up to 353 polygons) were estimated using the Three-step initialization method (Ogle et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2011, Liu et al., 2019).

      The residue removal ratio of each province was set in a uniform PDF in line with the field investigation on straw amendments implemented in 2011, covering 60 most representative counties across 31 provinces of China. Detailed information about the nitrogen fertilizer and manure additions, together with the other inputs, such as meteorological data, crop rotations, and crop production parameters, were set based on our previous research (Liu et al., 2019). According to the availability of model input data, the modelling duration was set from 1980 to 2010.

    • The Monte Carlo method was employed to quantify the uncertainties of CENTURY-modelled SOC dynamics which are relevant to the spatial heterogeneity of input data. The CENTURY model was repeatedly driven by the random input data sampled from the PDFs constructed in the ‘Model input data’ section. In the process of the uncertainty analysis, the CENTURY model was executed repetitively 4500 times for each modelling unit, leading to a total of 6 525 150 (1450 × 4500 + 150) times of CENTURY model runs. The uncertainty was represented by the 95% confidence intervals of the SOC estimates. In the meantime, the percentage uncertainty of the estimated SOC was figured out by 95% confidence interval/ (2 × mean) (Ogle et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2012). R 3.1.1 software and data I/O codes of C# were used to implement the Monte Carlo analysis.

    • Overall, the CENTURY-modelled SOC storage and the associated uncertainty changed over time (Fig. 2a). During the past three decades, the SOC storage in topsoils (up to a depth of 20 cm) of Chinese uplands had increased from 3.03 Pg C to 3.40 Pg C. The uncertainty intervals were from 1.59 to 4.78 Pg C in 1980 and from 2.39 to 4.62 Pg C in 2010. The SOC storage increment during this period was 370 Tg C with the uncertainty interval ranging from –440 to 1110 Tg C. The mean percentage uncertainty of SOC storage estimated according to method in 2.4 was 41%, which decreased from 52% in 1980 to 33% in 2010. The rates of SOC change underwent three distinct stages. To be specific, SOC storage declined whilst the decrease rate of SOC gradually reached to 0 in the late 1980s, and then, the increase rate of SOC persistently increased in the 1990s, finally reaching to a relatively stable level in the 2000s (Fig. 2b). Mean changing rates of SOC in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s were –5, 18 and 24 Tg C/yr, respectively, with mean 95% confidence intervals ranging from –40 to 24, –6 to 41 and 2 to 45 Tg C/yr, respectively.

      Figure 2.  CENTURY-modelled soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics for Chinese upland soils. a) SOC storage, b) changes in SOC storage

      The estimated mean SOC storage for Chinese uplands (upper 20 cm) over the past three decades was 3.11 Pg C, representing an average soil organic carbon density (SOCD) of 29.4 Mg C/ha. The median value of the simulated SOCD as a robust estimator was utilized to figure out the area proportions of different SOCD levels in Chinese uplands (Fig. 3). The area percentage for SOCD being lower than 20 Mg C/ha decreased from 35% in 1980 to 11% to 2010, whilst for SOCD between 20 and 50 Mg C/ha, this figure increased from 50% in 1980 to 82% in 2010 (Fig. 3a). Overall, SOCD for approximately 74% of the Chinese uplands increased during the period of 1980–2010, and 31% of the uplands had a SOCD increment of 5–10 Mg C/ha (Fig. 3b). Additionally, the mean simulated SOCD of 1600 modelling units also increased by 4 Mg C/ha from 1980 to 2010, implying that Chinese upland soils served as a crucial carbon sink during this period.

      Figure 3.  Changes in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) from 1980 to 2010. (a) Distribution of SOCD in 1980 and 2010. (b) Distribution of changes in SOCD (ΔSOCD) from 1980 to 2010. ΔSOCD = SOCD2010 – SOCD1980. Uplands: upper 20 cm

    • The spatial distribution maps of the mean rate of changes in SOCD between 1980 and 2010 were shown in Fig. 4. A dramatic SOCD increase in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China (including Beijing, Tianjin municipalities, Shandong, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces) can be obviously observed, while the SOCD decrease was mainly witnessed in Heilongjiang Province of the northeastern China (Fig. 4). Upland soils in the northern, eastern, and south central China had sequestrated 118, 132 and 97 Tg C over the past three decades, respectively, whereas upland soil in the northeastern China lost 113 Tg C during that period. SOC accumulation in Hebei, Shandong, Henan, and Sichuan provinces was most significant (Fig. 5). On contrast, SOC in upland soils of Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Guizhou declined by 136, 21 and 1 Tg C, respectively.

      Figure 4.  Spatial distribution of the mean rate of changes in SOCD (ΔSOCD) of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) between 1980 and 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1

      Figure 5.  Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and their changes in the provinces of China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not covered as a result of the lack of data) from 1980 to 2010. Full names for provinces refer to caption of Fig. 1

      The regional discrepancies in SOC storages for different time periods were also considerable (Fig. 6). During the 1980s, the possibility of SOC loss in the northern, northeastern, and northwestern China was high, while SOC accumulation mainly occurred in the eastern, south central, and southwestern China. During the 1990s, only the northeastern China was highly likely to suffer from SOC lost, while SOC in the northern, northwestern, and south central China tended to rise. The SOC storages in the eastern and southwestern China rose by 57 and 40 Tg C, with the uncertainty intervals ranging from 23 to 85 Tg C, and 6 to 72 Tg C, respectively. The SOC in the northeastern China kept declining during the 2000s, whereas SOC storages in the other five regions showed a rising trend. Over the entire 30 years, the amounts of SOC accumulation were ranked as: eastern China (132, from 26 to 220 Tg C) > northern China (118, from –75 to 284 Tg C) > south central China (97, from –38 to 209) > southwestern China (82, from –25 to 187 Tg C) > northwestern China (54, from –44 to 141 Tg C) > northeastern China (–113, from –237 to 12 Tg C). The uplands in eastern China functioned as a crucial carbon sink, and accounted for 35% of the total SOC increment in China, while SOC lost in the northeastern China represented –29% of the total change in SOC of China (Table 1). When uncertainties associated with the estimated SOC changes were taken into account, however, only the eastern China could be confirmed to function as a carbon sink over the 30 years. The changing trend of SOC in upland soils of the other five regions remained to be determined.

      Figure 6.  Soil organic carbon (SOC) changes and uncertainties among regions in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and three decades from 1980 to 2010. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals

      Table 1.  Soil organic carbon (SOC) storages and SOC change (ΔSOC) percentage of the total in six regions

      RegionArea / MhaSOC storage in 1980 / Pg CSOC storage in 2010 / Pg CΔSOC percentage of total / %
      1980s1990s2000s1980–2010
      NE22.671.00 (0.62 to 1.40)0.89 (0.62 to 1.18)155.78 –12.77 –6.09 –28.68
      N23.450.59 (0.27 to 1.01)0.71 (0.47 to 1.01)23.8828.2531.7030.92
      NW15.930.36 (0.20 to 0.56)0.41 (0.30 to 0.55)22.9511.1218.6514.44
      E17.540.32 (0.15 to 0.55)0.45 (0.34 to 0.60)–64.1130.4719.5834.86
      SC13.730.34 (0.14 to 0.60)0.44 (0.31 to 0.60)–27.8621.6619.4426.22
      SW12.450.42 (0.21 to 0.66)0.50 (0.35 to 0.68)–10.6421.2716.7222.24
      China105.773.03 (1.59 to 4.78)3.40 (2.39 to 4.62)100.00100.00100.00100.00
      Notes: ‘–’ means that the SOC change in the region is opposite to the total SOC change in China. NE represents northeastern China, N represents northern China, NW represents northwestern China, E represents eastern China, SC represents south central China, and SW represents southwestern China. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC storages
    • In 1980, the area-weighted means of SOCD (0–20 cm) for 50 major soil types of Chinese uplands varied from 10.4 Mg C/ha (Aeolian soils) to 125.8 Mg C/ha (Peat soils). SOC storages in 1980 for the 50 soil types ranged from 463 Tg C (Fluvo-aquic soils) to 0.015 Tg C (Red earths). Nevertheless, by 2010, the area-weighted mean of SOCD for the 50 soil types ranged from 13.6 Mg C/ha (Aeolian soils) to 97.2 Mg C/ha (Peat soils). The SOC storages for the 50 soil types ranged from 652 Tg C (Fluvo-aquic soils) to 0.027Tg C (Red earths). The soil types with top 10 highest SOCDs and SOC storages were manifested in Figs. 7a7d. The total SOC storages for the top 10 soil types in 1980 and 2010 were 2.17 and 2.43 Pg C, respectively, both taking up 71% of the total SOC storage in topsoils of Chinese uplands.

      Figure 7.  Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in 1980 (a) and 2010 (b), SOC storage in 1980 (c) and 2010 (d) of top 10 soil types. PS: Peat soils; AS: Albic soils; DFS: Dark felty soils; BS: Black soils; DBE: Dark-brown earths; MS: Meadow soils; YBE: Yellow-brown earths; LS: Limestone soils; RE: Red earths; YCS: Yellow-cinnamon soils; LRE: Lateritic red earths; CBS: Cold brown calcic soils; FS: Fluvo-aquic soils; CS: Cinnamon soils; C: Chernozems; PuS: Purplish soils; CA: Castanozems; LCS: Lime concretion black soils; BrE: Brown earths. Bars denote 95% confidence intervals

      Over the past three decades, changes in SOC differed dramatically among soil types (Fig. 8). To be specific, SOCD for Peat soils, Albic soils, and Black soils declined most evidently (decreased by 28.5, 12.1 and 8.3 Mg C/ha, respectively), while SOCD for Red earths, Lime concretion black soils and Purplish soils increased most significantly (increased by 11.3, 11.0 and 10.0 Mg C/ha, respectively). SOC lost from Meadow soils, Black soils and Chernozems during these 30 years was most severe (decreased by 40.5, 36.6 and 31.5 Tg C, respectively), while SOC accumulation in Fluvo-aquic soils, Cinnamon soils and Purplish soils was most considerable (increased by 188.4, 69.6 and 66.6 Tg C, respectively).

      Figure 8.  Decline and increase in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) (a) and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage (b) from 1980 to 2010 in the top three types of soil. Full names for soil types refer to caption of Fig. 7

    • Although many researches have explored the rate of the SOC change in croplands of China, most of them were implemented within the local or regional range (Zhao et al., 2018). The nationwide estimate of upland SOC changes is still rare. Some of the existing national-scale estimates were based on the meta-analysis of literature data (Xie et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2010). However, other researchers (Wang et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2013) used process-based models (Table 2). There are differences between the results of the previous and current studies due to the considerable uncertainties originating from the limited sample size, multiple data sources, inconsistent analysis methods, and the inherent spatial heterogeneities of model inputs (Tang et al., 2018). Estimates derived from a meta-analysis of literature data would inevitably bring about a high level of uncertainty due to the spatial coverage limits of the literature data in the study area and the assumed changes in the SOC density, but quantifying such uncertainty is still hard (Sun et al., 2010). While for SOC estimates using the process-based model, uncertainties associated with the spatial heterogeneity of available model input data were usually overlooked (Liu et al., 2019). Nonetheless, this study provided not only the estimates of SOC but also their uncertainty intervals. Given the uncertainties resulting from the spatial heterogeneity of available model input data, our CENTURY model estimated the rate of SOC change for Chinese uplands during 1980–2010 was 12.3 Tg C/yr, with an uncertainty interval of –14.6 to 37.0 Tg C/yr. Even if the medians of SOC estimates were comparable to those of existing studies (Table 2), the ranges of estimated uncertainty intervals were still large owing to the availabilities of detailed model input data and inherent spatial heterogeneity of available input data for the model.

      Table 2.  Estimated soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in uplands of China reported by different studies

      PeriodArea / MhaSoil depth/cmChange rate in SOC storage / (Tg C/yr)SOC storage / Pg CSOCD in 2010 / (Mg C/ha)MethodReference
      1980–2000125.919.418.53.07Meta-analysisXie et al. (2007)
      1985–2006106.420.017.5Meta-analysisPan et al. (2010)
      1980–2000100.2–20.010.7 (8.9 to 12.5)Meta-analysisSun et al. (2010)
      1980–2020105.820.012.4CENTURY modelWang et al. (2011)
      1980–201087.330.035.4Agro-C modelYu et al. (2013)
      1980–2010105.820.012.3 (–14.6 to 37.0)3.11 (2.1 to 4.5)32.1 (22.0 to 42.6)CENTURY modelThe current study
      Notes: ‘–’ means no data. Numbers in the parentheses are 95% confidence intervals of the modelled SOC stocks
    • The estimated uncertainty intervals for SOC storage change during the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were –40 to 24, –6 to 41, and 2 to 45 Tg C/yr, respectively. In this way, it was concluded that whether Chinese upland soils functioned as a carbon source or sink during the first two decades (1980–2000) remained uncertain, but it was definite that they acted as a carbon sink during the subsequent 10 years. Although SOC storage over the past three decades increased by 370 Tg C, the uncertainties associated with the spatial heterogeneity of model inputs remained high (from –440 to 1110 Tg C). Such uncertainties may exert a profound impact on decision–making and policy development. Thus, identifying the sources of uncertainties and developing strategies for reducing such uncertainties are vital in future modelling.

      The initial SOC and clay content have been identified as the two most influential soil properties affecting the CENTURY-modelled SOC dynamics in Chinese uplands and such influences on CENTURY-modelled SOC were time-varying (Liu et al., 2017; 2019), which may explain why the uncertainties associated with the estimated SOC storage changed over time (Fig. 2a). Consequently, collecting more detailed information on the soil properties, especially initial SOC and clay content from legacy soil investigation data, is of great significance to provide credible and meaningful estimates of SOC for decision-making regarding soil fertility and carbon management. Besides, the estimated changes in SOC in northeastern China are slightly different from those in Liu et al. (2019) (–106 Tg C, with an uncertainty interval ranging from –207 to –9). This difference is mainly attributed to the data aggregation effect of the modelling units. Liu et al. (2019) divided uplands of northeastern China into 1037 modeling units by spatially overlaying soil subgroup boundary polygons with the county-level land-use boundary polygons. Furthermore, in this national-scale study, this region was categorized into 199 modelling units by spatially overlaying soil type boundary polygons with the city-level land-use boundary polygons. Despite this, estimated trends of SOC changes in uplands of northeastern China were consistent, indicating that the upland SOC lost in Northeastern China was definite.

    • Over the past 30 years, significant upland SOC accumulation mainly showed up in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China (including Beijing, Tianjin municipalities, Shandong, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, Figs. 4, 5), while SOC in Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China declined significantly (Figs. 4, 5). Upland soils in northeastern China lost 113 Tg C over this period, and the carbon loss in Black soils of the northeastern China was most serious. For instance, the fertile Black soils in the northeastern China lost 8.3 Mg C/ha, equivalent to approximately 15% of the baseline SOCD in 1980 (~55 Mg C/ha). The decline of SOC in black soils of the northeastern China was mainly attributed to their relatively higher initial SOC content and shorter period of reclamation for agricultural purposes (Xie et al., 2007; Mao et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019). Overall, despite significant SOC accumulation in Chinese uplands, the mean SOCD in 2010 (34.75 Mg C/ha) was still significantly smaller than those in croplands of developed countries like the United States (44 Mg C/ha) and those in Europe (53 Mg C/ha) (Chiti et al., 2012; Adhikari et al., 2019). The relatively low SOC levels in Chinese uplands provided a prerequisite for further sequestration of more carbon in the soils, as the changes of SOC stock were greatly related to the initial SOC levels (Stewart et al., 2007; 2008, Jin et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2012; Korsaeth et al., 2014). For example, across the six major agronomic regions of China, the relationship between change in SOC and the initial SOC levels in 1980 (r = –0.86, P < 0.05) was significantly negative. This negative baseline effect could be accounted for by the method of soil carbon saturation, as low SOCD that is far from the saturation level may have higher potential and efficiency to store added C (Stewart et al., 2007; 2008). Also, soils with a high initial SOC level (i.e., the northeastern China) are liable to lose carbon as it can generate higher CO2 equivalents originating from SOC mineralisation (Korsaeth et al., 2014). This implies that Chinese upland soils are still highly likely to sequestrate more carbon in the soils, providing suitable management practices such as reduced tillage, rational fertilization, crop residue incorporation, and manure amendment. Moreover, economic and policy incentives to farmers for improving soil fertility are also indispensable (Chiti et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). Also, this reveals that soils on a declining path can furthermore lose a lot of carbon if the management is not adapted. The first step should be stopping losses (especially on such fertile soils as black soils).

    • There was a significant accumulation of topsoil SOC in major upland soils of China over the period of 1980–2010, especially in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. During this period, the SOC storage increment was 370 Tg C, with the associated uncertainty interval ranging from –440 to 1110 Tg C. The estimated uncertainty intervals for SOC storage change during the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were –40 to 24, –6 to 41, and 2 to 45 Tg C/yr, respectively. Although it was still uncertain whether Chinese upland soils functioned as a carbon source or sink during the first two decades, the SOC increase was definite in the subsequent decade. The relatively low SOC levels in Chinese uplands provided chances to sequestrate more carbon in the soils if rational managements were adapted. Furthermore, the changes in SOC manifested significant differences in regions and soil types. Such information and knowledge are of great significance for the credible and meaningful estimation of SOC to make decisions regarding soil fertility improvement and carbon management. Thus, identifying the sources of uncertainties in different regions, soil types and periods, and developing strategies for reducing such uncertainties are vital in future modelling.

    • We gratefully acknowledge Ms. Cindy Keough, who used to work in the Natural Resources Ecology Lab of Colorado State University, for supplying CENTURY 4.6 and providing extremely valuable advice on CENTURY model initialization.

参考文献 (35)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回