LIU Haiyan, HAO Haiguang, HU Xujun, DU Leshan, ZHANG Zhe, LI Yuanyuan. Livelihood Diversification of Farm Households and Its Impact on Cul-tivated Land Utilization in Agro-pastoral Ecologically-vulnerable Areas in the Northern China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 279-293. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1111-6
Citation: LIU Haiyan, HAO Haiguang, HU Xujun, DU Leshan, ZHANG Zhe, LI Yuanyuan. Livelihood Diversification of Farm Households and Its Impact on Cul-tivated Land Utilization in Agro-pastoral Ecologically-vulnerable Areas in the Northern China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 279-293. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1111-6

Livelihood Diversification of Farm Households and Its Impact on Cul-tivated Land Utilization in Agro-pastoral Ecologically-vulnerable Areas in the Northern China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1111-6
Funds:

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41501095, 41871196, 41701601)

  • Received Date: 2019-09-17
  • The relationship between livelihood diversification of farm households and cultivated land utilization has become a core research topic related to global environmental change. Agro-pastoral ecologically-vulnerable areas face challenges such as insufficient ecosystem conservation, low agricultural production, and weak economies. In this study, 215 farm households from Zhengxiangbai Banner, Taibus Banner, and Duolun County of Inner Mongolia were surveyed. The sustainable livelihoods framework of the United Kingdom (UK) Department for International Development (DFID) was used to measure the livelihood capital of these farm households. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to examine the differences in the livelihood capital of different types households, and a correlation analysis was applied to analyze its impact on cultivated land utilization. Results showed that households with non-farming activities accounted for 64.7% of the total surveyed households, and non-farming employment was becoming more prevalent. Physical and financial capital was the driving factors for livelihood diversity. Each livelihood capital had key factors that affected household farmland use behaviors, such as the age of householder, the labor ratio, proportion of income, farmland scale, number of machines, and these had a significantly positive or negative influence on farmland use. Full-time farming households were more likely to transfer the land into cultivation and invest more labor, while non-farming households with high income were likely to transfer farmland out and invest more money to develop efficient farming or improve the employment skills. The results of this study suggest that policymakers need to fully consider livelihood changes of local households. It is effective to strengthen labor training, create farmland market and improve the efficiency of farmland utilization. We hope to achieve a win-win scenario to improve local economies and ecosystem conservation.

  • [1] Alary V, Messad S, Aboul-Naga A et al., 2014. Livelihood strategies and the role of livestock in the processes of adaptation to drought in the coastal zone of western desert (Egypt). Agricultural Systems, 128(2):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.03.008
    [2] Bhandari P B, 2013. Rural livelihood change? Household capital, community resources and livelihood transition. Journal of Rural Studies, 32(4):126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.001
    [3] Collins A M, Grant J A, Ackah-Baidoo P, 2019. The glocal dynamics of land reform in natural resource sectors:insights from Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 81:889-896. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.027
    [4] Costanza R, De G R, Braat L et al., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services:how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
    [5] DFID (Department for International Development), 1999. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London:UK, 1-2.
    [6] Dib J B, Krishna V V, Alamsyah Z et al., 2018. Land-use change and livelihoods of non-farm households:The role of income from employment in oil palm and rubber in rural Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 76:828-838. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol. 2018.03.020
    [7] Dong Tian, Zhang Lu, Xiao Yi et al., 2019. Assessment of ecological assets and gross ecosystem product value in Ordos City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(09):3062-3074. (in Chinese)
    [8] Ellis F, 2000a. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 273.
    [9] Ellis F, 2000b. The determinants of rural livelihood diversifcation in developing countries. Agricultural Economics, 51(2):289-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x
    [10] Everard M, Gupta N, Scott C A et al., 2018. Assessing livelihood-ecosystem interdependencies and natural resource governance in Indian villages in the Middle Himalayas. Regional Environmental Change, 19(1):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s10113-018-1391-x
    [11] Flannery W, Lynch K, Cinnéide M Ó, 2015. Consideration of coastal risk in the Irish spatial planning process. Land Use Policy, 43:161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.001
    [12] Garibaldi L A, Gemmill-Herren B, D'Annolfo R et al., 2017. Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32(1):68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001
    [13] Hao H G, Zhang J P, Li X B et al., 2015a. Impact of livelihood diversification of rural households on their ecological footprint in agro-pastoral areas of northern China. Journal of Arid Land, 7(5):653-664. doi: 10.1007/s40333-015-0049-5
    [14] Hao H G, Li X B, Tan M H et al., 2015b. Agricultural land use intensity and its determinants:a case study in Taibus Banner, Inner Mongolia, China. Frontiers of Earth Science, 9(2):308-318. doi: 10.1007/s11707-014-0471-6
    [15] Hao H G, Li X B, Xin L J, 2017. Impacts of non-farm employment of rural laborers on agricultural land use:theoretical analysis and its policy implications. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(6):595-604. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.06.005
    [16] Hao Haiguang, Gou Mengmeng, Zhang Huiyuan et al., 2018. Assessing ecological compensation policies based on ecosystem services and human wellbeing:a review of recent progress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(19):6810-6817. (in Chinese)
    [17] He Renwei, Liu Shaoquan, Chen Guojie et al., 2013. Research progress and tendency of sustainable livelihoods for peasant household in China. Progress in Geography, 32(4):657-670. (in Chinese)
    [18] Hua L M, Squires V R, 2015. Managing China's pastoral lands:Current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy, 43:129-137. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.004
    [19] Ito J, Bao Z S, Ni J, 2016. Land rental development via institutional innovation in rural Jiangsu, China. Food Policy, 59:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.005
    [20] Jain M, Naeem S, Orlove B et al., 2015. Understanding the causes and consequences of differential decision-making in adaptation research:adapting to a delayed monsoon onset in Gujarat, India. Global Environmental Change, 31:98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.008
    [21] Kassie G W, 2017. The Nexus between livelihood diversification and farmland management strategies in rural Ethiopia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2016.1275087
    [22] Kibria A S M G, Costanza R, Groves C et al., 2018. The interactions between livelihood capitals and access of local communities to the forest provisioning services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh. Ecosystem Services, 32(A):41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.003
    [23] Kilgore M A, Snyder S A, 2016. Lake States natural resource managers' perspectives on forest land parcelization and its implications for public land management. Land Use Policy, 59:320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.035
    [24] Zhang L, Feng S Y, Heerink N et al., 2018. How do land rental markets affect household income? Evidence from rural Jiangsu, P.R. China. Land Use Policy, 74:151-165. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.005
    [25] Li M P, Huo X X, Peng C H et al., 2017. Complementary livelihood capital as a means to enhance adaptive capacity:a case of the Loess Plateau, China. Global Environmental Change, 47:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.10.004
    [26] Li Shengfa, Li Xiubin, 2017. Global understanding of farmland abandonment:A review and prospects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(9):1123-1150. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1426-0
    [27] Li Shengfa, Li Xiubin, 2018. Economic characteristics and the mechanism of farmland marginalization in mountainous areas of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(5):803-817. (in Chinese)
    [28] Liu Y S, Wang Y S, 2019. Rural land engineering and poverty alleviation:lessons from typical regions in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(5):643-657. doi: 10.1007/s11442-019-1619-9
    [29] Makita R, 2016. Livelihood diversification with certification-supported farming:the case of land reform beneficiaries in the Philippines:certification-supported farming. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 57(1):44-59. doi: 10.1111/apv.12106
    [30] Malmborg K, Sinare H, Kautsky E E et al., 2018. Mapping regional livelihood benefits from local ecosystem services assessments in rural Sahel. PLoS One, 13(2):e0192019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192019
    [31] MEE (Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China), 2008. Ecologically-vulnerable area protection program 2008. Available at:http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2009/content_1250928.htm. Cited on 9 October 2008. (in Chinese)
    [32] Mikulcak F, Haider J L, Abson D J et al., 2015. Applying a capitals approach to understand rural development traps:a case study from post-socialist Romania. Land Use Policy, 43:248-258. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.024
    [33] Mirzabaev A, Nkonya E, Braun J V, 2015. Economics of sustainable land management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 15:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.004
    [34] Nguyen A T, Nguyen L T, Nguyen H H et al., 2019. Rural livelihood diversification of Dzao farmers in response to unpredictable risks associated with agriculture in Vietnamese Northern Mountains today. Environment. Development and Sustainability, 1(6):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00429-x
    [35] Nyanga A, Kessler A, Tenge A, 2016. Key socio-economic factors influencing sustainable land management investments in the West Usambara Highlands, Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 51:260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.020
    [36] Orea L, Perez J A, Roibas D, 2015. Evaluating the double effect of land fragmentation on technology choice and dairy farm productivity:a latent class model approach. Land Use Policy, 45:189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.016
    [37] Paul C J, Weinthal E S, Bellemare M F et al., 2016. Social capital, trust, and adaptation to climate change:evidence from rural Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 36:124-138. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.003
    [38] Peng W J, Zheng H, Robinson B E et al., 2017. Household livelihood strategy choices, impact factors, and environmental consequences in Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China. Sustainability, 9(2):175-186. doi: 10.3390/su9020175
    [39] Salazar O V, Ramos-Martín J, Lomas P L, 2018. Livelihood sustainability assessment of coffee and cocoa producers in the Amazon region of Ecuador using household types. Journal of Rural Studies, 62:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.004
    [40] Sandhage-Hofmann A, Kotzé E, Van D L et al., 2015. Rangeland management effects on soil properties in the savanna biome, South Africa:a case study along grazing gradients in communal and commercial farms. Journal of Arid Environments, 120:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.04.004
    [41] Schilling B J, Attavanich W, Sullivan K P et al., 2014. Measuring the effect of farmland preservation on farm profitability. Land Use Policy, 41:84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.019
    [42] Shao Liya, 2014. The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Farmers' Land Use Change. Chongqing:Southwest University. (in Chinese)
    [43] Sherren K, Loik L, Debner J A, 2016. Climate adaptation in ‘new world’ cultural landscapes:the case of Bay of Fundy agricultural dykelands (Nova Scotia, Canada). Land Use Policy, 51:267-280. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.018
    [44] Su Yi, Deng Wei, Zhang Jifei et al., 2016. Relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategies of rural households in Melamchi Basin of Central Mountainous Area in Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science, 34(5):645-653. (in Chinese)
    [45] Tan S H, Heerink N, Qu F T, 2006. Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China. Land Use Policy, 23(3):272-285. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.12.001
    [46] Tang Qing, Xu Yong, Li Yang, 2013.Assessment of farmers'sustainable livelihoods and future strategies on the Loess Plateau:based on a survey of 1076 farmers in Yan'an City in Shaanxi Province and Guyuan City in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Progress in Geography, 32(2):161-169. (in Chinese)
    [47] Tian Xiaoyu, Xu Xia, Jiang Honglei et al., 2018. Optimization of land use structure under Grain for Green Project:a case study in Taibus Banner in Inner Mongolia. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(12):25-30. (in Chinese)
    [48] Travers H, Winney K, Clements T et al., 2015. A tale of two villages:An investigation of conservation-driven land tenure reform in a Cambodian Protection Forest. Land Use Policy, 43:186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.007
    [49] Udmale P, Ichikawa Y, Manandhar S et al., 2014. Farmers' perception of drought impacts, local adaptation and administrative mitigation measures in Maharashtra State, India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10:250-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.011
    [50] Vincent A, Fleury P, 2015. Development of organic farming for the protection of water quality:local projects in France and their policy implications. Land Use Policy, 43:197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.020
    [51] Wan Jiangjun, Deng Wei, Song Xueqian et al., 2018. Spatio-Temporal impact of rural livelihood capital on labor migration in Panxi, Southwestern Mountainous Region of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(1):153-166. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0936-8
    [52] Wang Chengchao, Yang Yusheng, 2012. An overview of farmers' livelihood strategy change and its effect on Land Use/Cover Change in developing countries. Progress in Geography, 31(6):792-798. (in Chinese)
    [53] Wang C C, Zhang Y Q, Yang Y S et al., 2016. Assessment of sustainable livelihoods of different farmers in hilly red soil erosion areas of southern China. Ecological Indicators, 64(5):123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.036
    [54] Wang F C, Zheng H, Wang X K et al., 2017. Classification of the relationship between household welfare and ecosystem reliance in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China. Sustainability, 9(12):2290-2304. doi: 10.3390/su9122290
    [55] Wang Yichao, Hao Haiguang, Zhang Huiyuan et al., 2018. Livelihood diversification of farm household and its impact on the utilization of cultivated land in agro-pastoral area:a case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Journal of Natural Resources, 33(2):302-312. (in Chinese)
    [56] Xie Y, Jiang Q B, 2016. Land arrangements for rural-urban migrant workers in China:findings from Jiangsu Province. Land Use Policy, 50:262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.010
    [57] Xu Hanshi, Yue Zhang, 2012. Livelihood capitals, livelihood risks and livelihood strategies of farmers. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 10:100-105. (in Chinese)
    [58] Yan Jianzhong, Wu Yingying, Zhang Yili et al., 2010a. Livelihood diversification of farmers and nomads of eastern transect in Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(5):757-770. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0809-2
    [59] Yan Jianzhong, Zhuo Rengui, Xie Deti et al., 2010b. Land use characters of farmers of different livelihood strategies:cases in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(11):1401-1410. (in Chinese)
    [60] Yang Donglang, Li Tianzhe, Wu Tianchen et al., 2018. The differences of farmers' behavior of rural land circulation under the cognitive perspective of circulation environment. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 38(2):69-79. (in Chinese)
    [61] Zhang Jinping, Zuo Feng, Zhou Yanmei et al., 2018. Analyzing influencing factors of rural poverty in typical poverty areas of Hainan Province:a case study of Lingao County. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(6):1061-1076. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1008-9
    [62] Zhang Liping, Zhang Yili, Yan Jianzhong et al., 2008. Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 18(4):377-385. doi: 10.1007/s11442-008-0499-1
    [63] Zhao Y L, Zhang M, Li X B et al., 2016. Farmland marginalization and policy implications in mountainous areas:a case study of Renhuai City,Guizhou. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 7(1):61-67. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.01.008
    [64] Zhu Likai, Meng Jijun, Liu Yang et al., 2010. Livelihoods of farming and grazing households and land use in farming-pastoral transitional zone:a case study of Uxin Banner in Ordos,Inner-Mongolia. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 02:81-88. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(204) PDF downloads(63) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Livelihood Diversification of Farm Households and Its Impact on Cul-tivated Land Utilization in Agro-pastoral Ecologically-vulnerable Areas in the Northern China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1111-6
Funds:

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41501095, 41871196, 41701601)

Abstract: 

The relationship between livelihood diversification of farm households and cultivated land utilization has become a core research topic related to global environmental change. Agro-pastoral ecologically-vulnerable areas face challenges such as insufficient ecosystem conservation, low agricultural production, and weak economies. In this study, 215 farm households from Zhengxiangbai Banner, Taibus Banner, and Duolun County of Inner Mongolia were surveyed. The sustainable livelihoods framework of the United Kingdom (UK) Department for International Development (DFID) was used to measure the livelihood capital of these farm households. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to examine the differences in the livelihood capital of different types households, and a correlation analysis was applied to analyze its impact on cultivated land utilization. Results showed that households with non-farming activities accounted for 64.7% of the total surveyed households, and non-farming employment was becoming more prevalent. Physical and financial capital was the driving factors for livelihood diversity. Each livelihood capital had key factors that affected household farmland use behaviors, such as the age of householder, the labor ratio, proportion of income, farmland scale, number of machines, and these had a significantly positive or negative influence on farmland use. Full-time farming households were more likely to transfer the land into cultivation and invest more labor, while non-farming households with high income were likely to transfer farmland out and invest more money to develop efficient farming or improve the employment skills. The results of this study suggest that policymakers need to fully consider livelihood changes of local households. It is effective to strengthen labor training, create farmland market and improve the efficiency of farmland utilization. We hope to achieve a win-win scenario to improve local economies and ecosystem conservation.

LIU Haiyan, HAO Haiguang, HU Xujun, DU Leshan, ZHANG Zhe, LI Yuanyuan. Livelihood Diversification of Farm Households and Its Impact on Cul-tivated Land Utilization in Agro-pastoral Ecologically-vulnerable Areas in the Northern China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 279-293. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1111-6
Citation: LIU Haiyan, HAO Haiguang, HU Xujun, DU Leshan, ZHANG Zhe, LI Yuanyuan. Livelihood Diversification of Farm Households and Its Impact on Cul-tivated Land Utilization in Agro-pastoral Ecologically-vulnerable Areas in the Northern China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 279-293. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1111-6
Reference (64)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return