Volume 29 Issue 3
Jun.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

MA Shuang, ZENG Gang. Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 517-527. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y
Citation: MA Shuang, ZENG Gang. Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 517-527. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y

Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41771143), Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of Shanghai (No. 2018EJL002)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZENG Gang. E-mail:gzeng@re.ecnu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2018-07-20
  • Publish Date: 2019-06-01
  • There are two opposing viewpoints on which kind of network configuration provides a more competitive advantage, namely, network closure or structural holes, with the latter occupying the dominant position in the literature. Using social network analysis and negative binomial regression methods, we graph the co-patent network of Dongying's petroleum equipment industry in China and explore its impact on enterprise innovation. The analysis is based on 17 face-to-face interviews, 31 enterprise questionnaires, and 354 co-patent records from the China State Intellectual Property Office identifying cooperative innovation for the years 1988-2013. We find that this network is closed, controlled by state-owned enterprises, and its closure has positive effects on enterprise innovation performance. This may be related to China's unique industrial development history, state system and policies, regional culture and circumstances, and enterprise characteristics. Therefore, for some industries in specific regions, the advantages usually attributed to structural holes and open innovation may not necessarily apply.
  • [1] Asheim B, Coenen L, Vang J, 2007. Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases:socio-spatial implications for learning, in-novation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C:Politics and Space, 25(5):655-670. doi: 10.1068/c0648
    [2] Bathelt H, Glückler J, 2003. Toward a relational economic geog-raphy. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2):117-144. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
    [3] Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P, 2004. Clusters and knowledge:local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1):31-56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
    [4] Bathelt H, Zeng G, 2012. Strong growth in weakly-developed networks:producer-user interaction and knowledge brokers in the Greater Shanghai chemical industry. Applied Geography, 32(1):158-170. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.015
    [5] Bathelt H, Li P F, 2014. Global cluster networks:foreign direct investment flows from Canada to China. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1):45-71. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt005
    [6] Breschi S, Lissoni F, 2004. Knowledge networks from patent data:methodological issues and research targets. In:Moed H F, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (eds). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht:Springer, 613-643. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_29
    [7] Burt R S, 1992. Structural Holes:the Social Structure of Compe-tition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    [8] Burt R S, 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 42(2):339-365. doi: 10.2307/2393923
    [9] Burt R S, 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22:345-423. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
    [10] Burt R S, 2002. Bridge decay. Social Networks, 24(4):333-363. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00017-5
    [11] Burt R S, 2005. Brokerage and Closure:An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
    [12] Coleman J, 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    [13] Coleman J S, 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S1):S95-S120. doi: 10.1086/228943
    [14] Cooke P, 2013. Qualitative analysis and comparison of firm and system incumbents in the new ICT global innovation network. European Planning Studies, 21(9):1323-1340. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.755828
    [15] Crescenzi R, Rodríguez-Pose A, Storper M, 2007. The territorial dynamics of innovation:a Europe-United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6):673-709. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm030
    [16] de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V, 2011. Exploratory Social Net-work Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
    [17] Fan C C, Scott A J, 2003. Industrial agglomeration and develop-ment:a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Economic Geography, 79(3):295-319.
    [18] Gemünden H G, Ritter T, Heydebreck P, 1996. Network configu-ration and innovation success:an empirical analysis in German high-tech industries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(5):449-462. doi:10.1016/S0167-8116(96) 00026-2
    [19] Giuliani E, 2011. Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters:evidence from Chile. Regional Studies, 45(10):1329-1348. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.619973
    [20] Grabher G, 1993. The weakness of strong ties:the lock-in of re-gional development in the Ruhr area. In:Grabher G (ed). The Embedded Firm:on Social-economics of Industrial Networks. London:Routledge, 255-277.
    [21] Granovetter M, 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78:1360-1380.
    [22] Granovetter M, 1985. Economic action and social structure:the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3):481-510. doi: 10.1086/228311
    [23] He S W, Macneill S, Wang J M, 2014. Assessing overall network structure in regional innovation policies:a case study of cluster policy in the west midlands in the UK. European Planning Studies, 22(9):1940-1959. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013. 812066
    [24] Huggins R, Johnston A, Thompson P, 2012. Network capital, social capital and knowledge flow:how the nature of in-ter-organizational networks impacts on innovation. Industry and Innovation, 19(3):203-232. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012. 669615
    [25] Huggins R, Thompson P, 2014. A network-based view of regional growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3):511-545. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt012
    [26] Huggins R, Prokop D, 2017. Network structure and regional in-novation:a study of university-industry ties. Urban Studies, 54(4):931-952. doi: 10.1177/0042098016630521
    [27] Johansson M, Jacob M, Hellström T, 2005. The strength of strong ties:university spin-offs and the significance of historical rela-tions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3):271-286. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-0930-z
    [28] Lawson C, Lorenz E, 1999. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4):305-317. doi: 10.1080/713693555
    [29] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C, 1981. Social resources and strength of ties:structural factors in occupational status at-tainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4):393-405. doi: 10.2307/2095260
    [30] Lyu G Q, Liefner I, 2018. The spatial configuration of innovation networks in China. GeoJournal, 83(6):1393-1410. doi: 10.1007/s10708-017-9844-1
    [31] Ma Shuang, Zeng Ggang, Lyu Guoqing, 2014. The formation of the informal ties and its impact on the technological innovation:a case study of Dongying. Economic geography, 34(10):104-110. (in Chinese)
    [32] Maggioni M A, Nosvelli M, Uberti T E, 2007. Space versus net-works in the geography of innovation:a European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3):471-493. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00130.x
    [33] Maskell P, Malmberg A, 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2):167-185. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.2.167
    [34] Maskell P, Malmberg A, 2007. Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5):603-618. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm020
    [35] Morrison A, 2008. Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial districts:who they are, how they interact. Regional Studies, 42(6):817-835. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654178
    [36] Mortara L, Minshall T, 2011. How do large multinational compa-nies implement open innovation? Technovation, 31(10-11):586-597. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.002
    [37] Ponds R, van Oort F, Frenken K, 2010. Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration:an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geogra-phy, 10(2):231-255. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp036
    [38] Reagans R, McEvily B, 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer:the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2):240-267. doi: 10.2307/3556658
    [39] Rost K, 2011. The strength of strong ties in the creation of inno-vation. Research Policy, 40(4):588-604. doi:10.1016/j.respol. 2010.12.001
    [40] Saviotti P P, 1998. On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy, 26(7-8):843- 856. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00066-8
    [41] Sorenson O, Rivkin J W, Fleming L, 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7):994-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002
    [42] Storper M, 1997. The Regional world. London:Guilford Press.
    [43] Storper M, Venables A J, 2004. Buzz:face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4):351-370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
    [44] Suarez F F, 2005. Network effects revisited:the role of strong ties in technology selection. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4):710-720. doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.17843947
    [45] Tan J, Zhang H J, Wang L, 2015. Network closure or structural hole? The conditioning effects of network-level social capital on innovation performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5):1189-1212. doi: 10.1111/etap.12102
    [46] Ter Wal A L J, Boschma R A, 2009. Applying social network analysis in economic geography:framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3):739-756. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
    [47] Tortoriello M, Mcevily B, Krackhardt D, 2015. Being a catalyst of innovation:the role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organization Science, 26(2):423-438. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0942
    [48] Uzzi B, 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm net-works:the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(10):35-67. doi: 10.2307/2393808
    [49] Vermeulen B, Pyka A, 2018. The role of network topology and the spatial distribution and structure of knowledge in regional innovation policy:a calibrated agent-based model study. Computational Economics, 52(3):773-808. doi:10.1007/s10614- 017-9776-3
    [50] Wei Y D, Li W M, Wang C B, 2007. Restructuring industrial dis-tricts, scaling up regional development:a study of the Wenzhou model, China. Economic Geography, 83(4):421-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00381.x
    [51] West J, Salter A, Vanhaverbeke W et al., 2014. Open innovation:the next decade. Research Policy, 43(5):805-811. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001
    [52] Whittington K B, Owen-Smith J, Powell W W, 2009. Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1):90-122. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.90
    [53] Zeng G, Bathelt H, 2011. Divergent growth trajectories in China's chemical industry:the case of the newly developed industrial parks in Shanghai, Nanjing and Ningbo. Geojournal, 76(6):675-698. doi: 10.1007/s10708-009-9313-6
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(275) PDF downloads(230) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41771143), Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of Shanghai (No. 2018EJL002)
    Corresponding author: ZENG Gang. E-mail:gzeng@re.ecnu.edu.cn

Abstract: There are two opposing viewpoints on which kind of network configuration provides a more competitive advantage, namely, network closure or structural holes, with the latter occupying the dominant position in the literature. Using social network analysis and negative binomial regression methods, we graph the co-patent network of Dongying's petroleum equipment industry in China and explore its impact on enterprise innovation. The analysis is based on 17 face-to-face interviews, 31 enterprise questionnaires, and 354 co-patent records from the China State Intellectual Property Office identifying cooperative innovation for the years 1988-2013. We find that this network is closed, controlled by state-owned enterprises, and its closure has positive effects on enterprise innovation performance. This may be related to China's unique industrial development history, state system and policies, regional culture and circumstances, and enterprise characteristics. Therefore, for some industries in specific regions, the advantages usually attributed to structural holes and open innovation may not necessarily apply.

MA Shuang, ZENG Gang. Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 517-527. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y
Citation: MA Shuang, ZENG Gang. Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 517-527. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y
Reference (53)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return