ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Citation: ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z

Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Funds:  Under the auspices of Forestry Public Interest Research Program (No. 201204201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171415)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHOU Demin. E-mail: zhoudemin@neigae.ac.cn
  • Received Date: 2013-01-31
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-04-23
  • Publish Date: 2014-03-27
  • Wetlands are highly productive natural ecosystems, providing valuable goods and services. There is growing interest in transferring ecosystem service value from the existing wetlands studied to other wetlands ecosystems at a large geographic scale. The benefit transfer method uses the known values from wetlands to predict the value of other wetland sites. This methodology requires only limited time and resources. The present study calculated the value of the ecological services provided by lake and marsh wetlands in China in terms of biodiversity indices, water quality indices and economic indices. Basic data on wetlands were obtained through remote sensing images. The results show that: 1) The total ecosystem service value of the lake and marsh wetlands in 2008 was calculated to be 8.1841×1010 United States Dollars (USD), with the marsh and lake wetlands contributing 5.6329×1010 and 2.5512×1010 USD, respectively. Values of marsh ecosystem service were concentrated in Heilongjiang Province (2.5516×1010 USD), Qinghai Province (1.2014×1010 USD), and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (1.1884×1010 USD). The value of the lakes were concentrated in Tibet Autonomous Region (6.223×109 USD), Heilongjiang (5.810×109 USD), and Qinghai (5.500×109 USD). 2) Waste treatment and climate regulation services contributed to 26.29% and 24.74% respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the marsh wetlands. Hydrological regulation and waste treatment contributed to 41.39% and 32.75%, respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the lake wetlands. 3) The total ecological service value of the lake and marsh wetlands was 54.64% of the total service value of natural grassland ecosystems and 30.34% of the total service value of forests ecosystems in China.
  • [1] Acharya G, 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 63-74. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00168-3
    [2] Bai J, Xiao R, Zhang K et al., 2013. Soil organic carbon as affected by land use in young and old reclaimed regions of a coastal estuary wetland, China. Soil Use and Management, 29(1): 57-64. doi:  10.1111/sum.12021
    [3] Barber E B, 2000. Valuing the environment as input: Application to mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 47-61. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00167-1
    [4] Bodegom P V, Bakker C, Gon H D, 2004. Identifying key issues in environmental wetland research using scaling and uncertainty analysis. Regional Environmental Change, 4(2-3): 100-106. doi:  10.1007/s10113-004-0069-8
    [5] Cedfeldt P T, Watzin M C, Richardson B C, 2000. Using GIS to identify functionally significant wetlands in the northeastern United States. Environmental Management, 26(1): 13-24. doi:  10.1007/s002670010067
    [6] Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S, 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modeling & Software, 25(12): 1582-1591. doi:  10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001
    [7] Chen Zhongxin, Zhang Shixin, 2000. Study on ecosystem benefit of china. Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(1): 17-22. (in Chinese)
    [8] Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R D et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
    [9] Cui Lijuan, 2004. Evaluation on functions of Poyang Lake ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 23(4): 47-51. (in Chinese)
    [10] Daily G C, 1997. Introduction: What are ecosystem services? In: Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystem. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1-10.
    [11] Eshet T, Baron M G, Shechter M, 2007. Exploring benefit transfer: Disamenities of waste transfer stations. Environmental & Resource Economics, 37(3): 521-547. doi:  10.1007/s10640-006-9047-6
    [12] European Environment Agency, 2010. Scaling up ecosystem benefits—A contribution to the economics of ecosystem and biodiversity (TEEB) study. In: European Environment Agency Report No. 4. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/scaling-up-ecosystem-benefits-a.
    [13] Farber S, Costanza R, Childers D L et al., 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience, 56(2): 121-133. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE] 2.0.CO;2
    [14] Farely J, 2008. The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital. Conservation Biology, 22(6): 1399-1408. doi:  10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01090.x.
    [15] Fennessy M S, Jacobs A D, Kentula M E, 2004. Review of rapid methods for assessing wetland conditions. In: US Environmental Production Agency Report No. EPA/620/R-04/009. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/download_files/publications/rapidmethodreview.pdf.
    [16] Finnoff D, Tschirhart J, 2008. Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2): 91-114. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.08. 005
    [17] Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, Chen Liding et al., 2001. Scheme of ecological regionalization in China. Ecological Acta, 21(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
    [18] Fu Bojie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei et al., 2009. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in china. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571-576. (in Chinese)
    [19] Gascoigne W R, Hoag D, Koontz L et al., 2011. Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecological Economic, 70(10): 1715-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04. 010
    [20] Ghermandi A, Bergh J M, Brander L M et al., 2008. The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: A meta-analysis. FEEM working paper No. 79.2008.
    [21] Groot R, Brande L, Ploeg S et al., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystem and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07. 005
    [22] Huang L b, Bai J h, Gao H f et al., 2012. Soil organic carbon content and storage of raised field wetlands in different functional zones of a typical shallow freshwater lake, China. Soil Research, 50(8): 664-671.
    [23] Johnston R J, Rosenberger R S, 2010. Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3): 479-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419. 2009.00592.x
    [24] Lars H, Koppen K V, Groot R D et al., 2006. Spatial scale, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04. 005
    [25] Li Wenhua, 2008. Ecosystem Service Valuation: Theory, Method and Application. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 37-51. (in Chinese)
    [26] Liu S, Costanza R, Troy A et al., 2010. Valuing New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital: A spatially explicit benefit transfer. Environment Management, 45(6): 1271-1285. doi:  10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5
    [27] Liu Xiaohui, Lu Xianguo, Jiangming et al., 2008. Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(11): 5625-5631. (in Chinese)
    [28] Luke M B, Florax R M, Vermaat J E et al., 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental & Resources Economics, 33(2): 223-250. doi:  10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4
    [29] Luke M, Brauer I, Gerdes H et al., 2011. Using meta-analysis and GIS for value transfer and scaling up: Valuing climate change induced losses of European wetlands. Environment Resource Economic, 52(3): 395-413. doi: 10.1007/s 10640-011-9535-1
    [30] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2008. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 49-70.
    [31] National Bureau of Statistics, 2000. China Statistical Yearbook 2000. Beijing: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
    [32] National Bureau of Statistics, 2008. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
    [33] National Research Council (United States), Committee on Characterization of Wetlands, 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 215-220.
    [34] Niu Z G, Gong P, Cheng X et al., 2009. Geographical characteristics of China's wetlands derived from remotely sensed data. Science in China Series D: Earth Science, 52(6): 723-738. doi:  10.1007/s11430-009-0075-2
    [35] Niu Z G, Zhang H Y, Wang X W et al., 2012. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(22): 2813-2823. doi:  10.1007/s11434-012-5093-3
    [36] Ojea E, Ruiz-Benito P, Markandya A et al., 2012. Wood provisioning in Mediterranean forests: A bottom-up spatial valuation approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 20: 78-88. doi:  10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.003
    [37] Ouyang Zhiyun, Zhao Tongqian, Wang Xiaoke et al., 2004. Ecosystem services analyses and valuation of china terrestrial surface water system. Acta Ecological Sinica, 24(10): 2091-2099. (in Chinese)
    [38] Rosenberger R S, Loomis J B, 2003. Benefit transfer. In: Champ P A (ed.). A Primer on Non-market Valuation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 445-482.
    [39] Rudolf S G, Wilson M A, Boumans R J et al., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393-408. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
    [40] The Ministry of Water Resources of the P. R. C., 2000. Statistical Bulletin of Chinese Water Conservancy 2000. Availabe at: http://www.cws.net.cn.
    [41] Wan Bentai, Xu Haigen, Ding Hui et al., 2007. Methodology of comprehensive biodiversity assessment. Biodiversity Science, 15(1): 97-106. (in Chinese)
    [42] Wang Sumin, Dou Hongshen, 1998. Chinese Lakes. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
    [43] William J M, James G G, 2000. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 25-33. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8
    [44] William J M, James G G, 2007. Wetlands (4th edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 35-42.
    [45] Wilsom M A, Carpenter S R, 1999. Economics valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971-1997. Ecological Applications, 9(3): 772-783. doi:  10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0772:EVOFES]2.0.CO;2
    [46] Woodward R T, Wui Y S, 2001. The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 37(2): 257-270. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7
    [47] Xie Gaodi Zhang Yili, Lu Chunxia et al., 2001. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1): 47-53. (in Chinese)
    [48] Xie G d, Zhen L, Lu C x et al., 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911-919.
    [49] Yao Weihao, Su Chunhua, Chen Bin, 2009. Progress of wetlands ecosystem service evaluation. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 16(3): 245-249. (in Chinese)
    [50] Yu Xiaofei, Zhang Yuxia, Zhao Hongmei et al., 2010. Freeze-thaw effects on sorption/desorption of dissolved organic carbon in wetland soils. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(3): 209-217. doi:  10.1007/S11769-010-0209-7
    [51] Yu Xinxiao, Lu Shaowei, Ji Fang et al., 2005. The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecological Sinica, 25(8): 2096-2102. (in Chinese)
    [52] Zhang Ping, Ma Tao, 2011. A comment on studies on evaluation of services value of wetland ecosystem in China. Wetland Science, 9(2): 203-208. (in Chinese)
    [53] Zhao Kuiyi, 1999. Chinese Marsh. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
    [54] Zhao Ling, Wang Erda, 2011. An empirical study of meta-regression benefit transfer of natural resources. Resources Science, 33(1): 31-40. (in Chinese)
    [55] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke et al., 2003. Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial surface water system in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(4): 443-452. (in Chinese)
    [56] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua et al., 2004. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in china. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(4): 480-491. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(524) PDF downloads(1425) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Funds:  Under the auspices of Forestry Public Interest Research Program (No. 201204201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171415)
    Corresponding author: ZHOU Demin. E-mail: zhoudemin@neigae.ac.cn

Abstract: Wetlands are highly productive natural ecosystems, providing valuable goods and services. There is growing interest in transferring ecosystem service value from the existing wetlands studied to other wetlands ecosystems at a large geographic scale. The benefit transfer method uses the known values from wetlands to predict the value of other wetland sites. This methodology requires only limited time and resources. The present study calculated the value of the ecological services provided by lake and marsh wetlands in China in terms of biodiversity indices, water quality indices and economic indices. Basic data on wetlands were obtained through remote sensing images. The results show that: 1) The total ecosystem service value of the lake and marsh wetlands in 2008 was calculated to be 8.1841×1010 United States Dollars (USD), with the marsh and lake wetlands contributing 5.6329×1010 and 2.5512×1010 USD, respectively. Values of marsh ecosystem service were concentrated in Heilongjiang Province (2.5516×1010 USD), Qinghai Province (1.2014×1010 USD), and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (1.1884×1010 USD). The value of the lakes were concentrated in Tibet Autonomous Region (6.223×109 USD), Heilongjiang (5.810×109 USD), and Qinghai (5.500×109 USD). 2) Waste treatment and climate regulation services contributed to 26.29% and 24.74% respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the marsh wetlands. Hydrological regulation and waste treatment contributed to 41.39% and 32.75%, respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the lake wetlands. 3) The total ecological service value of the lake and marsh wetlands was 54.64% of the total service value of natural grassland ecosystems and 30.34% of the total service value of forests ecosystems in China.

ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Citation: ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Reference (56)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return