留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China

Xiaofei LI Wei LIANG Lei JIAO Jianwu YAN Weibin ZHANG Fengjiao WANG Fen GOU Chengxi WANG Quanqin SHAO

LI Xiaofei, LIANG Wei, JIAO Lei, YAN Jianwu, ZHANG Weibin, WANG Fengjiao, GOU Fen, WANG Chengxi, SHAO Quanqin, 2022. Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 32(4): 620−642 doi:  10.1007/s11769-022-1290-4
Citation: LI Xiaofei, LIANG Wei, JIAO Lei, YAN Jianwu, ZHANG Weibin, WANG Fengjiao, GOU Fen, WANG Chengxi, SHAO Quanqin, 2022. Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 32(4): 620−642 doi:  10.1007/s11769-022-1290-4

doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1290-4

Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China

Funds: Under the auspices of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Strategic Leading Science and Technology Project Category A (No. XDA23100203), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42071144, 41501093, 41771118), Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0501601), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. GK202003060)
More Information
    • 关键词:
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  / 
    •  
  • Figure  1.  Topographic map of the study areas and meteorological stations: (I) the semihumid region, (II) the semiarid region, and (III) the arid region

    Figure  2.  Technology roadmap. T is average air temperature; Tmax is maximum air temperatures; Tmin is minimum air temperatures; n is actual sunshine duration; U2 is wind speed at 2 m height; RH is mean relative humidity; VPD is vapor pressure deficit; Rs is global solar radiation; and Rn is the net radiation

    Figure  3.  Change points and segmented trends of the annual ET0 from 1960–2017 in (a) the Loess Plateau, (b) the semi-humid region, (c) the semi-arid region, and (d) the arid region. The dots denote the observed values; the red line denotes the trend by the segmented regression model; the blue dashed line denotes the trend by the simple linear regression model; the gray line denotes the five-year moving average; and the vertical lines indicate the change points

    Figure  4.  Spatial distribution of the ET0 trends on the Loess Plateau from 1960–2017. The bar chart denotes different significance station numbers

    Figure  5.  Time evolution of ET0 on the Loess Plateau from 1960–2017 in (a) spring, (b) summer, (c) autumn, and (d) winter. The dots denote the observed values; the blue dashed line denotes the trend by the simple linear regression model; and the gray line denotes the five-year moving average

    Figure  6.  Morlet wavelet results of the annual ET0 from 1960–2017 on the Loess Plateau: (a) variance of the wavelet coefficient, (b) wavelet coefficients, and (c) real part of the wavelet coefficients. The solid lines in Fig. 6c are values of wavelet coefficients and represents flow periods

    Figure  7.  Spatial variability of the (a) annual, (b) spring, (c) summer, (d) autumn, and (e) winter ET0 from 1960–2017 on the Loess Plateau. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2

    S1.  Spatial distribution of (a) sunshine duration, (b) temperature, (c) wind speed at 2m height, (d) relative humidity, (e) precipitation, (f) maximum air temperature, (g) minimum air temperature, (h) vapor pressure deficit, (i) solar radiation, and (j) net radiation. Ⅰ is the semihumid region; Ⅱ is the semiarid region; Ⅲ is the arid region

    Figure  8.  Temporal evolution of the contribution rates of the meteorological factors to ET0 in the (a) semihumid region; (b) semiarid region; (c) arid region, and (d) the Loess Plateau. n, T, U2, RH, Pr, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

    Figure  9.  Absolute contribution of the meteorological variables to ET0 in different time periods on the Loess Plateau. T, U2, RH, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4. T, U2, RH, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

    Figure  10.  Relationships between the annual ET0 calculated by the FAO56-PM model and pan evaporation on the Loess Plateau

    Figure  11.  Absolute contribution of the meteorological variables to ET0 of the original and three random sampling stations on the Loess Plateau in the subperiods. T, U2, RH, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

    Table  1.   Trends of the ET0 changes and dominant meteorological variables in different regions of China

    RegionPeriodTrends of the ET0 changesDominant meteorological variablesReferences
    China 1960–2011 Decreased from 1960−1992 Decreasing solar radiation in the humid region; decreasing wind speed in the arid and semiarid/semihumid regions Zhang et al. (2013)
    Increased from 1993−2011 Rapidly increasing temperature in China
    Yangtze River catchment 1960–2000 Decreased Decreased net radiation and wind speed Xu et al. (2006)
    Yellow River Basin 1957–2008 Decreased in the southeast corner, northern side, and midwest Decreased wind speed and sunshine duration Wang et al. (2012)
    Increased in the middle part and southwest corner Increasing mean temperature
    The middle reaches of Yellow River Basin 1960–2012 Insignificant decreased Decreasing solar radiation and wind speed She et al. (2017a)
    The non-monsoon region 1961–2014 Increased from 1961–1973 Increasing wind speed and maximum air temperature Dong et al. (2021)
    Decreased from 1974–1994 Decreasing wind speed
    Increased from 1995–2017 Increasing wind speed and maximum air temperature
    Xinjiang 1961–2010 Decreased from 1961–1993 Decreasing wind speed Dong et al. (2020)
    Increased from 1994−2010 Increasing wind speed and air temperature
    Taohe River Basin 1981–2010 Increased Increasing air temperature Yang et al. (2014)
    Loess Plateau 1960–2013 Decreased from 1960−1990 Decreasing wind speed Li et al. (2016)
    Increased from 1991−2013 Rapidly increasing temperature
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  2.   Mean annual ET0 (mm) and trend slopes (mm/yr) of the annual ET0 obtained by the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen’s estimator in the three subregions and on the Loess Plateau during different periods

    PeriodLP
    ET0TrendβET0TrendβET0TrendβET0Trendβ
    1960–2017984–0.2331011***–1.7039550.13611020.261
    1960–197210041.83210730.6849641.38810991.875
    1973–1990972**–4.339996**–7.861944**–3.9601089*–3.696
    1991–1999975↑+6.9659999.123943*6.6891117*8.794
    2000–2010989–3.089987**–4.096968–2.0131115*–6.690
    2011–2017990↑+7.999994*11.4939696.16811076.304
    Notes: ***, **, *, and + denote significance at 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 levels, respectively. Ⅰ is a semihumid region; Ⅱ is a semiarid region; and Ⅲ is an arid region
    下载: 导出CSV

    S1.   Trend slopes of meteorological variables by the Mann-Kendal test and the Theil-Sen’s slope estimator

    YearRegionnTU2RHPrTmaxTminVPDRsRn
    1960

    1972
    LP 0.003 –0.037 0.018+ –0.015 –5.134 –0.038 –0.058 0.001 0.015 0.014
    –0.009 –0.041 0.003 0.124 –4.791 –0.060 –0.024 –0.000 0.007 0.019
    0.007 –0.030 0023* –0.024 –7.117 –0.025 –0.059 0.001 0.017 0.013
    0.027 –0.039 0.015 –0.095 –4.842 –0.056 –0.043 0.002 0.035 –0.004
    1973

    1990
    LP –0.031* 0.009 –0.026*** 0.089 0.893 0.003 0.026 –0.002 –0.033* –0.011*
    –0.048* –0.006 –0.025*** 0.203 0.490 –0.003 0.010 –0.005* –0.067* –0.023+
    –0.026* 0.004 –0.025*** 0.074 0.629 0.004 0.022 –0.002 –0.026* –0.009
    –0.008 0.032 –0.030*** –0.018 0.578 0.007 0.069* 0.000 –0.008 –0.001
    1991

    1999
    LP 0.039 0.130 0.001 –0.497+ –8.729 0.160 0.108 0.009+ 0.016 –0.006
    0.034 0.117+ 0.015 –0.565 –3.300 0.139* 0.095 0.010 0.048 –0.000
    0.033 0.129 0.001 –0.495* –6.252 0.157 0.112 0.012 0.029 –0.009
    0.032 0.096 0.023 –0.372+ –0.879 0.103 0.120 0.010 0.031 0.008
    2000

    2010
    LP –0.034+ –0.018 –0.008+ –0.116 3.783 –0.013 0.003 0.002 –0.047+ –0.028**
    –0.050+ –0.016 –0.004 –0.220 2.615 –0.027 –0.007 0.003 –0.073* –0.044**
    –0.037+ –0.018 0.003 –0.085 4.351 –0.025 0.002 0.001 –0.044+ –0.023*
    –0.001 0.001 –0.060*** –0.087 0.912 –0.001 0.013 0.005 –0.006 –0.011*
    2011

    2017
    LP 0.035 0.094 0.021 0.022 11.378+ 0.147 0.069* 0.005 0.040 0.022
    0.068* 0.144 0.019** 0.090 10.056 0.212 0.130 0.007 0.106** 0.072**
    0.023 0.098+ 0.023 0.008 14.758 0.106 0.068 0.004 0.021 0.010
    0.035 0.088 0.010 –0.133 8.613 0.123 0.043+ 0.008+ 0.042 0.004
    1960

    2017
    LP –0.012*** 0.032*** –0.008*** –0.048** –0.029 0.032*** 0.039*** 0.002*** –0.013*** –0.006***
    –0.016*** 0.022*** –0.010*** –0.031 –0.823 0.023*** 0.028*** 0.001* –0.019*** –0.008***
    –0.011*** 0.033*** –0.007*** –0.045* 0.011 0.034*** 0.039*** 0.002*** –0.013*** –0.006***
    –0.004+ 0.040*** –0.010*** –0.089*** 0.093 0.031*** 0.052*** 0.004*** –0.003 –0.004***
    Notes: n is actual sunshine duration; T is average air temperature; U2 is wind speed at 2 m height; RH is mean relative humidity; Pr is precipitation; Tmax is maximum air temperatures; Tmin is minimum air temperatures; VPD is vapor pressure deficit; Rs is global solar radiation; and Rn is the net radiation. Ⅰ is the semihumid region; Ⅱ is the semiarid region; Ⅲ is the arid region. ***, **, *, + mean the significance level of 0.001,0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  3.   Mean seasonal ET0 (mm) and trend slopes (mm/yr) of seasonal ET0 obtained by the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen’s estimator in the three subregions and on the Loess Plateau

    RegionSpringSummerAutumnWinter
    ET0TrendβET0TrendβET0TrendβET0Trendβ
    LP3130.183405−0.390176*−0.020890.074
    3090.041415***−1.135184*−0.350103−0.154
    3080.256319−0.2411700.05084↑+0.128
    352↑+0.244468−0.0301960.051860.076
    Notes: ***, **, *, and + denote significance at 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 levels, respectively. Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  4.   Standardized stepwise regression coefficients for meteorological factors on the Loess Plateau (LP) and in the three subregions

    RegionCoefficient
    nTU2RHPrTmaxTminVPDRsRn
    LP–0.3220.1830.2260.0210.082–0.233–0.1320.5610.5760.114
    –0.3420.1470.4710.0170.0570.0260.0910.4760.7760.017
    –0.1870.0210.0180.0210.188–0.0230.0630.8240.5810.084
    –0.0210.1820.800–0.220–0.0360.024–0.0420.7430.0050.253
    Notes: the variables that were selected and applied to the regression model are shown in bold. n is actual sunshine duration; T is average air temperature; U2 is wind speed at 2 m height; RH is mean relative humidity; Pr is precipitation; Tmax is maximum air temperatures; Tmin is minimum air temperatures; VPD is vapor pressure deficit; Rs is global solar radiation; and Rn is the net radiation. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table  5.   Contribution rates of meteorological variables to ET0

    RegionRelative contribution rate / %
    nTU2RHPrTmaxTminVPDRsRn
    LP/12.08415.817////35.24836.851/
    16.080/18.908///7.19923.66634.147/
    ////12.034//52.02535.941/
    /6.95238.59213.545///28.238/12.673
    Notes: the maximum relative contributions in the individual regions are shown in bold. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2. n, T, U2, RH, Pr, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4
    下载: 导出CSV

    S2.   Mean annual ET0 (mm) and trend slopes (mm/yr) of the annual ET0 obtained by the Mann-Kendall test in the three sub-regions and the LP during different periods

    PeriodLP
    ET0TrendβET0TrendβET0TrendβET0Trendβ
    1960–1990982**–2.9071025***–5.520950*–2.0801092–1.500
    1991–20179860.831995–0.206960↑+1.2791114–0.623
    Notes: β is the estimated magnitude of slopes of the ET0 trends. β > 0 represents an increasing trend (↑); β < 0 represents a decreasing trend (↓). ***, **, * and + means the significance level of 0.001,0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively. Ⅰ is the semihumid region; Ⅱ is the semiarid region; Ⅲ is the arid region
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Abtew W, Obeysekera J, Iricanin N, 2011. Pan evaporation and potential evapotranspiration trends in South Florida. Hydrological Processes, 25(6): 958–969. doi:  10.1002/hyp.7887
    [2] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D et al. , 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO
    [3] Ashraf M, Loftis J C, Hubbard K G, 1997. Application of geostatistics to evaluate partial weather station networks. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 84(3−4): 255–271. doi:  10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02358-1
    [4] Bais A F, Tourpali K, Kazantzidis A et al., 2011. Projections of UV radiation changes in the 21st century: impact of ozone recovery and cloud effects. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(15): 7533–7545. doi:  10.5194/acp-11-7533-2011
    [5] Bandyopadhyay A, Bhadra A, Raghuwanshi N S et al., 2009. Temporal trends in estimates of reference evapotranspiration over India. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(5): 508–515. doi:  10.1061/(Asce)He.1943-5584.0000006
    [6] Burn D H, Hesch N M, 2007. Trends in evaporation for the Canadian prairies. Journal of Hydrology, 336(1−2): 61–73. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.12.011
    [7] Cazelles B, Chavez M, Berteaux D et al., 2008. Wavelet analysis of ecological time series. Oecologia, 156(2): 287–304. doi:  10.1007/s00442-008-0993-2
    [8] Che H Z, 2005. Analysis of 40 years of solar radiation data from China, 1961–2000. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(6): L06803. doi:  10.1029/2004gl022322
    [9] Chen L, Li D, Pryor S C, 2013. Wind speed trends over China: quantifying the magnitude and assessing causality. International Journal of Climatology, 33(11): 2579–2590. doi:  10.1002/joc.3613
    [10] Cristea N C, Kampf S K, Burges S J, 2013. Linear models for estimating annual and growing season reference evapotranspiration using averages of weather variables. International Journal of Climatology, 33(2): 376–387. doi:  10.1002/joc.3430
    [11] Dalezios N R, Loukas A, Bampzelis D, 2002. Spatial variability of reference evapotranspiration in Greece. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(23-24): 1031–1038. doi:  10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00139-0
    [12] Dong Q, Wang W G, Shao Q X et al., 2020. The response of reference evapotranspiration to climate change in Xinjiang, China: historical changes, driving forces, and future projections. International Journal of Climatology, 40(1): 235–254. doi:  10.1002/joc.6206
    [13] Dong Y Y, Zhao Y, Zhai J Q et al., 2021. Changes in reference evapotranspiration over the non-monsoon region of China during 1961–2017: relationships with atmospheric circulation and attributions. International Journal of Climatology, 41(S1): E734–E751. doi:  10.1002/joc.6722
    [14] Fan J L, Wu L F, Zhang F C et al., 2016. Climate change effects on reference crop evapotranspiration across different climatic zones of China during 1956–2015. Journal of Hydrology, 542: 923–937. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.060
    [15] Feng X M, Fu B J, Piao S et al., 2016. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6(11): 1019–1022. doi:  10.1038/nclimate3092
    [16] Feng Y, Cui N B, Zhao L et al., 2017. Spatiotemporal variation of reference evapotranspiration during 1954–2013 in Southwest China. Quaternary International, 441: 129–139. doi:  10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.023
    [17] Han S J, Tang Q H, Xu D et al., 2014. Irrigation-induced changes in potential evaporation: more attention is needed. Hydrological Processes, 28(4): 2717–2720. doi:  10.1002/hyp.10108
    [18] Hobbins M T, Ramírez J A, Brown T C, 2004. Trends in pan evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U. S. : paradoxical or complementary. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(13): L13503. doi:  10.1029/2004GL019846
    [19] Hosseinzadeh Talaee P, Shifteh Some’e B, Sobhan Ardakani S, 2014. Time trend and change point of reference evapotranspiration over Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 116(3): 639–647. doi:  10.1007/s00704-013-0978-x
    [20] Hurvich C M, Tsai C L, 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76(2): 297–307. doi:  10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
    [21] Hutchinson M F, Gessler P E, 1994. Splines-more than just a smooth interpolator. Geoderma, 62(1−3): 45–67. doi:  10.1016/0016-7061(94)90027-2
    [22] Irmak S, Kabenge I, Skaggs K E et al. , 2012. Trend and magnitude of changes in climate variables and reference evapotranspiration over 116-yr period in the Platte River Basin, central Nebraska–USA. Journal of Hydrology, 420–421: 228–244. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.006
    [23] Jhajharia D, Dinpashoh Y, Kahya E et al., 2012. Trends in reference evapotranspiration in the humid region of northeast India. Hydrological Processes, 26(3): 421–435. doi:  10.1002/hyp.8140
    [24] Kendall M G, 1975. Rank Correlation Methods. London: Charles Griffin & Co. Ltd.
    [25] Kisi O, 2016. Modeling reference evapotranspiration using three different heuristic regression approaches. Agricultural Water Management, 169: 162–172. doi:  10.1016/j.agwat.2016.02.026
    [26] Li Y Z, Liang K, Bai P et al., 2016. The spatiotemporal variation of reference evapotranspiration and the contribution of its climatic factors in the Loess Plateau, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(4): 354. doi:  10.1007/s12665-015-5208-7
    [27] Li Z, Zheng F L, Liu W Z, 2012. Spatiotemporal characteristics of reference evapotranspiration during 1961–2009 and its projected changes during 2011–2099 on the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 154–155: 147–155. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.019
    [28] Liu Changming, Sun Rui, 1999. Ecological aspects of water cycle: advances in soil-vegetation-atmosphere of energy and water fuxes. Advances in Water Science, 10(3): 251–259. (in Chinese)
    [29] Liu C W, Sun G, McNulty S G et al., 2017. Environmental controls on seasonal ecosystem evapotranspiration/potential evapotranspiration ratio as determined by the global eddy flux measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(1): 311–322. doi:  10.5194/hess-21-311-2017
    [30] Liu H Z, Feng J W, 2012. Seasonal and interannual variations of evapotranspiration and energy exchange over different land surfaces in a semiarid area of China. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 51(10): 1875–1888. doi:  10.1175/jamc-d-11-0229.1
    [31] Liu Q, Yang Z F, Cui B S et al., 2010. The temporal trends of reference evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to key meteorological variables in the Yellow River Basin, China. Hydrological Processes, 24(15): 2171–2181. doi:  10.1002/hyp.7649
    [32] Liu X M, Luo Y Z, Zhang D et al., 2011. Recent changes in pan-evaporation dynamics in China. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(13): L13404. doi:  10.1029/2011GL047929
    [33] Liu Z P, Wang Y Q, Shao M G et al., 2016. Spatiotemporal analysis of multiscalar drought characteristics across the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology, 534: 281–299. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.003
    [34] Lü Y H, Fu B J, Feng X M et al., 2012. A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: quantifying ecosystem services changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS One, 7(2): e31782. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0031782
    [35] Maček U, Bezak N, Šraj M, 2018. Reference evapotranspiration changes in Slovenia, Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 260–261: 183–192. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.014
    [36] Mann H B, 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13(3): 245–259. doi:  10.2307/1907187
    [37] McVicar T R, Roderick M L, Donohue R J et al. , 2012. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: implications for evaporation. Journal of Hydrology, 416–417: 182–205. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024
    [38] Palumbo A D, Vitale D, Campi P et al., 2012. Time trend in reference evapotranspiration: analysis of a long series of agrometeorological measurements in Southern Italy. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 25(4): 395–411. doi:  10.1007/s10795-012-9132-7
    [39] Papaioannou G, Kitsara G, Athanasatos S, 2011. Impact of global dimming and brightening on reference evapotranspiration in Greece. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 116(D9): D09107. doi:  10.1029/2010JD015525
    [40] Price D T, McKenney D W, Nalder I A et al., 2000. A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 101(2−3): 81–94. doi:  10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00169-0
    [41] Qian T T, Dai A G, Trenberth K E, 2007a. Hydroclimatic trends in the Mississippi River basin from 1948 to 2004. Journal of Climate, 20(18): 4599–4614. doi:  10.1175/Jcli4262.1
    [42] Qian Y, Wang W G, Leung L R et al., 2007b. Variability of solar radiation under cloud-free skies in China: the role of aerosols. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(12): L12804. doi:  10.1029/2006gl028800
    [43] Qin M, Hao L, Sun L et al., 2017. Climatic controls on watershed reference evapotranspiration vary dramatically during the past 50 years in southern China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–40. doi:  10.5194/hess-2017-241
    [44] Roderick M L, Farquhar G D, 2002. The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years. Science, 298(5597): 1410–1411. doi:  10.1126/science.1075390-a
    [45] Roderick M L, Farquhar G D, 2004. Changes in Australian pan evaporation from 1970 to 2002. International Journal of Climatology, 24(9): 1077–1090. doi:  10.1002/joc.1061
    [46] Roderick M L, Farquhar G D, 2005. Changes in New Zealand pan evaporation since the 1970s. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15): 2031–2039. doi:  10.1002/joc.1262
    [47] Sen P K, 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324): 1379–1389. doi:  10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934
    [48] Shadmani M, Marofi S, Roknian M, 2012. Trend analysis in reference evapotranspiration using mann-kendall and Spearman’s Rho tests in arid regions of Iran. Water Resources Management, 26(1): 211–224. doi:  10.1007/s11269-011-9913-z
    [49] Shan N, Shi Z J, Yang X H et al., 2015. Spatiotemporal trends of reference evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the Beijing–Tianjin Sand Source Control Project Region, China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200: 322–333. doi:  10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.008
    [50] Shao Q X, Campbell N A, 2002. Applications: modelling trends in groundwater levels by segmented regression with constraints. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 44(2): 129–141. doi:  10.1111/1467-842x.00216
    [51] Shao Q X, Li Z L, Xu Z X, 2010. Trend detection in hydrological time series by segment regression with application to Shiyang River Basin. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(2): 221–233. doi:  10.1007/s00477-009-0312-4
    [52] She D X, Xia J, Zhang Y Y, 2017a. Changes in reference evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the middle reaches of Yellow River Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 607–608: 1151–1162. doi:  10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.007
    [53] She D X, Xia J, Shao Q X et al., 2017b. Advanced investigation on the change in the streamflow into the water source of the middle route of China’s water diversion project. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 122(13): 6950–6961. doi:  10.1002/2016jd025702
    [54] Shiri J, 2017. Evaluation of FAO56-PM, empirical, semi-empirical and gene expression programming approaches for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in hyper-arid regions of Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 188: 101–114. doi:  10.1016/j.agwat.2017.04.009
    [55] Tabari H, Aeini A, Talaee P H et al., 2012. Spatial distribution and temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Hydrological Processes, 26(4): 500–512. doi:  10.1002/hyp.8146
    [56] Vicente-Serrano S M, Azorin-Molina C, Sanchez-Lorenzo A et al., 2014. Sensitivity of reference evapotranspiration to changes in meteorological parameters in Spain (1961–2011). Water Resources Research, 50(11): 8458–8480. doi:  10.1002/2014wr015427
    [57] Wang L Z, Cao L G, Deng X J et al., 2014. Changes in aridity index and reference evapotranspiration over the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau in China during 1960–2012. Quaternary International, 349: 280–286. doi:  10.1016/j.quaint.2014.07.030
    [58] Wang W G, Shao Q X, Peng S Z et al., 2012. Reference evapotranspiration change and the causes across the Yellow River Basin during 1957–2008 and their spatial and seasonal differences. Water Resources Research, 48(5): W05530. doi:  10.1029/2011WR010724
    [59] Wang Yashu, Li Xiaoyan, Shi Fangzhong et al., 2019. The Grain for Green Project intensifies evapotranspiration in the revegetation area of the Loess Plateau in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 64(5−6): 588–589. (in Chinese). doi:  10.1360/N972018-00515
    [60] Wang Z L, Xie P W, Lai C G et al., 2017. Spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and contributing climatic factors in China during 1961–2013. Journal of Hydrology, 544: 97–108. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.021
    [61] Wild M, Gilgen H, Roesch A et al., 2005. From dimming to brightening: decadal changes in solar radiation at Earth’s surface. Science, 308(5723): 847–850. doi:  10.1126/science.1103215
    [62] Xing W Q, Wang W G, Shao Q X et al., 2016. Periodic fluctuation of reference evapotranspiration during the past five decades: does Evaporation Paradox really exist in China. Scientific Reports, 6: 39503. doi:  10.1038/srep39503
    [63] Xu C Y, Gong L B, Jiang T et al., 2006. Analysis of spatial distribution and temporal trend of reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation in Changjiang (Yangtze River) catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 327(1−2): 81–93. doi:  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.029
    [64] Yang Linshan, Li Changbin, Wang Shuaibing et al., 2014. Sensitive analysis of potential evapotranspiration to key climatic factors in Taohe River Basin. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(11): 102–109. (in Chinese)
    [65] Yin Yunhe, Wu Shaohong, Dai Erfu, 2010. Determining factors in potential evapotranspiration changes over China in the period 1971–2008. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(29): 3329–3337. doi:  10.1007/s11434-010-3289-y
    [66] Yu P S, Yang T C, Chou C C, 2002. Effects of climate change on evapotranspiration from paddy fields in Southern Taiwan. Climatic Change, 54(1): 165–179. doi:  10.1023/A:1015764831165
    [67] Zhang D, Liu X M, Hong H Y, 2013. Assessing the effect of climate change on reference evapotranspiration in China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27(8): 1871–1881. doi:  10.1007/s00477-013-0723-0
    [68] Zhang Q A, Xu C Y, Chen X H, 2011. Reference evapotranspiration changes in China: natural processes or human influences? Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 103(3): 479–488. doi:  10.1007/s00704-010-0315-6
    [69] Zhang X T, Kang S Z, Zhang L et al., 2010. Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 97(10): 1506–1516. doi:  10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.004
    [70] Zhao Z Y, Wang H R, Wang C et al., 2020. Changes in reference evapotranspiration over Northwest China from 1957 to 2018: variation characteristics, cause analysis and relationships with atmospheric circulation. Agricultural Water Management, 231: 105958. doi:  10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105958
    [71] Zheng C L, Wang Q, 2015. Spatiotemporal pattern of the global sensitivity of the reference evapotranspiration to climatic variables in recent five decades over China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29(8): 1937–1947. doi:  10.1007/s00477-015-1120-7
    [72] Zhu G F, He Y Q, Pu T et al., 2012. Spatial distribution and temporal trends in potential evapotranspiration over Hengduan Mountains region from 1960 to 2009. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(1): 71–85. doi:  10.1007/s11442-012-0912-7
    [73] Zuo D P, Xu Z X, Yang H et al., 2012. Spatiotemporal variations and abrupt changes of potential evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to key meteorological variables in the Weihe River Basin, China. Hydrological Processes, 26(8): 1149–1160. doi:  10.1002/hyp.8206
  • [1] Yi LI, Bin FANG, Yurui LI, Weilun FENG, Xu YIN.  Spatiotemporal Pattern of Cultivated Land Pressure and Its Influencing Factors in the Huaihai Economic Zone, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(2): 287-303. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1334-4
    [2] Xingchuan GAO, Tao LI, Dongqi SUN.  Regional Differentiation Regularity and Influencing Factors of Population Change in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(5): 888-899. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1223-7
    [3] QU Lulu, HUANG Yunxin, YANG Lingfan, LI Yurui.  Vegetation Restoration in Response to Climatic and Anthropogenic Changes in the Loess Plateau, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(1): 89-100. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1093-4
    [4] LIU Yuanxin, LYU Yihe, BAI Yingfei, ZHANG Buyun, TONG Xiaolin.  Vegetation Mapping for Regional Ecological Research and Management: A Case of the Loess Plateau in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(3): 410-426. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1120-5
    [5] ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Baiping, YAO Yonghui, ZHAO Fang, QI Wenwen, HE Wenhui, WANG Jing.  Magnitude and Forming Factors of Mass Elevation Effect on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(6): 745-754. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0834-x
    [6] ZHU Hongchun, TANG Guoan, QIAN Kejian, LIU Haiying.  Extraction and Analysis of Gully Head of Loess Plateau in China Based on Digital Elevation Model . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(3): 328-338. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0663-8
    [7] ZHOU Yuliang, JIN Juliang, LIU Li, ZHANG Libing, He Jun, WANG Zhesun.  Inference of Reference Conditions for Nutrient Concentrations of Chaohu Lake Based on Model Extrapolation . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(1): 35-48.
    [8] LI Huixia, LIU Guohua, FU Bojie.  Estimation of Regional Evapotranspiration in Alpine Area and Its Response to Land Use Change: A Case Study in Three-River Headwaters Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(4): 437-449.
    [9] WANG Hongrui, GAO Yuanyuan, LIU Qiong, SONG Jinxi.  Land Use Allocation Based on Interval Multi-objective Linear Programming Model: A Case Study of Pi County in Sichuan Province . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(2): 176-183. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0176-z
    [10] YAN Jianzhong, ZHANG Yili, ZHANG Liping, WU Yingying.  Livelihood Strategy Change and Land Use Change——Case of Danzam Village in Upper Dadu River Watershed, Tibetan Plateau of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 231-240. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0231-9
    [11] LIANG Liqiao, LI Lijuan, ZHANG Li, LI Jiuyi, LI Bin.  Sensitivity of Penman-Monteith Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Tao'er River Basin of Northeastern China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(4): 340-347. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0340-x
    [12] LIU Xianzhao, LI Jiazhu.  Application of SCS Model in Estimation of Runoff from Small Watershed in Loess Plateau of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(3): 235-241. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0235-x
    [13] HE Jinwei, GE Miao, SU Huimin, LIANG Wei, CHEN Hongfei.  Normal Reference Value of Red Blood Cell Count of Chinese Presenile Men and Geographical Factors . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(1): 92-98. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0092-z
    [14] WANG Hao, XU Shiguo, SUN Leshi.  Effects of Climatic Change on Evapotranspiration in Zhalong Wetland, Northeast China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(3): 265-269.
    [15] ZHA Xiao-chun, TANG Ke-li.  ECO-ENVIRONMENT CHANGE AND SOIL EROSION PROCESS IN THE RECLAIMED FORESTLAND OF THE LOESS PLATEAU . Chinese Geographical Science, 2003, 13(3): 232-237.
    [16] QIAN Ya-dong, LU Guo-nian, CHEN Zhong-ming.  AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF VALLEY BOUNDARY FROM DEMS IN THE HILLY LOESS PLATEAU . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(3): 238-244.
    [17] 方精云, 刘绍辉, 赵坤.  FACTORS AFFECTING SOIL RESPIRATION IN REFERENCE WITH TEMPERATURE'S ROLE IN THE GLOBAL SCALE . Chinese Geographical Science, 1998, 8(3): 246-255.
    [18] 朱志诚.  BASIC FEATURES OF FOREST STEPPE IN THE LOESS PLATEAU OF CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 1995, 5(2): 170-174.
    [19] 王菱, 王勤学, 张如一.  HUMAN IMPACTS ON THE ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AND MODERN URBAN CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE LOESS PLATEAU . Chinese Geographical Science, 1993, 3(4): 365-375.
    [20] 李柱臣.  COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE IN THE LOESS PLATEAU AREA . Chinese Geographical Science, 1992, 2(1): 56-63.
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表ll (7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  277
  • HTML全文浏览量:  128
  • PDF下载量:  58
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-05-10
  • 录用日期:  2021-10-08
  • 刊出日期:  2022-07-05

Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1290-4
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Strategic Leading Science and Technology Project Category A (No. XDA23100203), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42071144, 41501093, 41771118), Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0501601), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. GK202003060)
    通讯作者: YAN Jianwu. E-mail: yanjw2001@163.com

English Abstract

LI Xiaofei, LIANG Wei, JIAO Lei, YAN Jianwu, ZHANG Weibin, WANG Fengjiao, GOU Fen, WANG Chengxi, SHAO Quanqin, 2022. Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 32(4): 620−642 doi:  10.1007/s11769-022-1290-4
Citation: LI Xiaofei, LIANG Wei, JIAO Lei, YAN Jianwu, ZHANG Weibin, WANG Fengjiao, GOU Fen, WANG Chengxi, SHAO Quanqin, 2022. Identification of Dominant Climate Variables on Spatiotemporal Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 32(4): 620−642 doi:  10.1007/s11769-022-1290-4
    • Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) refers to the regional evapotranspiration capacity under sufficient water supply conditions, defined as the evapotranspiration rate on the hypothetical underlying surface with fixed parameters (Allen et al., 1998). ET0 is a key element of estimating actual evapotranspiration (Fan et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017), hydrological modeling, and predicting the impact of changes in meteorological conditions on water supply (Liu et al., 2010). In the context of global climate change, the accurate estimation of ET0 is indispensable for improving water management, strengthening crop efficient water use, and predicting crop agricultural water demand (Han et al., 2014; She et al., 2017a; Shiri, 2017). The revised Penman-Monteith equation recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 1998 is one of the most widely methods used to calculate ET0 (Tabari et al., 2012; Kisi, 2016; Wang et al., 2017). From the perspectives of meteorology and hydrology, ET0 is also an important topic in studies of the energy balance and water balance on land surface (Liu and Sun, 1999). Quantifying the effects of different meteorological variables on ET0 facilitates the explanation of the impact of climate change on hydrological processes in terrestrial ecosystems (Qin et al., 2017).

      As global warming is exacerbating recently, ET0 has shown an increasing trend owing to its high dependence on temperature in some regions in the world, e.g., the Mississippi River Basin (Qian et al., 2007a), the Mediterranean region (Palumbo et al., 2012; Vicente-Serrano et al., 2014), the Taiwan Province of China (Yu et al., 2002), the Platte River Basin in central Nebraska, USA (Irmak et al., 2012), and Florida, USA (Abtew et al., 2011). Although air temperature is increasing continuously, evapotranspiration is observed to a decrease trend but not an expected increase trend in many regions (Hobbins et al., 2004; Roderick and Farquhar, 2005; Burn and Hesch, 2007; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2009; Jhajharia et al., 2012; Hosseinzadeh Talaee et al., 2014; Zheng and Wang, 2015). Such a contradiction between the expectations and the observations is called the ‘evaporation paradox’ (Roderick and Farquhar, 2002).

      Furthermore, spatial-temporal changes of ET0 are complex in China (Xing et al., 2016). Based on wide reviews of the literatures, it is suggested that: 1) the changing trends of ET0 are different in China and other regions of the world; 2) the meteorological factors that affect ET0 include multiple aspects, such as wind speed, precipitation, and solar radiation in addition to air temperature, and affect ET0 to varying degrees; 3) the major meteorological factors that cause ET0 changes in different regions of China are different (Table 1); 4) few studies on the Loess Plateau (LP) have considered the effect of vapor pressure deficit on ET0; and 5) detecting meaningful change points is very important for the analysis of long time series in the field of hydrometeorology. Therefore, it is inevitable to analyze the trends of the ET0 changes in a long-term period and different periods and the comprehensive effects of various meteorological variables on ET0 on the LP.

      Table 1.  Trends of the ET0 changes and dominant meteorological variables in different regions of China

      RegionPeriodTrends of the ET0 changesDominant meteorological variablesReferences
      China 1960–2011 Decreased from 1960−1992 Decreasing solar radiation in the humid region; decreasing wind speed in the arid and semiarid/semihumid regions Zhang et al. (2013)
      Increased from 1993−2011 Rapidly increasing temperature in China
      Yangtze River catchment 1960–2000 Decreased Decreased net radiation and wind speed Xu et al. (2006)
      Yellow River Basin 1957–2008 Decreased in the southeast corner, northern side, and midwest Decreased wind speed and sunshine duration Wang et al. (2012)
      Increased in the middle part and southwest corner Increasing mean temperature
      The middle reaches of Yellow River Basin 1960–2012 Insignificant decreased Decreasing solar radiation and wind speed She et al. (2017a)
      The non-monsoon region 1961–2014 Increased from 1961–1973 Increasing wind speed and maximum air temperature Dong et al. (2021)
      Decreased from 1974–1994 Decreasing wind speed
      Increased from 1995–2017 Increasing wind speed and maximum air temperature
      Xinjiang 1961–2010 Decreased from 1961–1993 Decreasing wind speed Dong et al. (2020)
      Increased from 1994−2010 Increasing wind speed and air temperature
      Taohe River Basin 1981–2010 Increased Increasing air temperature Yang et al. (2014)
      Loess Plateau 1960–2013 Decreased from 1960−1990 Decreasing wind speed Li et al. (2016)
      Increased from 1991−2013 Rapidly increasing temperature

      The LP is characterized the serious soil erosion and the fragile ecological environment. To solve the deteriorating ecological problems on the LP, revegetation was carried out several decades ago, which led to a significant increase in the average vegetation coverage and a significant change in land use patterns (Lü et al., 2012). Revegetation also resulted in an ecological problem associated with water resource depletion (Feng et al., 2016). Meanwhile, vegetation greening also further affect the changes of meteorological variables and ET0 (Zhang et al., 2011). Atmospheric demand becomes the main influencing factor in the process of the ET0 changes instead of the air temperature alone (Qin et al., 2017). Moreover, due to the decadal and interannual changes in the climate variables and human activities, the ET0 series may have multiple change points and different changing trends in different periods instead of following a simple monotonic linear trend, which may also lead to differences in the contributing factors of ET0 in each period (She et al., 2017a). Previous studies on the LP focused on detecting the long-term trend of ET0 and attributing it to independent meteorological factors, which may affect the understanding of the ET0 changes and their contributing factors. Therefore, it is concluded in this paper that under the regional background of vegetation greening and regarding vapor pressure deficit as a key contributing factor, it is of great significance for regional water resource planning as well as ecosystem restoration to identify the changing trend of ET0 in different periods and its major contributing factors in the process of studying the trend of ET0 changes over a long period.

      The main objectives of this study are to: 1) detect the change points of the annual ET0 series from 1960 to 2017 by utilizing the segmented regression model; 2) analyze the spatiotemporal distribution of ET0 on annual and seasonal scales on the LP by using the linear regression method and the Mann-Kendall test and further explain the trend of the ET0 changes in different periods; 3) analyze the periodicity of ET0 under climate change conditions through wavelet analysis; 4) assess the relative contribution of the various meteorological factors to the ET0 changes and the temporal evolution of the relative contribution utilizing multiple stepwise regressive analysis and the generalized linear model; and 5) quantitatively identify the dominant meteorological variables of the ET0 changes in different periods using the detrending method.

    • The Loess Plateau (LP) (33°43′N–41°16′N; 100°54′E–114°33′E) is a typical region with water and soil losses and ecological fragility in the northern China (Fig. 1). The LP has a total area of 6.4 × 105 km2 (Liu et al., 2016). It has a continental monsoon climate characterized by hot summers and autumns with rainfall dominated by rainstorms, and cold and dry winters and springs with winds and sandstorms. From northwest to southeast, the annual mean temperature ranges from 3.6°C to 14.3°C, and the multiyear average annual precipitation ranges from 150 mm to 800 mm and mostly occurs in summer (Wang et al., 2019). Considering the differences in ET0 contributing factors in different climatic regions, this study divided the Loess Plateau region into three regions according to the climatic conditions: (Ⅰ) the semihumid region, (Ⅱ) the semiarid region, and (Ⅲ) the arid region (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1.  Topographic map of the study areas and meteorological stations: (I) the semihumid region, (II) the semiarid region, and (III) the arid region

      The daily meteorological data of 69 meteorological stations on the LP collected by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) (http://data.cma.cn/). They were applied to calculate of ET0 from 1960 to 2017 by the FAO56-PM model. The meteorological variables include maximum air temperature, minimum air temperature, average air temperature, wind speed, mean relative humidity, and sunshine duration (Allen et al., 1998).

    • Because of the difficulties in obtaining accurate field measurements, ET0 is generally calculated from the weather data. In this study, ET0 was calculated using the FAO Penman-Monteith model, which was widely used all over the world (Vicente-Serrano et al., 2014; Kisi, 2016; Maček et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2020). The FAO recommended it as the standard method for the estimation of ET0 (Allen et al., 1998). The Penman-Monteith equation can be expressed as follows:

      $$ {\mathrm{E}\mathrm{T}}_{0}=\frac{0.408\Delta \left({R}_{n}-G\right)+\gamma \frac{900}{T+273}{U}_{2}\left({e}_{s}-{e}_{a}\right)}{\Delta +\gamma \left(1+0.34{U}_{2}\right)} $$ (1)

      where ET0 is the reference evapotranspiration (mm/d); G is the soil heat flux density (MJ/(m2·d)); Rn is the net radiation at the crop surface (MJ/(m2·d)); T is the average air temperature at 2 m height (°C); U2 is the wind speed at 2 m height (m/s); es is the saturation vapor pressure (kPa); ea is the actual vapor pressure (kPa); esea is the saturation vapor pressure deficit (kPa); Δ is the slope of the vapor pressure curve (kPa/°C); and γ is the psychrometric constant (kPa/°C) (Allen et al., 1998).

      The wind speed at 2 m height can be calculated from the wind speed at 10 m by using the equation based on the wind profile relationship as follows (Allen et al., 1998):

      $$ {U}_{2}={u}_{\mathrm{z}}\frac{4.87}{{\rm{ln}}\left(67.8z-5.42\right)} $$ (2)

      where z is the height of the measurement above the ground surface (m) and uz is the measured wind speed at z m above the ground surface (m/s). Here, z = 10 m.

      The global solar radiation (Rs) can be estimated by the following equation:

      $$ {R}_{\mathrm{s}}=\left(\mathrm{a}+\mathrm{b}\frac{n}{N}\right){R}_{\mathrm{a}} $$ (3)

      where Ra is the extraterrestrial radiation (MJ/(m2·d)), n is the actual sunshine duration, N is the potential sunshine duration, and a and b are empirical coefficients of 0.25 and 0.5, respectively (Allen et al., 1998).

      The vapor pressure deficit (VPD) can be calculated by the following equation:

      $$ VPD={e}_{\mathrm{s}}-{e}_{\mathrm{a}} $$ (4)

      In the above equation, es (kPa) and ea (kPa) can be calculated as follows:

      $$ {e}_{\mathrm{s}}=\frac{{e}^{0}\left({T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}}\right)+{e}^{0}\left({T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}\right)}{2} $$ (5)
      $$ {e}^{0}\left({T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}}\right)=0.6108\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p}\left[\frac{17.27{T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}}}{{T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}}+273.3}\right] $$ (6)
      $$ {e}^{0}\left({T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}\right)=0.6108\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p}\left[\frac{17.27{T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}}{{T}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}+273.3}\right] $$ (7)
      $$ {e}_{\mathrm{a}}={e}_{\mathrm{s}}\times RH $$ (8)

      where Tmax (°C) and Tmin (°C) are the maximum and minimum air temperatures, respectively, and RH is the mean relative humidity (%).

    • The linear regression method was used to detect and analyze temporal trends (Feng et al., 2017). Generally, the least squares method was applied to estimate the linear trend as follows:

      $$ {\widehat{y}}_{n}={a}_{0}+{a}_{1}t $$ (9)

      where $ {\widehat{y}}_{n} $ is the response variable; t is the year in the series; a0 is the intercept; and a1 is the slope of the estimated trend. If a1 < 0, then the trend is negative; and if a1 > 0, then the trend is positive. a1 × 10 is called the climate tendency rate, which is used to calculate the climate change rate per decade.

    • The segmented regression mode, which can detect step changes and shift trends simultaneously even when the specific pattern of change points is lacking (Shao and Campbell, 2002; Shao et al., 2010; She et al., 2017b), was employed to identify the multiple potential change points of the annual ET0 between 1960–2017 in this study. The least squares method was used to fit the model, and the modified Akaike information criterion (AICc) (Hurvich and Tsai, 1989) was utilized to find the suitable break points (Shao and Campbell, 2002; Shao et al., 2010). When the AICc has the minimum value, the model is optimal. The linear regression method was applied to identify the trends of the annual ET0 series in different segmented periods after detecting the break points (She et al., 2017a).

    • To analyze change trends in a series of meteorological variables and ET0, the Mann-Kendall test (Mann, 1945; Kendall, 1975), a typical nonparametric statistical analysis, was used here. Details of the Mann-Kendall test are provided as follows.

      Given a data series composed of x1, x2, …, xn that is independent and identically distributed, the statistic S of Kendall’s tau is defined as follows:

      $$ {S}=\sum _{i=1}^{n-1}\sum _{j=i+1}^{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{n}\left({x}_{j}-{x}_{i}\right) $$ (10)

      where n is the length of the dataset, xi and xj are the sequential data values in time series i and j, and

      $$ \mathrm{s}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{n}\left(\theta \right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}1\;\;\;\theta > 0\\ 0\;\;\;\theta =0\\ -1\;\;\theta < 0\end{array}\right. $$ (11)

      Mann (1945) and Kendall (1975) documented that when n ≥ 8, the statistic S is approximately normally distributed, and the mean and variance are as follows:

      $$ \mathrm{E}\left(S\right)=0 $$ (12)
      $$ Var\left(S\right)=\dfrac{n\left(n-1\right)\left(2n+5\right)-\displaystyle\sum _{m=1}^{n}{t}_{m}\left(m-1\right)\left(2m+5\right)}{18} $$ (13)

      where tm is the number of ties of extent m. The standardized test statistic Zc can be computed according to the following equation:

      $$ {Z}_{c}=\left\{\begin{array}{c}\dfrac{S-1}{\sqrt{Var\left(S\right)}}\;\;\;\;\;S > 0\\ 0\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;S=0\\ \dfrac{S+1}{\sqrt{Var\left(S\right)}}\;\;\;\;\;S > 0\end{array}\right. $$ (14)

      where Zc is the test statistic. When |Zc| > Z1 − α/2, where Z1 − α/2 is the standard normal deviation and α is the significance level for the test, the data series has a significant trend at the significance level of α. In this study, a significance level of 0.05 was used. The magnitude of the trend of the data can be obtained using Theil-Sen’s estimator as follows:

      $$ \;\beta =\mathrm{M}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\left(\frac{{x}_{j}-{x}_{l}}{j-l}\right)\;\forall \mathrm{ }1 < \mathrm{l} < \mathrm{j} $$ (15)

      where β is the estimated slope of the data series (Sen, 1968). If β < 0, then the data series has a decreasing trend, and if β > 0, then the data series has an increasing trend.

    • Using a cluster of wavelet functions to represent or approximate a certain signal or function is the basic idea of wavelet analysis. Wavelet analysis is a tool for studying the long-term changes in hydrometeorological elements, and it can not only clearly reveal the various time-varying periodic oscillations hidden in the time series but also reflect their changing trends (Wang et al., 2014; Feng et al., 2017). The wavelet transform of time series f(t) is defined as follows (Feng et al., 2017):

      $$ {W}_{f}\left(a,b\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}{\int }_{-\mathrm{\infty }}^{\mathrm{\infty }}f\left(t\right)\overline{\mathrm{\Psi }}\left(\frac{t-b}{a}\right)dt $$ (16)

      where Wf(a, b) is the transformation coefficient; a is a scale factor representing the cycle length; b is a time factor representing the time location; t is the time variable; ψ(t) is the mother wavelet; and $ \overline{\mathrm{\Psi }} $ is the conjugate function of ψ(t).

      Since the observed time series are mostly discrete, the discrete wavelet transform can be defined as follows:

      $$ {W}_{f}\left(a,b\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}\mathrm{\Delta }t\sum _{k=1}^{N}f\left(k\mathrm{\Delta }t\right)\overline{\mathrm{\Psi }}\left(\frac{k\mathrm{\Delta }t-b}{a}\right) $$ (17)

      where f (kΔt) is the time series; k = 1, 2, …, N; and Δt is the time interval.

      Wavelet variance is defined as follows:

      $$ Var\left(a\right)={\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\left|{W}_{f}\left(a,b\right)\right|}^{2}db $$ (18)

      The wavelet transform reflects the characteristics of the time domain and frequency domain of f(t) simultaneously (Cazelles et al., 2008). If a is decreased, then the frequency resolution declines, but the time resolution improves; if a is increased, then the frequency resolution becomes better and shifts toward low frequencies, but the time resolution becomes poorer.

    • Some spatial interpolation methods, such as spline, ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting (IDW), have been used to interpolate hydro-meteorological variables, including evapotranspiration (Ashraf et al., 1997; Dalezios et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2010). The spline method is characterized by fitting a smooth and continuous surface with the observation points and does not need a preliminary estimate for the structure of temporal variance and statistical hypothesis (Zhu et al., 2012). The interpolated surface passes exactly through the data points and has a minimum curvature (Zuo et al., 2012). Previous investigators have demonstrated that spline is a better interpolation method in climatic and meteorological research (Hutchinson and Gessler, 1994; Price et al., 2000; Zhu et al., 2012; Shan et al., 2015). Hutchinson and Gessler (1994) found that the spline method was approximately as accurate for interpolation as kriging, but avoided initial estimation of the covariance structure. There were no singularities at the data points. Price et al. (2000) compared the inverse distance weighting and spline method by calculating the relative values of the difference and showed that the latter produced better results. Zhang et al. (2010) used the spline method based on the lower square root of cross-validation errors it produced compared with some other methods and settings based on previous work. Shan et al. (2015) concluded that the results from spline were more favorable around topographic features than other interpolation methods by summarizing previous studies and therefore chose this method. Li et al. (2016) firstly interpolated the values to map the spatial distribution of the evapotranspiration based on the three methods; comparisons were made between the accuracy of the results calculated using three spatial interpolation techniques using cross-validation. The results indicated that the accuracy of the different methods was satisfactory on the Loess Plateau. Besides, the spline method fits a smooth and continuous surface and has a minimum curvature. Therefore, the spline method was applied in this study.

    • To evaluate the relative contribution of meteorological variables to the ET0 trends, a stepwise linear regression analysis and a generalized linear model were utilized in this study, with ET0 as the dependent variable, and sunshine duration (n), mean air temperature (T), wind speed (U2), mean relative humidity (RH), precipitation (Pr), maximum air temperature (Tmax), minimum air temperature (Tmin), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), solar radiation (Rs), and net radiation (Rn) as the independent variables. Stepwise linear regression is a multiple linear regression analysis method. It was applied to remove the variables that cause multicollinearity and select effective predictors (Cristea et al., 2013; Shan et al., 2015), and the selected predictors were considered the main meteorological variables that affected the changes and variations in ET0. The generalized linear model, which is a direct extension of the general linear model, is an effective statistical model for processing discrete observational data as well as an effective method of separating the relative contributions of individual independent variables from that of the dependent variable (Wang et al., 2019). Prior to applying these methods, the original data and the meteorological variables were normalized to eliminate the effects of the dimension and magnitude of the data.

      To quantify the contributions of changes in meteorological variables to ET0, previous studies (Liu et al., 2010; Qin et al., 2017) provided an effective method of detrending based on the following three steps: 1) removing the change trends in the meteorological variables to make them stationary data series; 2) recalculating ET0 using one detrended data series of meteorological variables and the other original meteorological variables; and 3) comparing the recalculated ET0 with the original ET0, and the difference is considered the influence on the trend by that meteorological variable, which could be quantified by an evaluating indicator R:

      $$ R={\sum }_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\left({\mathrm{E}\mathrm{T}}_{0}^{{O}}-{\mathrm{E}\mathrm{T}}_{0}^{{R}}\right)}{{\mathrm{E}\mathrm{T}}_{0}^{O}i} $$ (19)

      where n is the length of the data series and ET0O and ET0R are the original and recalculated ET0, respectively. When R > 0, the change in that meteorological variable has a positive effect on the ET0 changes; when R < 0, the change in that meteorological variable has a negative effect on the ET0 changes. The larger the value of |R| is, the greater the effect on ET0 changes will be.

      To remove the change trend in the meteorological variables, we adopted a detrend method based on the following steps: 1) regarding the first year 1960 as the baseline; 2) calculating the linear yearly trend in the meteorological data series; and 3) subtracting an arithmetic progression with the linear slope as the tolerance from the original data sequence to obtain the stationary time series.

      The specific process of the present research and the data used are shown in the technology roadmap (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2.  Technology roadmap. T is average air temperature; Tmax is maximum air temperatures; Tmin is minimum air temperatures; n is actual sunshine duration; U2 is wind speed at 2 m height; RH is mean relative humidity; VPD is vapor pressure deficit; Rs is global solar radiation; and Rn is the net radiation

    • The temporal changes in annual ET0 showed a fluctuating downtrend on the LP from 1960–2017 (Fig. 3a). The annual ET0 was 984 mm on average and ranged from 898–1065 mm (Table 2). The dominant monotonic trend in the annual ET0 showed that the ET0 declined on the LP and in the semihumid region with tendency rates of –1.80 mm/10 yr and –15.68 mm/10 yr, respectively, while it increased in the semiarid region and the arid region with tendency rates of 1.79 mm/10 yr and 3.57 mm/10 yr, respectively (Fig. 3). The results show that the change trends of the annual ET0 were inconsistent in the three subregions from 1960–2017 and that the annual ET0 in the semihumid region exhibited a significant downward trend, which dominated the ET0 changes on the LP.

      Table 2.  Mean annual ET0 (mm) and trend slopes (mm/yr) of the annual ET0 obtained by the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen’s estimator in the three subregions and on the Loess Plateau during different periods

      PeriodLP
      ET0TrendβET0TrendβET0TrendβET0Trendβ
      1960–2017984–0.2331011***–1.7039550.13611020.261
      1960–197210041.83210730.6849641.38810991.875
      1973–1990972**–4.339996**–7.861944**–3.9601089*–3.696
      1991–1999975↑+6.9659999.123943*6.6891117*8.794
      2000–2010989–3.089987**–4.096968–2.0131115*–6.690
      2011–2017990↑+7.999994*11.4939696.16811076.304
      Notes: ***, **, *, and + denote significance at 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 levels, respectively. Ⅰ is a semihumid region; Ⅱ is a semiarid region; and Ⅲ is an arid region

      Figure 3.  Change points and segmented trends of the annual ET0 from 1960–2017 in (a) the Loess Plateau, (b) the semi-humid region, (c) the semi-arid region, and (d) the arid region. The dots denote the observed values; the red line denotes the trend by the segmented regression model; the blue dashed line denotes the trend by the simple linear regression model; the gray line denotes the five-year moving average; and the vertical lines indicate the change points

      To thoroughly analyze the change patterns of ET0, a segmented regression method was performed to accurately detect change points for the annual ET0 series from 1960–2017, and a linear regression was performed to identify the change trends in different periods. Finally, four change points were found in 1972, 1990, 1999, and 2010, and an increasing-decreasing-increasing-decreasing-increasing change pattern of the annual ET0 was found in the three subregions and on the LP (Table 2 and Fig. 3). It indicated that the annual ET0 showed different change trends in each subperiod on the LP, instead of a monotonic trend over a long period. The results agreed with the previous research conclusions demonstrating that ET0 or pan evaporation had abrupt changes in similar years of 1972, 1990, and 1999 in China (Liu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2016; Xing et al., 2016; She et al., 2017a). A new change point was detected in 2010 because the research time series was longer than that in previous studies. In the five subperiods, the highest value of ET0 was found in the arid region, while the lowest was found in the semiarid region (Table 2). The average annual ET0 from 1972 to 1990 was very close to the average value from 1990 to 1999, and the average annual ET0 between 1999 and 2010 was very close to the average value between 2010 and 2017 (Table 2).

      Fig. 4 shows the spatial distribution of the annual ET0 trends from 1960–2017. A negative trend was found in the southeast, west and north of the LP. Only 24 stations (approximately 34.8% of the total number of stations) had significant downward trends at the 95% confidence level, and they were mainly distributed in the north and west of the semihumid and semiarid regions. Baotou in Inner Mongolia showed the largest decreasing trend (–38.2 mm/10 yr, P < 0.01). In contrast, the western part of the arid region and most of the semiarid region showed an increasing trend. The stations showing positive trends were located in semiarid and arid regions. However, only 17 stations (approximately 24.6% of the total number of stations) achieved a significant level (P < 0.05), and the Wutaishan station in Shanxi had the largest increasing trend (43.0 mm/10 yr, P < 0.01).

      Figure 4.  Spatial distribution of the ET0 trends on the Loess Plateau from 1960–2017. The bar chart denotes different significance station numbers

      The annual ET0 trends on the LP indicated that there was a certain periodicity of interannual variability in ET0. This situation seemed to be due to changes in relevant meteorological factors. From 1960–2017, T, Tmax, Tmin, and VPD showed a significantly increasing trend, while n, RH, U2, Pr, Rs, and Rn of most stations exhibited a significantly decreasing trend (Table S1). In general, higher air temperature and vapor pressure deficit and lower relative humidity augment ET0, while lower wind speed and solar radiation lessen ET0 (Allen et al., 1998; Li et al., 2012). Finally, the counteracting effects of meteorological variables resulted in a zigzag change pattern of ET0 on the LP.

      Table S1.  Trend slopes of meteorological variables by the Mann-Kendal test and the Theil-Sen’s slope estimator

      YearRegionnTU2RHPrTmaxTminVPDRsRn
      1960

      1972
      LP 0.003 –0.037 0.018+ –0.015 –5.134 –0.038 –0.058 0.001 0.015 0.014
      –0.009 –0.041 0.003 0.124 –4.791 –0.060 –0.024 –0.000 0.007 0.019
      0.007 –0.030 0023* –0.024 –7.117 –0.025 –0.059 0.001 0.017 0.013
      0.027 –0.039 0.015 –0.095 –4.842 –0.056 –0.043 0.002 0.035 –0.004
      1973

      1990
      LP –0.031* 0.009 –0.026*** 0.089 0.893 0.003 0.026 –0.002 –0.033* –0.011*
      –0.048* –0.006 –0.025*** 0.203 0.490 –0.003 0.010 –0.005* –0.067* –0.023+
      –0.026* 0.004 –0.025*** 0.074 0.629 0.004 0.022 –0.002 –0.026* –0.009
      –0.008 0.032 –0.030*** –0.018 0.578 0.007 0.069* 0.000 –0.008 –0.001
      1991

      1999
      LP 0.039 0.130 0.001 –0.497+ –8.729 0.160 0.108 0.009+ 0.016 –0.006
      0.034 0.117+ 0.015 –0.565 –3.300 0.139* 0.095 0.010 0.048 –0.000
      0.033 0.129 0.001 –0.495* –6.252 0.157 0.112 0.012 0.029 –0.009
      0.032 0.096 0.023 –0.372+ –0.879 0.103 0.120 0.010 0.031 0.008
      2000

      2010
      LP –0.034+ –0.018 –0.008+ –0.116 3.783 –0.013 0.003 0.002 –0.047+ –0.028**
      –0.050+ –0.016 –0.004 –0.220 2.615 –0.027 –0.007 0.003 –0.073* –0.044**
      –0.037+ –0.018 0.003 –0.085 4.351 –0.025 0.002 0.001 –0.044+ –0.023*
      –0.001 0.001 –0.060*** –0.087 0.912 –0.001 0.013 0.005 –0.006 –0.011*
      2011

      2017
      LP 0.035 0.094 0.021 0.022 11.378+ 0.147 0.069* 0.005 0.040 0.022
      0.068* 0.144 0.019** 0.090 10.056 0.212 0.130 0.007 0.106** 0.072**
      0.023 0.098+ 0.023 0.008 14.758 0.106 0.068 0.004 0.021 0.010
      0.035 0.088 0.010 –0.133 8.613 0.123 0.043+ 0.008+ 0.042 0.004
      1960

      2017
      LP –0.012*** 0.032*** –0.008*** –0.048** –0.029 0.032*** 0.039*** 0.002*** –0.013*** –0.006***
      –0.016*** 0.022*** –0.010*** –0.031 –0.823 0.023*** 0.028*** 0.001* –0.019*** –0.008***
      –0.011*** 0.033*** –0.007*** –0.045* 0.011 0.034*** 0.039*** 0.002*** –0.013*** –0.006***
      –0.004+ 0.040*** –0.010*** –0.089*** 0.093 0.031*** 0.052*** 0.004*** –0.003 –0.004***
      Notes: n is actual sunshine duration; T is average air temperature; U2 is wind speed at 2 m height; RH is mean relative humidity; Pr is precipitation; Tmax is maximum air temperatures; Tmin is minimum air temperatures; VPD is vapor pressure deficit; Rs is global solar radiation; and Rn is the net radiation. Ⅰ is the semihumid region; Ⅱ is the semiarid region; Ⅲ is the arid region. ***, **, *, + mean the significance level of 0.001,0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively
    • The four seasons were distinct on the LP, and the ET0 change trends varied considerably in different seasons (Fig. 5). The spring and winter ET0 had increasing trends at rates of 2.34 mm/10 yr and 0.85 mm/10 yr, respectively, but the summer and autumn ET0 showed decreasing trends at rates of –4.18 mm/10 yr and –0.54 mm/10 yr, respectively (Fig. 5). The summer ET0 had the largest values (405 mm on average) among the four seasons, and it varied from 371 to 445 mm and had the largest decreasing rate, while the downward trend of ET0 was gentler in autumn (Table 3 and Fig. 5b). Table 3 shows that the change trends of ET0 in autumn and winter were diverse in different climate regions. The winter ET0 in the semihumid region showed an insignificant downward trend, and the autumn ET0 in the semiarid and arid regions increased insignificantly, which is different from the seasonal variation trends on the entire LP.

      Table 3.  Mean seasonal ET0 (mm) and trend slopes (mm/yr) of seasonal ET0 obtained by the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen’s estimator in the three subregions and on the Loess Plateau

      RegionSpringSummerAutumnWinter
      ET0TrendβET0TrendβET0TrendβET0Trendβ
      LP3130.183405−0.390176*−0.020890.074
      3090.041415***−1.135184*−0.350103−0.154
      3080.256319−0.2411700.05084↑+0.128
      352↑+0.244468−0.0301960.051860.076
      Notes: ***, **, *, and + denote significance at 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 levels, respectively. Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2

      Figure 5.  Time evolution of ET0 on the Loess Plateau from 1960–2017 in (a) spring, (b) summer, (c) autumn, and (d) winter. The dots denote the observed values; the blue dashed line denotes the trend by the simple linear regression model; and the gray line denotes the five-year moving average

    • To explore the change cycle of the annual ET0 on the LP, a Morlet wavelet analysis was performed to analyze the scale and oscillation characteristics of the annual ET0 series from 1960–2017. The annual ET0 had periods of 6 yr and 11–13 yr on the LP (Fig. 6). The largest peak corresponded to the time scale of 6 yr, indicating that the periodic oscillation at approximately 6 yr was the strongest; therefore, 6 yr was the first major cycle of the annual ET0. The second peak corresponded to the time scale of 11–13 yr, which was the second major cycle. The positive and negative phases of the wavelet coefficients alternately changed at time scales of 6 yr and 11–13 yr, respectively, and the catastrophic points of the wavelet coefficients occurred approximately every 2–3 yr and 5–6 yr, which means that the change trend of the annual ET0 changed once. The Morlet wavelet analysis shows that the annual ET0 exhibited a short cycle of 6 yr and a medium cycle of 11–13 yr, but no long cycle was discovered on the LP.

      Figure 6.  Morlet wavelet results of the annual ET0 from 1960–2017 on the Loess Plateau: (a) variance of the wavelet coefficient, (b) wavelet coefficients, and (c) real part of the wavelet coefficients. The solid lines in Fig. 6c are values of wavelet coefficients and represents flow periods

    • The spatial distribution of the long-term average annual ET0 on the LP from 1960–2012 is shown in Fig. 7. The average annual total ET0 varied between 693 mm and 1185 mm. The spatial distribution of the annual ET0, which was similar to that of VPD (Fig. S1h), had strong gradients with higher values in the southeast and northwest and lower values corresponding to the middle, southwest and northeast of the LP (Fig. 7a).

      Figure 7.  Spatial variability of the (a) annual, (b) spring, (c) summer, (d) autumn, and (e) winter ET0 from 1960–2017 on the Loess Plateau. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2

      Figure S1.  Spatial distribution of (a) sunshine duration, (b) temperature, (c) wind speed at 2m height, (d) relative humidity, (e) precipitation, (f) maximum air temperature, (g) minimum air temperature, (h) vapor pressure deficit, (i) solar radiation, and (j) net radiation. Ⅰ is the semihumid region; Ⅱ is the semiarid region; Ⅲ is the arid region

      From spring to autumn, the spatial distribution of ET0 was close to that of annual ET0 and initially decreased and then increased from northwest to southeast (Fig. 7b, c, and d). In spring, the maximum ET0 (372.7 mm) appeared in the arid region, and the low value shifted to the semiarid region (Fig. 7b). The spatial gradient of ET0 was strongest in summer. Almost all ET0 values in the arid region were above 450 mm, while the lowest value (only 203.7 mm) occurred in the semiarid region (Fig. 7c). The highest autumn ET0 appeared in the semihumid region (Fig. 7d). Compared with the spatial distribution of other seasons, the ET0 value of the whole area in winter was lower (Fig. 7e). The mean seasonal ET0 values from high to low were 41.2%, 31.9%, 117.9%, and 9.0% of the annual ET0 in summer, spring, autumn, and winter, respectively.

    • ET0 is mainly affected by changes in meteorological variables. Table 4 illustrates the regression coefficients of the meteorological variables on the LP and in the three subregions. The mean R2 value of the regression equations was 0.946, which indicated a good fit for the model. Among the ten meteorological variables, the regression coefficients of T, U2, VPD, Rs, and Rn were greater than 0, which indicated that the changes in ET0 were positively correlated with these variables but negatively correlated with n; while RH, Pr, Tmax, and Tmin presented variations in different climatic regions. The VPD in all regions was selected in the regression model, indicating that VPD was a common factor affecting the ET0 changes on the LP. However, for the model, only n and Tmin were selected in the semihumid region; Pr was selected in the semiarid region; T, RH, and Rn were selected in the arid region; U2 was selected in the semihumid and arid regions; and Rs was selected in the semihumid and semiarid regions, demonstrating that the above meteorological variables were regional impact factors.

      Table 4.  Standardized stepwise regression coefficients for meteorological factors on the Loess Plateau (LP) and in the three subregions

      RegionCoefficient
      nTU2RHPrTmaxTminVPDRsRn
      LP–0.3220.1830.2260.0210.082–0.233–0.1320.5610.5760.114
      –0.3420.1470.4710.0170.0570.0260.0910.4760.7760.017
      –0.1870.0210.0180.0210.188–0.0230.0630.8240.5810.084
      –0.0210.1820.800–0.220–0.0360.024–0.0420.7430.0050.253
      Notes: the variables that were selected and applied to the regression model are shown in bold. n is actual sunshine duration; T is average air temperature; U2 is wind speed at 2 m height; RH is mean relative humidity; Pr is precipitation; Tmax is maximum air temperatures; Tmin is minimum air temperatures; VPD is vapor pressure deficit; Rs is global solar radiation; and Rn is the net radiation. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2
    • To evaluate the relative impacts of dominant factors on ET0 trends in different regions on the LP, a generalized linear model was used to calculate the relative contributions of the selected meteorological variables to the ET0 changes (Table 5). The results revealed that the relative contributions of T, U2, VPD, and Rs to the variability in ET0 on the LP were 12.08%, 15.82%, 35.25%, and 36.85%, respectively. VPD and Rs may be considered the dominant meteorological factors mainly driving the changes in ET0 on the LP, followed by U2 and T. The increases in T and VPD led to an increase in ET0, and the decreases in Rs and U2 resulted in a reduction in ET0. Finally, the counteracting effect of these major meteorological factors led to a decrease in ET0 at a rate of –1.80 mm/10 yr from 1960 to 2017. Therefore, these changes explain why the ET0 declined slightly from 1960–2017 on the LP. Rs and U2 showed a negative effect, whereas VPD and T exerted positive influences. The combined effects of four meteorological variables resulted in negative effects that dominated the variability in ET0. Moreover, among the four major meteorological factors on the LP, Rs, VPD and U2 presented the highest relative contributions in the semihumid, semiarid, and arid regions, respectively.

      Table 5.  Contribution rates of meteorological variables to ET0

      RegionRelative contribution rate / %
      nTU2RHPrTmaxTminVPDRsRn
      LP/12.08415.817////35.24836.851/
      16.080/18.908///7.19923.66634.147/
      ////12.034//52.02535.941/
      /6.95238.59213.545///28.238/12.673
      Notes: the maximum relative contributions in the individual regions are shown in bold. Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are the same as Table 2. n, T, U2, RH, Pr, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

      Among the five major driving factors in the semihumid region, the decreased U2 and Rs resulted in a negative trend of ET0, while the reduction of n and the increases in Tmin and VPD caused increases in ET0. Finally, the changes in the five driving factors decreased ET0 at a rate of 15.68 mm/10 yr. The results suggested that the decreased Rs was the main driving factor for the decreasing ET0 in the semi-humid region from 1960–2017. This effect was intensified by the decreased U2, although it was counteracted by the decreased n and increased Tmin and VPD to certain degrees. In the semiarid region, the combined effect of VPD, Rs and Pr resulted in a downward trend of ET0, with an increase in VPD representing a major driver with a contribution rate of 52.03%. Moreover, this effect was aggravated by the increased Pr and offset by the decreased Rs. In the arid region, ET0 declined with decreasing U2 and Rn. However, this negative effect was counterbalanced by the positive effects of the decreased RH and the increased T and VPD. Finally, the joint effect of the five meteorological variables augmented ET0 at a rate of 3.57 mm/10 yr.

    • The temporal evolution of the relative contribution rates of the main meteorological variables to the ET0 trend was determined by applying the generalized linear model for moving windows of 10 yr width (i.e., 1960–1969, 1961–1970, …, 2008–2017). The selected meteorological factors on the LP and in the three subregions were used as independent variables, and ET0 was used as a dependent variable. The time series of the relative contributions of the major meteorological variables to the ET0 changes is shown in Fig. 8.

      Figure 8.  Temporal evolution of the contribution rates of the meteorological factors to ET0 in the (a) semihumid region; (b) semiarid region; (c) arid region, and (d) the Loess Plateau. n, T, U2, RH, Pr, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

      According to Figs. 8a–8c, the relative contribution of VPD in the three subregions presented a fluctuating downtrend from 1969–2017 and played a dominant role in the semiarid region. Rs complemented the fluctuation trend of VPD in the semihumid and semiarid regions and jointly affected the ET0 changes. The contribution rate of U2 had stable trends in the semiarid and arid regions and played a relatively subordinate role in the arid region. The relative contributions of Tmin and Pr showed stable upward trends, RH and Rn had fluctuating uptrends, and n and T exhibited stable trends.

      Fig. 8d shows the evolution of the relative contributions of the major meteorological factors to ET0 on the LP. The relative contribution of VPD exhibited an overall downward trend with two rapid decline phases, reaching a value of approximately 80% before 1974, which was followed by the first sharp decline to approximately 50%; then, it fluctuated in a small range, which was followed by the second rapid decline since 2012, reaching the valley bottom (approximately 4%) in 2014. The relative contribution of Rs showed high instability and fluctuated between approximately 4% and more than 50%, and it reached minimum values in 1991 and 2014 and showed two processes from rising to falling from 1969–2017. A stable upward trend was presented in the relative contribution of T, which became more significant after 2008. By 2017, the relative contribution of T exceeded VPD and Rs and reached 56.8%. The U2 relative contribution fluctuated in the range of 0–29% from 1969–2017.

    • The specific contributions of the meteorological variables to ET0 were further analyzed with the detrending method and the evaluating indicator R in the five subperiods of the entire LP (Fig. 9). From 1960–1972, U2 increased at a rate of 0.18 (m/s)/10 yr (P < 0.1) (Table S1) and was a dominant factor resulting in the uptrend of ET0 with an R value of 0.247. The upward trend of Rn played a relatively subordinate role in the ET0 changes with an R value of 0.232. Whereas Tmax had the largest negative influence on ET0, with an R value of –0.129. The combined effects of the meteorological variables rendered ET0 increase at a rate of 18.32 mm/10 yr (Table 2). From 1973–1990, U2 was still a dominant factor influencing the ET0 changes, with an R value of –0.653, but the significantly declining trend of U2 led to a decline in ET0 (–43.39 mm/10 yr, P < 0.01) (Table 2). Rn, VPD, RH, and Rs exerted certain impacts on the decrease in ET0 from high to low, with R values of –0.481, –0.337, –0.196, and –0.165, respectively. After 1990, VPD played a dominant role in the ET0 changes. From 1991–1999, VPD increased at a rate of 0.09 kPa/10 yr (P < 0.1) (Table S1), mainly driving the increase in ET0, with an R value of 0.376. This effect was intensified by the decrease in RH (R = 0.290) and weakened by the decline in Rn (R = –0.166). However, VPD was the factor that had the greatest impact on the ET0 changes, but its insignificant upward trend did not completely dominate the changes in ET0 from 2000–2010. The positive effects of VPD and RH on ET0 were offset by the negative effects of factors such as U2, Tmax, and Rs. Finally, the joint effect of these variables resulted in the reduction in ET0 at a rate of –30.89 mm/10 yr (Table 2). From 2011–2017, the increases in VPD and U2 increased ET0, while the reductions in Rn and RH lessened ET0. Together, their counteracting effect increased ET0 at a rate of 79.99 mm/10 yr (P < 0.1) (Table 2).

      Figure 9.  Absolute contribution of the meteorological variables to ET0 in different time periods on the Loess Plateau. T, U2, RH, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4. T, U2, RH, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

    • In this study, ET0 was calculated with the daily meteorological data from 69 meteorological stations on the LP for the period from 1960–2017 by the FAO56-PM model. Uncertainties in the FAO56-PM ET0 estimation and its contributing meteorological factors primarily relate to the model itself and the accuracy of the input data. The distribution of the meteorological stations is sparse and uneven, and the measurement dates of all the meteorological stations are inconsistent. The meteorological stations with as complete data as possible from 1960 to 2017 were selected. For the missing date value, we selected the daily data of 15 d before and after the missing dates and used the cubic spline interpolation method for supplementation. Moreover, uncertainty may come from spatial interpolation. The spline method was applied to obtain the spatial distribution of ET0. The spline method is considered a reliable and robust method to interpolate hydro-meteorological variables (Price et al., 2000). However, elevation was not considered in the interpolation, which may introduce uncertainty. The FAO 56-PM ET0 models need additional calculating equations to estimate Rn, which is not typically measured from meteorological stations. Previous research showed that the calculated Rn with the FAO 56-PM models was accurate enough to replace the measured Rn to calculate ET0. The elevation is an input of the calculation of Rn (Allen et al., 1998). However, because of the complexity of the underlying surface and the uneven distribution of meteorological stations, other influencing factors cannot be ignored even when considering elevation, such as the land use change and interpolation of meteorological variables (Dong et al., 2020; 2021).

      To verify the representativeness of our research results, we randomly selected nine meteorological stations and removed data in missing and discontinuous years to compare and verify the annual ET0 with pan evaporation. The results showed that ET0 had a positive linear relationship and large correlation coefficients (r) with pan evaporation (Fig. 10). Correlation coefficients were all above 0.7, and R2 values were mostly above 0.6, with only two sites between 0.5 and 0.6. The result proved that there was a considerable linear correlation between ET0 and pan evaporation. In addition, to verify the representativeness of meteorological stations, we randomly selected 90% of the stations and calculated the absolute contribution of meteorological variables to ET0 in five subperiods with these stations and repeated three sample surveys. The results are shown in Fig. 11. Although the index R value of each meteorological variable was slightly different each time, the results of the three samples were consistent with the original conclusion. Therefore, despite the above uncertainties, this study confirmed the spatiotemporal variations in ET0 and indicated the dominant factors contributing to ET0.

      Figure 10.  Relationships between the annual ET0 calculated by the FAO56-PM model and pan evaporation on the Loess Plateau

      Figure 11.  Absolute contribution of the meteorological variables to ET0 of the original and three random sampling stations on the Loess Plateau in the subperiods. T, U2, RH, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, Rs and Rn are same as in Table 4

    • Under the background of global climate change, downward trends in ET0 have been found worldwide (Roderick and Farquhar, 2004; Irmak et al., 2012; Hosseinzadeh Talaee et al., 2014; Zheng and Wang, 2015), and more complex trends in ET0 have been observed in recent years (Papaioannou et al., 2011; Shadmani et al., 2011). In this study, the annual ET0 showed a slightly downward trend with obvious differences in various periods on the LP. Besides, the annual ET0 decreased in the semi-humid region at a rate of –15.38 mm/10 yr and increased in the semiarid and arid regions. The annual ET0 exhibited significant negative trends (P < 0.01) at 24 stations (approximately 34.8% of the total number of stations), which were largely located in the north and west of the semihumid and semiarid regions of the LP. The stations with an upward trend in the annual ET0 were mainly distributed in the semiarid and arid regions of the LP, and 17 stations (approximately 24.6% of the total number of stations) reached the significance level (P < 0.01). The results are consistent with the conclusions described by Wang et al. (2012). Wang et al. (2012) found that the significant decreases in ET0 were mostly located in the southeast, north and midwest of the Yellow River Basin, and the significant increases in ET0 mainly occurred in the middle and southwestern corners.

      Previous studies showed a change point of ET0 in 1990, with ET0 declining prior to 1990 and increasing after 1990 on the LP (Li et al., 2016). However, we found that ET0 decreased significantly in all regions from 1960–1990, but ET0 increased significantly in the semiarid region and decreased in the semi-humid and arid regions from 1991–2017. These findings indicated that the change trend of ET0 was mainly attributed to the ET0 changes in the semiarid region rather than the entire LP from 1991–2017 (Table S2). Thus, the trend of first increasing and then decreasing may not fully summarize the general trend of ET0 in the LP in the past 58 years. The present study revealed that ET0 showed a zigzag fluctuating trend of ‘increasing-decreasing-increasing-decreasing-increasing’, with change points at the year of 1972, 1990, 1999, and 2010. The results are consistent with the conclusions reported in some studies in similar regions in China that ET0 or pan evaporation had abrupt changes in similar years of 1972, 1990, and 1999 (Liu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2016; Xing et al., 2016; She et al., 2017a). A new change point was detected in 2010 because the research time series was longer in our study.

      Table S2.  Mean annual ET0 (mm) and trend slopes (mm/yr) of the annual ET0 obtained by the Mann-Kendall test in the three sub-regions and the LP during different periods

      PeriodLP
      ET0TrendβET0TrendβET0TrendβET0Trendβ
      1960–1990982**–2.9071025***–5.520950*–2.0801092–1.500
      1991–20179860.831995–0.206960↑+1.2791114–0.623
      Notes: β is the estimated magnitude of slopes of the ET0 trends. β > 0 represents an increasing trend (↑); β < 0 represents a decreasing trend (↓). ***, **, * and + means the significance level of 0.001,0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively. Ⅰ is the semihumid region; Ⅱ is the semiarid region; Ⅲ is the arid region
    • Changes in meteorological variables caused by climate change and human activities are the essential influencing factors of ET0 changes (Yin et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011). The analysis of the relative contribution rate revealed that the ET0 changes on the LP were mainly affected by Rs (36.85%) and VPD (35.25%) from 1960–2017, followed by U2 and T. The increase in VPD and T caused the rising trend of ET0, while this effect was offset by the decrease in Rs and U2, which are consistent with previous research in other regions. Qin et al. (2017) found that the reduction in wind speed was the key factor resulting in the downward trend of annual ET0 from 1961–1987, while the increase in VPD and the decrease in relative humidity were the primary reasons for the augmentation in annual ET0 from 1988 to 2012 in the Qinhuai River Basin in the southern China. She et al. (2017a) investigated the characteristics and driving factors of ET0 changes in the middle of the Yellow River in China and revealed that solar radiation and wind speed controlled the changes in ET0 at most stations and in most subperiods. Maček et al. (2018) analyzed the impact of meteorological variables on the ET0 trends in different climate types of weather stations in Slovenia, Europe. They denoted that the relative impact of wind speed on ET0 is much smaller than the relative contribution of solar radiation, and the latter generally controls the change in reference evapotranspiration, followed by temperature and VPD.

      The major driving factors of ET0 are diverse in different subregions of the LP. Solar radiation, VPD, and wind speed are the key factors affecting the ET0 changes in the semihumid, semiarid, and arid regions, respectively. The results of other reports provided support for our conclusions. Some studies indicated that the reduction in surface solar radiation became apparent in many observational records up to 1990, a phenomenon called global dimming, which may substantially affect surface temperature, the hydrological cycle, and ecosystems and cause a decline in the essential energy of evaporation (Roderick and Farquhar, 2002; Wild et al., 2005). However, some indications show that dimming did not persist into the 1990s and the amount of sunlight at the surface has increased, which may profoundly influence the surface climate (Wild et al., 2005). Such a change trend in solar radiation has also been confirmed in China (Che, 2005). Some studies stated that the phenomenon of ‘from dimming to brightening’ could be partially caused by the increased aerosol loading from pollutant emissions and the changes in the mix of fuels and consumption technologies since the 1980s in China (Qian et al., 2007b). Moreover, the absorption of Rs could be affected by water vapor in the atmosphere, and Rs reaching the land surface may be potentially influenced by variations in RH via the hygroscopic effect of aerosols and absorption at solar wavelengths (Qian et al., 2007b). This finding may partly explain why solar radiation has become the dominant factor affecting ET0 in the semi-humid region of the LP. McVicar et al. (2012) evaluated the trend of global wind speed and its effect on the changes in ET0 and revealed a worldwide reduction in the observed wind speed at the land surface (called ‘global stilling’). They also found that ET0 was extremely sensitive to wind speed and ‘global stilling’ was considered the primary factor in the decline of ET0. Studies have shown that the increasing land surface roughness caused by vegetation growth and rapid urbanization may explain this phenomenon to a certain extent (She et al., 2017a). The wind speed has dropped at a rate of –0.17 (m/s)/10 yr in recent decades in China (Chen et al., 2013), although the influence of wind speed on ET0 was gradually decreasing, and the effects of other meteorological factors were becoming more important (Liu et al., 2011).

      Wind speed was the major driving factor for the changes in ET0 on the LP prior to 1990, which is supported by the conclusions of some studies on the same region. Li et al. (2016) believed that the change in wind speed was the main factor causing the downward trend of ET0 and solar radiation played a relatively subordinate role between 1960 and 1990. Our study found that the changing trend of wind speed from 1960–1972 and 1973–1990 changed, which had the opposite effects on the changing trend of ET0. The upward trend of ET0 was primarily attributed to the increase in wind speed on the LP from 1960–1972, and ET0 showed a downward trend because of the significant reduction in wind speed from 1973–1990 (Fig. 8). The upward and downward trends of net radiation from 1960–1972 and 1973–1990 became the second leading factors for the increase/decrease in ET0, while the index R of solar radiation in the two subperiods was only 0.046 and –0.165 and thus did not play a dominant role (Fig. 8). After 1990, VPD was the dominant factor for ET0 changes on the LP, which is inconsistent with previous studies in this region. Li et al. (2016) suggested that the rapidly rising temperature drove the changes in ET0 after 1990 because previous research mainly focused on the influence of temperature and generally ignored the influence of VPD changes. VPD is the difference between the saturation vapor pressure and actual vapor pressure (Allen et al., 1998). Saturation vapor pressure is a function of the maximum temperature and minimum temperature, and actual vapor pressure is a function of the relative humidity. Therefore, VPD is a comprehensive function of temperature and relative humidity. Generally, higher air temperature and lower relative humidity cause higher VPD. It is difficult to completely distinguish the effects of relative humidity and temperature on ET0 change trends on the LP because the changes in relative humidity are closely related to the warming of the study area. The increase in temperature, the intensification of drought and the decrease in soil moisture have led to a decline in atmospheric water content as well as a significant reduction in relative humidity. Relative humidity controls the loss of air moisture from plant leaves by increasing VPD (Liu and Feng, 2012), and the air in the study area becomes drier, which results in higher VPD and ET0. Therefore, our research shows that VPD provides a more powerful explanation for the changes in ET0 compared with the individual influences of temperature and relative humidity on ET0. This finding is consistent with the research conclusion of Qin et al. (2017). The upward trend of ET0 from 1988–2012 was mainly affected by decreased relative humidity and increased VPD; that is, the gradually dry environment of the Qinhuai River Basin was the primary reason for the increase in ET0. Overall, VPD increased significantly throughout the study period (Table S1), which is consistent with the results of a global study (Bais et al., 2011).

      The contribution of the meteorological variables to the ET0 change trends has been found to have strong temporal and spatial variability on the LP, which may be caused by the strong gradients of the meteorological variables and the variation range of the variables in the spatial pattern. These variables have strong spatial changes due to climatic factors, topographic features and land cover/use on the LP. In the past few decades, the LP has undergone engineering measures, such as the Grain for Green Project, grassland reconstruction, terraces and dams. Although vegetation coverage has increased, large-scale vegetation restoration has also caused excessive consumption of soil water and affected the evolution of local meteorological variables, which may further explain the complex temporal and spatial patterns observed in the ET0 changes.

    • In this study, daily data from 69 meteorological stations on the Loess Plateau (LP) from 1960 to 2017 were applied to calculate the reference evapotranspiration (ET0) with the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method. The spatiotemporal pattern evolution of ET0 and the contribution of related meteorological variables to the ET0 changes were analyzed using the Mann-Kendall test, segmented regression model, simple linear regression, wavelet analysis, and generalized linear model. Compared with previous studies on the ET0 change trends and its attribution on the LP, this study emphasized the importance of the change points in the long-term ET0 and quantitatively calculated the contributions to the changes by the detrending method.

      (1) In the past 58 yr, the annual ET0 on the LP showed strong gradients with an initial decrease and then increase from northwest to southeast and had a short cycle of 6 yr and a medium cycle of 11–13 yr but did not show a long-term cycle.

      (2) From 1960–2017, Rs and VPD were the primary factors driving the annual ET0 changes on the LP. With complex interactions of the decreases in Rs and U2 and the increases in T and VPD, ET0 declined slightly at a rate of –1.80 mm/10 yr. Rs, VPD, and U2 were the dominant factors contributing to the ET0 changes and resulted in downward, upward, and upward trends in annual ET0 in the semihumid, semiarid, and arid regions, respectively.

      (3) Four change points at the year of 1972, 1990, 1999, and 2010 were detected by the segmented regression model, which can divide the study period into five subperiods and lead to a zigzag change trend of ‘increasing-decreasing-increasing-decreasing-increasing’ in ET0 in the three subregions. Furthermore, the dominant meteorological factors affecting ET0 underwent significant changes. The ET0 changes were mainly attributed to U2 before 1990 and VPD after 1990. In general, the variations in ET0 were influenced by the combined effects of the meteorological driving factors, and U2 and VPD were the two major contributing factors that control the ET0 variations from 1960–1990 and from 1991–2017, respectively.

    参考文献 (73)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回