-
Xingkai Lake (Khanka Lake) is the largest freshwater lake in Northeast Asia, and is a boundary lake between China and Russia (Long and Shen, 2017) (Fig. 1a). Xiao Xingkai Lake (45°16′N–45°24′N, 132°20′E–132°50′E) is part of Xingkai Lake, and has a total area of 176 km2 (Fig. 1b). Xiao Xingkai Lake is separated from Xingkai Lake by a 90-km natural sand dam that was formed following a decrease in lake water area (Fig. 1c). Water exchange between the large and small lake takes place via two sluice gates, Sluice 1 and Sluice 2. Xiao Xingkai Lake is 35.0 km long and 4.5 km wide, with average and maximum water depths of 1.8 m and 5.0 m, respectively. The lake freezes in December every year and thaws in late April in the subsequent year. The maximum and minimum monthly mean temperatures are 27℃ and –19℃, respectively, which occur in summer and winter, respectively. Rainfall mainly occurs in summer (from June to August), reaching 750 mm annually (Long and Shen, 2017).
Figure 1. The location of Xiao Xingkai Lake (a, b) and sampling sites distribution (c) from 2012 to 2014. There were five types of sampling sites. AC represents aquaculture sites with two sampling points near the Dongbeipao and Baiyutan aquaculture centers; S represents sluices with two sampling points near sluice gates connecting Xiao Xingkai Lake and Xingkai Lake to control the water level. T represents tourism sites with two sampling sites near the major ecotourism areas, wetland park and a new flow scenic spot. The new flow scenic spot is located between the large and small lake and offers numerous tourist activities (ecological tours, ancient culture tours, leisure travels, etc.) that attract a lot of visitors. The wetland park is located in the eastern portion of the small lake and represents an ecological tours project. AD represents agricultural sites, with nine sampling points located in the northern part of the lake, which are river outlets used as agricultural irrigation channels and drainages from rice paddies. The rice planting area near of the agricultural site of the lake was 146 215 ha in 2013, accounting for 99% of the total agricultural area in the study region. LC represents the lake center with three sampling points in the lake center were used as controls for comparisons with other sites
-
The lake water freezes in December and thaws in late April, and water quality monitoring and sampling times were generally carried out between May and October from 2012 to 2014. The seven monitoring and sampling times were September in 2012, May, July, August, and October in 2013, and June and September in 2014. Nineteen sites were monitored and sampled each time (Fig. 1c).
Water temperature (WT), electroconductivity (EC), pH, salinity, total dissolved solids (TDS) and dissolved oxygen (DO) were monitored using a portable YSI Pro Plus multiparameter meter (YSI Incorporated, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). According to the setting method of vertical sampling points for lake monitoring (Wei, 2002), two water samples were collected 0.5 m below the water surface at each site, mixed, and placed in coolers until they were transported to the laboratory. Secchi depth (SD) was determined using a Secchi disk and water depth was recorded using a depth recorder. Water samples were sent to the Public Technology Service Center at the Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for analysis. The concentrations of TN, TP, nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) were determined using flow injection analysis (Skalar, Netherlands) (Bremne, 1998), while chlorophyll a (Chl-a) and total suspended solids (TSS) were measured using the spectrophotometric and gravimetric methods, respectively (Wu et al. 2017a). Air temperature and precipitation data were collected from Xingkai Lake Monitoring Station of China during the growing seasons (from May to October) of 2012–2014.
-
We used the trophic state index (TLI) (Carlson 1977; Wu et al. 2017a) to assess the trophic status of Xiao Xingkai Lake. The lake was considered eutrophic when the TLI value was greater than 50. Furthermore, we divided eutrophication into three levels: light eutrophic (50 < TLI ≤ 60), medium eutrophic (60 < TLI ≤ 70) and heavy eutrophic (> 70) . The TLI value was determined according to the following equation:
$$ TLI\left(\sum \right)=\sum _{j=1}^{m}{W}_{j} \times TLI\left(j\right) $$ (1) where TLI
$\left(\displaystyle\sum\right) $ is the comprehensive nutrition state index, TLI(j) is the nutrition state index of a parameter j. The different parameters in the tropic state index were calculated according to Yu et al. (2013). Wj is the relevant importance of the nutrition state index in parameter j. The normalized weights in the relative importance of parameter j on the nutrition state index were calculated using the following equation:$$ {W}_{j}=\dfrac{{R}_{ij}^{2}}{\displaystyle\sum _{j=1}^{m}{R}_{ij}^{2}} $$ (2) where Rij is the correlation coefficient of parameter j for Chl-a, and m is the number of the selected important parameters (3 to 4 generally). If the importance of Chl-a to the state of eutrophication is considered 1, the correlation of parameter j to Chl-a is Rij (j=1, 2 ,…m), and Rij=Rji; therefore, the relative importance of each parameter to eutrophication is proportional to the correlation coefficient Rij2. The correlation index Rij and Rij2 between Chl-a and other parameters in the lake was calculated according to Jin and Tu (1990).
-
IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US), Origin 2018 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, US), and SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, California, US) were used to analyze and plot the data. The water quality levels of Xiao Xingkai Lake were evaluated based on the Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard ( (SEP and GAQSIQ, 2002, GB 3838−2002) of China. Seasonal variations in lake water quality were examined from late Spring (May) to mid-Autumn (October) between 2012 and 2014, because of the long freeze-thaw period in Xiao Xingkai Lake. In Xiao Xingkai Lake, Spring is from March to May, summer is from June to August, and autumn is from September to November. Spatial variation of lake water quality in the sampling sites under anthropogenic influence, which included tourism, agriculture, sluice and aquaculture, was analyzed and compared with the water quality at the center of the lake independent sample. Non-parametric tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare water quality parameters among different sampling sites and sampling times. Histogram plots and vertical box plots were used to illustrate spatial and temporal variation in water quality, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate correlations among water quality parameters.
-
The average (ranges) values of physicochemical characteristics are displayed in Table 1. From May to October, the average water temperature in the lake was 18.07℃ (range, 5.00℃ to 26.00℃). The average DO concentrations was 6.45 mg/L, which falls under Grade Ⅱ (6.00–7.50 mg/L). The average NH4+-N concentration was 0.17 mg/L, which also falls under Grade Ⅱ (0.15–0.5 mg/L). The average CODMn concentration was 7.68 mg/L, which falls under Grade Ⅳ (6.00–10.00 mg/L). The average TP and TN concentrations were 0.11 (0.10–0.20 mg/L) and 1.63 mg/L (1.50–2.00 mg/L), respectively, which fall under Grade Ⅴ (GB 3838–2002).
Table 1. The average, median, and ranges of water quality parameters in Xiao Xingkai Lake from 2012 to 2014
Parameters Average Median Range Average water temperature / ℃ 18.07 20.10 5.00–26.00 Water depth /cm 151.08 145.00 20.00–350.00 SD /cm 17.37 15.00 2.00–80.00 Conductivity (EC) / (μs/cm) 194.33 196.50 33.90–260.10 pH 7.43 7.45 5.86–9.62 TDS / (mg/L)) 148.52 148.20 87.80–222.30 Dissolved oxygen (DO) / (mg/L) 6.45 6.65 0.11–14.21 Total nitrogen (TN) / (mg/L) 1.63 1.22 0.16–12.29 Total phosphorus (TP) / (mg/L) 0.11 0.08 0.01–0.97 Chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) / (mg/L) 7.68 5.13 0.16–85.60 NH4+-N / (mg/L) 0.17 0.11 0.00–0.90 NO3--N / (mg/L) 0.21 0.10 0.00–1.45 Chl-a / (mg/L) 7.62 5.04 1.03–65.13 TSS / (mg/L) 170.80 146.00 3.00–719.00 Notes: SD, Secchi depth; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a Water quality varied seasonally and spatially, as illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. The concentrations of TN and Chl-a in autumn (September to November) were lower in 2013 than in 2012 and 2014 (Figs. 2a and 2c); however, TP concentrations exhibited opposite trends (Fig. 2b). CODMn and DO decreased markedly in autumn, from 2012 to 2014 (Figs. 2d and 2h). In addition, WT, TN, and TSS were higher in summer (June to August) than in spring (March to May) and autumn (September to November); however, DO was lower in summer than in spring and autumn (Figs. 2g, 2a, 2k and 2h). Chl-a and NH4+-N concentrations were higher in spring than in summer and autumn (Figs. 2c, 2f). pH and TDS exhibited no significant seasonal variability (Figs. 2j, 2l).
Figure 2. Temporal variation in lake water quality from September of 2012 to September of 2014. Some months had no values because of freezing in December and thawing in late April, and lack of monitoring; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a
Figure 3. Mean (dashes), median (solid line), and ranges of water quality parameters at different sampling sites. Edges in the boxes represent 25% and 75% percentiles; whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum, dots indicate outliers outside the 10th and 90th percentiles. Different letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 significance level; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a
Water quality in the central sections of the lake were relatively better, and the concentrations of TN, TP, NH4+-N, CODMn, and DO were 8.20, 1.52, 0.10, 3.68, and 0.07 mg/L, respectively (Figs. 3a, 3b, 3d, 3e, and 3h). Based on the Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard (GB 3838–2002), the water quality in the lake center was better than grade Ⅱ, with the exception of TN and TP, which were Grade Ⅴ.
There were no significant differences in DO and TDS contents between the selected sampling sites and the lake center (Figs. 3h and 3k). In the tourism sites, the average NH4+-N concentrations were higher than at the lake center, while WT was lower at the sites than at the lake center (Figs. 3d and 3g). In sluice areas, the EC was lower than at the lake center (Fig. 3i). In the aquaculture sites, the NH4+-N and CODMn concentrations were higher; however, pH in the aquaculture sites was lower than at the lake center (Figs. 3d, 3e, and 3i). In addition, the pH in the agricultural sites were lower than at the lake center (Fig. 3i). Although the TN and NO3–-N contents did not differ significantly among sampling sites, they were higher in agricultural sites than in tourism sites (Figs. 3a and 3c). The sampling points proportion of TN concentrations greater than 2.0 mg/L were 15.69%, 17.86%, and 32.73% at the tourism, aquaculture and agriculture sites, respectively. The sampling points proportion of TP concentrations greater than 0.2 mg/L were 3.92%, 7.14%, and 5.45% at the tourism, aquaculture, and agricultural sites, respectively (Figs. 3a and 3b).
-
The TLI ranged from 55.16 to 64.41 in 2012 to 2014 (Table 2). When compared with the eutrophication standard, Xiao Xingkai Lake was in an light and medium eutrophic state. In addition, the TLI value in 2012 (64.41) was greater than those in 2013 (58.33) and 2014 (59.59). Our results indicated that the water quality changed from medium eutrophic to light eutrophic. In 2013 and 2014, the TLI values in summer (June, July, and August) were higher than those in autumn (September and October). The TLI values in different sites ranged from 56.70 to 60.44, and were greater than 60 in the tourist and aquaculture sites, indicating medium eutrophication, while they were lower than 60 in the lake center and agricultural and sluice areas, indicating light eutrophication.
Table 2. Eutrophication assessment of Xiao Xingkai Lake
TLI(Chl-a) TLI(TP) TLI(TN) TLI(SD) TLI(CODMn) TLI Assessment results Sampling time Sep.−2012 53.89 50.48 69.68 82.61 70.61 64.41 Medium eutrophic Jul.−2013 43.40 60.03 61.75 86.55 51.54 59.22 Light eutrophic Aug.−2013 44.47 56.74 63.29 86.47 59.57 60.62 Medium eutrophic Oct.−2013 38.12 60.98 54.35 86.95 42.93 55.16 Light eutrophic Jun.−2014 42.53 64.75 63.86 89.54 50.81 60.66 Medium eutrophic Sep.−2014 48.09 56.85 72.58 79.69 40.47 58.52 Light eutrophic Sampling points LC 43.51 57.37 61.66 91.23 35.79 56.70 Light eutrophic T 51.88 54.90 60.36 81.59 57.46 60.44 Medium eutrophic AC 44.50 60.44 59.38 81.56 62.68 60.29 Medium eutrophic S 41.86 58.13 55.29 104.23 41.80 58.75 Light eutrophic AD 44.53 57.09 65.36 87.87 46.34 58.90 Light eutrophic Notes: AC, aquaculture sites; S, sluices sites; T, tourism sites; AD, agricultural sites; LC, the lake center; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; SD, Water temperature; Chal-a, chlorophyll a -
The total precipitation in the growing seasons from May to October was 454, 499, and 507 mm in 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively, and the highest rainfall occurred in July (Fig. 4). The air temperature ranged from 2.79℃ to 27.21℃ during the growing season from May to October in 2012, 2013, and 2014, with the highest air temperatures observed in July and August (Fig. 4). A Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient test did not reveal a significant relationship between water quality and precipitation or air temperature (Table 3), except for a marked positive correlation between air temperature and TSS. However, there were negative correlations between water level and TN, CODMn, Chl-a, and NH4-N (Table 3).
Figure 4. Monthly precipitation and daily average temperature in Xiao Xingkai Lake in the growing season from 2012 to 2014
Table 3. Correlations between climate condition and water quality in Xiao Xingkai Lake based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
Parameters EC DO TDS TSS TN TP Chl-a CODMn NO3-N NH4-N Precipitation 0.310 −0.090 0.260 0.540 0.390 −0.360 0. 540 0.320 −0.430 0.540 Temperature 0.540 −0.770 −0.430 0.930* 0.040 0.040 0.000 0.390 1.100 0.290 Water level −0.131 −0.027 0.123 0.026 −0.343** 0.184 −0.255* −0.398** 0.286** −0.229* Notes: *, **, *** means P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a The results of nonparametric tests on the effect of sampling times and sites on water quality indicated that all water quality parameters were significantly influenced by sampling time (P < 0.05, Table 3). In addition, all water quality parameters, excluding TP, TSS, and Chl-a, were influenced by sampling site (Table 4).
Table 4. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis test) results on effect of sampling time and sites on water quality in Xiao Xingkai Lake
Sampling time Sampling sites Water quality parameters H df P Water quality parameters H df P WT 138.61 5 0.000 WT 10.41 4 0.034 DO 85.11 5 0.000 DO 13.77 4 0.008 EC 49.12 5 0.000 EC 24.28 4 0.000 pH 74.18 5 0.000 pH 14.98 4 0.005 TDS 31.56 5 0.000 TDS 14.89 4 0.005 TN 56.76 6 0.000 TN 16.55 4 0.002 TP 58.58 6 0.000 TP 7.71 4 0.103 TSS 85.30 6 0.000 SS 1.01 4 0.908 Chl-a 56.83 6 0.000 Chl-a 8.63 4 0.071 CODMn 22.49 6 0.001 CODMn 13.49 4 0.009 NO3−-N 48.53 6 0.000 NO3−-N 17.19 4 0.002 NH4+-N 90.35 6 0.000 NH4+-N 18.63 4 0.001 Notes: TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a; H, chi-square; df, the degree of freedom There were significant correlations among water quality parameters based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Table 5). TN was significantly negatively correlated with DO and pH, and positively correlated with Chl-a. TP was significantly negatively correlated with EC and positively correlated with DO, NO3-N, and NH4-N. Chl-a was negatively correlated with pH, salinity and NO3-N, and positively correlated with TN and CODMn. CODMn was negatively correlated with pH, and positively correlated with TN, Chl-a, and NH4-N (Table 5).
Table 5. Correlations among different water quality parameters in Xiao Xingkai Lake based on Spearman’ s rank correlation coefficient
WT DO pH EC Sal TDS TN TP Chl-a CODMn NO3-N NH4-N WT 1.00 –0.52 0.02 0.60** –0.18 –0.14 0.09 –0.21 0.15 –0.06 –0.33 0.06 DO –0.52** 1.00 0.57** –0.47** 0.05 0.02 –0.27** 0.29** –0.11 –0.17 0.02 –0.10 pH 0.02 0.57** 1.00 –0.14 0.03 0.05 –0.48** 0.20* –0.25** –0.62** 0.06 –0.35** EC 0.60** –0.47** –0.14 1.00 0.56** 0.60** 0.12 –0.26** 0.10 –0.03 –0.19* 0.204* Sal –0.18* 0.05 0.03 0.56** 1.00 0.97** –0.05 0.02 –0.18* –0.11 0.17 0.18 TDS –0.14 0.02 0.05 0.60** 0.97** 1.00 –0.09 0.02 –0.17 –0.14 0.14 0.17 TN 0.09 –0.27** –0.48** 0.12 –0.05 –0.09 1.00 0.15 0.29** 0.47** 0.11 0.39** TP –0.21* 0.29** 0.20* –0.26** 0.02 0.02 0.15 1.00 –0.05 0.06 0.24** 0.31** Chl-a 0.15 –0.11 –0.25** 0.10 –0.18* –0.17 0.29** –0.05 1.00 0.28** –0.38** 0.18 CODMn –0.06 –0.17 –0.62** –0.03 –0.11 –0.14 0.47** 0.06 0.28** 1.00 –0.13 0.36** NO3-N –0.33** 0.02 0.06 –0.19* 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.24** –0.38** –0.13 1.00 –0.08 NH4-N 0.06 –0.10 –0.35** 0.20* 0.18 0.17 0.39** 0.31** 0.18 0.36** –0.08 1.00 Notes: *, **, *** means P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids Sal, salinity; Chal-a, chlorophyll a
Characterization of Water Quality in Xiao Xingkai Lake: Implications for Trophic Status and Management
-
Abstract: Increasing cases of lake eutrophication globally have raised concerns among stakeholders, and particularly in China. Evaluating the causes of eutrophication in waterways is essential for effective pollution prevention and control. Xiao Xingkai Lake is part of and connected to Xingkai (Khanka) Lake, a boundary lake between China and Russia. In this study, we investigated the spatio-temporal variabilities in water quality (i.e., dissolved oxygen (DO), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) and ammonium-nitrogen (NH4+-N)) in Xiao Xingkai Lake, from 2012 to 2014, after which a Trophic Level Index was used to evaluate trophic status, in addition to the factors influencing water quality variation in the lake. The DO, TN, TP, CODMn and NH4+-N concentrations were 0.44–15.57, 0.16–5.11, 0.01–0.45, 0.16–48.31, and 0.19–0.78 mg/L, respectively. Compared to the Environmental Quality Standards for surface water (GB 3838−2002) in China, the lake transitioned to an oligotrophic status in 2013 and 2014 from a mesotrophic status in 2012, TN and TP concentrations were the key factors influencing water quality of Xiao Xingkai Lake. Non-parametric test results showed that sampling time and sites had significant effects on water quality. Water quality was worse in summer and in tourism and aquaculture areas, followed by agricultural drainage areas. Furthermore, lake water trophic status fluctuated between medium eutrophic and light eutrophic status from September 2012 to September 2014, and was negatively correlated with water level. Water quality in tourism and aquaculture sites were medium eutrophic, while in agricultural areas were light eutrophic. According to the results, high water-level fluctuations and anthropogenic activities were the key factor driving variability in physicochemical parameters associated with water quality in Xiao Xingkai Lake.
-
Key words:
- water quality /
- lake eutrophication /
- temporal variation /
- human activities /
- Xiao Xingkai Lake
-
Figure 1. The location of Xiao Xingkai Lake (a, b) and sampling sites distribution (c) from 2012 to 2014. There were five types of sampling sites. AC represents aquaculture sites with two sampling points near the Dongbeipao and Baiyutan aquaculture centers; S represents sluices with two sampling points near sluice gates connecting Xiao Xingkai Lake and Xingkai Lake to control the water level. T represents tourism sites with two sampling sites near the major ecotourism areas, wetland park and a new flow scenic spot. The new flow scenic spot is located between the large and small lake and offers numerous tourist activities (ecological tours, ancient culture tours, leisure travels, etc.) that attract a lot of visitors. The wetland park is located in the eastern portion of the small lake and represents an ecological tours project. AD represents agricultural sites, with nine sampling points located in the northern part of the lake, which are river outlets used as agricultural irrigation channels and drainages from rice paddies. The rice planting area near of the agricultural site of the lake was 146 215 ha in 2013, accounting for 99% of the total agricultural area in the study region. LC represents the lake center with three sampling points in the lake center were used as controls for comparisons with other sites
Figure 2. Temporal variation in lake water quality from September of 2012 to September of 2014. Some months had no values because of freezing in December and thawing in late April, and lack of monitoring; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a
Figure 3. Mean (dashes), median (solid line), and ranges of water quality parameters at different sampling sites. Edges in the boxes represent 25% and 75% percentiles; whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum, dots indicate outliers outside the 10th and 90th percentiles. Different letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 significance level; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a
Table 1. The average, median, and ranges of water quality parameters in Xiao Xingkai Lake from 2012 to 2014
Parameters Average Median Range Average water temperature / ℃ 18.07 20.10 5.00–26.00 Water depth /cm 151.08 145.00 20.00–350.00 SD /cm 17.37 15.00 2.00–80.00 Conductivity (EC) / (μs/cm) 194.33 196.50 33.90–260.10 pH 7.43 7.45 5.86–9.62 TDS / (mg/L)) 148.52 148.20 87.80–222.30 Dissolved oxygen (DO) / (mg/L) 6.45 6.65 0.11–14.21 Total nitrogen (TN) / (mg/L) 1.63 1.22 0.16–12.29 Total phosphorus (TP) / (mg/L) 0.11 0.08 0.01–0.97 Chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) / (mg/L) 7.68 5.13 0.16–85.60 NH4+-N / (mg/L) 0.17 0.11 0.00–0.90 NO3--N / (mg/L) 0.21 0.10 0.00–1.45 Chl-a / (mg/L) 7.62 5.04 1.03–65.13 TSS / (mg/L) 170.80 146.00 3.00–719.00 Notes: SD, Secchi depth; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a Table 2. Eutrophication assessment of Xiao Xingkai Lake
TLI(Chl-a) TLI(TP) TLI(TN) TLI(SD) TLI(CODMn) TLI Assessment results Sampling time Sep.−2012 53.89 50.48 69.68 82.61 70.61 64.41 Medium eutrophic Jul.−2013 43.40 60.03 61.75 86.55 51.54 59.22 Light eutrophic Aug.−2013 44.47 56.74 63.29 86.47 59.57 60.62 Medium eutrophic Oct.−2013 38.12 60.98 54.35 86.95 42.93 55.16 Light eutrophic Jun.−2014 42.53 64.75 63.86 89.54 50.81 60.66 Medium eutrophic Sep.−2014 48.09 56.85 72.58 79.69 40.47 58.52 Light eutrophic Sampling points LC 43.51 57.37 61.66 91.23 35.79 56.70 Light eutrophic T 51.88 54.90 60.36 81.59 57.46 60.44 Medium eutrophic AC 44.50 60.44 59.38 81.56 62.68 60.29 Medium eutrophic S 41.86 58.13 55.29 104.23 41.80 58.75 Light eutrophic AD 44.53 57.09 65.36 87.87 46.34 58.90 Light eutrophic Notes: AC, aquaculture sites; S, sluices sites; T, tourism sites; AD, agricultural sites; LC, the lake center; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; SD, Water temperature; Chal-a, chlorophyll a Table 3. Correlations between climate condition and water quality in Xiao Xingkai Lake based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
Parameters EC DO TDS TSS TN TP Chl-a CODMn NO3-N NH4-N Precipitation 0.310 −0.090 0.260 0.540 0.390 −0.360 0. 540 0.320 −0.430 0.540 Temperature 0.540 −0.770 −0.430 0.930* 0.040 0.040 0.000 0.390 1.100 0.290 Water level −0.131 −0.027 0.123 0.026 −0.343** 0.184 −0.255* −0.398** 0.286** −0.229* Notes: *, **, *** means P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a Table 4. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis test) results on effect of sampling time and sites on water quality in Xiao Xingkai Lake
Sampling time Sampling sites Water quality parameters H df P Water quality parameters H df P WT 138.61 5 0.000 WT 10.41 4 0.034 DO 85.11 5 0.000 DO 13.77 4 0.008 EC 49.12 5 0.000 EC 24.28 4 0.000 pH 74.18 5 0.000 pH 14.98 4 0.005 TDS 31.56 5 0.000 TDS 14.89 4 0.005 TN 56.76 6 0.000 TN 16.55 4 0.002 TP 58.58 6 0.000 TP 7.71 4 0.103 TSS 85.30 6 0.000 SS 1.01 4 0.908 Chl-a 56.83 6 0.000 Chl-a 8.63 4 0.071 CODMn 22.49 6 0.001 CODMn 13.49 4 0.009 NO3−-N 48.53 6 0.000 NO3−-N 17.19 4 0.002 NH4+-N 90.35 6 0.000 NH4+-N 18.63 4 0.001 Notes: TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids; Chal-a, chlorophyll a; H, chi-square; df, the degree of freedom Table 5. Correlations among different water quality parameters in Xiao Xingkai Lake based on Spearman’ s rank correlation coefficient
WT DO pH EC Sal TDS TN TP Chl-a CODMn NO3-N NH4-N WT 1.00 –0.52 0.02 0.60** –0.18 –0.14 0.09 –0.21 0.15 –0.06 –0.33 0.06 DO –0.52** 1.00 0.57** –0.47** 0.05 0.02 –0.27** 0.29** –0.11 –0.17 0.02 –0.10 pH 0.02 0.57** 1.00 –0.14 0.03 0.05 –0.48** 0.20* –0.25** –0.62** 0.06 –0.35** EC 0.60** –0.47** –0.14 1.00 0.56** 0.60** 0.12 –0.26** 0.10 –0.03 –0.19* 0.204* Sal –0.18* 0.05 0.03 0.56** 1.00 0.97** –0.05 0.02 –0.18* –0.11 0.17 0.18 TDS –0.14 0.02 0.05 0.60** 0.97** 1.00 –0.09 0.02 –0.17 –0.14 0.14 0.17 TN 0.09 –0.27** –0.48** 0.12 –0.05 –0.09 1.00 0.15 0.29** 0.47** 0.11 0.39** TP –0.21* 0.29** 0.20* –0.26** 0.02 0.02 0.15 1.00 –0.05 0.06 0.24** 0.31** Chl-a 0.15 –0.11 –0.25** 0.10 –0.18* –0.17 0.29** –0.05 1.00 0.28** –0.38** 0.18 CODMn –0.06 –0.17 –0.62** –0.03 –0.11 –0.14 0.47** 0.06 0.28** 1.00 –0.13 0.36** NO3-N –0.33** 0.02 0.06 –0.19* 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.24** –0.38** –0.13 1.00 –0.08 NH4-N 0.06 –0.10 –0.35** 0.20* 0.18 0.17 0.39** 0.31** 0.18 0.36** –0.08 1.00 Notes: *, **, *** means P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CODMn, oxygen demand; WT, Water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; EC, electroconductivity; TSS, total suspended solids; TDS, total dissolved solids Sal, salinity; Chal-a, chlorophyll a -
[1] Abell J M, Özkundakci D, Hamilton D P et al., 2020. Restoring shallow lakes impaired by eutrophication: approaches, outcomes, and challenges. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, . doi: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1854564 [2] Bhagowati B, Ahamad K U, 2019. A review on lake eutrophication dynamics and recent developments in lake modeling. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 19(1): 155–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.03.002 [3] Bhattrai B D, Kwak S, Choi K et al., 2017. Long-term changes of physicochemical water quality in Lake Youngrang, Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, 50(1): 169–185. doi: 10.11614/KSL.2017.50.1.169 [4] Bremner J M, 1998. Nitrogen-total. In: Bartels J M (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. Madison: ACSESS, 1085–1117. [5] Butchart S H M, Walpole M, Collen B et al., 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982): 1164–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.1187512 [6] Bouwman A F, Beusen A H, Griffioen J et al., 2013. Global trends and uncertainties in terrestrial denitrification and N2O emissions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1621): 20130112. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0112 [7] Carlson R E, 1977. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 22(2): 361–369. doi: 10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361 [8] Carpenter S R, Stanley E H, Vander Zanden M J, 2011. State of the world’s freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36: 75–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-021810-094524 [9] Chang C, Sun D M, Feng P et al., 2017. Impacts of nonpoint source pollution on water quality in the Yuqiao Reservoir. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(6): 418–432. doi: 10.1089/ees.2016.0124 [10] Chique C, Potito A P, Molloy K et al., 2018. Tracking recent human impacts on a nutrient sensitive Irish lake: integrating landscape to water linkages. Hydrobiologia, 807(1): 207–231. doi: 10.1007/s10750-017-3395-9 [11] Crosa G, Froebrich J, Nikolayenko V et al., 2006. Spatial and seasonal variations in the water quality of the Amu Darya River (Central Asia). Water Research, 40(11): 2237–2245. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.004 [12] Heino J, Alahuhta J, Bini L M et al., 2021. Lakes in the era of global change: moving beyond single-lake thinking in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services. Biological Reviews, 96(1): 89–106. doi: 10.1111/brv.12647 [13] Imani S, Niksokhan M H, Jamshidi S et al., 2017. Discharge permit market and farm management nexus: an approach for eutrophication control in small basins with low-income farmers. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 189: 346. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6066-4 [14] Jabłońska E, Wiśniewska M, Marcinkowski P et al., 2020. Catchment-scale analysis reveals high cost-effectiveness of wetland buffer zones as a remedy to non-point nutrient pollution in north-eastern Poland. Water, 12(3): 629. doi: 10.3390/w12030629 [15] Jin Xiangcan, Tu Qingying, 1990. Code for Investigation of Lake Eutrophication. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese) [16] Jones J I, Murphy J F, Anthony S G et al., 2017. Do agri-environment schemes result in improved water quality? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2): 537–546. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12780 [17] Kast J B, Apostel A M, Kalcic M M et al., 2021. Source contribution to phosphorus loads from the Maumee River watershed to Lake Erie. Journal of Environmental Management, 279: 111803. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111803 [18] Li B, Yang G S, Wan R R et al., 2017b. Dynamic water quality evaluation based on fuzzy matter-element model and functional data analysis, a case study in Poyang Lake. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(23): 19138–19148. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9371-0 [19] Li Sijia, Song Kaishan, Chen Zhiwen et al., 2015. Absorption characteristics of particulates and CDOM in spring in the Lake Xingkai. Journal of Lake Sciences, 27(5): 941–952. (in Chinese). doi: 10.18307/2015.0522 [20] Li S Y, Bush R T, Mao R et al., 2017a. Extreme drought causes distinct water acidification and eutrophication in the Lower Lakes (Lakes Alexandrina and Albert), Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 544: 133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.015 [21] Li T, Chu C L, Zhang Y N et al., 2017c. Contrasting eutrophication risks and countermeasures in different water bodies: assessments to support targeted watershed management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7): 695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070695 [22] Lin S S, Shen S L, Zhou A N et al., 2020. Approach based on TOPSIS and Monte Carlo simulation methods to evaluate lake eutrophication levels. Water Research, 187: 116437. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116437 [23] Liu X, Teubner K, Chen Y W, 2016. Water quality characteristics of Poyang Lake, China, in response to changes in the water level. Hydrology Research, 47(S1): 238–248. doi: 10.2166/nh.2016.209 [24] Long H, Shen J, 2017. Sandy beach ridges from Xingkai Lake (NE Asia): timing and response to palaeoclimate. Quaternary International, 430: 21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.009 [25] Mammides C, 2020. A global assessment of the human pressure on the world’s lakes. Global Environmental Change, 63: 102084. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102084 [26] Mueller H, Hamilton D, Doole G et al., 2019. Economic and ecosystem costs and benefits of alternative land use and management scenarios in the Lake Rotorua, New Zealand, catchment. Global Environmental Change, 54: 102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.013 [27] Ouyang Y, Nkedi-Kizza P, Wu Q T et al., 2006. Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality. Water Research, 40(20): 3800–3810. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.030 [28] Sarkar S K, Saha M, Takada H et al., 2007. Water quality management in the lower stretch of the river Ganges, east coast of India: an approach through environmental education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(16): 1559–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.030 [29] Sinha E, Michalak A M, Balaji V, 2017. Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes. Science, 357(6349): 405–408. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2409 [30] Srinivas R, Singh A P, Dhadse K et al., 2020. An evidence based integrated watershed modelling system to assess the impact of non-point source pollution in the riverine ecosystem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246: 118963. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118963 [31] SEP (State Environmental Protection Administration), GAQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China), 2002. GB 3838−2002 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water. Beijing: China Environmental Press. (in Chinese) [32] Sun B, Zhang L X, Yang L Z et al., 2012. Agricultural non-point source pollution in China: causes and mitigation measures. AMBIO, 41(4): 370–379. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0249-6 [33] Sundaray S K, Panda U C, Nayak B B et al., 2006. Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of the Mahanadi river–estuarine system (India)–a case study. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 28(4): 317–330. doi: 10.1007/s10653-005-9001-5 [34] Tao Shengli, Fang Jingyun, Ma Suhui et al., 2020. Changes in China’s lakes: climate and human impacts. National Science Review, 7(1): 132–140. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz103 [35] Tong Y D, Zhang W, Wang X J et al., 2017. Decline in Chinese lake phosphorus concentration accompanied by shift in sources since 2006. Nature Geoscience, 10(7): 507–511. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2967 [36] Vadeboncoeur Y, McIntyre P B, Vander Zanden M J, 2011. Borders of biodiversity: life at the edge of the world’s large lakes. Bioscience, 61(7): 526–537. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.7 [37] Wang J J, Zhao Q H, Pang Y et al., 2017. Research on nutrient pollution load in Lake Taihu, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(21): 17829–17838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9384-8 [38] Wei Fusheng, 2002. Methods for Monitoring and Analysis of Water and Wastewater. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese) [39] Wu D, Yan H Y, Shang M S et al., 2017a. Water eutrophication evaluation based on semi-supervised classification: a case study in Three Gorges Reservoir. Ecological Indicators, 81: 362–372. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.004 [40] Wu J H, Xue C Y, Tian R et al., 2017b. Lake water quality assessment: a case study of Shahu Lake in the semiarid loess area of northwest China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(5): 232. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-6516-x [41] Xu Y G, Li A J, Qin J H et al., 2017. Seasonal patterns of water quality and phytoplankton dynamics in surface waters in Guangzhou and Foshan, China. Science of the Total Environment, 590–591: 361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.032 [42] Yazdi J, Moridi A, 2017. Interactive reservoir-watershed modeling framework for integrated water quality management. Water Resources Management, 31(7): 2105–2125. doi: 10.1007/s11269-017-1627-4 [43] Yu Shuling, Li Xiujun, Li Xiaoyu et al., 2013. Evaluation of Water Quality of Xiaoxingkai Lake. Wetland Science, 11(4): 466–469. (in Chinese) [44] Yu Shuling. 2014. The Research on Phosphorus Release Characteristics of Surficial Sediment and Its Effects on Eutrophication in Lake XiaoXingkai, China. Changchun: Northeast Institute of geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)