-
Surface water may be affected by atmospheric parameters and solar radiation except water environment parameters, which is different with the middle and bottom water(Table 1). Therefore, mercury species of surface waterand the other water layer were analyzed respectively.
Table 1. Comparison of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM), active mercury (RHg) and their parameters at different depths in South Yellow Sea, North Yellow Sea, and Bohai Sea
Sea area Water layer DGM/(pg/L) RHg/(ng/L) Depth / m Water temperature /℃ DO/(mg/L) Chlorophyll-a/(µg/L) South Yellow Sea Surface layer 70.4 ± 53.8a 0.63 ± 0.39b 4.6 8.9 10.7 1.78 Middle layer 61.8 ± 51.0a 0.34 ± 0.29a 18.0 8.2 10.4 1.69 Bottom layer 75.1 ± 66.6a 0.63 ± 0.36b 42.5 8.0 10.0 1.36 North Yellow Sea Surface layer 21.4 ± 7.4a 0.12 ± 0.07a 4.1 5.1 12.0 1.28 Middle layer 19.5 ± 11.1a 0.13 ± 0.11a 19.5 5.0 11.8 1.46 Bottom layer 44.6 ± 37.8b 0.13 ± 0.07a 43.9 4.8 11.5 1.70 Bohai Sea Surface layer 29.4 ± 26.5a 0.16 ± 0.05a 3.6 5.0 12.2 1.52 Middle layer 35.0 ± 19.9a 0.13 ± 0.10a 10.9 4.9 11.9 1.81 Bottom layer 40.2 ± 38.1a 0.16 ± 0.09a 22.8 4.7 11.4 2.33 Notes: Significant differences among DGM, RHg at different depths in different sea areas are marked with different letters of a and b (P < 0.05) -
During the cruise, the mean DGM concentration in the surface water was (44.3 ± 43.9) pg/L, and ranged from 6.4 to 220.9 pg/L (Table 2). The mean DGM concentrations were (70.4 ± 53.8) pg/L, (21.4 ± 7.4) pg/L and (29.4 ± 26.5) pg/L in the South Yellow Sea, North Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea, respectively (Table 2). DGM concentrations in the South Yellow Sea were higher than those in the North Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea. The highest concentration was observed at station H10 (220.9 pg/L), to the south of the Shandong Peninsula, while the lowest concentration was detected at the N11 station (6.4 pg/L), in the middle of the Bohai Strait. Hg concentrations obtained by other researchers are listed in Table 1. The DGM concentrations in the South Yellow Sea were higher than those in the Mediterranean ((30.1 ± 24.1) pg/L) (Horvat et al., 2003). DGM in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea was lower than that in the South China Sea ((53.7 ± 18.8) pg/L, Ci et al., 2016), while it was higher than the concentrations in the Yellow Sea-Northwest Pacific ((39.6 ± 22.9) pg/L, Liu et al., 2017), and in the Baltic Sea (17.4 pg/L, Wängberg et al., 2001). In spring, DGM in the Yellow and Bohai Seas accounted for less than 2.2% of THg, far lower than for the Yellow Sea-Northwest Pacific surface seawater (8.06%, Liu et al., 2017) and for the Mediterranean Sea (20%, Kotnik et al., 2017) and for other open seas. This ratio was close to that of the nearshore waters of the Yellow Sea (3.6%, Ci et al., 2011a; 1.3%, Ci et al., 2011b). Research has also shown that higher levels of DGM/THg occur in deeper seas (Mastromonaco et al., 2017). Mercury concentrations in the oceans and deep seas are low and mercury mainly exists in a dissolved state (Horvat et al., 2003), which is beneficial for mercury reduction. DGM also comes from deeper waters in the oceans. Mercury concentrations in the marginal seas increase because of the input from land by runoff and atmospheric dry and wet deposition. Productivity in the coastal waters is higher (Muller-Karger et al., 2005; Xing et al., 2011), and more organic matter and particulate matter in seawater result in higher particulate mercury contents (Conaway et al., 2003; Ci et al., 2011c), resulting in lower DGM/THg values.
Table 2. Comparison of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM), active mercury (RHg) and total mercury (THg) concentrations in surface water in the Yellow and Bohai Seas with other sea areas
Sea area Period DGM/(pg/L) RHg/(ng/L) THg/(ng/L) References South Yellow Sea Spring 2018 70.4 ± 53.8 0.63 ± 0.39 2.81 ± 1.67 This study North Yellow Sea Spring 2018 21.4 ± 7.4 0.12 ± 0.07 2.35 ± 1.64 This study Bohai Sea Spring 2018 29.4 ± 26.5 0.16 ± 0.05 3.18 ± 1.90 This study Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea Spring 2018 44.3 ± 43.9 0.44 ± 0.63 2.65 ± 1.74 This study South Yellow Sea Fall 2013 90.9 ± 25.8 − − Wang et al., 2017 North Yellow Sea, Bohai Fall 2013 63.2 ± 23.4 − − Wang et al., 2017 Yellow Sea Summer 2016 49 ± 19 0.80 ± 0.36 2.46 ± 0.36 Gao, 2017 Yellow Sea Spring 2012 27.0 ± 6.8 − − Ci et al., 2015 East China Sea Fall 2013 49.6 ± 12.5 − 1.45 ± 0.62 Wang et al., 2016 South China Sea Winter 2015 53.7 ± 18.8 − 1.40 ± 0.48 Ci et al., 2016 Baltic Sea Winter 1998 17.4 − − Wängberg et al., 2001 Minamata Bay coast site Spring 2014 105 ± 46 − 2.68 ± 1.91 Matsuyama et al., 2018 Minamata Bay open sea Spring 2014 68 ± 29 − 1.10 ± 0.24 Matsuyama et al., 2018 Coastal waters of the Yellow Sea 2008−2009 − 0.94 ± 0.28 2.69 ± 0.78 Ci et al., 2011b Long Island Sound estuary 1995−1997 8.0 −110.3 − − Rolfhus and Fitzgerald, 2001 Mediterranean Sea Summer 2000 30.1 ± 24.1 0.16 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.08 Horvat et al., 2003 Yellow Sea-North Pacific Ocean Spring 2015 39.6 ± 22.9 0.33 ± 0.24 0.75 ± 0.51 Liu et al., 2017 Atlantic Ocean 1999 48.1 ± 32.1 0.34 ± 0.24 0.58 ± 0.34 Mason and Sullivan, 1999 Note: − no data High DGM concentrations were observed in southeastern part of Qingdao, the central part of the southern Yellow Sea, northeastern Bohai Bay, and in the coastal waters of Dalian, while the lowest concentrations were present in the northern Yellow Sea and in the central Bohai Sea. In the southern Yellow Sea, DGM concentrations near the Yangtze River Estuary were lower than those in the central part of the South Yellow Sea and were different from what was observed in the fall of 2013. In the fall of 2013, DGM concentrations in the Yangtze River estuary and in the southern Yellow Sea were higher (Wang et al., 2017). During this period of this study, most of the southern Yellow Sea cruise had foggy conditions with high relative humidity (Fig. 2). The weakened solar radiation did not benefit the production of seawater DGM. The DGM concentrations on the surface of the Bohai Sea were higher in the offshore area and lower in the central area. As an enclosed sea, Bohai Sea is polluted by pollutants discharged from coastal human activities and rivers. Pollutants in coastal areas might benefit DGM formation.
-
The average RHg concentration in the surface seawater of the Yellow and Bohai Seas is (0.44 ± 0.63) ng/L (Table 2), ranging from 0.03 to 4.40 ng/L. The highest RHg value in surface water appeared in the southern sea area of Shandong Province, and the RHg concentrations in the central of South Yellow Sea were also much higher. The average concentrations of RHg in the surface seawaters of the South Yellow Sea, the North Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea were (0.63 ± 0.39) ng/L, (0.12 ± 0.07) ng/L, and (0.16 ± 0.05) ng/L, respectively (Table 2). The concentrations for the South Yellow Sea were higher than for the North Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea. The RHg concentrations in seawater were lower in the north and higher in the south. The South Yellow Sea concentrations in spring were lower than those in summer ((1.08 ± 0.28) ng/L, Ci et al., 2011a), higher than for the Yellow Sea-Northwest Pacific Ocean (0.33 ng/L, Liu et al., 2016) and Atlantic Ocean (0.34 ng/L, Mason et al., 1999) (Table 2). Due to low seawater temperatures and foggy conditions in the South Yellow Sea, photooxidation weakens, resulting in lower RHg production in the seawater. The RHg concentrations in the surface waters of the Yellow Sea are similar to the DGM distributions, implying that DGM and RHg may be affected by the same factors. Moreover, the content of THg in the coastal areas of China is higher than that in open seas abroad, resulting in a lower RHg / THg ratio. The ratios of the percentages of RHg to THg in the surface layer of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea were between 1% and 59%, with an average of 17%, which was lower than in summer (29.9%, Gao, 2017). RHg / THg was also lower than that in the open sea or ocean. For example, RHg / THg ranged from 4% and 63%, with an average of 31% in the Mediterranean in spring (Kotnik et al., 2007). RHg / THg values ranged from 15% to 89%, with an average of 48% in the Yellow Sea-North Atlantic Ocean in spring (Liu et al., 2017) and were approximately 59% in the southern equatorial Atlantic (Mason and Sullivan, 1999).
THg concentrations in the surface water of the Yellow and Bohai Seas were (2.65 ± 1.74) ng/L, ranging between 0.34 and 7.23 ng/L. Higher THg concentrations appeared in the center of the South Yellow Sea, the Bohai Strait, south of Dalian Yalu River estuary. The average concentrations were higher than the Yellow Sea in summer ((1.69 ± 0.35) ng/L, Ci et al., 2011a) and the South China Sea in winter ((1.40 ± 0.48) ng/L, Ci et al., 2016). The concentrations of THg in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea was much higher than for other oceans and deep seas, such as the Mediterranean Sea ((0.24 ± 0.06) ng/L, Kotnik et al., 2007) and the Northern Pacific Ocean ((0.23 ± 0.17) ng/L, Laurier et al., 2004), reflecting the influence of land on the marginal sea of China.
-
The DGM concentrations in the middle layer of the Yellow and Bohai Seas were 5.1–206.0 pg/L, with an average of (43.4 ± 39.9) pg/L. The South Yellow Sea had the highest average concentration ((61.8 ± 51.0) pg/L), followed by the Bohai Sea and the lowest concentration was in the North Yellow Sea at (19.5 ± 11.1) pg/L (Table 2). DGM concentrations in the bottom seawater were 9.8–284.0 pg/L, showing an average value of (56.5 ± 55.3) pg/L, with the following relationships being observed: South Yellow Sea > North Yellow Sea > Bohai Sea, which was different from the pattern of surface seawater. Higher DGM in bottom water appeared in the southeastern part of the South Yellow Sea, the southeastern part of the Shandong Peninsula and the central Bohai Sea (Fig. 3). The high value areas in the southeastern part of the South Yellow Sea and the central Bohai Sea all appeared in the deeper sea areas. With increases in depth for the southeastern region of the South Yellow Sea, the DGM concentrations in the bottom layer increased.
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM, pg/L) (A), reactive mercury (RHg, ng/L) (B) and dissolved oxygen (DO, mg/L) (C) for the bottom water of Yellow and Bohai Seas
The mean DGM in the bottom layer and the surface layer were generally greater than for the middle layer. The South Yellow Sea was characterized by bottom layer > surface layer > middle layer, while the North Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea were characterized by bottom layer > middle layer > surface layer (Table 1). The DGM concentrations in the bottom seawater were the highest. DGM concentrations in the Yellow Sea for the bottom layer were higher than for the surface water and were smallest for the middle layer. DGM concentrations in the Bohai Sea area increased gradually with increasing seawater depths. This property is different from that in summer (DGM decreased with depth) (Gao, 2017). This is mainly due to low water temperatures in the spring and weak solar radiation, especially during foggy weather in the South Yellow Sea. The amount of DGM produced by photoreduction in the surface seawater was small. The DGM released from the bottom seawater or sediment plays an important role. Gao et al. (2017) stated that the surface layer and middle layer seawater have low turbidity and high chlorophyll-a content, which promotes the photoreduction of DGM in summer. The increased turbidity due to high river runoff in summer is not conducive to photoreduction, which causes the seasonal difference. DGM released by the bottom sediment was larger than the surface seawater photoreduction in spring, due to the influence of fog, weak solar radiation and low water temperature.
-
The RHg concentrations in the North Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea were much lower, and were close to those of the Mediterranean Sea ((0.16 ± 0.06) ng/L, Horvat et al., 2003). The high RHg values in middle water areas appeared mainly in the Bohai Strait, southeastern Shandong and on the eastern side of the Yangtze River estuary (Fig. 4). The highest values (0.99 ng/L) appeared in the southeastern Shandong sea area. The average concentration of RHg in the bottom layer was (0.35 ± 0.34) ng/L, ranging from 0.06 to 1.62 ng/L. The concentration distribution for RHg in bottom water was similar to the middle layer. The highest value appeared in southeastern Shandong and the east south of the Yellow Sea. The RHg concentrations in the sea near the mouth of the Yalu River, Huaihe River and the coast of the Bohai Sea were higher.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of gaseous mercury (DGM, pg/L) (A), reactive mercury (RHg, ng/L) (B). and water temperature (℃) (C). for the middle water of Yellow and Bohai Seas
RHg concentration differences in the vertical direction were not obvious. The RHg concentrations at the surface of the South Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea were larger than for the middle layer. Mercury in surface waters benefits the photooxidation of mercury. Higher RHg concentrations in bottom water might be due to releases from sediment. RHg concentrations in the surface and bottom layers of the South Yellow Sea were significantly higher than those in the middle layer (P < 0.05) (Table 1). The vertical variation difference of RHg concentrations between the North Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea were small. The RHg concentrations in the South Yellow Sea were much higher than those in the North Yellow Sea and in the Bohai Sea. The differences in water temperature caused by latitude differences and the warm currents of the Yellow Sea affected the production and distribution of DGM and RHg in the South Yellow Sea (Gao et al., 2017). However, the temperature differences between the North Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea were relatively small, and the vertical differences were small in these sea areas.
-
DGM in surface seawater is derived from the photoreduction of RHg in coastal seawaters (Wang et al., 2017). A significant positive relationship between surface DGM concentrations and RHg was seen in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea (r = 0.81, P < 0.01) (Fig. 5) and indicates that the generation of DGM and RHg may be controlled by the same factors. Mercury in seawater usually exists in the form of complex states, organic matter binding states, and particle states. Under solar radiation, mercury in these forms can be photooxidized and converted into RHg. RHg is more easily reduced by solar radiation and converted DGM. Net production of DGM depends on the RHg concentrations and redox equilibria in seawater (Whalin et al., 2007; Qureshi et al., 2010). DGM in the surface water of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea correlated positively with water temperatures (r = 0.278, P < 0.05) (Table 3). Water temperature has an important influence on the reduction rate of RHg. Some Hg2+ combined with organic or inorganic ligands is gradually released with increases in water temperature (Xu et al., 2012), which increases RHg concentrations in seawater. Affected by the Yellow Sea warm current (branches of the Kuroshio Current), the higher water temperatures in the central part of the South Yellow Sea correspond to higher RHg concentrations. These high concentrations were the result from the higher concentrations of RHg seawater being transported northward by the Yellow Sea warm current. The higher value areas of DGM and RHg appeared at the northern end of the warm current in the Yellow Sea, which may be related to the convergence of the Yellow Sea warm current and the cold water mass of the Yellow Sea. Other studies have also suggested that water temperature has an effect on DGM concentrations (Xu et al., 2012; Ci et al., 2015; Marumoto and Imai, 2015; Gao et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Water temperature can reflect light intensity to a certain extent. Under the influence of the Yellow Sea warm current in the South Yellow Sea, the water temperature contours are curved. The surface water temperature contours of the northern Yellow Sea to the Bohai Sea are approximately parallel, reflecting the influence of solar radiation at different latitudes (Fig. 2d). The higher water temperatures were influenced by the light intensity, and higher DGM concentrations are produced by photoreduction in surface seawater. Studies have shown that photoreduction of divalent mercury is another important mechanism for Hg0 production in water environments (Amyot et al., 1997; Costa and Liss, 1999; Costa et al., 2000; Horvat et al., 2003). Solar radiation plays an important role in the generation of DGM (Ma et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017). Some studies have found that ultraviolet light (Ma et al., 2015), chlorine or bromine (Horvat et al., 2003) and ·OH conditions can also oxidize Hg0 (Mason et al., 2001).
Figure 5. Relationships between dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) and reactive mercury (RHg) for each layer of the Yellow and Bohai Seas
Table 3. Correlations between dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM), reactive mercury (RHg) and total mercury (THg) with other parameters for each layer in the Yellow and Bohai Seas (n = 72)
Water layer Species Water temperature Salinity Turbidity Chlorophyll-a DO pH Wind speed Relative humidity Air temperature Surface water DGM 0.278* 0.238 −0.075 0.170 −0.247* −0.136 −0.206 0.312* 0.013 RHg 0.506** 0.212 0.104 0.167 −0.455** −0.224 −0.264* 0.486** 0.254* THg −0.131 0.006 −0.075 0.279* 0.050 0.190 −0.218 0.377** −0.370** Middle water DGM 0.291* 0.206 −0.127 0.281* −0.101 −0.172 − − − RHg 0.305* 0.053 0.130 −0.006 −0.23 −0.246* − − − Bottom water DGM 0.331** 0.323** 0.226 −0.113 −0.366** −0.167 − − − RHg 0.515** 0.266* 0.192 −0.276* −0.447** −0.251* − − − Notes: **Significant correlations at the 0.01 level. * Significant correlations at the 0.05 level; DO, Dissolved oxygen; −, no data The DGM/RHg ratios ranged from 3.21% to 42.99%, with an average of 15.10%. The ratios were higher than observed during the summer research cruise (Gao et al., 2017). The low ratios of RHg to THg in the Yellow and Bohai Seas in spring indicated that the conversion efficiency between these is low. This indicates that the weak solar radiation in the spring, foggy conditions and lower water temperatures may affect RHg production in seawater, which is not conducive to the formation and release of DGM.
DGM concentrations did not significantly correlate with THg during the spring cruise. THg was not the main factor controlling DGM concentrations. One of the sources of mercury in the ocean is the deposition of atmospheric particulate matter (Mason et al., 2012). Studies have shown that the deposition of gaseous mercury is higher in spring and that the deposition of mercury is related to particles in the air (Mastromonaco et al., 2016). The relative humidity during the spring cruise was higher (84.15%), and the majority of the stations in the southern Yellow Sea were cloudy and foggy conditions, with an average relative humidity of 98.20% according to the voyage record. The higher THg concentrations in spring may be caused by a high level of coal burning in winter, which led to an increase in the concentrations of particulate mercury in the atmosphere and to the deposition flux of particulate mercury in the spring period with atmospheric circulation (Mastromonaco et al., 2017). THg concentrations in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea area significantly correlated with the relative humidities (r = 0.377, P < 0.01) (Table 3). The surface water THg concentration was 3.23 ng/L for foggy days, and 2.45 ng/L for sunny days in the Yellow Sea. It has been found that THg concentrations in wet deposition were 50 times higher than those in seawater (Soerensen et al., 2014). This process may exist in foggy weather, as water vapor condenses with the particulate matter, and gaseous divalent mercury dissolves in the water drops, resulting in higher atmospheric wet deposition, increasing the THg concentrations in surface seawater. We also found that THg correlated positively with chlorophyll-a in surface seawater (r = 0.279, P < 0.05). In the horizontal distribution maps of THg and chlorophyll-a, their maximum locations were consistent. In the spring, algae blooms in the partial sea areas, and algae can absorb and accumulate mercury in the water, thus increasing THg concentrations in seawater.
-
There was also a significant correlation between DGM and RHg in the bottom seawater (r = 0.38, P < 0.01), but the correlation of the bottom seawater was weaker than that of the surface and middle layers of seawater (Fig. 5). The bottom seawater is close to the sediment and is influenced by the underlying sediments. Depths in the marginal sea are affected by the continental shelf, which caused different dissolved oxygen concentrations. Water temperature is also influenced by warm currents and latitude. The relatively higher water temperatures and the lower-oxygen environment at the bottom facilitate the anaerobic reactions of sediments and promote the production of DGM. The bottom seawater DGM concentrations correlated positively with the water temperatures (r = 0.331, P < 0.01). The higher the water temperature, the stronger the microbial activity of the bottom seawater and in the underlying sediment; therefore, the divalent mercury is more easily reduced anaerobically by microorganisms and DGM is released into the overlying seawater, resulting in the increase in DGM concentrations in the bottom seawater. The seawater temperatures are affected by the warm current and latitude of the Yellow Sea in spring, and higher water temperatures in the central-south of the South Yellow Sea resulted in the corresponding maximum DGM concentrations in the bottom seawater.
DGM in the bottom seawater correlated negatively with DO (r = −0.366, P < 0.01) (Table 3), and the correlation of the bottom seawater was stronger than for the middle and surface waters. DGM concentrations decreased with increasing DO, which is consistent with the results of Bratkič (2016) and Kotnik (2017). DO decreases gradually with increasing depth, while the bottom DO decreases due to the respiration of heterotrophic microorganisms and due to oxygen consumption by organic matter decomposition (Zang et al., 2009).
There were higher RHg concentrations in different water layers in the southeastern part of the Shandong Peninsula, where the Yellow Sea cold-water mass is located. Pollutants may be brought here and accumulate. High metal contents were found in this sea area and were caused by resuspension (He et al., 2008). The hydrological parameters of the middle seawater were affected by both the surface and the bottom seawater, resulting in weak correlations between DO and DGM.
-
Chlorophyll-a concentrations reflect primary productivity in the sea. Algae bloom at appropriate water temperatures, with adequate nutrients, high transparency and in the presence of spores. We found that the correlation coefficients between chlorophyll-a and DGM in each layer were 0.170, 0.281 (P < 0.05), −0.113, respectively (Table 3). They showed a positive correlation in the surface layer but this was not significant because the DGM produced in the surface seawater is released into the air, and DGM is also influenced by other factors such as solar radiation and water temperature. Therefore, the factors affecting the concentration of surface seawater DGM are complex. However, in the middle seawater, there was a significant correlation between DGM and chlorophyll-a, indicating that the influence of chlorophyll-a on the production of DGM is great, and this may be due to the organic carbon released by algae. Researchers found low levels of DGM in sea areas of the South Atlantic with low chlorophyll-a values (Bratkič et al., 2016). Some researchers believe that algae can convert Hg2+ into DGM, and the rate of Hg2+ reduction is proportional to the concentration of chlorophyll-a (Wu et al., 2014); Phytoplankton and cell secretions in seawater may also promote DGM production in the Yellow and Bohai Seas (Kim et al., 2016).
DGM correlated positively with salinity in the seawater of different layers, and only significant correlations were seen for the bottom seawater. High-salinity seawater was present in open seas with high transparency, few suspended particles and organic matter. Low-salinity seawater is located in the estuaries of rivers and coastal sea areas with high levels of suspended particles, which is not beneficial for the photoreduction of mercury (Ma et al., 2015). A positive correlation between salinity and DGM appeared in coastal waters, suggesting that higher salinity may result in a decrease in Hg organic complex content and an increase in Hg0 concentrations (Rolfhus and Fitzgerald, 2001).
Spatial Differences and Influencing Factors of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea in Spring
-
Abstract: From 28 March to 17 April, 2018, different forms of mercury (Hg) in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea were measured to study the influencing factors on the distribution and transformation of Hg in spring using a shared cruise. The mean concentration of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) in the surface water of the Yellow and Bohai Seas was (44.3 ± 43.9) pg/L, which was close to that in mid-latitude oceans and deep seas. The ratio of DGM to THg (total mercury) was lower than in the oceans and in the Yellow and Bohai Seas in summer or fall. DGM concentrations in surface water were highest in the central part of the South Yellow Sea and were higher than those in the Bohai Sea, and their spatial distributions were consistent with RHg (reactive mercury). DGM and RHg correlated positively with water temperature in surface seawater (r = 0.506, P < 0.01; r = 0.278, P < 0.05). The concentrations of both DGM and RHg in surface water were controlled by solar radiation and water temperature. Foggy weather did not benefit the production of DGM and RHg. DGM in the bottom seawater was mainly affected by Dissolved Oxygen and water temperature (r = −0.366, P < 0.01; r = 0.331, P < 0.01), produced mainly by anaerobic reactions of the bottom seawater and sediment microorganisms. The bottom DGM concentrations in the Yellow and Bohai Seas were the highest, and DGM produced in bottom seawater and sediment plays a more important role than the surface water in spring. The concentrations of DGM and RHg in the surface and bottom water in the South Yellow Sea were all higher than those in the middle layer. Vertical variations in the North Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea were small. The production and distribution of DGM and RHg were influenced by differences of latitude and by the Yellow Sea warm current in spring.
-
Table 1. Comparison of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM), active mercury (RHg) and their parameters at different depths in South Yellow Sea, North Yellow Sea, and Bohai Sea
Sea area Water layer DGM/(pg/L) RHg/(ng/L) Depth / m Water temperature /℃ DO/(mg/L) Chlorophyll-a/(µg/L) South Yellow Sea Surface layer 70.4 ± 53.8a 0.63 ± 0.39b 4.6 8.9 10.7 1.78 Middle layer 61.8 ± 51.0a 0.34 ± 0.29a 18.0 8.2 10.4 1.69 Bottom layer 75.1 ± 66.6a 0.63 ± 0.36b 42.5 8.0 10.0 1.36 North Yellow Sea Surface layer 21.4 ± 7.4a 0.12 ± 0.07a 4.1 5.1 12.0 1.28 Middle layer 19.5 ± 11.1a 0.13 ± 0.11a 19.5 5.0 11.8 1.46 Bottom layer 44.6 ± 37.8b 0.13 ± 0.07a 43.9 4.8 11.5 1.70 Bohai Sea Surface layer 29.4 ± 26.5a 0.16 ± 0.05a 3.6 5.0 12.2 1.52 Middle layer 35.0 ± 19.9a 0.13 ± 0.10a 10.9 4.9 11.9 1.81 Bottom layer 40.2 ± 38.1a 0.16 ± 0.09a 22.8 4.7 11.4 2.33 Notes: Significant differences among DGM, RHg at different depths in different sea areas are marked with different letters of a and b (P < 0.05) Table 2. Comparison of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM), active mercury (RHg) and total mercury (THg) concentrations in surface water in the Yellow and Bohai Seas with other sea areas
Sea area Period DGM/(pg/L) RHg/(ng/L) THg/(ng/L) References South Yellow Sea Spring 2018 70.4 ± 53.8 0.63 ± 0.39 2.81 ± 1.67 This study North Yellow Sea Spring 2018 21.4 ± 7.4 0.12 ± 0.07 2.35 ± 1.64 This study Bohai Sea Spring 2018 29.4 ± 26.5 0.16 ± 0.05 3.18 ± 1.90 This study Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea Spring 2018 44.3 ± 43.9 0.44 ± 0.63 2.65 ± 1.74 This study South Yellow Sea Fall 2013 90.9 ± 25.8 − − Wang et al., 2017 North Yellow Sea, Bohai Fall 2013 63.2 ± 23.4 − − Wang et al., 2017 Yellow Sea Summer 2016 49 ± 19 0.80 ± 0.36 2.46 ± 0.36 Gao, 2017 Yellow Sea Spring 2012 27.0 ± 6.8 − − Ci et al., 2015 East China Sea Fall 2013 49.6 ± 12.5 − 1.45 ± 0.62 Wang et al., 2016 South China Sea Winter 2015 53.7 ± 18.8 − 1.40 ± 0.48 Ci et al., 2016 Baltic Sea Winter 1998 17.4 − − Wängberg et al., 2001 Minamata Bay coast site Spring 2014 105 ± 46 − 2.68 ± 1.91 Matsuyama et al., 2018 Minamata Bay open sea Spring 2014 68 ± 29 − 1.10 ± 0.24 Matsuyama et al., 2018 Coastal waters of the Yellow Sea 2008−2009 − 0.94 ± 0.28 2.69 ± 0.78 Ci et al., 2011b Long Island Sound estuary 1995−1997 8.0 −110.3 − − Rolfhus and Fitzgerald, 2001 Mediterranean Sea Summer 2000 30.1 ± 24.1 0.16 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.08 Horvat et al., 2003 Yellow Sea-North Pacific Ocean Spring 2015 39.6 ± 22.9 0.33 ± 0.24 0.75 ± 0.51 Liu et al., 2017 Atlantic Ocean 1999 48.1 ± 32.1 0.34 ± 0.24 0.58 ± 0.34 Mason and Sullivan, 1999 Note: − no data Table 3. Correlations between dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM), reactive mercury (RHg) and total mercury (THg) with other parameters for each layer in the Yellow and Bohai Seas (n = 72)
Water layer Species Water temperature Salinity Turbidity Chlorophyll-a DO pH Wind speed Relative humidity Air temperature Surface water DGM 0.278* 0.238 −0.075 0.170 −0.247* −0.136 −0.206 0.312* 0.013 RHg 0.506** 0.212 0.104 0.167 −0.455** −0.224 −0.264* 0.486** 0.254* THg −0.131 0.006 −0.075 0.279* 0.050 0.190 −0.218 0.377** −0.370** Middle water DGM 0.291* 0.206 −0.127 0.281* −0.101 −0.172 − − − RHg 0.305* 0.053 0.130 −0.006 −0.23 −0.246* − − − Bottom water DGM 0.331** 0.323** 0.226 −0.113 −0.366** −0.167 − − − RHg 0.515** 0.266* 0.192 −0.276* −0.447** −0.251* − − − Notes: **Significant correlations at the 0.01 level. * Significant correlations at the 0.05 level; DO, Dissolved oxygen; −, no data -
[1] Ahn M C, Kim B, Holsen T M et al., 2010. Factors influencing concentrations of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) and total mercury (TM) in an artificial reservoir. Environmental Pollution, 158(2): 347–355. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.036 [2] Amyot M, Gill G A, Morel F M M, 1997. Production and loss of dissolved gaseous mercury in coastal seawater. Environmental Science & Technology, 31(12): 3606–3611. doi: 10.1021/es9703685 [3] Andersson M E, Sommar J, Gårdfeldt K et al., 2008. Enhanced concentrations of dissolved gaseous mercury in the surface waters of the Arctic Ocean. Marine Chemistry, 110(3–4): 190–194. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2008.04.002 [4] Bowman K L, Hammerschmidt C R, Lamborg C H et al., 2016. Distribution of mercury species across a zonal section of the eastern tropical South Pacific Ocean (U.S. GEOTRACES GP16). Marine Chemistry, 186: 156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2016.09.005 [5] Bratkič A, Vahčič M, Kotnik J et al., 2016. Mercury presence and speciation in the South Atlantic Ocean along the 40°S transect. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 30(2): 105–119. doi: 10.1002/2015GB005275 [6] Cheng G Y, Li D, Li Y B et al., 2019. Distribution of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) and its controlling factors in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 180: 715–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.049 [7] Chong X X, Wang Y, Liu R H et al., 2019. Pollution characteristics and source difference of gaseous elemental mercury between haze and non-haze days in winter. Science of the Total Environment, 678: 671–680. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.338 [8] Ci Z J, Zhang X S, Wang Z W et al., 2011a. Distribution and air-sea exchange of mercury (Hg) in the Yellow Sea. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(6): 2881–2892. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-2881-2011 [9] Ci Z J, Zhang X S, Wang Z W, 2011b. Elemental mercury in coastal seawater of Yellow Sea, China: temporal variation and air–sea exchange. Atmospheric Environment, 45(1): 183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.025 [10] Ci Z J, Zhang X S, Wang Z W et al., 2011c. Phase speciation of mercury (Hg) in coastal water of the Yellow Sea, China. Marine Chemistry, 126(1–4): 250–255. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2011.06.004 [11] Ci Z J, Wang C J, Wang Z W et al., 2015. Elemental mercury (Hg(0)) in air and surface waters of the Yellow Sea during late spring and late fall 2012: concentration, spatial-temporal distribution and air/sea flux. Chemosphere, 119: 199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.064 [12] Ci Z J, Zhang X S, Wang Z W, 2016. Air-sea exchange of gaseous mercury in the tropical coast (Luhuitou fringing reef) of the South China Sea, the Hainan Island, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(11): 11323–11329. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6346-5 [13] Conaway C H, Squire S, Mason R P et al., 2003. Mercury speciation in the San Francisco Bay estuary. Marine Chemistry, 80(2–3): 199–225. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4203(02)00135-4 [14] Costa M, Liss P S, 1999. Photoreduction of mercury in sea water and its possible implications for Hg0 air-sea fluxes. Marine Chemistry, 68(1–2): 87–95. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00067-5 [15] Costa M, Liss P, 2000. Photoreduction and evolution of mercury from seawater. Science of the Total Environment, 261(1–3): 125–135. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00631-8 [16] Driscoll C T, Han Y J, Chen C Y et al., 2007. Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern United States. Bioscience, 57(1): 17–28. doi: 10.1641/B570106 [17] Ferrara R, Ceccarini C, Lanzillotta E et al., 2003. Profiles of dissolved gaseous mercury concentration in the Mediterranean seawater. Atmospheric Environment, 37(S1): 85–92. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00248-6 [18] Gao Honglong, 2017. Study on Air-sea Exchange of Mercury in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea in Summer. Qingdao: Ocean University of China. (in Chinese) [19] Gao Honglong, Liu Ruhai, Zhang Yanyan et al., 2017. Variation and its influencing factors of DGM in typical sea area of Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea. Marine Environmental Science, 36(6): 820–825. (in Chinese) [20] He Zhipeng, Song Jinming, Zhang Naixing et al., 2008. Variation characteristics and controlling factors of heavy metals in the south Yellow sea surface seawaters. Environmental Science, 29(5): 1153–1162. (in Chinese) [21] Horvat M, Kotnik J, Logar M et al., 2003. Speciation of mercury in surface and deep-sea waters in the Mediterranean Sea. Atmospheric Environment, 37(S1): 93–108. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00249-8 [22] Kim H, Rhee T S, Hahm D et al., 2016. Contrasting distributions of dissolved gaseous mercury concentration and evasion in the north pacific subarctic gyre and the subarctic front. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 110: 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2016.02.001 [23] Kotnik J, Horvat M, Tessier E et al., 2007. Mercury speciation in surface and deep waters of the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Chemistry, 107(1): 13–30. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2007.02.012 [24] Kotnik J, Horvat M, Begu E et al., 2017. Dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) in the Mediterranean Sea: spatial and temporal trends. Marine Chemistry, 193: 8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2017.03.002 [25] Laurier F J G, Mason R P, Gill G A et al., 2004. Mercury distributions in the North Pacific Ocean—20 years of observations. Marine Chemistry, 90(14): 3–19. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.02.025 [26] Liu Shixuan, Liu Ruhai, Wang Yan et al., 2017. Mercury species in surface water from Yellow Sea to Northwest Pacific Ocean. Marine Environmental Science, 36(3): 392–397. (in Chinese) [27] Ma Xuelin, Liu Ruhai, Wei Lai et al., 2015. Effect of ultraviolet on the photoproduction of dissolved gaseous mercury in coastal seawater during winter. China Environmental Science, 35(11): 3462–3467. (in Chinese) [28] Marumoto K, Imai S, 2015. Determination of dissolved gaseous mercury in seawater of Minamata Bay and estimation for mercury exchange across air–sea interface. Marine Chemistry, 168: 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2014.09.007 [29] Mason R P, Sullivan K A, 1999. The distribution and speciation of mercury in the South and equatorial Atlantic. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 46(5): 937–956. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(99)00010-7 [30] Mason R P, Lawson N M, Sheu G R, 2001. Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean: factors controlling air–sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the upper waters. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 48(13): 2829–2853. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0 [31] Mason R P, Choi A L, Fitzgerald W F et al., 2012. Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environmental Research, 119: 101–117. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.013 [32] Mastromonaco M G N, Gårdfeldt K, Assmann K M et al., 2017. Speciation of mercury in the waters of the Weddell, Amundsen and Ross Seas (Southern Ocean). Marine Chemistry, 193: 20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2017.03.001 [33] Mastromonaco M N, Gårdfeldt K, Jourdain B et al., 2016. Antarctic winter mercury and ozone depletion events over sea ice. Atmospheric Environment, 129: 125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.023 [34] Matsuyama A, Yano S, Taninaka T et al., 2018. Chemical characteristics of dissolved mercury in the pore water of Minamata Bay sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 129(2): 503–511. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.021 [35] Muller-Karger F E, Varela R, Thunell R et al., 2005. The importance of continental margins in the global carbon cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(1): L01602. doi: 10.1029/2004gl021346 [36] Qureshi A, O’Driscoll N J, MacLeod M et al., 2010. Photoreactions of mercury in surface ocean water: gross reaction kinetics and possible pathways. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(2): 644–649. doi: 10.1021/es9012728 [37] Rolfhus K R, Fitzgerald W F, 2001. The evasion and spatial/temporal distribution of mercury species in Long Island Sound, CT-NY. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 65(3): 407–418. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00519-6 [38] Soerensen A L, Mason R P, Balcom P H et al., 2014. Elemental mercury concentrations and fluxes in the tropical atmosphere and ocean. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(19): 11312–11319. doi: 10.1021/es503109p [39] Štrok M, Baya P A, Hintelmann H, 2015. The mercury isotope composition of Arctic coastal seawater. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 347(7–8): 368–376. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2015.04.001 [40] US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2002. Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. [41] Wang C J, Ci Z J, Wang Z W et al., 2016. Air-sea exchange of gaseous mercury in the East China Sea. Environmental Pollution, 212: 535–543. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.016 [42] Wang Y, Liu R H, Li Y P et al., 2017. GEM in the marine atmosphere and air-sea exchange of Hg during late autumn and winter cruise campaigns over the marginal seas of China. Atmospheric Research, 191: 84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.03.004 [43] Wängberg I, Schmolke S, Schager P et al., 2001. Estimates of air-sea exchange of mercury in the Baltic Sea. Atmospheric Environment, 35(32): 5477–5484. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00246-1 [44] Weiss-Penzias P, Jaffe D A, McClintick A et al., 2003. Gaseous elemental mercury in the marine boundary layer: evidence for rapid removal in anthropogenic pollution. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(17): 3755–3763. doi: 10.1021/es0341081 [45] Whalin L, Kim E H, Mason R, 2007. Factors influencing the oxidation, reduction, methylation and demethylation of mercury species in coastal waters. Marine Chemistry, 107(3): 278–294. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2007.04.002 [46] Wu Y, Wang W X, 2014. Intracellular speciation and transformation of inorganic mercury in marine phytoplankton. Aquatic Toxicology, 148: 122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.01.005 [47] Xing L, Tao S Q, Zhang H L et al., 2011. Distributions and origins of lipid biomarkers in surface sediments from the southern Yellow Sea. Applied Geochemistry, 26(8): 1584–1593. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.06.024 [48] Xu Liaoqi, Liu Ruhai, Wang Jinyu et al., 2012. Research on the mercury species in Jiaozhou bay in spring. Environmental Science, 33(1): 42–47. (in Chinese) [49] Zang Lu, Shi Xiaoyong, Zhang Chuansong, 2009. Seasonal distribution features of nutrients and DO at 37°N transect. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 31(2): 78–85. (in Chinese) [50] Zheng Wen, 2020. Mercury Species and Influencing Factors in Adjacent Waters of the Yangtze River Estuary in Summer and Autumn. Qingdao: Ocean University of China. (in Chinese)