ZHU Huayou, DAI Zejuan, JIANG Ziran. Industrial Agglomeration Externalities, City Size, and Regional Economic Development: Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Panel Data of 283 Cities and GMM Method[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(3): 456-470. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0877-7
Citation: ZHU Huayou, DAI Zejuan, JIANG Ziran. Industrial Agglomeration Externalities, City Size, and Regional Economic Development: Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Panel Data of 283 Cities and GMM Method[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(3): 456-470. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0877-7

Industrial Agglomeration Externalities, City Size, and Regional Economic Development: Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Panel Data of 283 Cities and GMM Method

doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0877-7
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571112), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (No. LY16D010002)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHU Huayou. E-mail: zhu589@zjnu.cn
  • Received Date: 2016-07-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-11-14
  • Publish Date: 2017-06-27
  • Local governments have long been ardently pursuing the industrial specialization effect (MAR externalities) and industrial diversification effect (Jacobs externalities). Such a pursuit has resulted in severe distortion of resource allocation and negative effect on sustainability of local economic development. Regarding the effect from both MAR and Jacobs externalities on local economic development existing literature records notable disputes. Therefore, for local economic development, one important issue is which externality (MAR or Jacobs) can better bring the effect into play. By studying a panel data of 283 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2012 and applying dynamic plane data GMM method, this paper conducted a regression analysis of the relationship among industrial agglomeration externalities, city size, and regional economic development. The result indicates that with regard to the whole nation, MAR externalities are conducive to regional economy development whereas Jacobs externalities will, to an extent, restrain regional economic development. As regards eastern, middle, and western regions, MAR externalities are conducive only to the economic development of the eastern region; their effects on middle and western regions are insignificant. Moreover, the interaction item between MAR externalities and city size has a significant negative synergistic effect on national economic development and a certain acceleration effect on eastern region as well as a strong negative synergistic effect on the middle region and an insignificant effect on the western region. The interaction item between Jacobs externalities and city size has a positive synergistic effect on only the middle region and has an insignificant synergistic effect on both eastern and western regions. Capital stock and labor input have significant accelerating effects on GDP growth per capita of Chinese cities, whereas material capital and labor input remain primary driving forces for Chinese local economic development. Furthermore, human capital contributes to accelerating urban economic development, whereas government intervention restrains urban economic development.
  • [1] Arellano M, Bond S,1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equation. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297. doi: 10. 2307/2297968
    [2] Batisse C, 2002. Dynamic externalities and local growth: a panel data analysis applied to Chinese provinces. China Economic Review, 13(2): 231-251. doi:  10.1016/s1043-951x(02)00068-8
    [3] Cheng Zhonghua, Yu Binbin, 2014. Industrial agglomeration and regional wage gap: spatial econometric analysis based on Chinese urban data. Modern Economic Science, 36(6): 86-94. (in Chinese)
    [4] Ellison G, Glaeser E L, 1997. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 889-927. doi:  10.3386/w4840
    [5] Glaeser E L, Hedi K, Jose A S et al., 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 1126-1152. doi: 10. 3386/w3787
    [6] Fan Jianyong, Feng Meng, Li Fangwen, 2014. Industrial agglomeration and total factor productivity of enterprises. Journal of World Economics, (5): 51-73. (in Chinese)
    [7] Feldman M P, Audretsch D B, 1999. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2): 409-429. doi: 10. 1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
    [8] Forni M, Paba S, 2002. Spillovers and the growth of local industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2): 151-171. doi:  10.1111/1467-6451.00172
    [9] Henderson J V, 1986. Efficiency of resource usage and city size. Journal of Urban economics, 19(1): 47-70.
    [10] Henderson J V, Kuncoro A, Turner M, 1995. Industrial develop-
    [11] ment in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103: 1067-1090. doi:  10.3386/w41781995
    [12] Hoover E M, 1937. Location Theory and the Shoe Leather Industries. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [13] Jacobs J, 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.
    [14] Marshall A, 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
    [15] Mukkala K, 2004. Agglomeration economies in the Finish manufacturing sector. Applied Economics, 36(21): 2419-2427. doi:  10.1080/0003684042000287655
    [16] Martin P, Mayer T, Mayneris F, 2008. Spatial concentration and firm-level productivity in France. CEPR Discussion Paper.
    [17] National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2004-2013. China Statistical Yearbook 2003-2012. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
    [18] Peng Xiang, Jiang Chuanhai, 2011.Industrial agglomeration, technological spillovers and regional innovation: evidences from China. China Economic Quarterly,10(3): 913-934. (in Chinese)
    [19] Su Hongjian, Zhao Jian, 2011. Sectoral specialization, functional specialization and growth in cities: evidences from panel data on China's prefecture-level city. China Industrial Economics, (4): 25-34. (in Chinese)
    [20] Sun Xiaohua, Zhou Linlin, 2013. Diversification, specialization, city size and economic growth: an empirical analysis based on panel data of prefecture-level cities of China. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 27(2): 71-78. (in Chinese)
    [21] Wang Chunhui, Zhao Wei, 2014. Agglomeration externalities and regional economic performance: a theoretical model based on regional opening. Journal of International Trade Issues, (4): 67-77. (in Chinese)
    [22] Young A, 2000. Gold into base metals: productivity growth in the People's Republic of China during the reform period. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber. org/papers/w7856.pdf
    [23] Yu Binbin, Jin Gang, 2014. Space spillovers of Chinese urban structure adjustment and pattern selection. China Industrial Economics, (2): 31-44. (in Chinese)
    [24] Zhang Zhiqiang, 2014. Dynamic externality, industry heterogeneity and synchronized regional industry development. Review of Industrial Economics, 13(3): 116-143. (in Chinese)
    [25] Zhang Jun, Wu Guiying, Zhang Jipeng, 2004. The estimation of China's provincial capital stock: 1952-2000. Journal of Economic Research, (10): 35-43. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(274) PDF downloads(1055) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Industrial Agglomeration Externalities, City Size, and Regional Economic Development: Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Panel Data of 283 Cities and GMM Method

doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0877-7
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571112), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (No. LY16D010002)
    Corresponding author: ZHU Huayou. E-mail: zhu589@zjnu.cn

Abstract: Local governments have long been ardently pursuing the industrial specialization effect (MAR externalities) and industrial diversification effect (Jacobs externalities). Such a pursuit has resulted in severe distortion of resource allocation and negative effect on sustainability of local economic development. Regarding the effect from both MAR and Jacobs externalities on local economic development existing literature records notable disputes. Therefore, for local economic development, one important issue is which externality (MAR or Jacobs) can better bring the effect into play. By studying a panel data of 283 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2012 and applying dynamic plane data GMM method, this paper conducted a regression analysis of the relationship among industrial agglomeration externalities, city size, and regional economic development. The result indicates that with regard to the whole nation, MAR externalities are conducive to regional economy development whereas Jacobs externalities will, to an extent, restrain regional economic development. As regards eastern, middle, and western regions, MAR externalities are conducive only to the economic development of the eastern region; their effects on middle and western regions are insignificant. Moreover, the interaction item between MAR externalities and city size has a significant negative synergistic effect on national economic development and a certain acceleration effect on eastern region as well as a strong negative synergistic effect on the middle region and an insignificant effect on the western region. The interaction item between Jacobs externalities and city size has a positive synergistic effect on only the middle region and has an insignificant synergistic effect on both eastern and western regions. Capital stock and labor input have significant accelerating effects on GDP growth per capita of Chinese cities, whereas material capital and labor input remain primary driving forces for Chinese local economic development. Furthermore, human capital contributes to accelerating urban economic development, whereas government intervention restrains urban economic development.

ZHU Huayou, DAI Zejuan, JIANG Ziran. Industrial Agglomeration Externalities, City Size, and Regional Economic Development: Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Panel Data of 283 Cities and GMM Method[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(3): 456-470. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0877-7
Citation: ZHU Huayou, DAI Zejuan, JIANG Ziran. Industrial Agglomeration Externalities, City Size, and Regional Economic Development: Empirical Research Based on Dynamic Panel Data of 283 Cities and GMM Method[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(3): 456-470. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0877-7
Reference (25)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return