XU Huashan, ZHENG Hua, CHEN Xiaoshu, REN Yufen, OUYANG Zhiyun. Relationships Between River Water Quality and Landscape Factors in Haihe River Basin, China: Implications for Environmental Management[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 197-207. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0799-9
Citation: XU Huashan, ZHENG Hua, CHEN Xiaoshu, REN Yufen, OUYANG Zhiyun. Relationships Between River Water Quality and Landscape Factors in Haihe River Basin, China: Implications for Environmental Management[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 197-207. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0799-9

Relationships Between River Water Quality and Landscape Factors in Haihe River Basin, China: Implications for Environmental Management

doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0799-9
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41371538), Independent Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. SKLURE2008-1-02)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHENG Hua
  • Received Date: 2015-06-19
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-10-15
  • Publish Date: 2016-02-27
  • River water plays a key role in human health, and in social and economic development, and is often affected by both natural factors and human activities. An in-depth understanding of the role of these factors can help in developing an effective catchment management strategy to protect precious water resources. This study analyzed river water quality, patterns of terrestrial and riparian ecosystems, intensity of agricultural activities, industrial structure, and spatial distribution of pollutant emissions in the Haihe River Basin in China for the year of 2010, identifying the variables that have the greatest impact on river water quality. The area percentage of farmland in study area, the percentage of natural vegetation cover in the 1000-m riparian zone, rural population density, industrial Gross Domestic Product (GDP)/km2, and industrial amino nitrogen emissions were all significantly correlated with river water quality (P< 0.05). Farming had the largest impact on river water quality, explaining 43.0% of the water quality variance, followed by the coverage of natural vegetation in the 1000-m riparian zone, which explained 36.2% of the water quality variance. Industrial amino nitrogen emissions intensity and rural population density explained 31.6% and 31.4% of the water quality variance, respectively, while industrial GDP/km2 explained 26.6%. Together, these five indicators explained 67.3% of the total variance in water quality. Consequently, water environmental management of the Haihe River Basin should focus on adjusting agricultural activities, conserving riparian vegetation, and reducing industrial pollutant emissions by optimizing industrial structure. The results demonstrate how human activities drive the spatial pattern changes of river water quality, and they can provide reference for developing land use guidelines and for prioritizing management practices to maintain stream water quality in a large river basin.
  • [1] Ahearn D S, Sheibley R W, Dahlgren R A et al., 2005. Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last free-flowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. Journal of Hydrology, 313(3): 234-247. doi: 10.1016/j. jhydrol.2005.02.038
    [2] Collins K E, Doscher C, Rennie H G et al., 2013. The effectiveness of riparian 'restoration' on water quality: a case study of lowland streams in Canterbury, New Zealand. Restoration Ecology, 21(1): 40-48. doi:  10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00859.x
    [3] de Souza A L T, Fonseca D G, Liborio R A et al., 2013. Influence of riparian vegetation and forest structure on the water quality of rural low-order streams in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 298: 12-18. doi:  10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.022
    [4] Ding S, Zhang Y, Liu B et al., 2013. Effects of riparian land use on water quality and fish communities in the headwater stream of the Taizi River in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(5): 699-708. doi:  10.1007/s11783-013-0528-x
    [5] Fernandes J d F, de Souza A L T, Tanaka M O, 2014. Can the structure of a riparian forest remnant influence stream water quality? A tropical case study. Hydrobiologia, 724(1): 175-185. doi:  10.1007/s10750-013-1732-1
    [6] Huang J, Zhan J, Yan H, et al., 2013. Evaluation of the impacts of land use on water quality: a case study in the Chaohu lake basin. Scientific World Journal, (2013): 1-7. doi: 10. 1155/2013/329187
    [7] Jan L, Petr S, 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25-42.
    [8] Lee S W, Hwang S J, Lee S B et al., 2009. Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(2): 80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.02. 008
    [9] Liu Z, Wang Y, Li Z et al., 2013. Impervious surface impact on water quality in the process of rapid urbanization in henzhen, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68(8): 2365-2373. doi:  10.1007/s12665-012-1918-2
    [10] Mehaffey M, Nash M, Wade T et al., 2005. Linking land cover and water quality in New York City's water supply watersheds. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 107(1-3): 29-44. doi:  10.1007/s10661-005-2018-5
    [11] Ortolani V, 2014. Land use and its effects on water quality using the BASINS model. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71(5): 2059-2063. doi:  10.1007/s12665-013-2607-5
    [12] Ragosta G, Evensen C, Atwill E et al., 2010. Causal connections between water quality and land use in a rural tropical island watershed. EcoHealth, 7(1): 105-113. doi:  10.1007/s10393-010-0299-9
    [13] Randhir T O, Ekness P, 2013. Water quality change and habitat potential in riparian ecosystems. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 13(3): 192-200. doi:  10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.09.001
    [14] Sun R, Wang Z, Chen L et al., 2013. Assessment of surface water quality at large watershed scale: land-use, anthropogenic, and administrative impacts. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 49(4): 741-752. doi:  10.1111/jawr.12033
    [15] Teixeira Z, Teixeira H, Marques J C, 2014. Systematic processes of land use/land cover change to identify relevant driving forces: Implications on water quality. Science of the Total Environment, 470: 1320-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10. 098
    [16] Tran C P, Bode R W, Smith A J et al., 2010. Land-use proximity as a basis for assessing stream water quality in New York State (USA). Ecological Indicators, 10(3): 727-733. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolind.2009.12.002
    [17] Uriarte M, Yackulic C B, Lim Y et al., 2011. Influence of land use on water quality in a tropical landscape: a multi-scale analysis. Landscape Ecology, 26(8): 1151-1164. doi:  10.1007/s10980-011-9642-y
    [18] Wan R, Cai S, Li H et al., 2014. Inferring land use and land cover impact on stream water quality using a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach in the Xitiaoxi river watershed, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 133: 1-11. doi: 10. 1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.035
    [19] Wang Jiao, Ma Keming, Zhang Yuxin et al., 2012. Impacts of land use and socioeconomic activity on river water quality. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 32(1): 57-65. (in Chinese)
    [20] Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P et al., 2001. Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environmental Management, 28(2): 255-266. doi: 10.1007/s0026 702409
    [21] Zhao Jun, Yang Kai, Tai Jun et al., 2011. Review of the relationship between regional landscape pattern and surface water quality. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(11): 3180-3189. (in Chinese)
    [22] Zhao Peng, Xia Beicheng, Qin Jianqiao et al., 2012. Multivariate correlation analysis between landscape pattern and water quality. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(8): 2331-2341. (in Chinese)
    [23] Zheng H, Robinson B E, Liang Y C et al., 2013. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41): 16681-16686. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1312324110
    [24] Zheng M, Zheng H, Wu Y et al., 2015. Changes in nitrogen budget and potential risk to the environment over 20 years (1990-2010) in the agroecosystems of the Haihe Basin, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 28: 195-202. doi: 10. 1016/j.jes.2014.05.053
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(346) PDF downloads(793) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Relationships Between River Water Quality and Landscape Factors in Haihe River Basin, China: Implications for Environmental Management

doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0799-9
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41371538), Independent Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. SKLURE2008-1-02)
    Corresponding author: ZHENG Hua

Abstract: River water plays a key role in human health, and in social and economic development, and is often affected by both natural factors and human activities. An in-depth understanding of the role of these factors can help in developing an effective catchment management strategy to protect precious water resources. This study analyzed river water quality, patterns of terrestrial and riparian ecosystems, intensity of agricultural activities, industrial structure, and spatial distribution of pollutant emissions in the Haihe River Basin in China for the year of 2010, identifying the variables that have the greatest impact on river water quality. The area percentage of farmland in study area, the percentage of natural vegetation cover in the 1000-m riparian zone, rural population density, industrial Gross Domestic Product (GDP)/km2, and industrial amino nitrogen emissions were all significantly correlated with river water quality (P< 0.05). Farming had the largest impact on river water quality, explaining 43.0% of the water quality variance, followed by the coverage of natural vegetation in the 1000-m riparian zone, which explained 36.2% of the water quality variance. Industrial amino nitrogen emissions intensity and rural population density explained 31.6% and 31.4% of the water quality variance, respectively, while industrial GDP/km2 explained 26.6%. Together, these five indicators explained 67.3% of the total variance in water quality. Consequently, water environmental management of the Haihe River Basin should focus on adjusting agricultural activities, conserving riparian vegetation, and reducing industrial pollutant emissions by optimizing industrial structure. The results demonstrate how human activities drive the spatial pattern changes of river water quality, and they can provide reference for developing land use guidelines and for prioritizing management practices to maintain stream water quality in a large river basin.

XU Huashan, ZHENG Hua, CHEN Xiaoshu, REN Yufen, OUYANG Zhiyun. Relationships Between River Water Quality and Landscape Factors in Haihe River Basin, China: Implications for Environmental Management[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 197-207. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0799-9
Citation: XU Huashan, ZHENG Hua, CHEN Xiaoshu, REN Yufen, OUYANG Zhiyun. Relationships Between River Water Quality and Landscape Factors in Haihe River Basin, China: Implications for Environmental Management[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 197-207. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0799-9
Reference (24)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return