Gentrification and Residential Differentiation in Nanjing,China

SONG Weixuan; WU Qiyan

doi:10.1007/s11769-010-0432-2

The institutional environment in China has quite evidently changed during modern socio-economic transitions.Driven both by local government and by marketing force,urban social space was redistributed after the reform of urban land and real estate policies.Urban renewal makes for wide differential rent and therefore gentrification is occurring in China.This paper analyzes the background and institutional environment of gentrification in China,and further discusses the process,characteristics and evolutionary mechanisms in the case of Nanjing,through investigation of the attributes of 1075 residential communities built during the 1998-2008 at a macro level,and interviewing the residents and analyzing questionnaires in 6 different and typical communities at a micro level.As a socio-spatial course of two-way interaction,gentrification is divided into 3 stages of incubation,occurrence and fast development,according to the time of landmark events and policy reform on the leasehold of land in Nanjing during socio-economic transition.In terms of the socio-spatial characteristics of gentrification in Nanjing,the gentrification process under the trajectory of urban renewal makes urban social space present a new circle-layer structure;the rise of quite a number of gated communities results in the fragmentation of social space and privatization of public space;the management mode of modern communities and the change of life style have aggravated the indifference of neighborhood relationship of gentrified communities.Based on the empirical evidence of this study,this paper indicates that gentrification is quite different between China and western countries with respect to spatio-temporal order,dominant forces,paths of realization and spatial expression,and it further reveals the dynamic mechanism of gentrification developing in China at the present stage.

Gentrification and Residential Differentiation in Nanjing,China

1. Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, Nanjing 210013, China;

2. School of Geographic Sciences of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210064, China

Received Date: 2010-05-05

Rev Recd Date: 2010-08-16

Publish Date: 2010-11-11

Key words:

Abstract: The institutional environment in China has quite evidently changed during modern socio-economic transitions.Driven both by local government and by marketing force,urban social space was redistributed after the reform of urban land and real estate policies.Urban renewal makes for wide differential rent and therefore gentrification is occurring in China.This paper analyzes the background and institutional environment of gentrification in China,and further discusses the process,characteristics and evolutionary mechanisms in the case of Nanjing,through investigation of the attributes of 1075 residential communities built during the 1998-2008 at a macro level,and interviewing the residents and analyzing questionnaires in 6 different and typical communities at a micro level.As a socio-spatial course of two-way interaction,gentrification is divided into 3 stages of incubation,occurrence and fast development,according to the time of landmark events and policy reform on the leasehold of land in Nanjing during socio-economic transition.In terms of the socio-spatial characteristics of gentrification in Nanjing,the gentrification process under the trajectory of urban renewal makes urban social space present a new circle-layer structure;the rise of quite a number of gated communities results in the fragmentation of social space and privatization of public space;the management mode of modern communities and the change of life style have aggravated the indifference of neighborhood relationship of gentrified communities.Based on the empirical evidence of this study,this paper indicates that gentrification is quite different between China and western countries with respect to spatio-temporal order,dominant forces,paths of realization and spatial expression,and it further reveals the dynamic mechanism of gentrification developing in China at the present stage.

HTML

Reference (19)

[1]	Butler T,1997.Gentrification and the Middle Classes.Aldershot,UK:Ashgate.
[2]	Butler T,2007.Re-urbanizing London Docklands:Gentrification, suburbanization or new urbanism.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,31(4):759-781.DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00758.x
[3]	Butler T,Lees L,2006.Super-gentrification in Barnsbury,London:Globalisation and gentrifying elites at the neighborhood level.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,31(4):467-487.DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00220.x
[4]	Davidson M,2007.Gentrification as global habitat:A process of class formation or corporate creation.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,32(4):490-506.DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00269.x
[5]	Glass R,1964.Introduction.In:University of London(ed.).Centre for Urban Studies.London:Aspects of Change.London: MacGibbon and Kee,xiii-xlii.
[6]	Graham S,Marvin S,2001.Splintering Urbanism:Networked Infrastructures,Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition.London:Routledge.
[7]	Hamnett C,2003.Gentrification and the middle class remaking of inner London.Urban Studies,40(12):2401-2426.
[8]	Harvey D,1989.From managerialism to entrepreneurialism:The transformation of governance in late capitalism.Geografiska Annaler B,71(1):3-17.
[9]	He Shenjing,2007.State-sponsored gentrification under market transition:The case of Shanghai.Urban Affairs Review,43(2):171-198.DOI:10.1177/1078087407305175
[10]	Hoyt H,1939.The Structure and Growth of Residential Neigh-borhoods in American Cities.Washington,D.C.:Federal Housing Administration.
[11]	Kennedy M,Leonard P,2001.Dealing with Neighborhood Change:A Primer on Gentrification and Policy Choices.A Discussion Paper Prepared for The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.Washington,D.C.:The Brookings Institute Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
[12]	Knox P,Pinch S,2000.Urban Social Geography:An Introduction.London:Prentice Hal.
[13]	Lees L,2003.Super-gentrification:The case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City.Urban Studies,40(12):2487-2510.DOI:10.1080/0042098032000136174
[14]	Nanjing Local Chronicles Office,2009.Nanjing Almanac.Nanjing:Nanjing Almanac Editorial Office Press.(in Chinese)
[15]	Smith N,1979.Toward a theory of gentrification:A back to the city movement of capital,not people.Journal of the American Planning Association,45(4):538-548.DOI:10.1080/0194436-7908977002
[16]	Smith N,2002.New globalism,new urbanism:Gentrification as global urban strategy.Antipode,34(3):427-450.DOI:10.111-1/1467-8330.00249
[17]	Smith N,Williams P,1986.Gentrification of the City.Winchester,UK:Allen and Unwin.
[18]	Wu F L,2002.China's changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy.Urban Studies,39(7):1071-1093.DOI:10.1080/00420980220135491
[19]	Wu F L,2008.China's great transformation:Neo-liberalization as establishing a market society.Geoforum,39(3):1093-1096.

Gentrification and Residential Differentiation in Nanjing,China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0432-2

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related