留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning

XIAO He LIU Yunhui YU Zhenrong ZHANG Qian ZHANG Xin

XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
引用本文: XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
Citation: XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y

Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning

doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
基金项目: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271198)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    YU Zhenrong,yuzhr@cau.edu.cn

Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning

More Information
    Corresponding author: YU Zhenrong,yuzhr@cau.edu.cn
  • 摘要: The protecting requirements and functional connectivity of species in isolated habitat patches are crucial factors of eco-network planning. This study aimed to improve the method of eco-network planning for species conservation. Ecoprofiling was used to group the species by similar behavior types, namely, choice of ecosystem, area requirement, and short distance dispersal abilities. A least-cost model was used to simulate the optimal corridor location to maintain functional connectivity. A combination of ecoprofile and least-cost model was hired to develop an eco-network that promoted species conservation. A case study was also conducted in Beijing, China. In addition to the required ecosystem, habitat area is an important parameter for habitat extraction. Habitat area can remove noise habitat patches because of lacking area. Short-distance dispersal can be used to identify corridor requirements and avoid unnecessary building requirements. Species with various dispersal abilities exhibit significant differences in terms of corridor length and location requirement. Habitat isolation is the main threat for weakly mobile species, and habitat loss is the major risk of mobile species protection. Different species groups also exhibit distinct landscape pattern demands for an eco-network, and the eco-network planning based on specific species can not protect other species. We proposed that a combination of ecoprofile and least-cost model improved the efficiency of species conservation by eco-network planning.
  • [1] Adriaensen F, Chardon J P, De Blust G et al., 2003. The application of ‘least-cost’modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4): 233-247. doi:  10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6
    [2] Avril A, Léonard Y, Letty J et al., 2011. Natal dispersal of European hare in a high-density population. Mammalian Biology, 76(2): 148-156. doi:  10.1016/j.mambio.2010.07.001
    [3] Baker A. M, Mather P B, Hughes J M, 2001. Evidence for long-distance dispersal in a sedentary passerine, Gymnothina Tibicen (Artamidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72(2): 333-343. doi:  10.1006/bij1.2000.0483
    [4] Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2011. Beijing Statistic Book 2011. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
    [5] Barreto L, Ribeiro M C, Veldkamp A et al., 2010. Exploring effective conservation networks based on multi-scale planning unit analysis. A case study of the Balsas sub-basin, Maranhão State, Brazil. Ecological Indicators, 10(5): 1055-1063. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.03.001
    [6] Battisti C, Luiselli L, 2011. Selecting focal species in ecological network planning following an expert-based approach, Italian reptiles as a case study. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19(2): 126-130. doi:  10.1016/j.jnc.2010.10.001
    [7] Belisle M, 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity, the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology, 86(6): 1988-1995. doi:  10.1890/04-0923
    [8] Bernstein L, Bosch P, Canziani O et al., 2007. Climate Change 2007, Synthesis Report. Valencia: IPCC.
    [9] Bifolchi A, Lode T, 2005. Efficiency of conservation shortcuts, an investigation with otters as umbrella species. Biological Conservation, 126(4): 523-527. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005. 07.002
    [10] Brooker L, 2002. The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighborhood as a template. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(4): 185-210. doi:  10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00055-5
    [11] Brown J L, Morales V, Summers K, 2009. Home range size and location in relation to reproductive resources in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae): A Monte Carlo approach using GIS data. Animal Behaviour, 77(2): 547-554. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav. 2008.10.002
    [12] Cale P G, 2003. The influence of social behaviour, dispersal and landscape fragmentation on population structure in a sedentary bird. Biological Conservation, 109(2): 237-248. doi:  10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00152-0
    [13] Calvete C, Estrada R, 2004. Short-term survival and dispersal of translocated European wild rabbits. Improving the release protocol. Biological Conservation, 120(4): 507-516. doi:  10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.023
    [14] Charles T, Garten J, 1995. Dispersal of radioactivity by wildlife from contaminated sites in a forested landscape. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 29(2): 137-156. doi:  10.1016/0265-931X(94)00068-8
    [15] Chase M K, Kristan W B, Lynam A J et al., 2000. Single species as indicators of species richness and composition in California coastal sage scrub birds and small mammals. Conservation Biology, 14(2): 474-487. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000. 98312.x
    [16] Conceição K S, de Oliveira V M, 2010. Habitat fragmentation effects on biodiversity patterns. Physica A, 389(17): 3496-3502. doi:  10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.036
    [17] Devillard S, Aubineau J, Berger F et al., 2008. Home range of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in three contrasting French populations. Mammalian Biology, 73(2): 128-137. doi:  10.1016/j.mambio.2007.01.003
    [18] Driezena K, Adriaensen F, Rondinini C et al., 2007. Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecological Modelling, 209(2-4): 314-322. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.002
    [19] Fasola M, Hafner H, Kayser Y et al., 2002. Individual dispersal among colonies of Little Egrets Egretta garzetta. Ibis, 144(2): 192-199. doi:  10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00060.x
    [20] Fischer J, Lindenmayer D B, 2002. Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 106(1): 129-136. doi:  10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00241-5
    [21] Gardner J L, Magrath R D, Kokko H, 2003. Stepping stones of life, natal dispersal in the group-living but noncooperative speckled warbler. Animal Behaviour, 66: 521-530. doi:  10.1006/anbe.2003.2206
    [22] Griffin S C, Taper M L, Hoffman R et al., 2008. The case of the missing marmots: Are metapopulation dynamics or range-wide declines responsible? Biological Conservation, 141(5): 1293-1309. doi:  10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.001
    [23] Gurrutxaga M, Lozano P, Barrio G, 2010. GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(4): 318-326. doi:  10.1016/j.jnc.2010.01.005
    [24] Hepcan ?, Hepcan Ç C, Bouwma I M et al., 2009. Ecological networks as a new approach for nature conservation in Turkey: A case study of Izmir Province. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90(3): 143-154. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10. 023
    [25] Hong S K, Nakagoshi N, Fu B J et al., 2007. Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas-Linking Man and Nature Systems. The Netherlands: Springer, 57-69.
    [26] Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M, Suhonen J et al., 2011. Merging wildlife community ecology with animal behavioral ecology for a better urban landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4): 383-385. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2011.02.001
    [27] Jongman R H G, Külvik M, Kristiansen I, 2004. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(2-3): 305-319. doi:  10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00163-4
    [28] Knaapen J P, Scheffer M, Harms B, 1992. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 23(1): 1-16. doi:  10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D
    [29] Li Feng, Wang Rusong, Paulussen J et al., 2005. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles, a case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4): 325-336. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04. 002
    [30] Liu Yi, 2010. Study on Distribution Influncing Factors of Plant Diversity and Management in Beijing. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. (in Chinese)
    [31] Lookingbill T R, Elmore A J, Engelhardt K A M et al., 2010. Influence of wetland networks on bat activity in mixed-use landscapes. Biological Conservation, 143(4): 974-983. doi:  10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.011
    [32] McHugh N, Thompson S, 2011. A rapid ecological network assessment tool and its use in locating habitat extension areas in a changing landscape. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19(4): 236-244. doi:  10.1016/j.jnc.2011.02.002
    [33] Merckx T, Feber R E, Dulieu R L et al., 2009. Effect of field margins on moths depends on species mobility: Field-based evidence for landscape-scale conservation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 129(1-3): 302-309. doi:  10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.004
    [34] Nathan R, 2005. Long-distance dispersal research: Building a network of yellow brick roads. Diversity and Distributions, 11(2): 125-130. doi:  10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00159.x
    [35] Opdam P, Pouwels R, van Rooij S et al., 2008. Setting biodiversity targets in participatory regional planning: Introducing ecoprofiles. Ecology and Society, 13(1): 20-35.
    [36] Opdam P, Steingrover E, van Rooij S, 2006. Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(3-4): 322-332. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.015
    [37] Petit J N, Hoddle M S, Grandgirard J et al., 2008. Short-distance dispersal behavior and establishment of the parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in Tahiti: Implications for its use as a biological control agent against Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Biological Control, 45(3): 344-352. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01. 020
    [38] Pino J, Marull J, 2012. Ecological networks: Are they enough for connectivity conservation? A case study in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (NE Spain). Land Use Policy, 29(3): 684-690. doi:  10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.004
    [39] Rabinowitz A, Zeller K A, 2010. A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biological Conservation, 143(4): 939-945. doi:  10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.002
    [40] Roedenbeck I A, Voser P, 2008. Effects of roads on spatial distribution, abundance and mortality of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Switzerland. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54(3): 425-437. doi:  10.1007/s10344-007-0166-3
    [41] Sanderson E W, Redford K H, Vedder A et al., 2002. A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(1): 41-56. doi:  10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00231-6
    [42] Shrestha M K, York A M, Boone C G et al., 2012. Land fragmentation due to rapid urbanization in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area: Analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers. Applied Geography, 32(2): 522-531. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog. 2011.04.004
    [43] Silva M, Hartling L, Opps S B, 2005. Small mammals in agricultural landscapes of Prince Edward Island (Canada): Effects of habitat characteristics at three different spatial scales. Biological Conservation, 126(4): 556-568. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon. 2005.07.007
    [44] Solé R V, Alonso D, Saldaña J, 2004. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity collapse in neutral communities. Ecological Complexity, 1(1): 65-75. doi:  10.1016/j.ecocom.2003.12.003
    [45] Tweed E J, Foster J T, Woodworth B L et al., 2003. Survival, dispersal, and home-range establishment of reintroduced captive-bred puaiohi, Myadestes palmeri. Biological Conservation, 111(1): 1-9. doi:  10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00175-1
    [46] Uezu A, Metzger J P, Vielliard J M E, 2005. Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biological Conservation, 123(4): 507-519. doi:  10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.001
    [47] van Langevelde F, 2000. Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations. Ecography, 23(5): 614-622. doi:  10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230512.x
    [48] Vogt P, Ferrari J R, Lookingbill T R et al., 2009. Mapping functional connectivity. Ecological Indicator, 9(1): 64-71. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.011
    [49] Vos C C, Verboom J, Opdam P F M et al., 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. The American Naturalist, 183(1): 24-41. doi:  10.1086/317004
    [50] Vuilleumier S, Prelaz-Droux R, 2002. Map of ecological networks for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2-4): 157-170. doi:  10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00218-3
    [51] Wiktander U, Olsson O, Nilsson S G, 2001. Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the lesser spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden. Biological Conservation, 100(3): 387-395. doi:  10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00045-3
    [52] Yamaura Y, Ikeno S, Sano M et al., 2009. Bird responses to broad-leaved forest patch area in a plantation landscape across seasons. Biological Conservation, 142(10): 2155-2165. doi:  10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.015
    [53] Young A J, Oosthuizen M K, Lutermann H et al., 2010. Physiological suppression eases in Damaraland mole-rat societies when ecological constraints on dispersal are relaxed. Hormones and Behavior, 57(2): 177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh. 2009.10.011
    [54] Yu Kongjian., Wang Sisi, Li Dihua et al., 2009. The function of ecological security patterns as an urban growth framework in Beijing. Acta Ecological Sinica, 29(3): 1189-1204. (in Chinese)
    [55] Zetterberg A, Mörtberg U M, Balfors B, 2010. Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(4): 181-191. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.002
    [56] Zhang Liquan, Wang Haizhen, 2006. Planning an ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4): 449-456. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.004
    [57] Zhang Tielou, Tian Hengjiu, Shi Yang et al., 2009. Studies on migration patterns and monitoring method of the water birds in Beijing. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 28(6): 889-892. (in Chinese)
    [58] Zhang Zhiming, Zhang Linyuan, Hu Yuan et al., 2003. Urban ecology and wildlife conservation and management in Beijing. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2(1): 40-44. (in Chinese)
  • [1] ZHAO Meifeng, LIU Shenghe, QI Wei.  Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Mechanism of Medical Care Accessibility in Beijing: A Migrant Equality Perspective . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(2): 353-362. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0950-x
    [2] GUO Peipei, SU Yuebo, WAN Wuxing, LIU Weiwei, ZHANG Hongxing, SUN Xu, OUYANG Zhiyun, WANG Xiaoke.  Urban Plant Diversity in Relation to Land Use Types in Built-up Areas of Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 100-110. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0934-x
    [3] LI Jiaming, ZHANG Wenzhong, YU Jianhui, CHEN Hongxia.  Industrial Spatial Agglomeration Using Distance-based Approach in Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(6): 698-712. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0770-1
    [4] WANG Wenjie, ZHENG Hua, XU Chao, JIANG Weiguo, DU Yunhui, WANG Wei, ZHANG Zhe, LIU Xiaofu.  Spatial Correlation and Ecological Characteristics Analysis of Management Area for Biodiversity Conservation and Relevant Regionalization . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(1): 71-82. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0657-6
    [5] YANG Zhenshan, LIANG Jinshe, CAI Jianming.  Urban Economic Cluster Template and Its Dynamics of Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(6): 740-750. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0686-1
    [6] LIU Shiliang, DENG Li, CHEN Liding, LI Junran, DONG Shikui, ZHAO Haidi.  Landscape Network Approach to Assess Ecological Impacts of Road Projects on Biological Conservation . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(1): 5-14. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0651-z
    [7] LUO Shanghua, MAO Qizheng, MA Keming.  Comparison on Soil Carbon Stocks Between Urban and Suburban Topsoil in Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(5): 551-561. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0709-y
    [8] ZHANG Xiaoping, HUANG Pingting, SUN Lei, WANG Zhaohong.  Spatial Evolution and Locational Determinants of High-tech Industries in Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(2): 249-260.
    [9] Ben DERUDDER, Peter J TAYLOR, Michael HOYLER, NI Pengfei, LIU Xingjian, ZHAO Miaoxi, SHEN Wei, Frank WITLOX.  Measurement and Interpretation of Connectivity of Chinese Cities in World City Network, 2010 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(3): 261-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0604-y
    [10] ZHAO Ying, CHAI Yanwei.  Residents’ Activity-travel Behavior Variation by Communities in Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(4): 492-505. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0616-7
    [11] KUANG Wenhui.  Spatio-temporal Patterns of Intra-urban Land Use Change in Beijing, China Between 1984 and 2008 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(2): 210-220.
    [12] CAO Guangzhong, LIU Tao, LIU Hui, MIAO Yangbing.  Changing Spatial and Structural Patterns of Non-agricultural Activities in Outward-moving Beijing Urban Fringe . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(6): 718-729.
    [13] ZHU Lin, CHEN Yun, GONG Huili, et al..  Economic Value Evaluation of Wetland Service in Yeyahu Wetland Nature Reserve, Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(6): 744-752.
    [14] XIAO Yu, AN Kai, XIE Gaodi, LU Chunxia, ZHANG Biao.  Carbon Sequestration in Forest Vegetation of Beijing at Sublot Level . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(3): 279-289.
    [15] HE Yan, CHEN Tian, ZHANG Meng.  Utilization Pattern of Olympic Parks and Its Application in Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(5): 414-422. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0415-3
    [16] XIE Gaodi, LI Wenhua, XIAO Yu, ZHANG Biao, LU Chunxia, AN Kai, WANG Jixing, XU Kang, WANG Jinzeng.  Forest Ecosystem Services and Their Values in Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(1): 51-58. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0051-y
    [17] CHAI Yanwei, SHEN Jie, LONG Tao.  Downtown Retailing Development Under Suburbanization——A Case Study of Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0001-5
    [18] SUN Tie-shan, LI Guo-ping, LU Ming-hua.  STUDY ON BEIJING'S EMERGING MOBILE COMMUNICATION INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER AND ITS POLICY IMPLICATIONS . Chinese Geographical Science, 2003, 13(2): 104-111.
    [19] 张佳华, 孔昭宸.  STUDY ON VEGETATION AND CLIMATE CHANGES IN BEIJING REGION SINCE LATE PLEISTOCENE . Chinese Geographical Science, 1999, 9(3): 243-249.
    [20] 杨开忠.  BASIC FEATURES AND TRENDS OF THE ECONOMIC BASE OF BEIJING . Chinese Geographical Science, 1999, 9(1): 12-19.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  275
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  788
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-04-18
  • 修回日期:  2013-08-16
  • 刊出日期:  2014-01-06

Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning

doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271198)
    通讯作者: YU Zhenrong,yuzhr@cau.edu.cn

摘要: The protecting requirements and functional connectivity of species in isolated habitat patches are crucial factors of eco-network planning. This study aimed to improve the method of eco-network planning for species conservation. Ecoprofiling was used to group the species by similar behavior types, namely, choice of ecosystem, area requirement, and short distance dispersal abilities. A least-cost model was used to simulate the optimal corridor location to maintain functional connectivity. A combination of ecoprofile and least-cost model was hired to develop an eco-network that promoted species conservation. A case study was also conducted in Beijing, China. In addition to the required ecosystem, habitat area is an important parameter for habitat extraction. Habitat area can remove noise habitat patches because of lacking area. Short-distance dispersal can be used to identify corridor requirements and avoid unnecessary building requirements. Species with various dispersal abilities exhibit significant differences in terms of corridor length and location requirement. Habitat isolation is the main threat for weakly mobile species, and habitat loss is the major risk of mobile species protection. Different species groups also exhibit distinct landscape pattern demands for an eco-network, and the eco-network planning based on specific species can not protect other species. We proposed that a combination of ecoprofile and least-cost model improved the efficiency of species conservation by eco-network planning.

English Abstract

XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
引用本文: XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
Citation: XIAO He, LIU Yunhui, YU Zhenrong, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Xin. Combination of Ecoprofile and Least-cost Model for Eco-network Planning[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 113-125. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0660-y
参考文献 (58)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回