留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China

LIU Xuling YANG Zhaoping DI Feng CHEN Xuegang

LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
引用本文: LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
Citation: LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z

Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
基金项目: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.40671057);Knowledge Innovation Pro-grams of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.KZCX3-SW-355)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    YANG Zhaoping.E-mail:yangzp@ms.xjb.ac.cn

Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.40671057);Knowledge Innovation Pro-grams of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.KZCX3-SW-355)
  • 摘要: The nature heritages are the precious legacy of nature with outstanding scientific and aesthetic value. They are quite different from other common ecotourism areas, because of its original and unique system, sensitive and vulnerable landscape, and peripheral cultural features. Therefore, the tourism development in the nature heritage sites should be on the premise of ecological security. The evaluation index system of tourism ecological security in nature heritage sites was constructed in this article by AHP and Delphi methods, including nature ecological security, landscape visual security and local culture ecological security, and the security thresholds of indices were also established. In the indices' weights of the evaluation model, the nature ecological security ranked the highest, followed by tourist landscape visual security and culture ecological security, which reflected the influence degree of the limited factor to tourism ecological security. Then, this paper carried out an empirical study of Kanas of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, which has the potential to be the World Nature Heritage. On the basis of the data attained from survey and observation on the spot, as well as questionnaire answered by tourists and local communities, the ecological security status in Kanas was evaluated. The result showed that the status of Kanas tourism ecological security was better, but there had some limiting factors. Lastly, effective measures were put forward to ensure its ecological security.
  • [1] Cao Xinxiang,2006.Ecological security evaluation of tourism destination based on ecological footprint analyses-A case of Kaifeng City.China Population,Resources and Environment,16(2):70-75.(in Chinese)
    [2] Cao Xinxiang,Chen Taizheng,Wang Weihong,2006.Ecological security evaluation of tourism destination——A case of Kaifeng City.Research of Soil and Water Conservation,13(2):149-152.(in Chinese)
    [3] Cheng Daopin,He Ping,Zhang Heping,2004.Establishment and valuation of the index system for the sample area of national ecotourism.Journal of Central South Forestry University,24(2):28-33.(in Chinese)
    [4] Costanza R,d'Arge R,de Groot R et al.,1997.The value of the world's ecosystem service and natural capital.Nature,387(15):253-260.DOI:10.1038/387253a0
    [5] Dong Xuewang,2003.Ecological security evaluation of tourist destinations——A case of Wudalianchi National Park Natural Science Journal of Harbin Normal University,19(6):100-105.(in Chinese)
    [6] Dong Xuewang,2004.Ecological security evaluation of Jingpohu National Park.Territory & Natural Resources Study,2:74——76.(in Chinese)
    [7] Gong Zixian,2006.Research on Ecotourism Development in Emei World Nature Heritage.Chengdu:Chengdu Engineering University.(in Chinese)
    [8] Lee D N B,Snepenger D J,1992.An ecotourism assessment of Tortuguero,Costa Rica.Annals of Tourism Research,19:367-370.DOI:10.1016/0160-7383(92)90092-4
    [9] Liu Yang,Lv Yihe,Chen Liding et al.,2005.The impact assessment of ecotourism in nature reserves:Progress and implications.Journal of Natural Resources,20(5):771-779.(in Chinese)
    [10] Lu Xiaoli,Wu Chunyou,Xiao Guirong,2006.Fuzzy synthetic evaluation on resident's perceptions of tourism impacts——Case of Jiuzhaigou National Park,Sichuan Province,China.Chinese Geographical Science,16(1):87-95.DOI:10.1007/s11769-006-0028-z
    [11] Ministry of Forestry of P.R.China,1995.Standard for Forest Parks Design (LY/T5132-95).http://www.chinafpark.net/flfg/more.aspx?id=80.(in Chinese)
    [12] National Tourism Administration of P.R.China,2003.Division and Evaluation on the Quality of Tourism Scenic Areas (GB/T17775-2003).http://www.cnta.gov.cn/html/2008-6/2008-6-27-20-31-36-5.html.(in Chinese)
    [13] Ross S,Wall G,1999a.Ecotourism:Towards congruence between theory and practice.Tourism Management,20:123-132.DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00098-3
    [14] Ross S,Wall G,1999b.Evaluating ecotourism:The case of North Sulawesi,Indonesia.Tourism Management,20:673-82.DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00040-0
    [15] SEPA (State Environmental Protection Administration of P.R.China),1994.Evaluation Index System of Environmental Impact of Resources Development in Mountain Scenic Area (HJ/T6-94).http://www.sepa.gov.cn/image20010518/5608.pdf.(in Chinese)
    [16] SEPA,1996a.Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB 3095-1996).http://www.mep.gov.cn/image20010518/5298.pdf.(in Chinese)
    [17] SEPA,1996b.Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard (GB 8978-1996).http://www.sepa.gov.cn/tech/hjbz/bzwb/shjbh/swrwpfbz/199801/W020061027521858212955.pdf.(in Chinese)
    [18] SEPA,1998.Acceptance Criteria of National Ecological Demonstration Zones.http://www.sepa.gov.cn/image20010518/6300.pdf.(in Chinese)
    [19] SEPA,2002.Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water (GB 3838-2002).http://www.sepa.gov,en/tech/hjbz/bzwb/shjbh/shjzlbz/200206/W020061027509896672057.pdf.(in Chinese)
    [20] SEPA,2003.Construction Index of Ecological County,Municipality and Province (Trial Implementation).http://www.zhb.gov.cn/image20010518/6304.pdf.(in Chinese)
    [21] Simon F J G,Narangajavana Y,Marques D P,2004.Carrying capacity in the tourism industry:A case study of Hengistbury Head.Tourism Management,25:275-283,DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00089-X
    [22] Sun Yujun,Wang Rusong,2000.Environment capacity of ecotourism resort.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,11(4):564-566.(in Chinese)
    [23] Wang Liangjian,2001.On the indicator system of sustainable development of tourism and the evaluating method.Tourism Tribune,16(1):67-70.(in Chinese)
    [24] Yang Zhaoping,Zhang Xiaolei,2000.Study on eco-tourism and sustainable development in nature reserve-A case of Khanas Nature Reserve.Scientia Geographica Sinica,20(5):450-454.(in Chinese)
    [25] Yu Kongjian,1996.Security patterns and surface model in landscape planning.Landscape and Urban Planning,36(5):1-17.DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00331-3
    [26] Yu Kongjian,1999.Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation.Acta Ecologica Sinica,19(1):8-15.(in Chinese)
    [27] Zhang Zheng,Zhang Jianwen,Li Yinnian et al.,1999.Indicators for wetland ecological assessment.Rural Environment Protection,18(6):283-285.(in Chinese)
    [28] Zheng Yunwen,Xue Dayuan,Zhang Gengsheng,1994.A study on evaluation criteria for effective management of natural reserves in China.Rural Eco-environment,10(3):22-25.(in Chinese)
    [29] Zhou Nianxing,Lin Zhenshan,Huang Zhenfang et al.,2008.Tourist ecological footprint and eco-efficiency on Nanji Archipelago.Scientia Geographica Sinica,28(4):571-578.(in Chinese)
  • [1] Fengjiao SONG, Shijie WANG, Xiaoyong BAI, Luhua WU, Jinfeng WANG, Chaojun LI, Huan CHEN, Xuling LUO, Huipeng XI, Sirui ZHANG, Guofeng LUO, Mengqi YAN, Qingqing ZHEN.  A New Indicator for Global Food Security Assessment: Harvested Area Rather Than Cropland Area . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(2): 204-217. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1264-6
    [2] YIN Jingbo, LI Hong, WANG Dongyan, LIU Shuhan.  Optimization of Rural Settlement Distributions Based On the Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study of Da'an City in Jilin Province of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(5): 824-838. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1128-x
    [3] CAO Yuhong, LIU Meiyun, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Chen, CAO Weidong.  Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 1052-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6
    [4] WAN Rongrong, YANG Guishan, DAI Xue, ZHANG Yanhui, LI Bing.  Water Security-based Hydrological Regime Assessment Method for Lakes with Extreme Seasonal Water Level Fluctuations: A Case Study of Poyang Lake, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(3): 456-469. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0958-2
    [5] LIU Shiliang, DENG Li, CHEN Liding, LI Junran, DONG Shikui, ZHAO Haidi.  Landscape Network Approach to Assess Ecological Impacts of Road Projects on Biological Conservation . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(1): 5-14. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0651-z
    [6] Shen Zehao, Wang Yanglin, Fu Bojie.  Corridors and Networks in Landscape:Structure, Functions and Ecological Effects . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(1): 1-4. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0668-3
    [7] GONG Huili, MENG Dan, LI Xiaojuan, ZHU Feng.  Soil Degradation and Food Security Coupled with Global Climate Change in Northeastern China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(5): 562-573. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0626-5
    [8] CHENG Shaowen, ZHANG Jie, LU Shaojing, et al..  Influence of Tourists′ Environmental Tropisms on Their Attitudes to Tourism and Nature Conservation in Natural Tourist Destinations: A Case Study of Jiuzhaigou National Park in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(3): 377-384.
    [9] DI Feng, YANG Zhaoping, LIU Xuling, WU Jingrui, MA Zhongguo.  Estimation on Aesthetic Value of Tourist Landscapes in a Natural Heritage Site:Kanas National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(1): 59-65. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0059-3
    [10] CHEN Liding, TIAN Huiying, FU Bojie, ZHAO Xinfeng.  Development of a New Index for Integrating Landscape Patterns with Ecological Processes at Watershed Scale . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(1): 37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0037-9
    [11] JIA Peihong, CHEN Yunzhen, MA Jinsong, ZHU Dakui.  Digital Watermark-based Security Technology for Geo-spatial Graphics Data . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(3): 276-281.
    [12] YU Bohua, LU Changhe.  Change of Cultivated Land and Its Implications on Food Security in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(4): 299-305.
    [13] WANG Zhi-qiang, ZHANG Bai, YANG Guang, WANG Zong-ming, ZHANG Shu-qing.  RESPONSES OF WETLAND ECO-SECURITY TO LAND USE CHANGE IN WESTERN JILIN PROVINCE, CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2005, 15(4): 330-336.
    [14] ZHANG Lei, JIANG Wei.  ISSUES ON CHINA'S ENERGY SECURITY . Chinese Geographical Science, 2005, 15(1): 1-6.
    [15] WU Kai-ya, HU Shu-heng, SUN Shi-qun.  APPLICATION OF FUZZY OPTIMIZATION MODEL IN ECOLOGICAL SECURITY PRE-WARNING . Chinese Geographical Science, 2005, 15(1): 29-33.
    [16] LIAO Chi-mei, LI Lan, YAN Zhi-qiang, HU Bao-qing.  ECOLOGICAL SECURITY EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN KARST MOUNTAINOUS AREA—A Case Study of Du'an Yao Autonomous County in Guangxi . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(2): 142-147.
    [17] ZANG Shu-ying, YUAN Hui, NING Jing.  THE LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING IN THE CONTROL WATERSHED BY RESERVOIR OF ERLONG MOUNTAIN . Chinese Geographical Science, 2002, 12(2): 176-181.
    [18] XIAO Du-ning.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION IN RURAL CHINA: THEORY AND APPLICATION . Chinese Geographical Science, 2001, 11(2): 104-114.
    [19] 刘惠清, 许嘉巍, 吴秀芹.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION AND BIODIVERSITY PROTECTION . Chinese Geographical Science, 1999, 9(4): 377-382.
    [20] 戴凡, 保继刚.  THE SOCIAL IMPACTS OF TOURISM──A Case Study in Dali, Yunnan Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 1996, 6(2): 132-144.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1180
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  996
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2008-08-19
  • 修回日期:  2009-02-18
  • 刊出日期:  2009-09-20

Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
    基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.40671057);Knowledge Innovation Pro-grams of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.KZCX3-SW-355)
    通讯作者: YANG Zhaoping.E-mail:yangzp@ms.xjb.ac.cn

摘要: The nature heritages are the precious legacy of nature with outstanding scientific and aesthetic value. They are quite different from other common ecotourism areas, because of its original and unique system, sensitive and vulnerable landscape, and peripheral cultural features. Therefore, the tourism development in the nature heritage sites should be on the premise of ecological security. The evaluation index system of tourism ecological security in nature heritage sites was constructed in this article by AHP and Delphi methods, including nature ecological security, landscape visual security and local culture ecological security, and the security thresholds of indices were also established. In the indices' weights of the evaluation model, the nature ecological security ranked the highest, followed by tourist landscape visual security and culture ecological security, which reflected the influence degree of the limited factor to tourism ecological security. Then, this paper carried out an empirical study of Kanas of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, which has the potential to be the World Nature Heritage. On the basis of the data attained from survey and observation on the spot, as well as questionnaire answered by tourists and local communities, the ecological security status in Kanas was evaluated. The result showed that the status of Kanas tourism ecological security was better, but there had some limiting factors. Lastly, effective measures were put forward to ensure its ecological security.

English Abstract

LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
引用本文: LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
Citation: LIU Xuling, YANG Zhaoping, DI Feng, CHEN Xuegang. Evaluation on Tourism Ecological Security in Nature Heritage Sites——Case of Kanas Nature Reserve of Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(3): 265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0265-z
参考文献 (29)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回