Volume 29 Issue 2
Apr.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

SONG Wen, WU Kening, ZHAO Huafu, ZHAO Rui, LI Ting. Arrangement of High-standard Basic Farmland Construction Based on Village-region Cultivated Land Quality Uniformity[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 325-340. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1011-1
Citation: SONG Wen, WU Kening, ZHAO Huafu, ZHAO Rui, LI Ting. Arrangement of High-standard Basic Farmland Construction Based on Village-region Cultivated Land Quality Uniformity[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 325-340. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1011-1

Arrangement of High-standard Basic Farmland Construction Based on Village-region Cultivated Land Quality Uniformity

doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1011-1
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Science and Technology Support Program of China (No. 2015BAD06B01)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: WU Kening
  • Received Date: 2017-11-10
  • Publish Date: 2019-04-01
  • As an important constitute of land consolidation, high-standard basic farmland construction is an important means to protect the quantity, quality and ecological environment of cultivated land. Its target not only lies in the increase of cultivated land quantity, but also the improvement of cultivated land quality, agricultural production conditions and ecosystem environments. In the present study, the quality evaluation method and construction arrangement of cultivated land were explored to facilitate the process of decision-making and implementation for high-standard basic farmland construction (HSBFC) with administrative village as the unit. Taking the land comprehensive improvement project area in Quzhou County, Handan City, Hebei Province as a case study, the whole process of the study comprised of three steps:1) establishment of the evaluation model of cultivated land quality uniformity based on regional optimum cultivated land quality, and construction of the uniformity evaluation index system from the aspects of soil fertility quality, engineering quality, spatial quality and eco-environment quality, according to the new concept of cultivated land quality; 2) calculation of cultivated land quality uniformity by grading indicators, assigning scores and weighting sums, exploring the local homogenization characteristics of regional cultivated land quality through spatial autocorrelation analysis, and analyzing the constraints and transformative potential of barrier factors; 3) arrangement of HSBFC according to the principle of concentration, continuity and priority to the easy operation. The results revealed that the value of farmland quality uniformity for the administrative villages in the study area was between 7.76 and 21.96, and there was a difference between various administrative villages. The regional spatial autocorrelation patterns included High-High (HH), Low-Low (LL), High-Low (HL) and Low-High (LH). These indicate that regional cultivated land quality has local homogenization characteristics. The most restrictive factors in the study area were the medium and low transformation difficulty indexes, including soil organic matter content, farmland shelterbelt network density, field regularity and scale of the field. In addition, there were also high transformation difficulty indicators in some areas, such as sectional configuration. The project area was divided into four partitions:major construction area, secondary construction area, general construction area, and conditional construction area. The cultivated land area of each subarea was 1538.85 ha, 1224.27 ha, 555.93 ha, and 1666.63 ha, respectively. This comprised of 30.87%, 24.56%, 11.15% and 33.42% of the total project area, respectively. The evaluation model and index system could satisfy the evaluation of farmland quality and diagnosis of obstacle factors to facilitate the subsequent construction decision. The present study provides reference for the practice of regional HSBFC, and a new feasible idea and method for related studies.
  • [1] Anselin L, 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2):93-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
    [2] Bendel R B, Higgins S S, Teberg J E et al., 1989. Comparison of skewness coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Gini coeffi-cient as inequality measures within populations. Oecologia, 78(3):394-400. doi: 10.1007/BF00379115
    [3] Cay T, Uyan M, 2013. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Land Use Policy, 30(1):541-548. doi:10.1016/j. landusepol.2012.04.023
    [4] Chen Yinjun, Xiao Bilin, Fang Linna et al., 2011. The quality analysis of cultivated land in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44(17):3557-3564. (in Chinese)
    [5] Coelho J C, Pinto P A, da Silva L M, 2001. A systems approach for the estimation of the effects of land consolidation projects (LCPs):a model and its application. Agricultural Systems, 68(3):179-195. doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00061-5
    [6] Crecente R, Alvarez C, Fra U, 2002. Economic, social and envi-ronmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia. Land Use Policy, 19(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00006-6
    [7] Cui Yong, Liu Zhiwei, 2014. A GIS-based approach for suitability evaluation of high standard primary farmland consolidation:a case from Huairou in Beijing. China Land Sciences, 28(9):76-81, 94. (in Chinese)
    [8] Cui J X, Kong X S, Liu Y F et al., 2016. Spatio-temporal variation of agricultural land consolidation in china:case study of Huangshi, Hubei Province. Journal of Maps, 12(S1):493-497. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2016.1195293
    [9] Demetriou D, Stillwell J, See L, 2012. Land consolidation in Cyprus:why is an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System required? Land Use Policy, 29(1):131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.012
    [10] Ding Yingxiang, Jiang Shengrong, Luan Yiling et al., 1993. Landscape ecological analyses on the spacial structure of shelterbelts. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 17(2):7-12. (in Chinese)
    [11] Du Guoming, Liu Yansui, Yu Fengrong et al., 2016. Evolution of concepts of cultivated land quality and recognition. Transac-tions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(14):243-249. (in Chinese)
    [12] Feng Rui, Wu Kening, Wang Qian, 2012. Time sequence and mode partition of high-standard prime farmland construction in Zhongjiang county, Sichuan province. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(22):243-251. (in Chinese)
    [13] Friedman S K, Reich P B, Frelich L E, 2001. Multiple scale composition and spatial distribution patterns of the north-eastern Minnesota presettlement forest. Journal of Ecology, 89(4):538-554. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001. 00578.x
    [14] Guo Li'na, Zhang Fengrong, Qu Yanbo et al., 2010. Farmland consolidation type zoning based on combination of grading factors. Transactions of the CSAE, 26(9):308-314. (in Chi-nese)
    [15] Huang Y F, Leung Y, 2009. Measuring regional inequality:a comparison of coefficient of variation and hoover concentration index. The Open Geography Journal, 2:25-34. doi:10. 2174/1874453200902010025
    [16] Jiang G H, Wang X P, Yun W J et al., 2015. A new system will lead to an optimal path of land consolidation spatial management in China. Land Use Policy, 42:27-37. doi:10.1016/j. landusepol.2014.07.005
    [17] Kachanoski R G, de Jong E, 1988. Scale dependence and the temporal persistence of spatial patterns of soil water storage. Water Resources Research, 24(1):85-91. doi:10.1029/WR 024i001p00085
    [18] Kong Xiangbin, Li Cuizhen, Zhao Jing et al., 2010. Method and empirical research on the realization degree of arable land production capacity at town level. Transactions of the CSAE, 26(12):345-351. (in Chinese)
    [19] Kong X S, Liu Y L, Liu X J et al., 2014. Thematic maps for land consolidation planning in Hubei Province, China. Journal of Maps, 10(1):26-34. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2013.847388
    [20] Li Ziliang, Wang Shutao, Zhang Li et al., 2010. Spatial pattern of cultivated land productivity in rapid economic development re-gion. Transactions of the CSAE, 26(11):323-331. (in Chinese)
    [21] Lilburne L, Sparling G, Schipper L, 2004. Soil quality monitoring in New Zealand:development of an interpretative framework. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 104(3):535-544. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.020
    [22] Liu Y S, Fang F, Li Y H, 2014. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy, 40:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.013
    [23] Liu Youzhao, Ma Xin, Xu Mao, 2003. Preliminary study on the early warning of cultivated land quality. China Land Science, 17(6):9-12. (in Chinese)
    [24] Lyu Zhenyu. 2015. Study on the Evaluation, Effects, and Consol-idation of Cultivated Land Fragmentation-An Empirical Analysis Based on Quzhou County. Beijing:China Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
    [25] Moran P A P, 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1-2):17-23. doi: 10.2307/2332142
    [26] Niu Xinsheng, Wang Shaolei, Lyu Zhenyu et al., 2014. Effect of arable land fragmentation on farmland-forest network at village level in typical agricultural regions of North China Plain-A case of Quzhou County, Hebei Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 22(4):447-455. (in Chinese)
    [27] Ozdemir M S, 2005. Validity and inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 161(3):707-720. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.099
    [28] Pan Yuchun, Liu Qiaoqin, Lu Zhou et al., 2009. Regional arable land consolidation based on agricultural land classification and gradation. Transactions of the CSAE, 25(S2):260-266. (in Chinese)
    [29] Qian Fengkui, Wang Qiubing, Li Na, 2015. High-standard prime farmland planning based on evaluation of farmland quality and site conditions. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agri-cultural Engineering, 31(18):225-232. (in Chinese)
    [30] Qu Yanbo, Zhang Fengrong, Guo Li'na et al., 2012. Estimation of farmland quality after rural residential land consolidation and its application. Transactions of the CSAE, 28(2):226-233. (in Chinese)
    [31] Reeves D W, 1997. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 43(1-2):131-167. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(97) 00038-X
    [32] Shao J A, Wei C F, Xie D T et al., 2006. Integrated indica-tors-based gradation of cultivated land quality in mountainous region of Southwestern China. Journal of Mountain Science, 3(3):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s11629-006-0259-6
    [33] Shao Jingan, Ge Xiaofeng, Wei Chaofu et al., 2007. Classification and gradation of cultivated land quality in Bishan County of Chongqing, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 17(1):82-91. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0082-1
    [34] Shen Renfang, Chen Meijun, Kong Xiangbin et al., 2012. Con-ception and evaluation of quality of arable land and strategies for its management. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 49(6):1210-1217. (in Chinese)
    [35] Sun Yu, Gao Ming, Mo Jianbing et al., 2016. Construction area division of high-standard primary farmland in the Southwest Hilly Area:a case study in Tongliang, Chongqing. China Land Sciences, 30(3):20-28, 87. (in Chinese)
    [36] Tang X M, Pan Y C, Liu Y, 2017. Analysis and demonstration of investment implementation model and paths for China's culti-vated land consolidation. Applied Geography, 82:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.002
    [37] Tang Xiumei, Pan Yuchun, Liu Yu et al., 2014. Layout and mode partition of high-standard basic farmland construction at county level based on four-quadrant method. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(13):238-246. (in Chinese)
    [38] Touriño J, Parapar J, Doallo R et al., 2003. Research article:a GIS-embedded system to support land consolidation plans in Galicia. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(4):377-396. doi: 10.1080/1365881031000072636
    [39] Tu Jianjun, Lu Debin, 2012. Consolidation area delimitation for supplemental prime farmland based on GIS and combined quality assessment model. Transactions of the CSAE, 28(2):234-238. (in Chinese)
    [40] Tyler M, Hunter L, Steiner F et al., 1987. Use of agricultural land evaluation and site assessment in Whitman County, Washington, USA. Environmental Management, 11(3):407-412. doi: 10.1007/BF01867169
    [41] Van Huylenbroeck G, Coelho J C, Pinto P A, 1996. Evaluation of land consolidation projects (LCPs):a multidisciplinary ap-proach. Journal of Rural Studies, 12(3):297-310. doi:10. 1016/0743-0167(96)00024-1
    [42] Wang Feng, Dong Yuxiang, 2015. Dynamic evaluation of land use functions based on grey relation projection method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators:a case study of guangzhou city. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(10):1698-1713. (in Chinese)
    [43] Wang Xinpan, Jiang Guanghui, Zhang Ruijuan et al., 2013. Zoning approach of suitable areas for high quality capital farmland construction. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricul-tural Engineering, 29(10):241-250. (in Chinese)
    [44] Wei Shichuan, Xiong Changsheng, Luan Qiaolin et al., 2014. Protection zoning of arable land quality index based on local spatial autocorrelation. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(18):249-256. (in Chinese)
    [45] Xiong Changsheng, Wei Shichuan, Luan Qiaolin et al., 2014. Spatial pattern disparity and cultivated land quality based on Moran's I analysis. Resources Science, 36(10):2066-2074. (in Chinese)
    [46] Xiong Changsheng, Tan Rong, Yue Wenze, 2015. Zoning of high standard farmland construction based on local indicators of spatial association. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Ag-ricultural Engineering, 31(22):276-284. (in Chinese)
    [47] Xue Jian, Han Juan, Zhang Fengrong et al., 2014. Development of evaluation model and determination of its construction sequence for well-facilitied capital farmland. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(5):193-203. (in Chi-nese)
    [48] Zhai Xiaoqing, Su Li, Pei Jiubo et al., 2015. Subarea utilization of cultivated land and zoning of its high-standard farmland con-struction in Liaoning Province. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 46(5):1056-1062. (in Chinese)
    [49] Zhang Zhengfeng, Zhao Wei, 2006. Arable land consolidation potentiality evaluation based on fuzzy evaluation theory in Daxing District in Beijing. Transactions of the CSAE, 22(2):83-88. (in Chinese)
    [50] Zhang Zhong, Lei Guoping, Zhang Hui et al., 2014. Time sequence analysis of high-standard basic farmland construction in 853 Farm of Heilongjiang Province. Economic Geography, 34(6):155-161. (in Chinese)
    [51] Zhang Z F, Yan J M, Zhao W W et al., 2013. An evaluation system for arable land consolidation potential and its application in China. Outlook on Agriculture, 42(4):265-272. doi:10. 5367/oa.2013.0147
    [52] Zhao Suxia, Niu Haipeng, Zhang Hanwei et al., 2016. Suitability evaluation on high quality capital farmland consolidation based on niche-fitness model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(12):220-228. (in Chinese)
    [53] Zhong Yi, Chen Chao, Jiang Suhui, 2012. Some thoughts on the high-standard basic farmland construction. Land & Resources Herald, (6):86-87. (in Chinese)
    [54] Zhu Chuanmin, Hao Jinmin, Chen Li et al., 2015. Well-facilitied capital farmland construction based on cultivated land com-prehensive quality. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Ag-ricultural Engineering, 31(8):233-242. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(320) PDF downloads(238) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Arrangement of High-standard Basic Farmland Construction Based on Village-region Cultivated Land Quality Uniformity

doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1011-1
Funds:  Under the auspices of National Science and Technology Support Program of China (No. 2015BAD06B01)
    Corresponding author: WU Kening

Abstract: As an important constitute of land consolidation, high-standard basic farmland construction is an important means to protect the quantity, quality and ecological environment of cultivated land. Its target not only lies in the increase of cultivated land quantity, but also the improvement of cultivated land quality, agricultural production conditions and ecosystem environments. In the present study, the quality evaluation method and construction arrangement of cultivated land were explored to facilitate the process of decision-making and implementation for high-standard basic farmland construction (HSBFC) with administrative village as the unit. Taking the land comprehensive improvement project area in Quzhou County, Handan City, Hebei Province as a case study, the whole process of the study comprised of three steps:1) establishment of the evaluation model of cultivated land quality uniformity based on regional optimum cultivated land quality, and construction of the uniformity evaluation index system from the aspects of soil fertility quality, engineering quality, spatial quality and eco-environment quality, according to the new concept of cultivated land quality; 2) calculation of cultivated land quality uniformity by grading indicators, assigning scores and weighting sums, exploring the local homogenization characteristics of regional cultivated land quality through spatial autocorrelation analysis, and analyzing the constraints and transformative potential of barrier factors; 3) arrangement of HSBFC according to the principle of concentration, continuity and priority to the easy operation. The results revealed that the value of farmland quality uniformity for the administrative villages in the study area was between 7.76 and 21.96, and there was a difference between various administrative villages. The regional spatial autocorrelation patterns included High-High (HH), Low-Low (LL), High-Low (HL) and Low-High (LH). These indicate that regional cultivated land quality has local homogenization characteristics. The most restrictive factors in the study area were the medium and low transformation difficulty indexes, including soil organic matter content, farmland shelterbelt network density, field regularity and scale of the field. In addition, there were also high transformation difficulty indicators in some areas, such as sectional configuration. The project area was divided into four partitions:major construction area, secondary construction area, general construction area, and conditional construction area. The cultivated land area of each subarea was 1538.85 ha, 1224.27 ha, 555.93 ha, and 1666.63 ha, respectively. This comprised of 30.87%, 24.56%, 11.15% and 33.42% of the total project area, respectively. The evaluation model and index system could satisfy the evaluation of farmland quality and diagnosis of obstacle factors to facilitate the subsequent construction decision. The present study provides reference for the practice of regional HSBFC, and a new feasible idea and method for related studies.

SONG Wen, WU Kening, ZHAO Huafu, ZHAO Rui, LI Ting. Arrangement of High-standard Basic Farmland Construction Based on Village-region Cultivated Land Quality Uniformity[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 325-340. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1011-1
Citation: SONG Wen, WU Kening, ZHAO Huafu, ZHAO Rui, LI Ting. Arrangement of High-standard Basic Farmland Construction Based on Village-region Cultivated Land Quality Uniformity[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(2): 325-340. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-1011-1
Reference (54)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return