Volume 30 Issue 6
Dec.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

CAO Yuhong, LIU Meiyun, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Chen, CAO Weidong. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 1052-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6
Citation: CAO Yuhong, LIU Meiyun, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Chen, CAO Weidong. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 1052-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6
Funds:

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571124)

  • Received Date: 2020-01-07
  • Ecological security is the foundation and guarantee of sustainable development, and its importance is increasingly widely recognized and valued by the world. The Yangtze River Basin is an important ecological security barrier in China and the Wanjiang City Belt (WCB) along the Yangtze River is directly related to the ecological security pattern of the entire basin. Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model and a geographical information system (GIS) platform, an ecosystem security evaluation index system was constructed to measure and evaluate the evolution of ecosystem security in the WCB, China. Results showed that: 1) From 2000 to 2018, the overall level of ecological security in the study area was in a state of either early warning or medium warning, but the level of ecological security in each prefecture-level city was significantly different. 2) From the perspective of the evolution of the ecosystem, the value of its comprehensive evaluation index dropped from 4.255 in 2000 to 3.885 in 2018. From the perspective of subsystems, the value of Pressure comprehensive evaluation index is much higher than that of other subsystems, indicating that during the rapid development of the social economy, the pressure on the natural environment tended to rise, and triggered changes in the State and Response subsystems. 3) The coefficient of variation (CV) of the Driver was much higher than other factors influencing the ecological security system. There are large differences in the economic development and ecological evolution of the cities in the WCB. This study has improved the theoretical research on regional ecological security, and has certain practical guiding significance for building a beautiful, green and sustainable China and promoting global ecological security.
  • [1] Antonio C, Manuel D, 2015. Local ecological footprint using Principal Component Analysis:a case study of localities in Andalusia (Spain). Ecological Indicators, 57(10):573-579. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.014
    [2] Braun A, Rosner H J, Hagensieker R et al., 2015. Multi-method dynamical reconstruction of the ecological impact of copper mining on Chinese historical landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 303:42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.013
    [3] Camarero M, Castillo J, Picazo-Tadeo A J et al., 2013. Eco-efficiency and 637 convergence in OECD countries. Environmental & Resource Economics, 55(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s10640-012-9616-9
    [4] Campbell E T, Brown M T, 2012. Environmental accounting of natural capital and ecosystem services for the US National Forest System. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14:691-724. doi: 10.1007/s10668-012-9348-6
    [5] Caniani D, Labella A, Lioi D S et al., 2016. Habitat ecological integrity and environmental impact assessment of anthropic activities:a GIS-based fuzzy logic model for sites of high biodiversity conservation interest. Ecological Indicators, 67:238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.038
    [6] Cao Yuhong, 2018. A Study of the Evolution and Adjustment of the Ecological Security Pattern of the Polarized Areas:Exampled by Wanjiang City Belt. Wuhu:Anhui Normal University. (in Chinese)
    [7] Cao Y H, Chen C, Liu C G et al., 2019a. Temporal and spatial variations of eco-asset patterns and the factors driving change in the Wanjiang Demonstration Area. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(3):282-288. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2019.03.006
    [8] Cao Yuhong, Chen Chen, Zhang Dapeng et al., 2019b. Evolution of ecological risk pattern of land use change in Wanjiang City Belt. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(13):4773-4781. (in Chinese)
    [9] Cumming G S, Allen C R, 2017. Protected areas as social-ecological systems:perspectives from resilience and social-ecological systems theory. Ecological Application, 27:1709-1717. doi: 10.1002/eap.1584
    [10] Estoque R C, Murayama Y, 2014. Social-ecological status index:a preliminary study of its structural composition and application. Ecological Indicators, 43(8):183-194. doi:10.1016/j. ecolind.2014.02.031
    [11] Ewertowska A, Galán-Martín A, Guillén-Gosálbez G et al., 2016. Assessment of the environmental efficiency of the electricity mix of the top European 674 economies via data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.100
    [12] Feng Y J, Yang Q Q, Tong X H et al., 2018. Evaluating land ecological security and examining its relationships with driving factors using GIS and generalized additive model. Science of the Total Environment, 633:1469-1479. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.272
    [13] Fu B J, Wei Y P, 2018. Editorial overview:keeping fit in the dynamics of coupled natural and human systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33:A1-A4. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.003
    [14] Fu Bojie, Tian Tao, Liu Yanxu et al., 2019. New developments and perspectives in physical geography in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(3):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1038-y
    [15] Halkos G, Petrou K N, 2018. Assessing 28 EU member states' environmental efficiency in national waste generation with DEA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208:509-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.145
    [16] He J H, Huang J L, Li Chun, 2017. The evaluation for the impact of land use change on habitat quality:a joint contribution of cellular automata scenario simulation and habitat quality assessment model. Ecological Modelling, 366:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.10.001
    [17] Houshyar E, Wu X F, Chen G, 2017. Sustainability of wheat and maize production in the warm climate of southwestern Iran:An emergy analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172:2246-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.187
    [18] Huang J, Yang H, Cheng G et al., 2014. A comprehensive eco-efficiency model and dynamics of regional eco-efficiency in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 67:228-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.003
    [19] Kattel G R, Elkadi H, Meikle H, 2013. Developing a complementary framework for urban ecology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(4):498-508. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.07.005
    [20] Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C, 2013. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 165:6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.001
    [21] Lei K, Pan H Y, Lin C Y, 2016. A landscape approach towards ecological restoration and sustainable development of mining areas. Ecological Engineering, 90:320-325. doi:10.1016/j. ecoleng.2016.01.080
    [22] Li Wenhua, Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia et al., 2010. Forest ecosystem services and their values in beijing. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(1):51-58. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0051-y
    [23] Menoni M, Morgavi H, 2014. Is eco-efficiency enough for sustainability? International Journal of Performability Engineering, 10 (4):337-346.
    [24] Neri A C, Dupin P, Sánchez L E, 2016. A pressure-state-response approach to cumulative impact assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126:288-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.134
    [25] Peng J, Yang Y, Liu Y X et al., 2018. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 644:781-790. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.292
    [26] Rak J R, Pietrucha-Urbanik K, 2019. An approach to determine risk indices for drinking water-study. Investigation. Sustainability, 11:3189. doi: 10.3390/su11113189
    [27] Rogan J, Wright T M, Cardille A et al., 2016. Forest fragmentation in Massachusetts, USA:a town-level assessment using morphological spatial pattern analysis and affinity propagation. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 53(4):506-519. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2016.1141448
    [28] Rybaczewska-Błażejowska M, Masternak-Janus A, 2018. Eco-efficiency assessment of Polish regions:Joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172:1180-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.204
    [29] Sekovski I, Newton A, Dennison W, 2012. Megacities in the coastal zone:Using a driver-pressure-state-impact-response framework to address complex environmental problems. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 96:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.07.011
    [30] Terrado M, Sabater S, Chaplin-Kramer B et al, 2013. Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Science of the Total Environment, 540:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.064
    [31] Ureshi S, Haase D, Coles R, 2013. The Theorized Urban Gradient (TUG) method:a conceptual framework for socio-ecological sampling in complex urban agglomerations. Ecological Indicators, 36(1):100-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.010
    [32] Wang Shiyuan, Zhang Xuexia, Zhu Tong et al., 2016. Assessment of ecological environment quality in the Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve based on remote sensing technology. Progress in Geography, 35:1269-1278. (in Chinese)
    [33] WCED, 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
    [34] Wursthorn S, Poganietz W R, Schebek L, 2011. Economic environmental monitoring indicators for European countries:a disaggregated sector-based approach for monitoring eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 70:487-496. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.033
    [35] Xu M, Zhu X, li J Z, 2012. Evaluation of land ecological security in Hunan Province based on DPSIR-TOPSIS model. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 34(5):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(200) PDF downloads(31) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6
Funds:

Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571124)

Abstract: Ecological security is the foundation and guarantee of sustainable development, and its importance is increasingly widely recognized and valued by the world. The Yangtze River Basin is an important ecological security barrier in China and the Wanjiang City Belt (WCB) along the Yangtze River is directly related to the ecological security pattern of the entire basin. Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model and a geographical information system (GIS) platform, an ecosystem security evaluation index system was constructed to measure and evaluate the evolution of ecosystem security in the WCB, China. Results showed that: 1) From 2000 to 2018, the overall level of ecological security in the study area was in a state of either early warning or medium warning, but the level of ecological security in each prefecture-level city was significantly different. 2) From the perspective of the evolution of the ecosystem, the value of its comprehensive evaluation index dropped from 4.255 in 2000 to 3.885 in 2018. From the perspective of subsystems, the value of Pressure comprehensive evaluation index is much higher than that of other subsystems, indicating that during the rapid development of the social economy, the pressure on the natural environment tended to rise, and triggered changes in the State and Response subsystems. 3) The coefficient of variation (CV) of the Driver was much higher than other factors influencing the ecological security system. There are large differences in the economic development and ecological evolution of the cities in the WCB. This study has improved the theoretical research on regional ecological security, and has certain practical guiding significance for building a beautiful, green and sustainable China and promoting global ecological security.

CAO Yuhong, LIU Meiyun, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Chen, CAO Weidong. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 1052-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6
Citation: CAO Yuhong, LIU Meiyun, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Chen, CAO Weidong. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Security in the Wanjiang City Belt, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(6): 1052-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1156-6
Reference (35)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return