Adv Search

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States

CHU Bo,  ZHANG Hua,  JIN Fengjun

downloadPDF
文章导航 > Chinese Geographical Science  > 2010 >  20(5): 471-480
CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. 中国地理科学, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
引用本文: CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. 中国地理科学, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
shu
CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
Citation: CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
shu

Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States

doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
  • 1.

    Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

  • 2.

    School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

  • 3.

    Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

基金项目: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.40635026,40801050);Knowledge Innovation Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(No.KZCXZ-YW-Q10-4)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    ZHANG Hua.E-mail:zhanghua@bnu.edu.cn

Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States

  • 1.

    Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

  • 2.

    School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

  • 3.

    Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Funds: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.40635026,40801050);Knowledge Innovation Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(No.KZCXZ-YW-Q10-4)

  • 摘要: Aircraft industry is very important to the economy and security of a country,and aircraft industry clusters have already existed in the world.Based on Input-Output data and Czamanski's method,the aircraft industry clusters in China and USA were identified quantitatively in this paper.Furthermore,this article carried out comparison analyses of the identification results.The research finds out:1) a mature aircraft industry cluster would be generally composed of 7 industrial subgroups,including aircraft industry,metal making and products manufacturing industry,machinery and equipment industry,electronics industry,automobile industry,material industry and others,and electronics industrial subgroup will play a more and more important role in the cluster;2) in the range of industry-covering,the level of industry-linkage,and the economic performance,there is a tremendously large gap between the aircraft industry cluster of China and that of USA;3) the spatial evolution of these clusters or centers is highly consistent with the diffusion of a country's industrialization.Finally,based on those findings,the paper gives some advice on how to improve Czamanski's method and what China should do to develop its own competitive aircraft industry:1) China should employ institutional innovation,and turn to be market-oriented;2) China should abandon the traditional pattern of closed-development,and strengthen the interaction and collaboration between aircraft industry and related industries,especially the electronics industry;3) China should rectify and perfect its spatial development planning of aircraft industry.
    Abstract: Aircraft industry is very important to the economy and security of a country,and aircraft industry clusters have already existed in the world.Based on Input-Output data and Czamanski's method,the aircraft industry clusters in China and USA were identified quantitatively in this paper.Furthermore,this article carried out comparison analyses of the identification results.The research finds out:1) a mature aircraft industry cluster would be generally composed of 7 industrial subgroups,including aircraft industry,metal making and products manufacturing industry,machinery and equipment industry,electronics industry,automobile industry,material industry and others,and electronics industrial subgroup will play a more and more important role in the cluster;2) in the range of industry-covering,the level of industry-linkage,and the economic performance,there is a tremendously large gap between the aircraft industry cluster of China and that of USA;3) the spatial evolution of these clusters or centers is highly consistent with the diffusion of a country's industrialization.Finally,based on those findings,the paper gives some advice on how to improve Czamanski's method and what China should do to develop its own competitive aircraft industry:1) China should employ institutional innovation,and turn to be market-oriented;2) China should abandon the traditional pattern of closed-development,and strengthen the interaction and collaboration between aircraft industry and related industries,especially the electronics industry;3) China should rectify and perfect its spatial development planning of aircraft industry.
  • [1] Aguilera C M,Castanedo A,Guerrero F,2006.Past,present and future of the Andalusian aeronautical cluster.In:Camarinlia-Matos L et al.(eds.).IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.Boston:Springer,583-590.
    [2] Beaudry C,2001.Entry,growth and patenting in industrial clusters:A study of the aerospace industry in the UK.International Journal of the Economics of Business,8(3):405-436.DOI:10.1080/13571510110079000
    [3] Bergman E,Feser E,Sweeney S,1996.Targeting North Carolina manufacturing:Understanding the state's economy through industrial cluster analysis.Chapel Hill:Institute for Economic Development.
    [4] Berk and Associates,2004.Basic industries cluster analysis study.Seattle:the City of Seattle Office of Economic Development.
    [5] Cunningham W G,1951.The Aircraft Industry:A Study in Industrial Location.Los Angeles:Lorrin L Morrison.
    [6] Czamanski S,1974.Study of clustering of industries,spatial organization of industries.Halifax,Nova Scotia,Canada:Institute of Public Affairs,Dalhousie University.
    [7] Feser E J,Bergman E M,2000.National industry cluster templates:A framework for applied regional cluster analysis.Regional Studies,34(1):1-19.DOI:10.1080/00343400050005844
    [8] Fichtmüller P,1999.Aerospace industry propelled upwards by European momentum and strong performance.Air&Space Europe,1(4):18-23.DOI:10.1016/S1290-0958(00)87114-2
    [9] Frenken K,2000.A complexity approach to innovation networks:The case of the aircraft industry 1909-1997.Research Policy, 29(2):257-272.DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)0006-4-5
    [10] Goldstein A,2005.The political economy of industrial policy in China:The case of aircraft manufacturing.Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies,4(3):259-273.DOI:10.1080/ 14765280600991628
    [11] Kaufman L,Rousseeuw P,1990.Finding Groups in Data.New York:Wiley.
    [12] Li Yanhua,Liu Jie,2008.Study on rearing of industry cluster about Tianjin aviation industry based on the intention of industry interaction and rooting.Soft Science,22(12):97-101.(in Chinese)
    [13] Liang Jinshe,He Canfei,Zhang Hua,2005.Changes in the economic functions of Beijing,1992-2002:Based on the interindustrial linkage and economic base theory.Acta Geographica Sinica,60(4):577-586.(in Chinese)
    [14] Libby J E,1992.To build wings for the angels:Los Angeles and its aircraft industry,1890-1936.Business and Economic History,21(2):22-25.
    [15] Lin Zuoming,2008.The aviation industry and the great power's status.Economic Research of the Aviation Industry,(1):4-16. (in Chinese)
    [16] MacPherson A,Pritchard D,2003.The international decentralisation of US commercial aircraft production:Implications for US employment and trade.Futures,35(3):221-238.DOI:10.1016 /S0016-3287(02)00055-1
    [17] Morris F A,2003.Boeing and Beyond:Seattle in the Global Economy.Los Angeles,CA:Pacific Council on International Policy.
    [18] Niosi J,Zhegu M,2005.Aerospace clusters:Local or global knowledge spillovers?Industry and Innovation,12(1):1-25. DOI:10.1080/1366271042000339049
    [19] Nolan P,Zhang J,2003.Globalization challenge for large firms from developing countries:China's oil and aerospace industries. European Management Journal,21(3):285-299.DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00047-1
    [20] Porter M,1998.Clusters and the new economics of competition.Harvard Business Review,76(6):77-90.DOI:10.1225/98609
    [21] PricewaterhouseCoopers,2006.Flight international top 100,2006. http://www.pwc.co.uk/eng/publications/flight_international_top_100_2006.html,200609/200905.
    [22] Rey S,Mattheis D,2000.Identifying regional industrial clusters in California.Sacramento:The California Employment De-velopment Department.
    [23] Schatzberg E M,2002.Materials and the development of aircraft: Wood-aluminium-composites.In:Coen Vermeeren(ed.).Around Glare:A New Aircraft Material in Context.Springer.
    [24] Scott A J,Mattingly D J,1989.The aircraft and parts Industry in Southern California:Continuity and change from the Inter-War Years to the 1990s.Economic Geography,65(1):48-71.
    [25] Shi Donghui,2008.The Global Market Structure and Competition of Large Commercial Airplane Industry.Hubei:Hubei Education Press.(in Chinese)
    [26] Slater P B,1977.The determination of groups of functionally integrated industries in the United States using a 1967 interindustry flow table.Empirical Economics,2(1):1-9.DOI:10.1007/BF 01764717
  • [1] Zerun JIN, Shengjun ZHU.  Innovation and Firm Co-ownership Network in China’s Electric Vehicle Industry . Chinese Geographical Science, 2024, 34(2): 195-209. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1403-8
    [2] Hui ZOU, Xuejun DUAN, Tingting JIN.  Urban Chemical Industrial Cluster Area Restructuring and Determinants: A Case Study of a Typical Old Chemical Industry Area Along the Yangtze River, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(2): 237-250. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1267-3
    [3] WANG Qiuyu, ZENG Gang.  Spatial Organization of Innovation in the Oil Equipment Manufacturing Industry: Case of Dongying, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 324-339. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1092-5
    [4] Nastaran NAJKAR, Mohammad Reza KOHANSAL, Mohammad GHORBANI.  Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Productivity: Evidence from Iran's Food Industry . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(2): 309-323. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1087-2
    [5] PENG Fei, ZHANG Qiqi, HAN Zenglin, DING Yan, FU Ningning.  Evolution Characteristics of Government-Industry-University Cooperative Innovation Network of Electronic Information Industry in Liaoning Province, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 528-540. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1047-x
    [6] MA Shuang, ZENG Gang.  Effects of Network Closure on Cooperative Innovation: Evidence from Dongying's Petroleum Equipment Industry in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 517-527. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1046-y
    [7] LI Erling, YAO Fei, XI Jiaxin, GUO Chunyang.  Evolution Characteristics of Government-Industry-University-Research Cooperative Innovation Network for China's Agriculture and Influencing Factors: Illustrated According to Agricultural Patent Case . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 137-152. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0924-4
    [8] TANG Zhipeng, GONG Peiping, LIU Weidong, LI Jiangsu.  Sensitivity of Chinese Industrial Wastewater Discharge Reduction to Direct Input Coefficients in an Input-output Context . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(1): 85-97. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0666-5
    [9] LI Yanmei, FU Jiafeng, MA Zhanyun, YANG Bo.  Sources and Flows of Embodied CO2 Emissions in Import and Export Trade of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(2): 220-230. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0644-3
    [10] YANG Zhenshan, LIANG Jinshe, CAI Jianming.  Urban Economic Cluster Template and Its Dynamics of Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(6): 740-750. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0686-1
    [11] CHEN Dong, FAN Jie.  Distribution Orientation and Driving Mechanism of Geographical Pattern Change of China′s Banking Industry . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(5): 563-.
    [12] ZHANG Yaoguang, ZHAO Yonghong, CHANG Hongwei, WANG Dan, MENG Zhaobin.  Distribution and Chain Pattern of Liquefied Natural Gas Industry in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17(3): 203-209. doi: 10.1007/s11769-007-0203-x
    [13] HAN Liang, LI Bo, SONG Tao, TONG Lian-jun.  CIRCULAR-ECONOMY MODELS OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY INDUSTRY IN JILIN PROVINCE . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(2): 148-153.
    [14] ZHOU De-min, XU Jian-chun, John RADKE, MU Lan.  A SPATIAL CLUSTER METHOD SUPPORTED BY GIS FOR URBAN-SUBURBAN-RURAL CLASSIFICATION . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(4): 337-342.
    [15] LUAN Wei-xin.  "BOTTLENECK" AND COUNTERMEASURE OF HIGH-TECHNOLOGIZATION OF MARINE INDUSTRY IN CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(1): 15-20.
    [16] ZHANG Ping-yu, MA Yan-ji, ZHAO Yan-xia, PAN Li-li.  YANJI CITY ORIENTATION AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT TOWARDS 21ST CENTURY . Chinese Geographical Science, 2001, 11(1): 70-75.
    [17] 陆玉麒, 佘之祥.  REGIONAL EFFECTS BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUZHOU INDUSTRY GARDEN . Chinese Geographical Science, 1999, 9(4): 342-349.
    [18] 郭柏林, 谷人旭.  A STUDY ON LOCATION OF TOWNSHIP INDUSTRY IN SHANGHAI SUBURBS . Chinese Geographical Science, 1992, 2(2): 133-144.
    [19] 金玉献, Christine M Leigh.  TECHNIQUES OF CONSTRUCTING REGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT TABLES: ACHIEVEMENTS . Chinese Geographical Science, 1992, 2(4): 337-356.
    [20] 李为, 曲丽霞.  CHANGING FEATURES AND TREND OF LIGHT INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTION IN NORTHEAST CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 1991, 1(4): 359-369.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1316
  • HTML全文浏览量:  15
  • PDF下载量:  1248
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2009-03-16
  • 修回日期:  2010-04-13
  • 刊出日期:  2010-09-15

Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States

doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
  • 2. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
  • 3. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    • 基金项目:  Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.40635026,40801050);Knowledge Innovation Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(No.KZCXZ-YW-Q10-4)
    通讯作者: ZHANG Hua.E-mail:zhanghua@bnu.edu.cn
  • 收稿日期: 2009-03-16
  • 修回日期: 2010-04-13
  • 刊出日期: 2010-09-15

摘要: Aircraft industry is very important to the economy and security of a country,and aircraft industry clusters have already existed in the world.Based on Input-Output data and Czamanski's method,the aircraft industry clusters in China and USA were identified quantitatively in this paper.Furthermore,this article carried out comparison analyses of the identification results.The research finds out:1) a mature aircraft industry cluster would be generally composed of 7 industrial subgroups,including aircraft industry,metal making and products manufacturing industry,machinery and equipment industry,electronics industry,automobile industry,material industry and others,and electronics industrial subgroup will play a more and more important role in the cluster;2) in the range of industry-covering,the level of industry-linkage,and the economic performance,there is a tremendously large gap between the aircraft industry cluster of China and that of USA;3) the spatial evolution of these clusters or centers is highly consistent with the diffusion of a country's industrialization.Finally,based on those findings,the paper gives some advice on how to improve Czamanski's method and what China should do to develop its own competitive aircraft industry:1) China should employ institutional innovation,and turn to be market-oriented;2) China should abandon the traditional pattern of closed-development,and strengthen the interaction and collaboration between aircraft industry and related industries,especially the electronics industry;3) China should rectify and perfect its spatial development planning of aircraft industry.

English Abstract

CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. 中国地理科学, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
引用本文: CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. 中国地理科学, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
shu
CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
Citation: CHU Bo, ZHANG Hua, JIN Fengjun. Identification and Comparison of Aircraft Industry Clusters in China and United States[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(5): 471-480. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (26)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © Editorial office of Chinese Geographical Science

    Tel: +86-0431-85542219   Email: egeoscien@neigae.ac.cn