Adv Search

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China

WEN Qingchun,  LI Xiuzhen,  HE Hongshi,  HU Yuanman,  CHEN Xin,  CHANG Yu,  WANG Wei,  BU Rencang

downloadPDF
文章导航 > Chinese Geographical Science  > 2014 >  (1): 50-59
WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
引用本文: WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
shu
WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
Citation: WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
shu

A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
  • 1.

    Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;

  • 2.

    Liaoning Environmental Monitoring Center, Shenyang 110031, China;

  • 3.

    State Key Laboratory of Estuarine & Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;

  • 4.

    University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65211, USA

基金项目: Under the auspices of Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2006CB403201)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    LI Xiuzhen,lixz@iae.ac.cn

A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China

  • 1.

    Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;

  • 2.

    Liaoning Environmental Monitoring Center, Shenyang 110031, China;

  • 3.

    State Key Laboratory of Estuarine & Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;

  • 4.

    University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65211, USA

More Information
    Corresponding author: LI Xiuzhen,lixz@iae.ac.cn

  • 摘要: Traditionally, patch-based analysis at the landscape scale fragmentation has been used in the study of landscape ecology while the study of boundary and node has not been considered as much detail until recently. This study investigated the possibility of applying boundary-and node-based methods in landscape pattern analysis to the upper reaches of the Minjiang River in the southwestern China. Boundary-based and node-based landscape indices were selected to be used in analyzing changes in landscape patterns, and the results were compared with analysis using traditional pattern indices. We compared the responses of patch-area-based, boundary-length-based and node-number-based indices, and concluded that boundary-based and node-based indices are more sensitive to disturbance than patch-based indices with various patterns, and node-based indices are even more sensitive than boundary-based ones. Thus, the results suggest that boundary-based and node-based pattern analysis methods provide helpful supplementary information to traditional patch-based pattern analysis methods. The results about pattern dynamics of landscapes in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River based on boundaries and nodes showed that with human disturbance, the dominance of forest landscape was weakened by other landscape types; thus the landscape pattern of the study area became more homogeneous and the boundary network became more complex. These changes further augmented disturbance interfaces in the landscape and increased the possibilities of further landscape fragmentation.
    Abstract: Traditionally, patch-based analysis at the landscape scale fragmentation has been used in the study of landscape ecology while the study of boundary and node has not been considered as much detail until recently. This study investigated the possibility of applying boundary-and node-based methods in landscape pattern analysis to the upper reaches of the Minjiang River in the southwestern China. Boundary-based and node-based landscape indices were selected to be used in analyzing changes in landscape patterns, and the results were compared with analysis using traditional pattern indices. We compared the responses of patch-area-based, boundary-length-based and node-number-based indices, and concluded that boundary-based and node-based indices are more sensitive to disturbance than patch-based indices with various patterns, and node-based indices are even more sensitive than boundary-based ones. Thus, the results suggest that boundary-based and node-based pattern analysis methods provide helpful supplementary information to traditional patch-based pattern analysis methods. The results about pattern dynamics of landscapes in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River based on boundaries and nodes showed that with human disturbance, the dominance of forest landscape was weakened by other landscape types; thus the landscape pattern of the study area became more homogeneous and the boundary network became more complex. These changes further augmented disturbance interfaces in the landscape and increased the possibilities of further landscape fragmentation.
  • [1] Albeke S E, Nibbelink N P, Mu L et al., 2010. Measuring boundary convexity at multiple spatial scales using a linear "moving window" analysis: An application to coastal river otter habitat selection. Landscape Ecology, 25(10): 1575-1587. doi:  10.1007/s10980-010-9528-4
    [2] Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Mandujano S, 2006. The importance of tropical rain forest fragments to the conservation of plant species diversity in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15(13): 4159-4179. doi:  10.1007/s10531-005-3374-8
    [3] Bailey D, Billeter R, Aviron S et al., 2007. The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22(3): 461-473. doi:  10.1007/s10980-006-9035-9
    [4] Bartholomew A, Bohnsack J A, Harper D E et al., 2008. Influence of marine reserve size and boundary length on the initial response of exploited reef fishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Landscape Ecology, 23(1): 55-65. doi:  10.1007/s10980-007-9136-0
    [5] Buyantuyev A, Wu J, 2010. Urban heat islands and landscape heterogeneity: Linking spatiotemporal variations in surface temperatures to land-cover and socioeconomic patterns. Land-
    [6] cape Ecology, 25(1): 17-33. doi:  10.1007/s10980-009-9402-4
    [7] Cadenasso M L, Pickett S T A, 2000. Linking forest edge structure to edge function: Mediation of herbivore damage. Journal of Ecology, 88(1): 31-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000. 00423.x
    [8] Carroll C, Mcrae B H, Brooks A et al., 2012. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in Western North America. Conservation Biology, 26(1): 78-87. doi:  10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01753.x
    [9] Congalton R G, 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1): 35-46. doi:  10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
    [10] Duan Y, Lu F, 2013. Structural robustness of city road networks based on community. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41(1): 75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.03. 002
    [11] Hassett E M, Stehman S V, Wickham J D, 2012. Estimating landscape pattern metrics from a sample of land cover. Landscape Ecology, 27(1): 133-149. doi:  10.1007/s10980-011-9657-4
    [12] Kilic S, Everendilek F, Berberoglu S et al., 2006. Environmental monitoring of land-cover change in a Mediterranean region of Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 114(1-3): 157-168. doi:  10.1007/s10661-006-2525-z
    [13] Kociolek A V, Clevenger A P, Clair C C S T et al., 2010. Effects of road networks on bird populations. Conservation Biology, 25(2): 241-249. doi:  10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01635.x
    [14] Liu Chengliang, Yu Ruilin, Zen Juxin et al., 2012. Complexity of spatial structure on the urban-rural road network in Wuhan Metropolitan Area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(4): 426-433. (in Chinese)
    [15] Lovett-Doust J, Biernacki M, Page R et al., 2003. Effects of land ownership and landscape scale factors on rare-species richness in natural areas of southern Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 18(6): 621-633. doi:  10.1023/A:1026028017696
    [16] Metzger J P, Muller E, 1996. Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. Landscape Ecology, 11(2): 65-77. doi:  10.1007/BF02093740
    [17] Polakowska A E, Fortin M J, Couturier A, 2012. Quantifying the spatial relationship between bird species' distributions and landscape feature boundaries in southern Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 27(10): 1481-1493. doi:  10.1007/s10980-012-9804-6
    [18] Qureshi S, 2011. Boundary crossing by transregional practice of governance to address sustainability issues. Landscape Ecology, 26(3): 455-456. doi:  10.1007/s10980-010-9559-x
    [19] Robles C D, Garza C, Desharnais R A et al., 2010. Landscape patterns in boundary intensity: A case study of mussel beds. Landscape Ecology, 25(5): 745-759. doi:  10.1007/s10980-010-9450-9
    [20] Ruiz J, Domon G, 2009. Analysis of landscape pattern change trajectories within areas of intensive agricultural use: Case study in a watershed of southern Québec, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 24(3): 419-432. doi:  10.1007/s10980-009-9321-4
    [21] Sitzia T, Semenzato P, Trentanovi G et al., 2010. Natural reforestation is changing spatial patterns of rural mountain and hill landscapes: A global overview. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(8): 1354-1362. doi:  10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.048
    [22] Stamps J A, Buechner M, Krishnan V V, 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. American Naturalist, 129(4): 533-552.
    [23] Wen Qingchun, Li Xiuzhen, He Hongshi et al., 2008. The pattern analysis of landscape boundary network in the upper reaches of Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(9): 4334-4343. (in Chinese)
    [24] Xiao Duning, Li Xiuzhen, Gao Jun et al., 2003. Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Science Press, 55-56. (in Chinese)
    [25] Zeng Hui, Kong Ningning, 2002. Landscape pattern analysis based on boundary characteristics. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 13(1): 81-86. (in Chinese)
    [26] Zeng H, Wu X B, 2005. Utilities of edge-based metrics for studying landscape fragmentation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(2): 159-178.
    [27] Zhao Fuqiang, Dai Limin, Yu Dapao et al., 2010. Dynamic changes of forest landscape pattern in Lushuihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains, Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(5): 1180-1184. (in Chinese)
    [28] Zhao Yonghua, He Xingyuan, Hu Yuanman et al., 2006. Land use and land cover changes and driving forces in the upper reach of Minjiang River. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17(5): 862-866. (in Chinese)
  • [1] Huishi DU, Eerdun HASI.  Sandy Land-lake-vegetation Landscape of Songnen Sandy Land of China: Pattern, Process and Mechanism . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(4): 580-591. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1287-z
    [2] Haoyu DENG, Shaohong WU, Yunhe YIN, Jiangbo GAO, Dongsheng ZHAO.  Eco-geographical Regionalization of China: An Approach Using the Rough Set Method . Chinese Geographical Science, 2022, 32(1): 93-109. doi: 10.1007/s11769-022-1259-3
    [3] Jie GONG, Jinxi ZHANG, Yunxia ZHANG, Yuehua ZHU, Tiantian JIN, Caixian XU.  Do Forest Landscape Pattern Planning and Optimization Play a Role in Enhancing Soil Conservation Services in Mountain Areas of Western China? . Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31(5): 848-866. doi: 10.1007/s11769-021-1230-8
    [4] CONG Pifu, CHEN Kexin, QU Limei, HAN Jianbo.  Dynamic Changes in the Wetland Landscape Pattern of the Yellow River Delta from 1976 to 2016 Based on Satellite Data . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 372-381. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1039-x
    [5] MOU Xiaojie, LIU Xingtu, TONG Chuan, SUN Zhigao.  Responses of CH4 Emissions to Nitrogen Addition and Spartina alterniflora Invasion in Minjiang River Estuary, Southeast of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(5): 562-574. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0692-3
    [6] LIU Xiaona, ZHANG Weiwei, LI Hong, SUN Danfeng.  Modeling Patch Characteristics of Farmland Loss for Site Assessment in Urban Fringe of Beijing, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2013, 23(3): 365-377. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0600-2
    [7] ZHANG Mingyang, WANG Kelin, LIU Huiyu, ZHANG Chunhua.  Responses of Spatial-temporal Variation of Karst Ecosystem Service Values to Landscape Pattern in Northwest of Guangxi, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(4): 446-453.
    [8] SHI Xiaoliang, LI Ying, DENG Rongxin.  The Method Study of Spatial heterogeneity evaluation on the Landscape Pattern Of Farmland Shelterbelt Network . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(1): 48-56.
    [9] FU Bojie, LIANG Di, LU Nan.  Landscape Ecology: Coupling of Pattern, Process, and Scale . Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(4): 385-391.
    [10] CHEN Liding, TIAN Huiying, FU Bojie, ZHAO Xinfeng.  Development of a New Index for Integrating Landscape Patterns with Ecological Processes at Watershed Scale . Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(1): 37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0037-9
    [11] CAO Xinxiang.  Dynamics of Wetland Landscape Pattern in Kaifeng City from 1987 to 2002 . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(2): 146-154. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0146-x
    [12] WANG Xuelei, NING Longmei, YU Jing, XIAO Rui, LI Tao.  Changes of Urban Wetland Landscape Pattern and Impacts of Urbanization on Wetland in Wuhan City . Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(1): 47-53. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0047-z
    [13] YIN Shu-bai, LU Xian-guo.  THEORY AND METHOD FOR WETLAND BOUNDARY DELINEATION . Chinese Geographical Science, 2006, 16(1): 56-62.
    [14] MENG Cai-hong, YANG Yong-chun, ZHANG Cong-guo.  RESEARCH ON IMAGO SPACE OF VALLEY CITY——A Case Study of Lanzhou City . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(3): 283-288.
    [15] RUAN Ren-zong, Erle C ELLIS.  AN ILLUSTRATIVE STUDY ON LOCAL LANDSCAPE AND ITS LONG-TERM CHANGES BASED ON IKONOS AND HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTO . Chinese Geographical Science, 2004, 14(2): 162-169.
    [16] DING Sheng-yan, QIAN Le-xiang, CAO Xin-xiang, LI Shuang, LI Hao-min.  FOREST LANDSCAPE PATTERN DYNAMICS OF LUONINGCOUNTY IN HENAN PROVINCE AND ITS DRIVING FORCES . Chinese Geographical Science, 2003, 13(3): 247-253.
    [17] WU Quan-yuan.  STUDY ON SPATIAL LANDSCAPE PATTERN OF YANTAI CITY BASED ON RS AND GIS . Chinese Geographical Science, 2003, 13(3): 254-258.
    [18] 王家骥, 高吉喜, 舒俭民, 菅小东, 李京荣, 常虹, 童岩.  MODIFICATION OF AGRICULTURE LANDSCAPE IN THREE RIVER AREA IN XIZANG . Chinese Geographical Science, 1999, 9(2): 120-125.
    [19] 肖笃宁, 赵羿, 郭林海.  LANDSCAPE PATTERN CHANGES IN WEST SUBURBS OF SHENYANG . Chinese Geographical Science, 1994, 4(3): 277-288.
    [20] 余泽忠.  A PREDICTION ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THE BUILDING OF SHUIKOU HYDROPOWER STATION ON THE ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE MIDDLE-LOWER REACHES OF THE MINJIANG RIVER . Chinese Geographical Science, 1991, 1(3): 248-261.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  325
  • HTML全文浏览量:  9
  • PDF下载量:  909
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-04-09
  • 修回日期:  2013-08-23
  • 刊出日期:  2014-01-06

A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
  • 1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
  • 2. Liaoning Environmental Monitoring Center, Shenyang 110031, China;
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine & Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;
  • 4. University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65211, USA
    • 基金项目:  Under the auspices of Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2006CB403201)
    通讯作者: LI Xiuzhen,lixz@iae.ac.cn
  • 收稿日期: 2013-04-09
  • 修回日期: 2013-08-23
  • 刊出日期: 2014-01-06

摘要: Traditionally, patch-based analysis at the landscape scale fragmentation has been used in the study of landscape ecology while the study of boundary and node has not been considered as much detail until recently. This study investigated the possibility of applying boundary-and node-based methods in landscape pattern analysis to the upper reaches of the Minjiang River in the southwestern China. Boundary-based and node-based landscape indices were selected to be used in analyzing changes in landscape patterns, and the results were compared with analysis using traditional pattern indices. We compared the responses of patch-area-based, boundary-length-based and node-number-based indices, and concluded that boundary-based and node-based indices are more sensitive to disturbance than patch-based indices with various patterns, and node-based indices are even more sensitive than boundary-based ones. Thus, the results suggest that boundary-based and node-based pattern analysis methods provide helpful supplementary information to traditional patch-based pattern analysis methods. The results about pattern dynamics of landscapes in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River based on boundaries and nodes showed that with human disturbance, the dominance of forest landscape was weakened by other landscape types; thus the landscape pattern of the study area became more homogeneous and the boundary network became more complex. These changes further augmented disturbance interfaces in the landscape and increased the possibilities of further landscape fragmentation.

English Abstract

WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
引用本文: WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
shu
WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
Citation: WEN Qingchun, LI Xiuzhen, HE Hongshi, HU Yuanman, CHEN Xin, CHANG Yu, WANG Wei, BU Rencang. A Landscape Pattern Analysis Method Based on Boundaries and Nodes：A Case Study in Upper Minjiang River, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (1): 50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0655-8
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (28)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © Editorial office of Chinese Geographical Science

    Tel: +86-0431-85542219   Email: egeoscien@neigae.ac.cn