Adv Search

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China

ZHANG Yiran,  ZHOU Demin,  NIU Zhenguo,  XU Fengjiao

downloadPDF
文章导航 > Chinese Geographical Science  > 2014 >  (3): 269-278
ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
引用本文: ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
shu
ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Citation: ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
shu

Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
  • 1.

    Base of the State Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Modeling, Beijing 100048, China;

  • 2.

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;

  • 3.

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

基金项目: Under the auspices of Forestry Public Interest Research Program (No. 201204201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171415)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    ZHOU Demin. E-mail: zhoudemin@neigae.ac.cn

Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China

  • 1.

    Base of the State Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Modeling, Beijing 100048, China;

  • 2.

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;

  • 3.

    Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Funds: Under the auspices of Forestry Public Interest Research Program (No. 201204201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171415)
More Information
    Corresponding author: ZHOU Demin. E-mail: zhoudemin@neigae.ac.cn

  • 摘要: Wetlands are highly productive natural ecosystems, providing valuable goods and services. There is growing interest in transferring ecosystem service value from the existing wetlands studied to other wetlands ecosystems at a large geographic scale. The benefit transfer method uses the known values from wetlands to predict the value of other wetland sites. This methodology requires only limited time and resources. The present study calculated the value of the ecological services provided by lake and marsh wetlands in China in terms of biodiversity indices, water quality indices and economic indices. Basic data on wetlands were obtained through remote sensing images. The results show that: 1) The total ecosystem service value of the lake and marsh wetlands in 2008 was calculated to be 8.1841×1010 United States Dollars (USD), with the marsh and lake wetlands contributing 5.6329×1010 and 2.5512×1010 USD, respectively. Values of marsh ecosystem service were concentrated in Heilongjiang Province (2.5516×1010 USD), Qinghai Province (1.2014×1010 USD), and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (1.1884×1010 USD). The value of the lakes were concentrated in Tibet Autonomous Region (6.223×109 USD), Heilongjiang (5.810×109 USD), and Qinghai (5.500×109 USD). 2) Waste treatment and climate regulation services contributed to 26.29% and 24.74% respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the marsh wetlands. Hydrological regulation and waste treatment contributed to 41.39% and 32.75%, respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the lake wetlands. 3) The total ecological service value of the lake and marsh wetlands was 54.64% of the total service value of natural grassland ecosystems and 30.34% of the total service value of forests ecosystems in China.
    Abstract: Wetlands are highly productive natural ecosystems, providing valuable goods and services. There is growing interest in transferring ecosystem service value from the existing wetlands studied to other wetlands ecosystems at a large geographic scale. The benefit transfer method uses the known values from wetlands to predict the value of other wetland sites. This methodology requires only limited time and resources. The present study calculated the value of the ecological services provided by lake and marsh wetlands in China in terms of biodiversity indices, water quality indices and economic indices. Basic data on wetlands were obtained through remote sensing images. The results show that: 1) The total ecosystem service value of the lake and marsh wetlands in 2008 was calculated to be 8.1841×1010 United States Dollars (USD), with the marsh and lake wetlands contributing 5.6329×1010 and 2.5512×1010 USD, respectively. Values of marsh ecosystem service were concentrated in Heilongjiang Province (2.5516×1010 USD), Qinghai Province (1.2014×1010 USD), and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (1.1884×1010 USD). The value of the lakes were concentrated in Tibet Autonomous Region (6.223×109 USD), Heilongjiang (5.810×109 USD), and Qinghai (5.500×109 USD). 2) Waste treatment and climate regulation services contributed to 26.29% and 24.74% respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the marsh wetlands. Hydrological regulation and waste treatment contributed to 41.39% and 32.75%, respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the lake wetlands. 3) The total ecological service value of the lake and marsh wetlands was 54.64% of the total service value of natural grassland ecosystems and 30.34% of the total service value of forests ecosystems in China.
  • [1] Acharya G, 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 63-74. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00168-3
    [2] Bai J, Xiao R, Zhang K et al., 2013. Soil organic carbon as affected by land use in young and old reclaimed regions of a coastal estuary wetland, China. Soil Use and Management, 29(1): 57-64. doi:  10.1111/sum.12021
    [3] Barber E B, 2000. Valuing the environment as input: Application to mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 47-61. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00167-1
    [4] Bodegom P V, Bakker C, Gon H D, 2004. Identifying key issues in environmental wetland research using scaling and uncertainty analysis. Regional Environmental Change, 4(2-3): 100-106. doi:  10.1007/s10113-004-0069-8
    [5] Cedfeldt P T, Watzin M C, Richardson B C, 2000. Using GIS to identify functionally significant wetlands in the northeastern United States. Environmental Management, 26(1): 13-24. doi:  10.1007/s002670010067
    [6] Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S, 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modeling & Software, 25(12): 1582-1591. doi:  10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001
    [7] Chen Zhongxin, Zhang Shixin, 2000. Study on ecosystem benefit of china. Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(1): 17-22. (in Chinese)
    [8] Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R D et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
    [9] Cui Lijuan, 2004. Evaluation on functions of Poyang Lake ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 23(4): 47-51. (in Chinese)
    [10] Daily G C, 1997. Introduction: What are ecosystem services? In: Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystem. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1-10.
    [11] Eshet T, Baron M G, Shechter M, 2007. Exploring benefit transfer: Disamenities of waste transfer stations. Environmental & Resource Economics, 37(3): 521-547. doi:  10.1007/s10640-006-9047-6
    [12] European Environment Agency, 2010. Scaling up ecosystem benefits—A contribution to the economics of ecosystem and biodiversity (TEEB) study. In: European Environment Agency Report No. 4. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/scaling-up-ecosystem-benefits-a.
    [13] Farber S, Costanza R, Childers D L et al., 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience, 56(2): 121-133. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE] 2.0.CO;2
    [14] Farely J, 2008. The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital. Conservation Biology, 22(6): 1399-1408. doi:  10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01090.x.
    [15] Fennessy M S, Jacobs A D, Kentula M E, 2004. Review of rapid methods for assessing wetland conditions. In: US Environmental Production Agency Report No. EPA/620/R-04/009. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/download_files/publications/rapidmethodreview.pdf.
    [16] Finnoff D, Tschirhart J, 2008. Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2): 91-114. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.08. 005
    [17] Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, Chen Liding et al., 2001. Scheme of ecological regionalization in China. Ecological Acta, 21(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
    [18] Fu Bojie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei et al., 2009. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in china. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571-576. (in Chinese)
    [19] Gascoigne W R, Hoag D, Koontz L et al., 2011. Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecological Economic, 70(10): 1715-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04. 010
    [20] Ghermandi A, Bergh J M, Brander L M et al., 2008. The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: A meta-analysis. FEEM working paper No. 79.2008.
    [21] Groot R, Brande L, Ploeg S et al., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystem and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07. 005
    [22] Huang L b, Bai J h, Gao H f et al., 2012. Soil organic carbon content and storage of raised field wetlands in different functional zones of a typical shallow freshwater lake, China. Soil Research, 50(8): 664-671.
    [23] Johnston R J, Rosenberger R S, 2010. Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3): 479-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419. 2009.00592.x
    [24] Lars H, Koppen K V, Groot R D et al., 2006. Spatial scale, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04. 005
    [25] Li Wenhua, 2008. Ecosystem Service Valuation: Theory, Method and Application. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 37-51. (in Chinese)
    [26] Liu S, Costanza R, Troy A et al., 2010. Valuing New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital: A spatially explicit benefit transfer. Environment Management, 45(6): 1271-1285. doi:  10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5
    [27] Liu Xiaohui, Lu Xianguo, Jiangming et al., 2008. Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(11): 5625-5631. (in Chinese)
    [28] Luke M B, Florax R M, Vermaat J E et al., 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental & Resources Economics, 33(2): 223-250. doi:  10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4
    [29] Luke M, Brauer I, Gerdes H et al., 2011. Using meta-analysis and GIS for value transfer and scaling up: Valuing climate change induced losses of European wetlands. Environment Resource Economic, 52(3): 395-413. doi: 10.1007/s 10640-011-9535-1
    [30] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2008. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 49-70.
    [31] National Bureau of Statistics, 2000. China Statistical Yearbook 2000. Beijing: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
    [32] National Bureau of Statistics, 2008. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)
    [33] National Research Council (United States), Committee on Characterization of Wetlands, 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 215-220.
    [34] Niu Z G, Gong P, Cheng X et al., 2009. Geographical characteristics of China's wetlands derived from remotely sensed data. Science in China Series D: Earth Science, 52(6): 723-738. doi:  10.1007/s11430-009-0075-2
    [35] Niu Z G, Zhang H Y, Wang X W et al., 2012. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(22): 2813-2823. doi:  10.1007/s11434-012-5093-3
    [36] Ojea E, Ruiz-Benito P, Markandya A et al., 2012. Wood provisioning in Mediterranean forests: A bottom-up spatial valuation approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 20: 78-88. doi:  10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.003
    [37] Ouyang Zhiyun, Zhao Tongqian, Wang Xiaoke et al., 2004. Ecosystem services analyses and valuation of china terrestrial surface water system. Acta Ecological Sinica, 24(10): 2091-2099. (in Chinese)
    [38] Rosenberger R S, Loomis J B, 2003. Benefit transfer. In: Champ P A (ed.). A Primer on Non-market Valuation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 445-482.
    [39] Rudolf S G, Wilson M A, Boumans R J et al., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393-408. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
    [40] The Ministry of Water Resources of the P. R. C., 2000. Statistical Bulletin of Chinese Water Conservancy 2000. Availabe at: http://www.cws.net.cn.
    [41] Wan Bentai, Xu Haigen, Ding Hui et al., 2007. Methodology of comprehensive biodiversity assessment. Biodiversity Science, 15(1): 97-106. (in Chinese)
    [42] Wang Sumin, Dou Hongshen, 1998. Chinese Lakes. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
    [43] William J M, James G G, 2000. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 25-33. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8
    [44] William J M, James G G, 2007. Wetlands (4th edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 35-42.
    [45] Wilsom M A, Carpenter S R, 1999. Economics valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971-1997. Ecological Applications, 9(3): 772-783. doi:  10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0772:EVOFES]2.0.CO;2
    [46] Woodward R T, Wui Y S, 2001. The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 37(2): 257-270. doi:  10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7
    [47] Xie Gaodi Zhang Yili, Lu Chunxia et al., 2001. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1): 47-53. (in Chinese)
    [48] Xie G d, Zhen L, Lu C x et al., 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911-919.
    [49] Yao Weihao, Su Chunhua, Chen Bin, 2009. Progress of wetlands ecosystem service evaluation. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 16(3): 245-249. (in Chinese)
    [50] Yu Xiaofei, Zhang Yuxia, Zhao Hongmei et al., 2010. Freeze-thaw effects on sorption/desorption of dissolved organic carbon in wetland soils. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(3): 209-217. doi:  10.1007/S11769-010-0209-7
    [51] Yu Xinxiao, Lu Shaowei, Ji Fang et al., 2005. The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecological Sinica, 25(8): 2096-2102. (in Chinese)
    [52] Zhang Ping, Ma Tao, 2011. A comment on studies on evaluation of services value of wetland ecosystem in China. Wetland Science, 9(2): 203-208. (in Chinese)
    [53] Zhao Kuiyi, 1999. Chinese Marsh. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
    [54] Zhao Ling, Wang Erda, 2011. An empirical study of meta-regression benefit transfer of natural resources. Resources Science, 33(1): 31-40. (in Chinese)
    [55] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke et al., 2003. Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial surface water system in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(4): 443-452. (in Chinese)
    [56] Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua et al., 2004. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in china. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(4): 480-491. (in Chinese)
  • [1] Lin FANG, Yanxiao LIU, Canfeng LI, Jun CAI.  Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Future Scenario Simulation of the Trade-offs and Synergies of Mountain Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Dabie Mountains Area, China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2023, 33(1): 144-160. doi: 10.1007/s11769-023-1330-8
    [2] ZHOU Yangming, DOU Yuehan, YU Xiubo, ZHANG Li, HUANG Chong, WANG Yuyu, LI Xiaowei, LI He, JIA Yifei, BAKKER Martha, CARSJENS Gerrit Jan, ZHOU Yan, DUAN Houlang.  Examining Health of Wetlands with Multiple Ecosystem Services as Targets in China’s Coastal Regions . Chinese Geographical Science, 2020, 30(4): 600-613. doi: 10.1007/s11769-020-1137-9
    [3] FU Bojie, TIAN Tao, LIU Yanxu, ZHAO Wenwu.  New Developments and Perspectives in Physical Geography in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2019, 20(3): 363-371. doi: 10.1007/s11769-019-1038-y
    [4] LIU Xiaopeng, CHEN Xiao, HUA Kaiping, WANG Yajuan, WANG Peng, HAN Xiaojia, YE Junyan, WEN Shengqiang.  Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Area Eco-logical Migration . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(5): 894-906. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0971-5
    [5] QIAO Xuning, GU Yangyang, ZOU Changxin, WANG Lei, LUO Juhua, HUANG Xianfeng.  Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28(1): 86-99. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y
    [6] XIA Shaoxia, LIU Yu, CHEN Bin, JIA Yifei, ZHANG Huan, LIU Guanhua, YU Xiubo.  Effect of Water Level Fluctuations on Wintering Goose Abundance in Poyang Lake Wetlands of China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27(2): 248-258. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0840-z
    [7] JIANG Bo, Christina P. WONG, CUI Lijuan, OUYANG Zhiyun.  Wetland Economic Valuation Approaches and Prospects in China . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 143-154. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0790-x
    [8] XIAO Yang, OUYANG Zhiyun, XU Weihua, XIAO Yi, ZHENG Hua, XIAN Chaofan.  Optimizing Hotspot Areas for Ecological Planning and Management Based on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services . Chinese Geographical Science, 2016, 26(2): 256-269. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0803-4
    [9] Armand Sedami Igor YEVIDE, WU Bingfang, YU Xiubo, LI Xiaosong, LIU Yu, LIU Jian.  Building African Ecosystem Research Network for Sustaining Local Ecosystem Goods and Services . Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(4): 414-425. doi: 10.1007/s11769-015-0767-9
    [10] BAI Junhong, ZHAO Qingqing, WANG Junjing, LU Qiongqiong, YE Xiaofei, GAO Zhaoqin.  Denitrification Potential of Marsh Soils in Two Natural Saline-alkaline Wetlands . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(3): 279-286. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0669-2
    [11] ZHEN Nahui, FU Bojie, LU Yihe, WANG Shuai.  Poverty Reduction, Environmental Protection and Ecosystem Services：A Prospective Theory for Sustainable Development . Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, 0(1): 83-92. doi: 10.1007/s11769-014-0658-5
    [12] RUAN Renzong, Susan USTIN.  Mapping of Freshwater Lake Wetlands Using Object-Relations and Rule-based Inference . Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(4): 462-471.
    [13] FENG Xiaoming, FU Bojie, YANG Xiaojun, LÜ Yihe.  Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Services:An Opportunity for Spatially Explicit Assessment . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(6): 522-535. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0428-y
    [14] XIE Gaodi, LI Wenhua, XIAO Yu, ZHANG Biao, LU Chunxia, AN Kai, WANG Jixing, XU Kang, WANG Jinzeng.  Forest Ecosystem Services and Their Values in Beijing . Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(1): 51-58. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0051-y
    [15] ZHAO Bin, LI Bo, ZHONG Yang, NAKAGOSHI Nobukazu, CHEN Jia-kuan.  ESTIMATION OF ECOLOGICAL SERVICE VALUES OF WETLANDS IN SHANGHAI, CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2005, 15(2): 151-156.
    [16] WANG Xian-li, LI Xiu-zhen, XIAO Du-ning.  SPATLAL PATTERN AND FUNCTION OF CORRIDORS IN WETLANDS OF LIAOHE DELTA . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(2): 177-181.
    [17] LU Xian-guo, LIU Hong-yu, YANG Qing.  WETLANDS IN CHINA: FEATURE, VALUE AND PROTECTION . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(4): 296-301.
    [18] CUI Li-juan, PAN Li-li, Zhang Yan-bo.  ASSESSMENT ON THE COMMONWEAL VALUES OF WETLANDS . Chinese Geographical Science, 2000, 10(4): 371-376.
    [19] 刘红玉.  CONSERVATION OF WETLANDS ESPECIALLY AS WATERFOWL HABITAT IN NORTHEAST CHINA . Chinese Geographical Science, 1998, 8(3): 281-288.
    [20] 蔡述明.  THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROTECTION OF WETLANDS IN THE FOUR LAKE AREA OF JIANGHAN PLAIN . Chinese Geographical Science, 1995, 5(3): 242-247.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  524
  • HTML全文浏览量:  20
  • PDF下载量:  1425
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-01-31
  • 修回日期:  2013-04-23
  • 刊出日期:  2014-03-27

Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China

doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
  • 1. Base of the State Key Laboratory of Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Modeling, Beijing 100048, China;
  • 2. College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
  • 3. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    • 基金项目:  Under the auspices of Forestry Public Interest Research Program (No. 201204201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171415)
    通讯作者: ZHOU Demin. E-mail: zhoudemin@neigae.ac.cn
  • 收稿日期: 2013-01-31
  • 修回日期: 2013-04-23
  • 刊出日期: 2014-03-27

摘要: Wetlands are highly productive natural ecosystems, providing valuable goods and services. There is growing interest in transferring ecosystem service value from the existing wetlands studied to other wetlands ecosystems at a large geographic scale. The benefit transfer method uses the known values from wetlands to predict the value of other wetland sites. This methodology requires only limited time and resources. The present study calculated the value of the ecological services provided by lake and marsh wetlands in China in terms of biodiversity indices, water quality indices and economic indices. Basic data on wetlands were obtained through remote sensing images. The results show that: 1) The total ecosystem service value of the lake and marsh wetlands in 2008 was calculated to be 8.1841×1010 United States Dollars (USD), with the marsh and lake wetlands contributing 5.6329×1010 and 2.5512×1010 USD, respectively. Values of marsh ecosystem service were concentrated in Heilongjiang Province (2.5516×1010 USD), Qinghai Province (1.2014×1010 USD), and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (1.1884×1010 USD). The value of the lakes were concentrated in Tibet Autonomous Region (6.223×109 USD), Heilongjiang (5.810×109 USD), and Qinghai (5.500×109 USD). 2) Waste treatment and climate regulation services contributed to 26.29% and 24.74% respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the marsh wetlands. Hydrological regulation and waste treatment contributed to 41.39% and 32.75%, respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the lake wetlands. 3) The total ecological service value of the lake and marsh wetlands was 54.64% of the total service value of natural grassland ecosystems and 30.34% of the total service value of forests ecosystems in China.

English Abstract

ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
引用本文: ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. 中国地理科学, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
shu
ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
Citation: ZHANG Yiran, ZHOU Demin, NIU Zhenguo, XU Fengjiao. Valuation of Lake and Marsh Wetlands Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014, (3): 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (56)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © Editorial office of Chinese Geographical Science

    Tel: +86-0431-85542219   Email: egeoscien@neigae.ac.cn